Democracy, sustainability and dialogic accounting technologies: Taking pluralism seriously

Critical Perspectives on Accounting

Volumn 20, Issue 3, 2009, Pages 313-342

  Brown, Judy ^a  

^a VICTORIA UNIVERSITY OF WELLINGTON   (New Zealand)

Author keywords

Agonistic democracy; Critical pluralism; Dialogic accounting; Positional analysis; Sustainability Assessment Models (SAMs); Sustainable development

Indexed keywords

EID: 64049087605     PISSN: 10452354     EISSN: 10959955     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.cpa.2008.08.002     Document Type: Article

References (209)

1. Abel R.L. Law and society: risk as an arena of struggle. Michigan Law Review 83 (1985) 772-812
2. Abel R.L. A critique of torts. UCLA Law Review 37 (1990) 785-831
3. Abramowicz M. Information markets, administrative decisionmaking, and predictive cost-benefit analysis. University of Chicago Law Review 71 (2004) 933-1020
4. Acampora C.D. Demos agonistes redux: reflections on the streit of political agonism. Nietzsche-Studien 32 (2003) 374-390
5. Addis A. Individualism, communitarianism, and the rights of ethnic minorities. Notre Dame Law Review 67 (1992) 615-676
6. Addis A. Cultural integrity and political unity: the politics of language in multilingual states. Arizona State Law Journal 33 (2001) 719-789
7. Anderson E. Values, risks, and market norms. Philosophy and Public Affairs 17 (1988) 54-65
8. Anderson E. Feminist epistemology and philosophy of science. In: Zalta EN, editor. The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy (Summer 2004 Edition), .
9. Armstrong P. Management, image and management accounting. Critical Perspectives on Accounting 13 (2002) 281-295
10. Arnold P., and Hammond T. The role of accounting in ideological conflict: lessons from the South African divestment movement. Accounting, Organizations and Society 19 2 (1994) 111-126
11. Baber W.F. Impact assessment and democratic politics. Policy Studies Review 8 1 (1988) 172-178
12. Baber W.F. Ecology and democratic governance: toward a deliberative model of environmental politics. Social Science Journal 41 (2004) 331-346
13. Bakhtin MM. The dialogical imagination. Emerson C, Holquist M. (trans.). Austin: University of Texas Press; 1981.
14. Baxter T., Bebbington J., and Cutteridge D. Sustainability assessment model: modelling economic, resource, environmental and social flows of a project. In: Henriques A., and Richardson J. (Eds). The triple bottom line-does it all add up? (2004), Earthscan, London
15. Bebbington J. Engagement, education and sustainability: a review essay on environmental accounting. Accounting, Auditing and Accountability Journal 10 3 (1997) 365-381
16. Bebbington J. Accounting for sustainability (2007), Elsevier, London
17. Bebbington J., Brown J., and Frame B. Accounting technologies and sustainability assessment models. Ecological Economics 61 2/3 (2007) 224-236
18. Bebbington J., Brown J., Frame B., and Thomson I. Theorizing engagement: the potential of a critical dialogic approach. Accounting, Auditing and Accountability Journal 20 3 (2007) 356-381
19. Bebbington J., and Gray R. An account of sustainability: failure, success and a reconceptualization. Critical Perspectives on Accounting 12 (2001) 557-587
20. Bebbington J, Gray R, Hibbitt C, Kirk E. FCA: an agenda for action. ACCA Research Report No. 73, London: ACCA; 2001.
21. Bebbington J, Gray R, Thomson I. Accountancy and sustainability: tentative findings on the meaning and implementation of sustainability. Paper presented at the fourth interdisciplinary perspectives on accounting conference, 11-13 July, University of Manchester, UK; 1994.
