Serial-attention models of reading

The Oxford Handbook of Eye Movements

Volumn , Issue , 2012, Pages

  Reichle, Erik D ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH SCHOOL OF MEDICINE   (United States)

Author keywords

E Z Reader model; Eye movement; Reading; Serial attention models; Simulations

Indexed keywords

EID: 84923839399     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book    
DOI: 10.1093/oxfordhb/9780199539789.013.0042     Document Type: Chapter

References (105)

1. Anderson, J.R. (1983). The architecture of cognition. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
2. Anderson, J.R. and Lebiere, C. (1998). The atomic components of thought. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
3. Ans, B., Carbonnel, S., and Valdois, S. (1998). A connectionist multiple-trace memory model for polysyllabic word reading. Psychological Review, 105, 678-723.
4. Balota, D.A., Pollatsek, A., and Rayner, K. (1985). The interaction of contextual constraints and parafoveal visual information in reading. Cognitive Psychology, 17, 364-390.
5. Becker, W. and Jürgens, R. (1979). An analysis of the saccadic system by means of double step stimuli. Vision Research, 19, 967-983.
6. Binder, K., Pollatsek, A., and Rayner, K. (1999). Extraction of information to the left of the fixated word in reading. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 25, 1162-1172.
7. Carpenter, R.H.S. (2000). The neural coding of looking. Current Biology, 10, R291-R293.
8. Clark, V.P., Fan, S., and Hillyard, S.A. (1995). Identification of early visual evoked potential generators by retinotopic and topographic analyses. Human Brain Mapping, 2, 170-187.
9. Dopkins, S. Morris, R.K., and Rayner, K. (1992). Lexical ambiguity and eye fixations in reading: A test of competing models of lexical ambiguity resolution. Journal of Memory and Language, 31, 461-476.
10. Duffy, S.A., Morris, R.K., and Rayner, K. (1988). Lexical ambiguity and fixation times in reading. Journal of Memory and Language, 27, 429-446.
11. Duffy, S.A., Kambe, G., and Rayner, K. (2001). The effect of prior disambiguating context on the comprehension of ambiguous words: Evidence from eye movements. In D.S. Gorfein (ed.) On the consequences of meaning selection (pp. 27-43). Washington, DC: APA Books.
12. Engbert, R., Nuthmann, A., Richter, E., and Kliegl, R. (2005). SWIFT: A dynamical model of saccade generation during reading. Psychological Review, 112, 777-813.
13. Eriksen, C.W. and Shultz, D.W. (1977). Retinal locus and acuity in visual information processing. Bulletin of the Psychonomic Society, 9, 81-84.
14. Feng, G. (2006). Eye movements as time-series random variables: A stochastic model of eye movement control in reading. Cognitive Systems Research, 7, 70-95.
15. Ferreira, F. and Patson, N.D. (2007). The 'good enough' approach to language comprehension. Language and Linguistics Compass, 1, 71-83.
16. Ferreira, F., Bailey, K.G.D., and Ferraro, V. (2002). Good-enough representations in language comprehension. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 11, 11-15.
17. Foxe, J.J. and Simpson, G.V. (2002). Flow of activation from V1 to frontal cortex in humans: A framework for defining 'early' visual processing. Experimental Brain Research, 142, 139-150.
18. Francis, W.N. and Kučera, H. (1982). Frequency analysis of English usage: Lexicon and grammar. Boston, MA: Houghton Mifflin.
19. Frazier, L. and Rayner, K. (1982). Making and correcting errors during sentence comprehension: Eye movements in the analysis of structurally ambiguous sentences. Cognitive Psychology, 14, 178-210.
20. Henderson, J.M. and Ferreira, F. (1990). Effects of foveal processing difficulty on the perceptual span in reading: Implications for attention and eye movement control. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 16, 417-429.
21. Huey, E.B. (1908). The psychology and pedagogy of reading. New York: Macmillian.
22. Hyönä, J. and Pollatsek, A. (1998). Reading Finnish compound words: Eye fixations are affected by component morphemes. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 24, 1612-1627.
23. Hyönä, J., Bertram, R., and Pollatsek, A. (2004). Are long compound words identified serially via their constituents? Evidence form an eye-movement contingent display change study. Memory and Cognition, 32, 523-532.
24. Inhoff, A.W., Eiter, B.M., and Radach, R. (2005). The time course of linguistic information extraction from consecutive words during eye fixations in reading. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 31, 979-995.
25. Inhoff, A.W., Radach, R., and Eiter, B.M. (2006). Temporal overlap in the linguistic processing of successive words in reading: Reply to Pollatsek, Reichle, and Rayner (2006). Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 32, 1490-1495.
