Issues of paradigm, ideology and democracy in sustainability assessment

Ecological Economics

Volumn 60, Issue 3, 2007, Pages 613-626

  Söderbaum, Peter ^a  

^a MÄLARDALEN UNIVERSITY   (Sweden)

Author keywords

Democracy; Ideological orientation; Political economic person; Positional Analysis (PA); Sustainability Assessment Model (SAM)

Indexed keywords

DECISION MAKING; DEMOCRACY; IDEOLOGY; SUSTAINABLE DEVELOPMENT;

EID: 33845673799     PISSN: 09218009     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.ecolecon.2006.01.006     Document Type: Article

References (50)

1. Ackerman F., and Heinzerling L. Priceless. On Knowing the Price of Everything and the Value of Nothing (2004), The New Press, New York
2. Baxter, Tom, Bebbington, J., Cutteridge, D., Harvey, G., 2002. The Sustainability Assessment Model (SAM) Paper presented at the Sixth SPE International Conference on Health, Safety and Environment in Oil and Gas Exploration and Production, 20-22 March. Society for Petroleum Engineers, SPE 73968, Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia.
3. Bebbington J., and Macgregor B. Modelling and Accounting for Sustainable Development (2005), RICS Foundation (Royal Institution of Corporate Surveyors), London
4. Brown, Judy, Frame, Bob, 2005. Democratizing Accounting Technologies: The Potential of the Sustainability Assessment Model (SAM). Victoria University of Wellington, Centre for Accounting, Governance and Taxation Research, School of Accounting and Commercial Law, Working paper series No. 15, Wellington, New Zealand, http://www.accountingresearch.org.nz.
5. Corner House, 1999. The Cost-Benefit Dilemma. Strategies and Alternatives (first published 8-10 October 1999) http://www.thecornerhouse.org.uk/item.shtml?x=52026.
6. Deutsches Institut für Wirtschaftsforschung (DIW) Sustainability economics project. http://www.sustainabilityeconomics.de.
7. Economic and Political Weekly, 2001. Vol. 36, No. 21, The Cost-Benefit Analysis Dilemma: Strategies and Alternatives, pp. 1824-1873. Mumbai, India.
8. Edlund, Jonas., Quintero, Rodolfo, 1995. Do Wabura-Farewell to the River! Application of Positional Analysis to the Urrá I Hydro Power Plant in Columbia. Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences, Department of Economics, Report 94, Uppsala.
9. Etzioni A. The Moral Dimension. Toward a New Economics (1988), Free Press, New York
10. Faber M., Manstetten R., and Petersen T. Homo oeconomicus and Homo politicus. Political economy, institutional interest and ecological interest. Kyklos 50 4 (1997) 457-484
11. Forbes, Valery, Calow, Peter, (Guest editors), 2006. Ecology in a Cost-Benefit Society. Integrated Environmental Assessment and Management, vol. 2, Issue 2 (April).
12. Forsberg, Göran, 1993. Finns ekologiskt hållbara energisystem? En uppföljning och konsekvensbeskrivning för Kils kommun (Energy systems and ecological sustainability. The municipality of Kil as a case). Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences, Department of Economics, Report 63, Uppsala.
13. In: Fullbrook E. (Ed). The crisis in economics. The post-autistic economics movement: the first 600 days (2003), Routledge, London
14. In: Fullbrook E. (Ed). A Guide to What's Wrong with Economics (2004), Anthem Press, London
15. Funtowicz S.O., and Ravetz J.R. A new scientific methodology for global environmental issues. In: Costanza R. (Ed). Ecological Economics. The Science and Management of Sustainability (1991), Columbia University Press, New York 137-152
16. Hajer M.A. The Politics of Environmental Discourse. Ecological Modernization and the Policy Process (1995), Clarendon, Oxford
17. In: Hajer M.A., and Wagenaar H. (Eds). Deliberative Policy Analysis. Understanding Governance in the Network Society (2003), Cambridge University Press, Cambridge
18. In: Harremoës P., Gee D., MacGarvin M., Stirling A., Keys J., Wynne B., and Vaz S.G. (Eds). The Precautionary Principle in the 20th Century. Late Lessons From Early Warnings (2002), European Environmental Agency/Earthscan, London
19. Hemmati M. Multi-stakeholder Processes for Governance and Sustainability. Beyond Deadlock and Conflict (2002), Earthscan, London
20. Howard J.A. Marketing Management. Analysis and Planning (1963), Irwing, Homewood IL