22. Bebbington J., and MacGregor B. Modelling and accounting for sustainable development (2003), RICS Foundation, London
23. Benhabib S. The democratic moment and the problem of difference. In: Benhabib S. (Ed). Democracy and difference: contesting the boundaries of the political (1996), Princeton University Press, New Jersey
24. Birkin F., Edwards P., and Woodward D. Accounting's contribution to a conscious cultural evolution: an end to sustainable development. Critical Perspectives on Accounting 16 3 (2005) 185-208
25. Bloche M.G. Beyond autonomy: coercion and morality in clinical relationships. Health Matrix 6 (1996) 229-304
26. Bohman J., and Rehg W. Deliberative democracy: essays on reason and politics (1997), MIT Press, Cambridge
27. Bokeno R.M. Introduction: appraisals of organizational learning as emancipatory change. Journal of Organizational Change Management 16 6 (2003) 603-618
28. Booth P., and Cocks N. Critical research issues in accounting standard setting. Journal of Business Finance & Accounting 17 4 (1990) 511-528
29. Bowman P. Ernesto Laclau, Chantal Mouffe, and post-marxism. In: Wolfreys J. (Ed). The Edinburgh Encyclopaedia of Modern Criticism and Theory (2002), University Press, Edinburgh
30. Boxelaar L., Paine M., and Beilin R. Community engagement and public administration: of silos, overlays and technologies of government. Australian Journal of Public Administration 65 1 (2006) 113-126
31. Boyce G. Public discourse and decision making: exploring possibilities for financial, social and environmental accounting. Accounting, Auditing and Accountability Journal 13 1 (2000) 27-64
32. Brady J.S. No contest? Assessing the agonistic critiques of Jürgen Habermas's theory of the public sphere. Philosophy and Social Criticism 30 3 (2004) 331-354
33. Brown J. Managerial disclosure of financial information to employees: a historical and comparative review. Journal of Industrial Relations 39 2 (1997) 263-286
34. Brown J., and Fraser M. Approaches and perspectives in social and environmental accounting: an overview of the conceptual landscape. Business Strategy and the Environment 15 2 (2006) 103-117
35. In: Brown H., Lovink G., Merrick H., Rossiter N., Teh D., and Wilson M. (Eds). Politics of a digital present: an inventory of Australian net culture, criticism and theory (2001), Fibreculture Publications, Melbourne
36. Burton M. Determinacy, indeterminacy and rhetoric in a pluralist world. Melbourne University Law Review 21 (1997) 544-583
37. Callaghan G., and Wistow G. Governance and public involvement in the British National Health Service: understanding difficulties and developments. Social Science & Medicine 63 (2006) 2289-2300
38. Carle S. A hazardous mix: discretion to disclose and incentives to suppress under OSHA's hazard communication standard. Yale Law Journal 97 (1988) 581-601
39. Carley M.J. Social theory and models in social indicator research. International Journal of Social Economics 6 1 (1979) 33-44
40. Castle D. Hearts, minds and radical democracy-an interview with Ernesto Laclau and Chantal Mouffe. Redpepper Archive June 1998, available at http://www.redpepper.org.uk/Hearts-Minds-and-Radical-Democracy.
41. Castro C.J. Sustainable development: mainstream and critical perspectives. Organization & Environment 17 2 (2004) 195-225
42. Cavanagh J.E., Lennox J.E., and Frame B. The sustainability assessment model (SAM): measuring sustainable development performance. Australasian Journal of Environmental Management 13 (2006) 31-34
43. Chambers R. Participatory rural appraisal (PRA): challenges, potentials and paradigm. World Development 22 10 (1994) 1437-1454
44. Chiesura A., and de Groot R. Critical natural capital: a socio-cultural perspective. Ecological Economics 44 (2003) 219-231
45. Chua W.F. Teaching and learning only the language of numbers-monolingualism in a multilingual world. Critical Perspectives on Accounting 7 1 (1996) 129-156
46. Churchman C.W. On the facility, felicity, and morality of measuring social change. The Accounting Review 46 1 (1971) 30-35
47. Conaghan J. Reassessing the feminist theoretical project in law. Journal of Law and Society 27 3 (2000) 351-385
48. Connolly W. Identity\difference: democratic negotiations of political paradox (2002), University of Minnesota Press, Minneapolis
49. Cooper C. The non and nom of accounting for (M)other nature. Accounting, Auditing and Accountability Journal 5 3 (1992) 16-39
50. Cooper D.J., and Sherer M.J. The value of corporate accounting reports: arguments for a political economy of accounting. Accounting, Organizations and Society 9 3/4 (1984) 207-232
51. Cooper C., Taylor P., Smith N., and Catchpowle L. A discussion of the political potential of social accounting. Critical Perspectives on Accounting 16 7 (2005) 951-974
