Computerized tailoring of health information

CIN - Computers Informatics Nursing

Volumn 27, Issue 1, 2009, Pages 34-43

  Park, Eun Jun ^a   McDaniel, Anna ^b   Jung, Myun Sook ^c  

^a Gachon University   (South Korea)

^b INDIANA UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^c Gyeongsang National University   (South Korea)

Author keywords

Consumer health information; Health education; Tailoring

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; HEALTH SERVICE; MEDICAL RECORD; ORGANIZATION AND MANAGEMENT;

HEALTH SERVICES NEEDS AND DEMAND; MEDICAL RECORDS SYSTEMS, COMPUTERIZED;

EID: 60749104828     PISSN: 15382931     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1097/NCN.0b013e31818dd396     Document Type: Article

References (41)

1. Strecher VJ. Computer-tailored smoking cessation materials: a review and discussion. Patient Educ Couns. 1999;36(2):107-117.
2. Schwitzer G. A review of features in Internet consumer health decision-support tools. J Med Internet Res. 2002;4(2):E11.
3. Revere D, Dunbar PJ. Review of computer-generated outpatient health behavior interventions: clinical encounters "in absentia". J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2001;8(1):62-79.
4. Lancaster T, Stead LF. Self-help interventions for smoking cessation. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2002;2(3):CD001118.
5. Brug J, Oenema A, Campbell M. Past, present, and future of computer-tailored nutrition education. Am J Clin Nutr. 2003; 77(4 suppl):1028S-1034S.
6. Brug J, Campbell M, Van Assema P. The application and impact of computer-generated personalized nutrition education: a review of the literature. Patient Educ Couns. 1999;36(2): 145-156.
7. Kreuter MW, Wray RJ. Tailored and targeted health communication: strategies for enhancing information relevance. Am J Health Behav. 2003;27(suppl 3):S227-S232.
8. Drogan M, Hsu J. Enhancing the Web customers' experience: techniques and business impacts of Web personalization and customization. Paper presented at: Proc ISECON 2003; November 8-9, 2003; San Diego, CA.
9. Doupi P, van der Lei J. Towards personalized Internet health information: the STEPPS architecture. Med Inform Internet Med. 2002;27(3):139-151.
10. Kreuter MW, Skinner CS. Tailoring: what's in a name? Health Educ Res. 2000;15(1):1-4.
11. Bental DS, Cawsey A, Jones R. Patient information systems that tailor to the individual. Patient Educ Couns. 1999;36(2): 171-180.
12. Prochaska JO, DiClemente CC, Velicer WF, Rossi JS. Standardized, individualized, interactive, and personalized self-help programs for smoking cessation. Health Psychol. 1993;12(5): 399-405.
13. Kukafka R, Lussier YA, Patel VL, Cimino JJ. Developing tailored theory-based educational content for WEB applications: illustrations from the MI-HEART Project. Paper presented at: MEDINFO 2001; September 2-5, 2001; London.
14. de Nooijer J, Lechner L, de Vries H. Tailored versus general information on early detection of cancer: a comparison of the reactions of Dutch adults and the impact on attitudes and behaviors. Health Educ Res. 2002;17(2):239-252.
15. Jerant A, Kravitz RL, Rooney M, Amerson S, Kreuter M, Franks P. Effects of a tailored interactive multimedia computer program on determinants of colorectal cancer screening: a randomized controlled pilot study in physician offices. Patient Educ Couns. 2007;66(1):67-74.
16. Brug J, van Assema P. Differences in use and impact of computer-tailored dietary fat-feedback according to stage of change and education. Appetite. 2000;34(3):285-293.
17. Oenema A, Brug J, Lechner L. Web-based tailored nutrition education: results of a randomized controlled trial. Health Educ Res. 2001;16(6):647-660.
18. De Bourdeaudhuij I, Stevens V, Vandelanotte C, Brug J. Evaluation of an interactive computer-tailored nutrition intervention in a real-life setting. Ann Behav Med. 2007;33(1):39-48.