26. Jacobs, A.M. and Grainger, J. (1994). Models of visual word recognition-Sampling the state of the art. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 20, 1311-1334.
27. Jarvella, R. and Meijers, G. (1983). Recognizing morphemes in spoken words: Some evidence for a stem-organized mental lexicon. In G.B. Flores d'Arcaos and R. Jarvella (eds.) The process of language understanding (pp. 81-112). New York, NY: Wiley.
28. Jolicoeur, P., Ullman, S., and Mackay, M.F. (1983). Curve tracing: A possible basic operation in the perception of spatial relations. Memory and Cognition, 14, 129-140.
29. Just, M.A. and Carpenter, P.A. (1980). A theory of reading: om eye fixations to comprehension. Psychological Review, 87, 329-354.
30. Just, M.A. and Carpenter, P.A. (1987). The psychology of reading and language comprehension. Newton, MA: Allyn and Bacon.
31. Just, M.A. and Varma, S. (2002). A hybrid architecture for working memory: Reply to MacDonald and Christiansen (2002). Psychological Review, 109, 55-65.
32. Kennison, S.M. and Clifton, C. (1995). Determinants of parafoveal preview benefit in high and low working memory capacity readers: Implications for eye movement control. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 21, 68-81.
33. Lee, H.-W., Legge, G.E., and Ortiz, A. (2003). Is word recognition different in central and peripheral vision? Vision Research, 43, 2837-2846.
34. Leff, A.P., Scott, S.K., Rothwell, J.C., and Wise, R.J.S. (2001). The planning and guiding of reading saccades: A repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation study. Cerebral Cortex, 11, 918-923.
35. MacKay, D.G. (1978). Derivational rules and the internal lexicon. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 17, 61-71.
36. McConkie, G.W., Kerr, P.W., Reddix, M.D., and Zola, D. (1988). Eye movement control during reading: I. The location of initial eye fixations in words. Vision Research, 28, 1107-1118.
37. McConkie, G.W., Zola, D., Grimes, J., Kerr, P.W., Bryant, N.R., and Wolff, P.M. (1991). Children's eye movements during reading. In J.F. Stein (ed.), Vision and visual dyslexia 13. London: MacMillan.
38. McDonald, S.A., Carpenter, R.H.S., and Shillcock, R.C. (2005). An anatomically constrained, stochastic model of eye movement control in reading. Psychological Review, 112, 814-840.
39. McPeek, R.M., Skavenski, A.A., and Nakayama, K. (2000). Concurrent processing of saccades in visual search. Vision Research, 40, 2499-2516.
40. Miellet, S., Sparrow, L., and Sereno, S.C. (2007). Word frequency and predictability effects in reading French: An evaluation of the E-Z Reader model. Psychonomic Bulletin and Review, 14, 762-769.
41. Molker, A. and Fischer, B. (1999). The recognition and correction of involuntary prosaccades in an antisaccade task. Experimental Brain Research, 125, 511-516.
42. Morrison, R.E. (1984). Manipulation of stimulus onset delay in reading: Evidence for parallel programming of saccades. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 10, 667-682.
43. Mouchetant-Rostaing, Y., Giard, M.-H., Bentin, S., Aguera, P.-E., and Pernier, J. (2000). Neurophysiological correlates of face gender processing in humans. European Journal of Neuroscience, 12, 303-310.
44. Newell, A. (1973). You can't play 20 questions with nature and win. In W.G. Chase (ed.), Visual information processing (pp. 283-308). New York: Academic Press.
45. Newell, A. (1990). Unified theories of cognition. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
46. Newell, A. and Simon, H.A. (1972). Human problem solving. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
47. O'Regan, J.K. (1981). The 'convenient viewing location' hypothesis. In D.F. Fisher, R.A. Monty, and J.W. Senders (eds.) Eye movements: Cognition and visual perception (pp. 289-298). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
48. O'Regan, J.K. and Lévy-Schoen, A. (1987). Eye-movement strategy and tactics in word recognition and reading. In M. Coltheart (ed.), Attention and performance, XII (pp. 363-384). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
49. Pacht, J.M. and Rayner, K. (1993). The processing of homophonic homographs during reading: Evidence from eye movement studies. Journal of Psycholinguistic Research, 22, 251-271.
50. Pollatsek, A., Hyönä, J., and Bertram, R. (2000). The role of morphological constituents in reading Finnish compound words. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 26, 820-833.
51. Pollatsek, A., Reichle, E.D., and Rayner, K. (2003). Modeling eye movements in reading: Extensions of the E-Z Reader model. In J. Hyönä, R. Radach and H. Deubel (eds.) The mind's eyes: Cognitive and applied aspects of oculomotor research (pp. 361-390). Oxford: Elsevier.