52. Cupps D.S. Emerging problems of citizen participation. Public Administration Review 37 5 (1977) 478-487
53. Davenport G., and Brown J. Good faith in collective bargaining (2002), LexisNexis Butterworths, Wellington
54. Davies M. The ethos of pluralism. Sydney Law Review 27 (2005) 87-112
55. Day M.T. Transformational discourse: ideologies of organizational change in the academic library and information science literature. Library Trends 46 4 (1998) 635-667
56. Deveaux M. Agonism and pluralism. Philosophy and Social Criticism 25 4 (1999) 1-22
57. Dey C. Corporate 'silent' and 'shadow' social accounting. Social and Environmental Accounting Journal 23 2 (2003) 6-9
58. Dietz T., Fitzgerald A., and Shwom R. Environmental values. Annual Review of Environment and Resources 30 (2005) 335-372
59. Dillard J.F. Professional services, IBM and the Holocaust. Journal of Information Systems 17 2 (2003) 1-16
60. Dillard J.F., and Ruchala L. The rules are no game: from instrumental rationality to administrative evil. Accounting, Auditing and Accountability Journal 18 5 (2005) 608-630
61. Downs A. An economic theory of democracy (1957), Harper, New York
62. Dryzek J.S. The politics of the earth: environmental discourses. 2nd ed. (2005), Oxford University Press, New York
63. Edmond G., and Mercer D. Trashing 'junk science'. Stanford Technology Law Review 3 (1998) 1-31
64. Ekins P., Simon S., Deutsch L., Folke C., and De Groot R. A framework for the practical application of the concepts of critical natural capital and strong sustainability. Ecological Economics 44 (2003) 165-185
65. Everett J. Exploring (false) dualisms for environmental accounting praxis. Critical Perspectives on Accounting 15 8 (2004) 1061-1084
66. Feldman L.C. Political judgment with a difference: agonistic democracy and the limits of 'enlarged mentality'. Polity 32 1 (1999) 1-24
67. Frame B., and Brown J. Developing post-normal technologies for sustainability. Ecological Economics 65 2 (2008) 225-241
68. Frame B., Molisa P., Taylor R., Toia H., and Wong L.S. 100% pure conjecture? accounts of our future state(s). In: Liu J.H., McCreanor T., McIntosh T., and Teaiwa T. (Eds). New Zealand identities: belonging and longing to be (2005), VUW Press, Wellington
69. Fraser N. Toward a discourse ethic of solidarity. Praxis International 5 4 (1986) 425-429
70. Fraser N. The uses and abuses of French discourse theories for feminist politics. Theory, Culture & Society 9 (1992) 51-71
71. Funtowicz S.O., and Ravetz J.R. Science for the post-normal age. Futures 25 7 (1993) 739-755
72. Gale F.P. Theorizing power in ecological economics. Ecological Economics 27 (1998) 131-138
73. Gallhofer S. M[othering] view on: 'The non and nom of accounting for (M)other nature'. Accounting, Auditing and Accountability Journal 5 3 (1992) 40-51
74. Gallhofer S., Haslam J., Monk E., and Roberts C. The emancipatory potential of online reporting: the case of counter accounting. Accounting, Auditing and Accountability Journal 19 5 (2006) 681-718
75. Galsto M. Taking Aristotle seriously: republican-oriented legal theory and the moral foundation of deliberative democracy. California Law Review 82 (1994) 331-399
76. Gibson K. The problem with reporting pollution allowances: reporting is not the problem. Critical Perspectives on Accounting 7 6 (1996) 655-665
77. Gillette C.P., and Krier J.E. Risks, courts, and agencies. University of Pennsylvania Law Review 138 (1990) 1027-1109
78. Goi S. Agonism, deliberation and the politics of abortion. Polity 37 1 (2005) 54-81
79. Gray R.H. The silent practice of social accounting and corporate social reporting in companies. In: Zadek S., Evans R., and Pruzan P. (Eds). Building corporate accountability: emerging practices in social and ethical accounting, auditing and reporting (1997), Earthscan, London
80. Gray R. The social accounting project and Accounting Organizations and Society: privileging engagement, imaginings, new accountings and pragmatism over critique?. Accounting, Organizations and Society 27 7 (2002) 687-708
81. Gray R. Why is social accounting so difficult?-Part 1. Social and Environmental Accounting 24 1 (2004) 12-17
82. Gray R., and Bebbington J. Accounting for the environment. 2nd ed. (2001), Sage, London
83. Gray R., Dey C., Owen D., Evans R., and Zadek S. Struggling with the praxis of social accounting: stakeholders, accountability, audits and procedures. Accounting, Auditing and Accountability Journal 10 3 (1997) 325-364
84. Haag D., and Kaupenjohann M. Parameters, prediction, post-normal science and the precautionary principle-a roadmap for modelling for decision-making. Ecological Modelling 144 (2001) 45-60
85. Hagendijk R, Egmond M. The GM food debate in the Netherlands, 1999-2002. Science Technology and Governance in Europe (STAGE), Discussion Paper 14, August 2004.
