Integrated reporting: On the need for broadening out and opening up

Accounting, Auditing and Accountability Journal

Volumn 27, Issue 7, 2014, Pages 1120-1156

  Brown, Judy ^a   Dillard, Jesse ^a  

^a VICTORIA UNIVERSITY OF WELLINGTON   (New Zealand)

Author keywords

Dialogic polylogic accountings; Integrated reporting; Social and environmental accounting; Sustainability

Indexed keywords

EID: 84924046696     PISSN: 09513574     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1108/AAAJ-04-2013-1313     Document Type: Article

References (125)

1. Accounting Standards Steering Committee (1975), The Corporate Report, ICAEW, London.
2. Agrawal, A. and Redford, K. (2009), “Conservation and displacement: an overview”, Conservation and Society, Vol. 7 No. 1, pp. 1-10.
3. American Accounting Association (1973), “Report of committee on environmental effects of organizational behavior”, The Accounting Review, Vol. 48 No. 4, pp. 72-119.
4. American Accounting Association (1974), “Report of the committee on accounting for human resources”, The Accounting Review, Vol. 49 No. 4, pp. 115-124.
5. American Accounting Association (1975), “Committee on social costs”, The Accounting Review, Vol. 50 No. 4, pp. 51-89.
6. Archel, P., Husillos, J. and Spence, C. (2011), “The institutionalisation of unaccountability: loading the dice of corporate social responsibility discourse”, Accounting, Organizations and Society, Vol. 36 No. 6, pp. 327-343.
7. Bacchi, C. (2009), Analysing Policy: What’s the Problem Represented to Be? Pearson, Frenchs Forest, Sydney.
8. Barre´, R. (2010), “Towards socially robust S&T indicators: indicators as debatable devices, enabling collective learning”, Research Evaluation, Vol. 19 No. 3, pp. 227-231.
9. Bebbington, J., Brown, J. and Frame, B. (2007a), “Accounting technologies and sustainability assessment models”, Ecological Economics, Vol. 61 Nos 2/3, pp. 224-236.
10. Bebbington, J., Brown, J., Frame, B. and Thomson, I. (2007b), “Theorizing engagement: the potential of a critical dialogic approach”, Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal, Vol. 20 No. 3, pp. 356-381.
11. Boiral, O. (2013), “Sustainability reports as simulacra? A counter-account of A and Aþ GRI reports”, Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal, Vol. 26 No. 7, pp. 1036-1071.
12. Booth, P. and Cocks, N. (1990), “Critical research issues in accounting standard setting”, Journal of Business Finance & Accounting, Vol. 17 No. 4, pp. 511-528.
13. Botzem, S. and Quack, S. (2009), “(No) limits to Anglo-American accounting? Reconstructing the history of the International Accounting Standards Committee: a review article”, Accounting, Organizations and Society, Vol. 34 No. 8, pp. 988-998.
14. Brown, H.S., de Jong, M. and Lessidrenska, T. (2009a), “The rise of the global reporting initiative: a case of institutional entrepreneurship”, Environmental Politics, Vol. 18 No. 2, pp. 182-200.
15. Brown, H.S., de Jong, M. and Levy, D.L. (2009b), “Building institutions based on information disclosure: lessons from GRI’s sustainability reporting”, Journal of Cleaner Production, Vol. 17 No. 6, pp. 571-580.
16. Brown, J. (2000), “Competing ideologies in the accounting and industrial relations environment”, British Accounting Review, Vol. 32 No. 1, pp. 43-75.
17. Brown, J. (2009), “Democracy, sustainability and dialogic accounting technologies: taking pluralism seriously”, Critical Perspectives on Accounting, Vol. 20 No. 3, pp. 313-342.
18. Brown, J. (2010), “Accounting and visual cultural studies: potentialities, challenges and prospects”, Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal, Vol. 23 No. 4, pp. 482-505.