52. Pollatsek, A., Reichle, E.D., and Rayner, K. (2006a). Tests of the E-Z Reader model: Exploring the interface between cognition and eye-movement control. Cognitive Psychology, 52, 1-56.
53. Pollatsek, A., Reichle, E.D., and Rayner, K. (2006b). Attention to one word at a time is still a viable hypothesis: Rejoinder to Inhoff, Eiter, and Radach. Journal of Experiment Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 32, 1496-1500.
54. Pollatsek, A., Reichle, E.D., and Rayner, K. (2006c). Serial processing is consistent with the time course of linguistic information extraction from consecutive words during eye fixations in reading: A response to Inhoff, Eiter, and Radach (2005). Journal of Experiment Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 32, 1485-1489.
55. Pollatsek, A., Lesch, M., Morris, R.K., and Rayner, K. (1992). Phonological codes are used in integrating information across saccades in word identification and reading. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 18, 148-162.
56. Pollatsek, A., Juhasz, B.J., Reichle, E.D., Machacek, D., and Rayner, K. (2008). Immediate and delayed effects of word frequency and word length on eye movements in reading: A delayed effect of word length. Journal of Experiment Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 34, 726-750.
57. Posner, M.I. (1978). Chronometric explorations of mind. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
58. Rayner, K. (1975). The perceptual span and peripheral cues in reading. Cognitive Psychology, 7, 65-81.
59. Rayner, K. (1979). Eye guidance in reading: Fixation locations with words. Perception, 8, 21-30.
60. Rayner, K. (1998). Eye movements in reading and information processing: 20 years of research. Psychological Bulletin, 124, 372-422.
61. Rayner, K. and Bertera, J.J. (1979). Reading without a fovea. Science, 206, 468-469.
62. Rayner, K. and Duffy, S.M. (1986). Lexical complexity and fixation times in reading: Effects of word frequency, verb complexity, and lexical ambiguity. Memory and Cognition, 14, 191-201.
63. Rayner, K. and Juhasz, B. (2004). Eye movements in reading: Old questions and new directions. European Journal of Cognitive Psychology, 16, 340-352.
64. Rayner, K. and Morrison, R.E. (1981). Eye movements and identifying words in parafoveal vision. Bulletin of the Psychonomic Society, 17, 135-138.
65. Rayner, K., Sereno, S.C., and Raney, G.E. (1996). Eye movement control in reading: A comparison of two types of models. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 22, 1188-1200.
66. Rayner, K., Pollatsek, A., and Reichle, E.D. (2003a). Eye movements in reading: Models and data. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 26, 507-518.
67. Rayner, K., Liversedge, S.P., and White, S.J. (2005). Eye movements when reading disappearing text: The importance of the word to the right of fixation. Vision Research, 46, 310-323.
68. Rayner, K., Li, X., and Pollatsek, A. (2007). Extending the E-Z Reader model of eye movement control to Chinese readers. Cognitive Science, 31, 1021-1033.
69. Rayner, K., Slowiaczek, M.L., Clifton, C., and Bertera, J.H. (1983). Latency of sequential eye movements: Implications for reading. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 9, 912-922.
70. Rayner, K., Juhasz, B., Ashby, J., and Clifton, C. (2003b). Inhibition of saccade return in reading. Vision Research, 43, 1027-1034.
71. Rayner, K., Ashby, J., Pollatsek, A., and Reichle, E.D. (2004a). The effects of frequency and predictability on eye fixations in reading: Implications for the E-Z Reader model. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 30, 720-732.
72. Rayner, K., Warren, T., Juhasz, B.J., and Liversedge, S.P. (2004b). The effect of plausibility on eye movements in reading. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 30, 1290-1301.
73. Rayner, K., Pollatsek, A., Liversedge, S.P., and Reichle, E.D. (2009). Eye movements and non-canonical reading: Comments on Kennedy and Pynte (2008). Vision Research, 49, 2232-2236.
74. Rayner, K., Sereno, S.C., Morris, R.K., Schmauder, A.R., and Clifton, C. (1989). Eye movements and on-line language comprehension processes. Language and Cognitive Processes, 4, 21-49.
75. Rayner, K., Reichle, E.D., Stroud, M.J., Williams, C.C., and Pollatsek, A. (2006). The effects of word frequency, word predictability, and font difficulty on the eye movements of young and elderly readers. Psychology and Aging, 21, 448-465.
76. Reichle, E.D. and Laurent, P.A. (2006). Using reinforcement learning to understand the emergence of 'intelligent' eye-movement behavior during reading. Psychological Review, 113, 390-408.
77. Reichle, E.D. and Nelson, J.R. (2003). Local vs. global attention: Are two states necessary? Comment on Liechty et al., 2003. Psychometrika, 68, 543-549.