86. Hajer M.A. The politics of environmental discourse: ecological modernisation and the policy process (1995), Oxford University Press, Oxford
87. Haraway D. Situated knowledges: the science question in feminism and the privilege of partial perspective. In: Haraway D. (Ed). Simians, cyborgs, and women: the reinvention of nature (1991), Routledge, New York
88. Harding S. Whose science? Whose knowledge? Thinking from women's lives (1991), Cornell University Press, Ithaca, NY
89. Harding S. Rethinking standpoint epistemology: what is "strong objectivity"?. In: Alcoff L., and Potter E. (Eds). Feminist epistemologies (1993), Routledge, New York
90. Harding S. The feminist standpoint theory reader: intellectual and political controversies (2004), Routledge, New York
91. Held D. Models of democracy. 2nd ed. (1996), Stanford University Press, Stanford
92. Henriot P. Political questions about social indicators. Western Political Journal 23 2 (1970) 235-255
93. Herbohn K. A full cost environmental accounting experiment. Accounting, Organizations and Society 30 6 (2005) 519-536
94. Hines R. Financial accounting: in communicating reality, we construct reality. Accounting, Organizations and Society 13 3 (1988) 251-261
95. Hines R. The FASB's conceptual framework, financial accounting and the maintenance of the social world. Accounting, Organizations and Society 16 4 (1991) 313-331
96. Hines R. On valuing nature. Accounting, Auditing and Accountability Journal 4 3 (1991) 27-29
97. Hines R. Accounting: filling the negative space. Accounting, Organizations and Society 17 3/4 (1992) 313-341
98. Honig B. Toward an agonistic feminism: Hannah Arendt and the politics of identity. In: Honig B. (Ed). Feminist interpretations of Hannah Arendt (1995), Pennsylvania State University Press, University Park
99. Hopwood A. The tale of a committee that never reported: disagreements on intertwining accounting with the social. Accounting, Organizations and Society 10 3 (1985) 361-377
100. Huijer M. Democratic transactions in the life sciences: a gender democratic labyrinth. European Journal of Women's Studies 12 1 (2005) 9-29
101. Hutchinson A.C. Talking the good life: from free speech to democratic dialogue. Yale Journal of Law and Liberty 1 (1989) 17-30
102. International Accounting Standards Board. Framework for the preparation and presentation of financial statements. London; 1989.
103. International Accounting Standards Board. Exposure draft-an improved conceptual framework for financial reporting: Chapter 1: the objective of financial reporting and Chapter 2: qualitative characteristics and constraints of decision-useful financial reporting information; 2008.
104. Jones E.G. Risky assessments: uncertainties in science and the human dimensions of environmental decisionmaking. William and Mary Environmental Law and Policy Review 22 (1997) 1-69
105. Kelly M. The divine right of capital (2001), Berrett-Koehler, San Francisco
106. Könnölä T., Unruh G.C., and Carrillo-Hermosilla J. Prospective voluntary agreements for escaping techno-institutional lock-in. Ecological Economics 57 2 (2006) 239-252
107. Kuhn T. The structure of scientific revolutions (1970), University of Chicago Press, Chicago
108. Laclau E. Emancipation(s) (1996), Verso, London
109. Laclau E., and Mouffe C. Hegemony and socialist strategy: towards a radical democratic politics. 2nd ed. (2001), Verso, London
110. Laird F.N. Participatory analysis, democracy, and technological decision making. Science, Technology & Human Values 18 3 (1993) 341-361
111. Larrinaga-Gonzalez C., and Bebbington J. Accounting change or institutional appropriation? A case study of the implementation of environmental accounting. Critical Perspectives on Accounting 12 3 (2001) 269-292
112. Lehman C., and Tinker T. The "real" cultural significance of accounts. Accounting, Organizations and Society 12 5 (1987) 503-522