19. Brown, J. and Dillard, J. (2013a), “Agonizing over engagement: SEA and the ‘death of environmentalism’ debates”, Critical Perspectives on Accounting, Vol. 24 No. 1, pp. 1-18.
20. Brown, J. and Dillard, J. (2013b), “Critical accounting and communicative action: on the limits of consensual deliberation”, Critical Perspectives on Accounting, Vol. 24 No. 3, pp. 176-190.
21. Brown, J. and Fraser, M. (2006), “Approaches and perspectives in social and environmental accounting: an overview of the conceptual landscape”, Business Strategy and the Environment, Vol. 15 No. 2, pp. 103-117.
22. Burgess, J., Stirling, A., Clark, J., Davies, G., Eames, M., Staley, K. and Williamson, S. (2007), “Deliberative mapping: a novel analytic-deliberative methodology to support contested science-policy decisions”, Public Understanding of Science, Vol. 16 No. 3, pp. 299-322.
23. Caglar, G. (2010), “Multiple meanings of gender budgeting: gender knowledge and economic knowledge in the World Bank and UNDP”, in Young, B. and Scherrer, C. (Eds), Gender Knowledge and Knowledge Networks in International Political Economy, Nomos, Baden-Baden, pp. 55-74.
24. Chambers, R. (1997), Whose Reality Counts? Putting the First Last, Practical Action, Warwickshire.
25. Clarkson, P.M., Li, Y., Richardson, G.D. and Vasvari, F.P. (2008), “Revisiting the relation between environmental performance and environmental disclosure: an empirical analysis”, Accounting, Organizations and Society, Vol. 33 Nos 4/5, pp. 303-327.
26. Cock, J. (2011), “Green capitalism’ or environmental justice? A critique of the sustainability discourse”, Focus, No. 63, pp. 45-51.
27. Cooper, D.J. and Morgan, W. (2013), “Meeting the evolving corporate reporting needs of government and society: arguments for a deliberative approach to accounting rule making”, Accounting and Business Research, Vol. 43 No. 4, pp. 418-441.
28. Cooper, D.J. and Sherer, M.J. (1984), “The value of corporate accounting reports: arguments for a political economy of accounting”, Accounting, Organizations and Society, Vol. 9 Nos 3/4, pp. 207-232.
29. Craig, R., Taonui, R. and Wild, S. (2012), “The concept of taonga in Maori culture: insights for accounting”, Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal, Vol. 25 No. 6, pp. 1025-1047.
30. Cuppen, E. (2012), “A quasi-experimental evaluation of learning in a stakeholder dialogue on bio-energy”, Research Policy, Vol. 41 No. 3, pp. 624-637.
31. Cuppen, E., Breukers, S., Hisschemoller, M. and Bergsma, E. (2010), “Q methodology to select participants for a stakeholder dialogue on energy options from biomass in the Netherlands”, Ecological Economics, Vol. 69 No. 3, pp. 579-591.
32. Davies, M. (2005), “The ethos of pluralism”, Sydney Law Review, Vol. 27 No. 1, pp. 87-112.
33. Dey, C. (2003), “Corporate ‘silent’ and ‘shadow’ social accounting”, Social and Environmental Accountability Journal, Vol. 23 No. 2, pp. 6-9.
34. Dillard, J. and Roslender, R. (2011), “Taking pluralism seriously: embedded moralities in management accounting and control systems”, Critical Perspectives on Accounting, Vol. 22 No. 2, pp. 135-147.
35. Dillard, J. and Yuthas, K. (2013), “Critical dialogics, agonistic pluralism and accounting information systems”, International Journal of Accounting Information Systems, Vol. 14 No. 2, pp. 113-119.
36. Dingwerth, K. and Eichinger, M. (2010), “Tamed transparency: how information disclosure under the global reporting initiative fails to empower”, Global Environmental Politics, Vol. 10 No. 3, pp. 74-96.
37. Dryzek, J.S. (2006), Deliberative Global Politics: Discourse and Democracy in a Divided World, Polity Press, Cambridge.