78. Reichle, E.D. and Perfetti, C.A. (2003). Morphology in word identification: A word experience model that accounts for morpheme frequency effects. Scientific Studies of Reading, 7, 219-237.
79. Reichle, E.D., Rayner, K., and Pollatsek, A. (1999). Eye movement control in reading: Accounting for initial fixation locations and refixations within the E-Z Reader model. Vision Research, 39, 4403-4411.
80. Reichle, E.D., Rayner, K., and Pollatsek, A. (2003). The E-Z Reader model of eye movement control in reading: Comparisons to other models. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 26, 445-476.
81. Reichle, E.D., Pollatsek, A., and Rayner, K. (2006). E-Z Reader: A cognitive-control, serial-attention model of eye-movement control during reading. Cognitive Systems Research, 7, 4-22.
82. Reichle, E.D., Pollatsek, A., and Rayner, K. (2007). Modeling the effects of lexical ambiguity on eye movements during reading. In R.P.G. Van Gompel, M.F. Fischer, W.S. Murray, and R.L. Hill (eds.) Eye movements: A window on mind and brain (pp. 271-292). Oxford: Elsevier.
83. Reichle, E.D., Warren, T., and McConnell, K. (2009b). Using E-Z Reader to model the effects of higher-level language processing on eye movements during reading. Psychonomic Bulletin and Review, 16, 1-21.
84. Reichle, E.D., Pollatsek, A., Fisher, D.L., and Rayner, K. (1998). Toward a model of eye movement control in reading. Psychological Review, 105, 125-157.
85. Reichle, E.D., Vanyukov, P.M., Laurent, P.A., and Warren, T. (2008). Serial or parallel? Using depth-of-processing to examine attention allocation during reading. Vision Research, 48, 1831-1836.
86. Reichle, E.D., Liversedge, S.P., Pollatsek, A., and Rayner, K. (2009a). Encoding multiple words simultaneously in reading is implausible. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 13, 115-119.
87. Reingold, E.M. and Rayner, K. (2006). Examining the word identification stages hypothesized by the E-Z Reader model. Psychological Science, 17, 742-746.
88. Reilly, R. and Radach, R. (2006). Some empirical tests of an interactive activation model of eye movement control in reading. Cognitive Systems Research, 7, 34-55.
89. Rumelhart, D.E. (1989). The architecture of mind: A connectionist approach. In M.I. Posner (ed.), Foundations of cognitive science (pp. 133-159). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
90. Salvucci, D.D. (2001). An integrated model of eye movements and visual encoding. Cognitive Systems Research, 1, 201-220.
91. Schilling, H.E.H., Rayner, K., and Chumbley, J.I. (1998). Comparing naming, lexical decision, and eye fixation times: Word frequency effects and individual differences. Memory and Cognition, 26, 1270-1281.
92. Shulman, G.L., Remington, R.W., and McLean, J.P. (1979). Moving attention through visual space. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 15, 522-526.
93. Starr, M.S. and Rayner, K. (2001). Eye movements during reading: Some current controversies. Trends in Cognitive Science, 5, 156-163.
94. Sutton, R.S. and Barto, A.G. (1998). Reinforcement learning: An introduction. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
95. Swets, B., Desmet, T., Clifton, C., and Ferreira, F. (2008). Underspecification of syntactic ambiguities: Evidence from self-paced reading. Memory and Cognition, 36, 201-216.
96. Thibadeau, R., Just, M.A., and Carpenter, P.A. (1982). A model of the time course and content of reading. Cognitive Science, 6, 157-203.
97. Treisman, A. and Gelade, G. (1980). A feature integration theory of attention. Cognitive Psychology, 12, 97-136.
98. Treisman, A. and Schmidt, H. (1982). Illusory conjuctions in the perception of objects. Cognitive Psychology, 14, 107-141.
99. Tsal, Y. (1983). Movements of attention across the visual field. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 9, 523-530.
100. Van Rullen, R. and Thorpe, S. (2001). The time course of visual processing: From early perception to decision-making. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 13, 454-461.
101. Vergilino, D. and Beauvillain, C. (2000). The planning of refixation saccades in reading. Vision Research, 40, 3527-3538.
102. Vitu, F., McConkie, G.W., Kerr, P., and O'Regan, J.K. (2001). Fixation location effects on fixation durations during reading: an inverted optimal viewing position effect. Vision Research, 41, 3513-3533.
103. Warren, T. and McConnell, K. (2007). Disentangling the effects of selectional restriction violations and plausibility violation severity on eye-movements in reading. Psychonomic Bulletin and Review, 14, 770-775.
104. Yang, S.-N. (2006). A oculomotor-based model of eye movements in reading: The competition/activation model. Cognitive Systems Research, 7, 56-69.
105. Yonelinas, A.P. (2002). The nature of recollection and familiarity: A review of 30 years of research. Journal of Memory and Language, 46, 441-517.