113. Lehman G. A legitimate concern for environmental accounting. Critical Perspectives on Accounting 6 5 (1995) 393-412
114. Lehman G. Environmental accounting: pollution permits or selling the environment. Critical Perspectives on Accounting 7 6 (1996) 667-676
115. Lehman G. Disclosing new worlds: a role for social and environmental accounting and auditing. Accounting, Organizations and Society 24 3 (1999) 217-241
116. Lehman G. Reclaiming the public sphere: problems and prospects for corporate social and environmental accounting. Critical Perspectives on Accounting 12 6 (2001) 713-733
117. Livesey S. Eco-identity as discursive struggle: Royal Dutch/Shell, Brent Spar, and Nigeria. The Journal of Business Communication 38 1 (2001) 58-91
118. Longino H.E. Science as social knowledge: values and objectivity in scientific inquiry (1990), Princeton University Press, Princeton
119. Longino H.E. The fate of knowledge (2002), Princeton University Press, Princeton
120. Luks F. The rhetorics of ecological economics. Ecological Economics 26 (1998) 139-149
121. Luks F. Post-normal science and the rhetoric of inquiry: deconstructing normal science?. Futures 31 (1999) 705-719
122. McAuley M. Proposal for a theory and a method of recodification. Loyola Law Review 49 (2003) 261-285
123. McGarity T.O. Professor Sunstein's fuzzy math. Georgetown Law Journal 90 (2002) 2341-2377
124. McGarity T.O., and Shapiro S.A. OSHA's critics and regulatory reform. Wake Forest Law Review 31 (1996) 587-646
125. Macintosh N.B., and Baker C.R. A literary theory perspective on accounting: towards heteroglossic accounting reports. Accounting, Auditing and Accountability Journal 15 2 (2002) 184-222
126. Markovitz R.S. Duncans do nots: cost-benefit analysis and the determination of legal entitlements. Stanford Law Review 36 5 (1984) 1169-1198
127. Mason R.O., and Mitroff I.I. Challenging strategic planning assumptions: theory, cases and techniques (1981), Wiley, New York
128. Maunders K.T., and Burritt R.L. Accounting and ecological crisis. Accounting, Auditing and Accountability Journal 4 3 (1991) 9-26
129. Mayumi K., and Giampietro M. The epistemological challenge of self-modifying systems: governance and sustainability in the post-normal science era. Ecological Economics 57 (2006) 382-399
130. Medawar C. The social audit: a political view. Accounting, Organizations and Society 1 4 (1976) 389-394
131. Mejía A. The problem of knowledge imposition: Paulo Freire and critical systems thinking. Systems Research and Behavioral Science 21 1 (2004) 63-82
132. Meppem T., and Bourke S. Different ways of knowing: a communicative turn toward sustainability. Ecological Economics 30 (1999) 389-404
133. Michelman F.I. Brennan and democracy. California Law Review 86 (1998) 399-427
134. Miller P. The margins of accounting. European Accounting Review 7 4 (1998) 605-621
135. Miller P., and O'Leary T. Accounting and the construction of the governable person. Accounting, Organizations and Society 12 3 (1987) 235-265
136. Morgan G. Accounting as reality construction: towards a new epistemology for accounting practice. Accounting, Organizations and Society 13 5 (1988) 477-485
137. Mouck T. Financial reporting, democracy and environmentalism: a critique of the commodification of information. Critical Perspectives on Accounting 6 6 (1995) 535-553
138. Mouffe C. The return of the political (1993), Verso, London
139. Mouffe C. Democracy, pluralism: a critique of the rationalist approach. Cardozo Law Review 16 (1995) 1533-1545
140. Mouffe C. The democratic paradox (2000), Verso, London
141. Mouffe C. Deliberative democracy or agonistic pluralism. Institute for Advanced Studies (IHS), Vienna, Political Science Series 72; 2000b.
142. Mouffe C. Which democracy in a post-political age? Paper presented at Dark Markets: infopolitics, electronic media and democracy in times of crisis conference, 3-4 October 2002.
