Feedback sandwiches affect perceptions but not performance

Advances in Health Sciences Education

Volumn 18, Issue 3, 2013, Pages 397-407

  Parkes, Jay ^a   Abercrombie, Sara ^a,c   McCarty, Teresita ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF NEW MEXICO   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF NEW MEXICO SCHOOL OF MEDICINE   (United States)

^c BOWLING GREEN STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

Academic performance; Compliments; Effective feedback; Feedback sandwich; Praise; Student perceptions

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; ATTITUDE; CLINICAL COMPETENCE; EDUCATION; FEEDBACK SYSTEM; HUMAN; MEDICAL EDUCATION; MEDICAL STUDENT; METHODOLOGY; PEER REVIEW; PSYCHOLOGICAL ASPECT; STANDARD; TEACHING;

ATTITUDE; CLINICAL COMPETENCE; EDUCATION, MEDICAL; EDUCATIONAL MEASUREMENT; FEEDBACK; HUMANS; PEER REVIEW; STUDENTS, MEDICAL; TEACHING;

EID: 84881029756     PISSN: 13824996     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s10459-012-9377-9     Document Type: Article

References (18)

1. Bienstock, J. L., Katz, N. T., Cox, S. M., Hueppchen, N., Erickson, S., & Puscheck, E. E. (2007). To the point: Medical education reviews-providing feedback. American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology, 196(6), 508-513.
2. Boehler, M. L., Rogers, D. A., Schwind, C. J., Mayforth, R., Quin, J., Williams, R. G., et al. (2006). An investigation of medical student reactions to feedback: A randomized controlled trial. Medical Education, 40, 746-749.
3. Chapman, O. L., & Fiore, M. A. (2001). The white paper: A description of CPR [Electronic Version]. Retrieved 10 April 2007, from http://cpr. molsci. ucla. edu/.
4. Dohrenwend, A. (2002). Serving up the feedback sandwich. Family Practice Management, 9, 43-46.
5. Dweck, C. S. (1999). Caution-praise can be dangerous. American Educator, 23(1), 4-9.
6. Gielen, S., Peeters, E., Dochy, F., Onghena, P., & Struyven, K. (2010). Improving the effectiveness of peer feedback for learning. Learning and Instruction, 20, 304-315.
7. Glover, P. A. (2000). 'Feedback. I listened, reflected and utilized': Third year nursing students' perceptions and use of feedback in the clinical setting. International Journal of Nursing Practice, 6, 247-252.
8. Hattie, J., & Timperley, H. (2007). The power of feedback. Review of Educational Research, 77, 81-112.
9. Hesketh, E. A., & Laidlaw, J. M. (2002). Developing the teaching instinct: Feedback. Medical Teacher, 24(3), 245-248.
10. Kluger, A. N., & DeNisi, A. (1996). The effects of feedback interventions on performance: A historical review, a meta-analysis, and a preliminary feedback intervention theory. Psychological Bulletin, 119(2), 254-284.
11. LeBaron, S. W. M., & Jernick, J. (2000). Evaluation as a dynamic process. Family Medicine, 32(1), 13-14.
12. OzGrid. com (n. d.). Count words in a cell. Retrieved from http://www. ozgrid. com/Excel/count-words. htm.
13. Prins, F. J., Sluijsmans, D. M. A., & Kirschner, P. A. (2006). Feedback for general practitioners in training: Quality, styles, and preferences. Advances in Health Sciences Education, 11, 289-303.
14. Richardson, B. K. (2004). Feedback. Academic Emergency Medicine, 11(12), 1283. e1-1283. e5.
15. Rogers, D. A., Boehler, M. L., Schwind, C. J., Meier, A. H., Wall, J. C. H., & Brenner, M. J. (2012). Engaging medical students in the feedback process. American Journal of Surgery, 203(1), 21-25.
16. Schlecht, K. D. (2008). Feedback. International Anesthesiology Clinics, 46(4), 67-84.
17. Schwenk, T. L., & Whitman, N. (1987). The physician as teacher. Baltimore, MD: Williams & Wilkins.
18. Shute, V. J. (2008). Focus on formative feedback. Review of Educational Research, 78(1), 153-189.