38. Eccles, R.G. and Krzus, M.P. (2010), One Report: Integrated Reporting for a Sustainable Strategy, John Wiley & Sons, Hoboken, NJ.
39. Eccles, R.G. and Saltzman, D. (2011), “Achieving sustainability through integrated reporting”, Stanford Social Innovation Review, Vol. 9 No. 3, pp. 56-61.
40. Etzion, D. and Ferraro, F. (2010), “The role of analogy in the institutionalization of sustainability reporting”, Organization Science, Vol. 21 No. 5, pp. 1092-1107.
41. Fischer, F. (2003), Reframing Public Policy: Discursive Politics and Deliberative Practices, Oxford University Press, Oxford.
42. Flyvbjerg, B. (1998), Rationality and Power: Democracy in Practice, University of Chicago Press, Chicago, IL.
43. Frame, B. and Brown, J. (2008), “Developing post-normal technologies for sustainability”, Ecological Economics, Vol. 65 No. 2, pp. 225-241.
44. Fraser, M. (2012), “ ‘Fleshing out’ an engagement with a social accounting technology”, Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal, Vol. 25 No. 3, pp. 508-534.
45. Friedman, M. (1970), “The social responsibility of business is to increase its profits”, New York Times Magazine, September 13, pp. 32-33, 122-124.
46. Fries, J., McCulloch, K. and Webster, W. (2010), “The Prince’s accounting for sustainability project: creating 21st-century decision-making and reporting systems to respond to 21stcentury challenges and opportunities”, in Hopwood, A., Unerman, J. and Fries, J. (Eds), Accounting for Sustainability: Practical Insights, Earthscan, London, pp. 29-45.
47. Fung, A. and O’Rourke, D. (2000), “Reinventing environmental regulation from the grassroots up: explaining and expanding the success of the Toxics Release Inventory”, Environmental Management, Vol. 25 No. 2, pp. 115-127.
48. Fung, A., Graham, M. and Weil, D. (2007), Full Disclosure: The Perils and Promise of Transparency, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
49. Gallhofer, S. and Chew, A. (2000), “Introduction: accounting and indigenous peoples”, Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal, Vol. 13 No. 3, pp. 256-267.
50. Gray, R. (2002), “The social accounting project and Accounting Organizations and Society: privileging engagement, imaginings, new accountings and pragmatism over critique?”, Accounting, Organizations and Society, Vol. 27 No. 7, pp. 687-708.
51. Gray, R. (2006), “Social, environmental and sustainability reporting and organisational value creation? Whose value? Whose creation?”, Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal, Vol. 19 No. 6, pp. 793-819.
52. Gross, C. and Jacobs, A. (2013), “From Tahrir Square to open space: practical experiences with open space technology in Egypt”, Journal of Social Science Education, Vol. 12 No. 1, pp. 50-58.
53. Gupta, A. (2010), “Transparency in global environmental governance: a coming of age?”, Global Environmental Politics, Vol. 10 No. 3, pp. 1-9.
54. Harvey, J.T. and Garnett, R.F. (2008), Future Directions for Heterodox Economics, University of Michigan Press, Ann Arbor, MI.
55. Hines, R. (1988), “Financial accounting: in communicating reality, we construct reality”, Accounting, Organizations and Society, Vol. 13 No. 3, pp. 251-261.
56. Hopper, T. (2013), “Making accounting degrees fit for a university”, Critical Perspectives on Accounting, Vol. 24 No. 2, pp. 127-135.
57. Howarth, D. (2000), Discourse, Open University Press, Buckingham.
58. International Integrated Reporting Council (2011), Towards Integrated Reporting: Communicating Value in the 21st Century, IIRC, New York, NY.
59. International Integrated Reporting Council (2012a), Understanding Transformation: Building the Business Case for Integrated Reporting, IIRC.
60. International Integrated Reporting Council (2012b), Towards Integrated Reporting: Communicating Value in the 21st Century – Summary of Responses to the September 2011 Discussion Paper and Next Steps, IIRC.