143. Mouffe C. On the political (2005), Routledge, London
144. Nagel T. The view from nowhere (1986), Oxford University Press, New York
145. Nelkin D., and Brown M.S. Workers at risk: voices from the workplace (1984), University of Chicago Press, Chicago
146. Neu D., Cooper D.J., and Everett J. Critical accounting interventions. Critical Perspectives on Accounting 12 6 (2001) 735-762
147. Obach B.K. Labor and the environmental movement: the quest for common ground (2004), MIT Press, Cambridge
148. O'Connor M. Dialogue and debate in a post-normal practice of science: a reflexion. Futures 31 7 (1999) 671-687
149. O'Dwyer B. Conceptions of corporate social responsibility: the nature of managerial capture. Accounting, Auditing and Accountability Journal 16 4 (2003) 523-557
150. O'Dwyer B. The construction of a social account: a case study in an overseas aid agency. Accounting, Organizations and Society 30 3 (2005) 279-296
151. O'Leary T. Observations on corporate financial reporting in the name of politics. Accounting, Organizations and Society 10 1 (1985) 87-102
152. Owen D.L., Swift T., and Hunt K. Questioning the role of stakeholder engagement in social and ethical accounting, auditing and reporting. Accounting Forum 25 3 (2001) 264-282
153. Pallot J. The legitimate concern with fairness: a comment. Accounting, Organizations and Society 16 2 (1991) 201-208
154. Pildes R.H. The unintended cultural consequences of public policy: a comment on the symposium. Michigan Law Review 89 (1991) 936-978
155. Porter T.M. Objectivity as standardization: the rhetoric of impersonality in measurement, statistics, and cost-benefit analysis. Annals of Scholarship 9 (1992) 19-59
156. Power M. After calculation? Reflections on Critique of Economic Reason by André Gorz. Accounting, Organizations and Society 17 5 (1992) 477-499
157. Power M., and Laughlin R.C. Habermas, law and accounting. Accounting, Organizations and Society 21 5 (1996) 441-465
158. Puxty A.G. Social accountability and universal pragmatics. Advances in Public Interest Accounting 4 (1991) 35-45
159. Ravetz J.R. Post-normal science and the complexity of transitions towards sustainability. Ecological Complexity 3 (2006) 275-284
160. Ravetz J., and Funtowicz S. Post-normal science-an insight now maturing. Futures 31 (1999) 641-646
161. Rawls J. A theory of justice (1971), Harvard University Press, Cambridge
162. Roberts J., and Scapens R. Accounting systems and systems of accountability: understanding accounting practices in their organisational contexts. Accounting, Organizations and Society 10 4 (1985) 443-456
163. Rose-Ackerman S. Progressive law and economics-and the new administrative law. Yale Law Journal 98 (1988) 341-368
164. Sagoff M. Aggregation and deliberation in valuing environmental public goods: a look beyond contingent pricing. Ecological Economics 24 (1998) 213-230
165. Satterfield T., Slovic P., and Gregory R. Narrative valuation in a policy judgment context. Ecological Economics 34 (2000) 315-331
166. Savage G.J. Thinking through theory: Vygotskian perspectives on the teaching of writing by J.T. Zebroski (Book Review). Technical Communication Quarterly 5 3 (1996) 341-344
167. Sawicki J. Disciplining Foucault: feminism, power, and the body (1991), Routledge, New York
168. Schumpeter J.A. Capitalism, socialism and democracy (1942), Harper, New York
169. Scott S.M. Justice redefined: minority-targeted scholarships and the struggle against racial oppression. University of Missouri at Kansas City Law Review 62 (1994) 651-714
170. Shalin D.N. Critical theory and the pragmatist challenge. American Journal of Sociology 98 2 (1992) 237-279
171. Sikka P. The internet and possibilities for counter accounts: some reflections. Accounting, Auditing and Accountability Journal 19 5 (2006) 759-769
172. Sinden A. The economics of endangered species: why less is more in the economic analysis of critical habitat designations. Harvard Environmental Law Review 28 (2004) 129-214
173. Sinden A. Cass Sunstein's cost-benefit lite: economics for liberals. Columbia Journal of Environmental Law 29 (2004) 191-241
174. Smith A.M. Laclau and Mouffe: the radical democratic imaginary (1998), Routledge, London
175. Sneddon C., Howarth R.B., and Norgaard R.B. Sustainable development in a post-Brundtland world. Ecological Economics 57 2 (2006) 253-268
176. Söderbaum P. Positional analysis and public decision making. Journal of Economic Issues 16 2 (1982) 391-400
177. Söderbaum P. Environmental management: a non-traditional approach. Journal of Economic Issues 21 1 (1987) 139-165
178. Söderbaum P. Values, markets, and environmental policy: an actor-network approach. Journal of Economic Issues 27 2 (1993) 387-408
