Attention to one word at a time in reading is still a viable hypothesis: Rejoinder to Inhoff, Radach, and Eiter (2006)

Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance

Volumn 32, Issue 6, 2006, Pages 1496-1500

  Pollatsek, Alexander ^a   Reichle, Erik D ^b   Rayner, Keith ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF MASSACHUSETTS   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH   (United States)

Author keywords

Alternating case; Attention; Eye fixation; Eye movements; Linguistic information; Parafoveal preview; Parallel processing; Reading; Saccade; Time course; Visibility; Word recognition; Words

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; ATTENTION; EYE FIXATION; HUMAN; LINGUISTICS; MENTAL FUNCTION; PSYCHOLOGICAL MODEL; READING; SACCADIC EYE MOVEMENT;

ATTENTION; FIXATION, OCULAR; HUMANS; MENTAL PROCESSES; MODELS, PSYCHOLOGICAL; PSYCHOLINGUISTICS; READING; SACCADES;

EID: 33845637737     PISSN: 00961523     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1037/0096-1523.32.6.1496     Document Type: Article

References (13)

1. Engbert, R., Longtin, A., & Kliegl, R. (2002). A dynamical model of saccade generation in reading based on spatially distributed lexical processing. Vision Research, 42, 621-636.
2. Engbert, R., Nuthmann, A., Richter, E., & Kliegl, R. (2005). SWIFT: A dynamical model of saccade generation during reading. Psychological Review, 112, 777-813.
3. Inhoff, A. W., Eiter, B. M., & Radach, R. (2005). Time course of linguistic information extraction from consecutive words during eye fixations in reading. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 31, 979-995.
4. Inhoff, A. W., Radach, R., & Eiter, B. (2006). Temporal overlap in the linguistic processing of successive words in reading: Reply to Pollatsek, Reichle, and Rayner (2006a). Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 32, 1490-1495.
5. Pollatsek, A., & Rayner, K. (1999). Is covert attention really unnecessary? Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 22, 695-696.
6. Pollatsek, A., Reichle, E. D., & Rayner, K. (2006a). Serial processing is consistent with the time course of linguistic information extraction from consecutive words during eye fixations in reading: A response to Inhoff, Eiter, and Radach (2005). Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 32, 1485-1489.
7. Pollatsek, A., Reichle, E. D., & Rayner, K. (2006b). Tests of the E-Z Reader model: Exploring the interface between cognition and eyemovement control. Cognitive Psychology, 52, 1-56.
8. Rayner, K., & Juhasz, B. J. (2004). Eye movements in reading: Old questions and new directions. European Journal of Cognitive Psychology, 16, 340-352.
9. Rayner, K., Pollatsek, A., & Reichle, E. D. (2003). Eye movements in reading: Models and data. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 26, 507-518.
10. Rayner, K., White, S. J., Kambe, G., Miller, B., & Liversedge, S. P. (2003). On the processing of meaning from parafoveal vision during eye fixations in reading. In J. Hyona, R. Radach, & H. Deubel (Eds.), The mind's eye: Cognitive and applied aspects of eye movement research (pp. 213-234). Oxford, England: Elsevier.
11. Reichle, E. D., Rayner, K., & Pollatsek, A. (2003). The E-Z Reader model of eye movement control in reading: Comparisons to other models. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 26, 445-476.
12. Reilly, R., & Radach, R. (2003). Foundations of an interactive activation model of eye movement control in reading. In J. Hyona, R. Radach, & H. Deubel (Eds.), The mind's eye: Cognitive and applied aspects of eye movement research (pp 429-455). Oxford, England: Elsevier.
13. Reilly, R., & Radach, R. (2006). Some empirical tests of an interactive activation model of eye movement control in reading. Cognitive Systems Research, 7, 34-55.