21. Jakubowski, Peter, 1999. Demokratische Umweltpolitik. Eine institutionenökonomische Analyse umweltpolitischer Zielfindung (PhD thesis). Peter Lang (European University Studies), Franfurt.
22. Jakubowski, Peter, 2000. Political Economic Person contra Homo oeconomicus. Mit PEP zu mehr Nachhaltigkeit. LIST FORUM für Wirtschafts- und Finanzpolitik Band 26, Heft 4, pp. 299-310.
23. Johansen L. Samfunnsökonmisk lönnsomhet. En dröfting av begrepets bakgrunn og inhold. Industriökonomisk Institutt, Rapport vol. 1 (1977), Tanum-Norli, Oslo (In Norwegian) (Profitability at the societal level in terms of CBA. A conceptual study)
24. Mishan E.J. The Costs of Economic Growth (1967), Penguin Books, Harmondsworth
25. Mishan E.J. Cost-Benefit Analysis (1971), Allen & Unwin, London
26. Mishan E.J. How valid are economic evaluations of allocative changes?. Journal of Economic Issues 14 1 (1980) 143-161 (March)
27. Müller A. A flower in full blossom? Ecological economics at the crossroads between normal and post-normal science. Ecological Economics 45 (2003) 19-27
28. Myrdal G. Institutional economics. Journal of Economic Issues 12 4 (1978) 771-783 (December)
29. Norgaard R.B. The case for methodological pluralism. Ecological Economics 1 1 (1989) 37-57
30. Owen J.M., and Rogers P.J. Program Evaluation. Forms and Approaches (1999), SAGE Publications, London
31. Pierre J., and Peters B.G. Governance, Politics and the State (2000), St Martin's Press, New York
32. Rutherford M. Institutions in Economics. The Old and the New Institutionalism (1996), Cambridge University Press, Cambridge
33. Sen A. On Ethics and Economics (1987), Basil Blackwell, New York
34. Siebenhüner B. Homo sustinens. Auf dem Weg zu einem Menschenbild der Nachhaltigkeit (2001), Metropolis Verlag, Marburg
35. Simon H. Administrative Behaviour (1945), Free Press, New York
36. Söderbaum P. Neoclassical and institutional approaches to development and the environment. Ecological Economics 5 (1992) 127-144
37. Söderbaum P. Actors, ideology, markets. Neoclassical and institutional perspectives on environmental policy. Ecological Economics 10 (1994) 47-60
38. Söderbaum P. Stakeholders as political economic persons-on participation, responsibility and democracy. In: Biesecker A., Elsner W., and Grenzdörffer K. (Eds). Ökonomie der Betroffenen und Mitwirkenden: Erwiterte Stakeholder-Prozesse (1998), Centaurus Verlag, Pfaffenweiler 241-260
39. Söderbaum P. Ecological Economics. A Political Economics Approach to Environment and Development (2000), Earthscan, London
40. Söderbaum P. Neoclassical economics, institutional theory and democracy. CBA and its alternatives. Economic and Political Weekly 36 21 (2001) 1846-1854 (Mumbai, India)
41. Söderbaum P. Business corporations, markets and the globalisation of environmental problems. In: Havila V., Forsgren M., and Håkansson H. (Eds). Critical Perspectives on Internationalisation (2002), Pergamon, Amsterdam 179-200
42. Söderbaum P. Democracy, markets and sustainable development: the European Union as example. European Environment 14 (2004) 342-355
43. Söderbaum P. Decision processes and decision-making in relation to sustainable development and democracy-where do we stand?. Journal of Interdisciplinary Economics 14 1 (2004) 41-60
44. Söderbaum P. Economics as ideology and the need for pluralism. In: Fullbrook E. (Ed). A Guide to What's Wrong with Economics (2004), Anthem Press, London 158-168
45. Söderbaum, Peter, 2004d. Politics and ideology in ecological economics. ISEE Homepage, encyclopaedia: www.ecoeco.org/publica/encyc_entries/PoliticsIdeology.
46. Söderbaum, Peter, 2006. Cost-Benefit Analysis, Democracy and Sustainable Development, In: Forbes, Valery and Peter Calow (guest editors). Integrated Environmental Assessment and Management, vol. 2, Issue 2 (April).
47. Sunstein C.R. Risk and Reason. Safety, Law and the Environment (2002), Cambridge University Press, Cambridge
48. World Commission on Dams (WCD). Dams and Development. A New Framework for Decision-Making. (The Report of the World Commission on Dams) (2000), Earthscan, London
49. World Commission on Environment and Development. Our Common Future (1987), Oxford University Press, Oxford
50. Zadek S. The Civil Corporation. The New Economy of Corporate Citizenship (2001), Earthscan, London