19. Velicer WF, Prochaska JO. An expert system intervention for smoking cessation. Patient Educ Couns. 1999;36(2):119-129.
20. Cunningham JA, Humphreys K, Koski-Jannes A. Providing personalized assessment feedback for problem drinking on the Internet: a pilot project. J Stud Alcohol. 2000;61(6):794-798.
21. Strecher VJ, Shiffman S, West R. Randomized controlled trial of a Web-based computer-tailored smoking cessation program as a supplement to nicotine patch therapy. Addiction. 2005;100(5): 682-688.
22. Bennett SJ, Hays LM, Embree JL, Arnould M. Heart messages: a tailored message intervention for improving heart failure outcomes. J Cardiovasc Nurs. 2000;14(4):94-105.
23. Kukafka R, Lussier YA, Eng P, Patel VL, Cimino JJ. Web-based tailoring and its effect on self-efficacy: results from the MI-HEART randomized controlled trial. Paper presented at: AMIA 2002; November 9-13, 2002; San Antonio, TX.
24. Levetan CS, Dawn KR, Robbins DC, Ratner RE. Impact of computer-generated personalized goals on HbA(1c). Diabetes Care. 2002;25(1):2-8.
25. Sciamanna CN, Harrold LR, Manocchia M, Walker NJ, Mui S. The effect of web-based, personalized, osteoarthritis quality improvement feedback on patient satisfaction with osteoarthritis care. Am J Med Qual. 2005;20(3):127-137.
26. Prochaska JO, DiClemente CC. Stages and processes of self-change of smoking: toward an integrative model of change. J Consult Clin Psychol. 1983;51(3):390-395.
27. Bandura A. Self-efficacy: toward a unifying theory of behavioral change. Psychol Rev. 1977;84(2):191-215.
28. Rosenstock IM, Strecher VJ, Becker MH. Social learning theory and the Health Belief Model. Health Educ Q. 1988;15(2):175-183.
29. de Vries H, Brug J. Computer-tailored interventions motivating people to adopt health promoting behaviours: introduction to a new approach. Patient Educ Couns. 1999;36(2):99-105.
30. Brug J. Dutch research into the development and impact of computer-tailored nutrition education. Eur J Clin Nutr. 1999; 53(suppl 2):S78-S82.
31. Skinner CS, Siegfried JC, Kelger MC, Strecher VJ. The potential of computers in patient education. Patient Educ Couns. 1993;22: 27-34.
32. Haley SM, Ni P, Hambleton RK, Slavin MD, Jette AM. Computer adaptive testing improved accuracy and precision of scores over random item selection in a physical functioning item bank. J Clin Epidemiol. 2006;59(11):1174- 1182.
33. Thede LQ. Mail merge: a time-saving tool. CIN: Comput Inform Nurs. 2007;25(3):134-138.
34. Dijkstra A, De Vries H. The development of computer-generated tailored interventions. Patient Educ Couns. 1999;36(2):193-203.
35. Wu D, Tremaine M, Instone K, Turoff M. A framework for classifying personalization scheme used on e-commerce Web sites. Paper presented at: 36th Hawaii International Conference on System Science; January 6-9, 2003; Big Island, HI.
36. Nguyen HQ, Carrieri-Kohlman V, Rankin SH, Slaughter R, Stulbarg MS. Supporting cardiac recovery through eHealth technology. J Cardiovasc Nurs. 2004;19(3):200-208.
37. Instone K. An information architecture-based framework for personalization systems. Argus Center for Information Architecture. http://argus-acia.com/. Accessed October 10, 2005.
38. Zielstorff RD. Controlled vocabularies for consumer health. J Biomed Inform. 2003;36(4-5):326-333.
39. Furnas GW, Landauer TK, Gomez LM, Dumais ST. The vocabulary problem in human-system communication. Commun ACM. 1987;30(11):964-971.
40. Office of the National Coordinator for Health Information Technology (ONC). Goals of strategic framework. December 10, 2004. http://www.hhs.gov/ healthit/goals.html. Accessed September 25, 2006.
41. Franklin VL, Waller A, Pagliarit C, Greene SA. A randomized controlled trial of Sweet Talk, a text-messaging system to support young people with diabetes. Diabet Med. 2006;23(12):1332-1338.