61. International Integrated Reporting Council (2013a), Business Leaders:What You Need to Know, IIRC.
62. International Integrated Reporting Council (2013b), The International /IRS Framework, IIRC.
63. Jasanoff, S. (2003), “Technologies of humility: citizen participation in governing science”, Minerva, Vol. 41 No. 3, pp. 223-244.
64. Kamp-Roelands, N. (2013), “A commentary on ‘integrated reporting: a review of developments and their implications for the accounting curriculum”, Accounting Education, Vol. 22 No. 4, pp. 357-359.
65. Kelly, M. (2001), The Divine Right of Capital, Berrett-Koehler, San Francisco, CA.
66. Knox-Hayes, J. and Levy, D. (2011), “The politics of carbon disclosure as climate governance”, Strategic Organization, Vol. 9 No. 1, pp. 1-9.
67. Leach, M., Scoones, I. and Stirling, A. (2010), Dynamic Sustainabilities: Technology, Environment, Social Justice, Earthscan, London.
68. Levy, D.L., Brown, H.S. and de Jong, M. (2010), “The contested politics of corporate governance: the case of the global reporting initiative”, Business & Society, Vol. 49 No. 1, pp. 88-115.
69. Lidskog, R. (2008), “Scientised citizens and democratised science: re-assessing the expert-lay divide”, Journal of Risk Research, Vol. 11 Nos 1/2, pp. 69-86.
70. Lo, A.Y. and Spash, C.L. (2013), “Deliberative monetary valuation: in search of a democratic and value plural approach to environmental policy”, Journal of Economic Surveys, Vol. 27 No. 4, pp. 768-789.
71. Lorde, A. (2007), Sister Outsider, Crossing Press, Berkeley.
72. Makower, J. and the editors of GreenBiz.com (2013), State of Green Business 2013, GreenBiz Group, available at: http://info.greenbiz.com/rs/greenbizgroup/images/state-greenbusiness-2013.pdf (accessed March 12, 2014).
73. Malsch, B. (2013), “Politicizing the expertise of the accounting industry in the realm of corporate social responsibility”, Accounting, Organizations and Society, Vol. 38 No. 2, pp. 149-168.
74. Mason, M. (2008), “Transparency for whom? Information disclosure and power in global environmental governance”, Global Environmental Politics, Vol. 8 No. 2, pp. 8-13.
75. Mason, M. (2010), “Information disclosure and environmental rights: the Aarhus Convention”, Global Environmental Politics, Vol. 10 No. 3, pp. 10-31.
76. Medawar, C. (1976), “The social audit: a political view”, Accounting, Organizations and Society, Vol. 1 No. 4, pp. 389-394.
77. Millon, D. (1993), “Communitarians, contractarians, and the crisis in corporate law”, Washington & Lee Law Review, Vol. 50 No. 4, pp. 1373-1391.
78. Milne, M.J. and Gray, R. (2013), “W(h)ither ecology? The triple bottom line, the Global Reporting Initiative, and corporate sustainability reporting”, Journal of Business Ethics, Vol. 118 No. 1, pp. 13-29.
79. Molisa, P., Vandangombo, D. and Brown, J. (2012), “Social and environmental accounting in developing countries – challenges, conflicts and contradictions”, in Hopper, T., Tsamenyi, M., Uddin, S. and Wickramasinghe, D. (Eds), Handbook of Accounting and Development, Edward Elgar, London, pp. 288-310.
80. Moneva, J.M., Archel, P. and Correa, A. (2006), “GRI and the camouflaging of corporate unsustainability”, Accounting Forum, Vol. 30 No. 2, pp. 121-137.
81. Movik, S. and Mehta, L. (2010), Liquid Dynamics: Accessing Water and Sanitation in an Uncertain Age, Symposium Report, STEPS Working Paper No. 42, STEPS Centre, Brighton.