179. Söderbaum P. Values, ideology and politics in ecological economics. Ecological Economics 28 (1999) 161-170
180. Söderbaum P. Ecological economics: a political economics approach to environment and development (2000), Earthscan, London
181. Söderbaum P. Business companies, institutional change, and ecological sustainability. Journal of Economic Issues 34 2 (2000) 435-443
182. Söderbaum P. Decision processes and decision-making in relation to sustainable development and democracy-where do we stand?. Journal of Interdisciplinary Economics 14 (2004) 41-60
183. Söderbaum P. Economics as ideology and the need for pluralism. In: Fullbook E. (Ed). A guide to what's wrong with economics (2004), Anthem Press, London
184. Söderbaum P. Democracy and sustainable development-what is the alternative to cost-benefit analysis?. Integrated Environmental Assessment and Management 2 2 (2006) 182-190
185. Söderbaum P. Issues of paradigm, ideology and democracy in sustainability assessment. Ecological Economics 60 (2007) 613-626
186. Solomons D. Accounting and social change: a neutralist view. Accounting, Organizations and Society 16 3 (1991) 287-295
187. Spivak G. The post-colonial critic: interviews, strategies, dialogues (1990), Routledge, New York
188. Springett D., and Foster B. Whom is sustainable development for? Deliberative democracy and the role of unions. Sustainable Development 13 (2005) 271-281
189. Sunstein C.R. The cost-benefit state: the future of regulatory protection (2002), American Bar Association, Chicago
190. Taylor C. Multiculturalism: examining the politics of recognition (1994), Princeton University Press, New Jersey
191. Taylor P. The texts of Paulo Freire (1993), Open University Press, Buckingham
192. Thomson I., and Bebbington J. It doesn't matter what you teach?. Critical Perspectives on Accounting 15 4/5 (2004) 609-628
193. Thomson I., and Bebbington J. Social and environmental reporting in the UK: a pedagogic evaluation. Critical Perspectives on Accounting 16 5 (2005) 507-533
194. Tillery D. Radioactive waste and technical doubts: genre and environmental opposition to nuclear waste sites. Technical Communication Quarterly 12 4 (2003) 405-421
195. Tinker T. The accountant as partisan. Accounting, Organizations and Society 16 3 (1991) 297-310
196. Tinker T., and Gray R. Beyond a critique of pure reason: from policy to politics to praxis in environmental and social research. Accounting, Auditing and Accountability Journal 16 5 (2003) 727-761
197. Tinker T., Lehman C., and Neimark M. Falling down the hole in the middle of the road: political quietism in corporate social reporting. Accounting, Auditing and Accountability Journal 4 2 (1991) 28-54
198. Torfing J. Discourse theory: achievements, arguments, and challenges. In: Howarth D., and Torfing J. (Eds). Discourse theory in European politics: identity, policy and governance (2005), Palgrave, Basingstoke
199. Tully J. The agonic freedom of citizens. Economy and Society 28 2 (1999) 161-182
200. Tully J. Recognition and dialogue: the emergence of a new field. Critical Review of International Social and Political Philosophy 7 3 (2004) 84-106
201. Tully J. Approaches to recognition, power, and dialogue. Political Theory 32 6 (2004) 855-862
202. Unerman J., and Bennett M. Increased stakeholder dialogue and the Internet: towards greater corporate accountability or reinforcing capitalist hegemony?. Accounting Organizations and Society 29 7 (2004) 685-707
203. van Asselt M.B.A., and Rijkens-Klomp N. A look in the mirror: reflection on participation in integrated assessment from a methodological perspective. Global Environmental Change 12 (2002) 167-184
204. van der Sluijs J.P., Craye M., Funtowicz S., Kloprogge P., Ravetz J., and Risbey J. Combining quantitative and qualitative measures of uncertainty in model-based environmental assessment: the NUSAP system. Risk Analysis 25 2 (2005) 481-492
205. Watts R.L., and Zimmerman J.L. The demand for and supply of accounting theories: the market for excuses. The Accounting Review 54 2 (1979) 273-305
206. Welford R.J. Corporate environmental management, technology and sustainable development: postmodern perspectives and the need for a critical research agenda. Business Strategy and the Environment 7 (1998) 1-12
207. Wenger E. Communities of practice: learning, meaning, and identity (1998), Cambridge University Press, Cambridge
208. White L. The integration of progressive thought and action: paradox, piece-work, and patience. Hastings Law Journal 43 (1992) 853-859
209. Wilkins H. The need for subjectivity in EIA: discourse as a tool for sustainable development. Environmental Impact Assessment Review 23 (2003) 401-414