82. Neu, D. (2001), “Banal accounts: subaltern voices”, Accounting Forum, Vol. 25 No. 4, pp. 319-333.
83. O’Dwyer, B. (2005), “Stakeholder democracy: challenges and contributions from social accounting”, Business Ethics, Vol. 14 No. 1, pp. 28-41.
84. O’Leary, T. (1985), “Observations on corporate financial reporting in the name of politics”, Accounting, Organizations and Society, Vol. 10 No. 1, pp. 87-102.
85. Owen, D. (2008), “Chronicles of wasted time? A personal reflection on the current state of, and future prospects for, social and environmental accounting research”, Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal, Vol. 21 No. 2, pp. 240-267.
86. Owen, G. (2013), “Integrated reporting: a review of developments and their implications for the accounting curriculum”, Accounting Education, Vol. 22 No. 4, pp. 340-356.
87. Pellizzoni, L. (2001), “The myth of the best argument: power, deliberation and reason”, British Journal of Sociology, Vol. 52 No. 1, pp. 59-86.
88. Phillips, D., Watson, L. and Willis, M. (2011), “Benefits of comprehensive integrated reporting”, Financial Executive, Vol. 27 No. 2, pp. 26-30.
89. Pike, S. (2012), “Destination positioning opportunities using personal values: elicited through the repertory test with laddering analysis”, Tourism Management, Vol. 33 No. 1, pp. 100-107.
90. Potter, B. (2012), “A paradigm shift in reporting”, Public Accountant, February/March, pp. 20-23.
91. Power, M. (2007), Organized Uncertainty: Designing a World of Risk Management, Oxford University Press, Oxford.
92. Ravetz, J.R. (2006), “Post-normal science and the complexity of transitions towards sustainability”, Ecological Complexity, Vol. 3 No. 4, pp. 275-284.
93. Rayner, S. (2006), “Wicked problems: clumsy solutions – diagnoses and prescriptions for environmental ills”, Jack Beale Memorial Lecture on Global Environment, available at: www.insis.ox.ac.uk/fileadmin/InSIS/Publications/Rayner_-_jackbealelecture.pdf (accessedMarch 12, 2014).
94. Roy, A. (1999), “The greater common good”, available at: www.narmada.org/gcg/gcg.html(accessed March 12, 2014).
95. Ruiz, C.C. (2013), “A commentary on ‘integrated reporting: a review of developments and their implications for the accounting curriculum”, Accounting Education, Vol. 22 No. 4, pp. 360-362.
96. Santos, B. de Sousa (2002), Toward a New Legal Common Sense: Law, Globalization, and Emancipation, Butterworths, London.
97. Schwartz, B. and Tilling, K. (2009), “ ‘ISO-lating’ corporate social responsibility in the organizational context: a dissenting interpretation of ISO 26000”, Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, Vol. 16 No. 5, pp. 289-299.
98. Scoones, I. and Thompson, J. (2003), “Participatory processes for policy change: reflections on the Prajateerpu e-forum”, PLA Notes, No. 46, pp. 51-57.
99. Seyfang, G. and Smith, A. (2007), “Grassroots innovations for sustainable development: towards a new research and policy agenda”, Environmental Politics, Vol. 16 No. 4, pp. 584-603.
100. Shenkin, M. and Coulson, A.B. (2007), “Accountability through activism: learning from Bourdieu”, Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal, Vol. 20 No. 2, pp. 297-317.
101. Sinden, A. (2004), “Cass Sunstein’s cost-benefit lite: economics for liberals”, Columbia Journal of Environmental Law, Vol. 29 No. 2, pp. 191-241.
102. Sinden, A., Kysar, D.A. and Driesen, D.M. (2009), “Cost-benefit analysis: new foundations on shifting sand”, Regulation & Governance, Vol. 3 No. 1, pp. 48-71.
103. Smith, A. and Stirling, A. (2007), “Moving outside or inside? Objectification and reflexivity in the governance of socio-technical systems”, Journal of Environmental Policy & Planning, Vol. 9 Nos 3-4, pp. 351-373.
104. Smith, A. and Stirling, A. (2010), “The politics of social-ecological resilience and sustainable socio-technical transitions”, Ecology and Society, Vol. 15 No. 1, pp. 11-23.
105. Soderbaum, P. (2007), “Issues of paradigm, ideology and democracy in sustainability assessment”, Ecological Economics, Vol. 60 No. 3, pp. 613-626.
106. Soderbaum, P. and Brown, J. (2010), “Democratizing economics: pluralism as a path towards sustainability”, Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences, Vol. 1185 No. 1, pp. 179-195.
107. Spence, C. (2007), “Social and environmental reporting and hegemonic discourse”, Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal, Vol. 20 No. 6, pp. 855-882.
108. Spence, C. and Gray, R. (2007), Social and Environmental Reporting and the Business Case, ACCA, London.
109. Spence, C., Husillos, J. and Correa-Ruiz, C. (2010), “Cargo cult science and the death of politics: a critical review of social and environmental accounting research”, Critical Perspectives on Accounting, Vol. 21 No. 1, pp. 76-89.
110. Stiglitz, J.E. (2002), Globalization and its Discontents, Norton, New York, NY.
111. Stirling, A. (2005), “Opening up or closing down? Analysis, participation and power in the social appraisal of technology”, in Leach, M., Scoones, I. and Wynne, B. (Eds), Science and Citizens: Globalization and the Challenge of Engagement, Zed, London, pp. 218-231.
112. Stirling, A. (2006), “Analysis, participation and power: justification and closure in participatory multi-criteria analysis”, Land Use Policy, Vol. 23 No. 1, pp. 95-107.
113. Stirling, A. (2008), “ ‘Opening up’ and ‘closing down’: power, participation, and pluralism in the social appraisal of technology”, Science, Technology & Human Values, Vol. 33 No. 2, pp. 262-294.
114. Stirling, A. (2012), “Opening up the politics of knowledge and power in bioscience”, PloS Biology, Vol. 10 No. 1, pp. 1-5.
115. Tinker, T., Lehman, C. and Neimark, M. (1991), “Falling down the hole in the middle of the road: political quietism in corporate social reporting”, Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal, Vol. 4 No. 2, pp. 28-54.
116. Tully, J. (2008), Public Philosophy in a New Key, Volume 1 – Democracy and Civic Freedom, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
117. Tuttle, B. and Dillard, J. (2007), “Beyond competition: institutional isomorphism in US accounting research”, Accounting Horizons, Vol. 21 No. 4, pp. 387-409.
118. Wakeford, T., Murtuja, B. and Bryant, P. (2008), “Four brief analyses of citizens’ juries and similar participatory processes”, Participatory Learning and Action, No. 58, pp. 48-55.
119. Walker, M. (2010), “Accounting for varieties of capitalism: the case against a single set of global accounting standards”, British Accounting Review, Vol. 42 No. 3, pp. 137-152.
120. Wallace, D. (2007), “From future states to images of identity”, Foresight, Vol. 9 No. 1, pp. 26-36.
121. Wilsdon, J. and Willis, R. (2004), See-Through Science: Why Public Engagement Needs to Move Upstream, Demos, London.
122. Wynne, B. (2001), “Creating public alienation: expert cultures of risk and ethics on GMOs”, Science as Culture, Vol. 10 No. 4, pp. 445-481.
123. Wynne, B. (2003), “Seasick on the third wave? Subverting the hegemony of propositionalism: response to Collins and Evans (2002)”, Social Studies of Science, Vol. 33 No. 3, pp. 401-417.
124. Yanow, D. (2009), “Ways of knowing: passionate humility and reflective practice in research and management”, The American Review of Public Administration, Vol. 39 No. 6, pp. 579-601.
125. Young, J.J. (2006), “Making up users”, Accounting, Organizations and Society, Vol. 31 No. 6, pp. 579-600.