The Lateralized Readiness Potential

The Oxford Handbook of Event-Related Potential Components

Volumn , Issue , 2012, Pages

  Smulders, Fren T Y ^a   Miller, Jeff O ^b  

^a MAASTRICHT UNIVERSITY   (Netherlands)

^b UNIVERSITY OF OTAGO   (New Zealand)

Author keywords

Central response activation; Lateralized readiness potential; Reaction time

Indexed keywords

EID: 84923448161     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book    
DOI: 10.1093/oxfordhb/9780195374148.013.0115     Document Type: Chapter

References (100)

1. Band, G. P. H., & Miller, J. (1997). Mental rotation interferes with response preparation. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 23, 319-338.
2. Band, G. P. H., & Kok, A. (2000). Age effects on response monitoring in a mental-rotation task. Biological Psychology, 51(2-3), 201-221.
3. Brunia, C. H. M., & Vingerhoets, A. (1980). Cnv and Emg preceding a plantar flexion of the foot. Biological Psychology, 11, 181-191.
4. Coles, M. G. (1989). Modern mind-brain reading: Psychophysiology, physiology, and cognition. Psychophysiology, 26, 251-269.
5. Coles, M. G. H., Gratton, G., & Donchin, E. (1988). Detecting early communication: Using measures of movementrelated potentials to illuminate human information processing. Biological Psychology, 26, 69-89.
6. De Jong, R., Coles, M. G. H., Logan, G. G., & Gratton, G. (1990). In search of the point of no return: The control of response processes. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 16, 164-182.
7. De Jong, R., Liang, C.-C., & Lauber, E. (1994). Conditional and unconditional automaticity: A dual-process model of effects of spatial stimulus-response correspondence. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 20, 731-750.
8. De Jong, R., Wierda, M., Mulder, G., & Mulder, L. J. M. (1988). Use of partial stimulus information in response processing. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 14, 682-692.
9. Deecke, L., Grozinger, B., & Kornhuber, H. H. (1976). Voluntary finger movement in man: Cerebral potentials and theory. Biological Cybernetics, 23, 99-119.
10. Donders, F. C. (1868/1969). Over de snelheid van psychische processen [On the speed of mental processes] (W. Koster, Trans.). In W. G. Koster (Ed.), Attention and performance II (pp. 412-431). Amsterdam: North Holland.
11. Eimer, M. (1995). Stimulus-response compatibility and automatic response activation: Evidence from psychophysiological studies. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 21, 837-854.
12. Eimer, M. (1998). The lateralized readiness potential as an on-line measure of central response activation processes. Behavior Research Methods, Instruments and Computers, 30, 146-156.
13. Eimer, M., & Schlaghecken, F. (1998). Effects of masked stimuli on motor activation: Behavioral and electrophysiological evidence. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 24, 1737-1747.
14. Elbert, T., Lutzenberger, W., Rockstroh, B., & Birbaumer, N. (1985). Removal of ocular artifacts from the EEG-A biophysical approach to the EOG. Electroencephalography and Clinical Neurophysiology, 60, 455-463.
15. Eriksen, B. A., & Eriksen, C. W. (1974). Effects of noise letters upon identification of a target letter in a nonsearch task. Perception and Psychophysics, 16, 143-149.
16. Gratton, G., Coles, M. G. H., Sirevaag, E., Eriksen, C. W., & Donchin, E. (1988). Pre-and post-stimulus activation of response channels: A psychophysiological analysis. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 14, 331-344.
17. Hackley, S. A., & Miller, J. (1995). Response complexity and precue interval effects on the lateralized readiness potential. Psychophysiology, 32, 230-241.
18. Hackley, S. A., Schankin, A., Wohlschlaeger, A., & Wascher, E. (2007). Localization of temporal preparation effects via trisected reaction time. Psychophysiology, 44, 334-338.
19. Hackley, S. A., & Valle-Inclán, F. (1998). Automatic alerting does not speed late motoric processes in a reactiontime task. Nature, 391, 786-788.
20. Hackley, S. A., & Valle-Inclán, F. (1999). Accessory stimulus effects on response selection: Does arousal speed decision making? Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 11, 321-329.
21. Heil, M., Rauch, M., & Henninghausen, E. (1998). Response preparation begins before mental rotation is finished:Evidence from event-related brain potentials. Acta Psychologica, 99, 217-232.
22. Ilan, A. B., & Miller, J. (1998). On the temporal relations between memory scanning and response preparation. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 24, 1501-1520.
23. Jasper, H. H. (1958). The ten twenty electrode system of the international federation. Electroencephalography and Clinical Neurophysiology, 10, 371-375.
24. Jentzsch, I., Leuthold, H., & Ulrich, R. (2007). Decomposing sources of response slowing in the PRP paradigm. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 33, 610-626.
25. Keus, I. M., Jenks, K. M., & Schwarz, W. (2005). Psychophysiological evidence that the SNARC effect has its functional locus in a response selection stage. Cognitive Brain Research, 24, 48-56.
26. Kiesel, A., Miller, J., Jolicaeur, P., & Brisson, B. (2008). Measurement of ERP latency differences: A comparison of single-participant and jackknife-based scoring methods. Psychophysiology, 45, 250-274.
27. Klemmer, E. T. (1956). Time uncertainty in simple reaction-time. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 51, 179-184.
28. Kutas, M., & Donchin, E. (1980). Preparation to respond as manifested by movement-related brain potentials. Brain Research, 202, 95-115.
29. Leuthold, H. (2003). Programming of expected and unexpected movements: Effects on the onset of the lateralized readiness potential. Acta Psychologica, 114, 83-100.
30. Leuthold, H., & Jentzsch, I. (2001). Neural correlates of advance movement preparation: A dipole source analysis approach. Cognitive Brain Research, 12(2), 207-224.
31. Leuthold, H., & Jentzsch, I. (2002). Distinguishing neural sources of movement preparation and execution-An electrophysiological analysis. Biological Psychology, 60, 173-198.
32. Leuthold, H., Sommer, W., & Ulrich, R. (1996). Partial advance information and response preparation: Inferences from the lateralized readiness potential. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 125, 307-323.
33. Logan, G. D. (1994). On the ability to inhibit thought and action: A users' guide to the stop signal paradigm. In D. Dagenbach & T. H. Carr (Eds.), Inhibitory processes in attention, memory, and language (pp. 189-239). New York: Academic Press.
34. Low, K. A., & Miller, J. (1999). The usefulness of partial information: Effects of go probability in the choice/Nogo task. Psychophysiology, 36, 288-297.
35. Low, K. A., Miller, J., & Vierck, E. (2002). Response slowing in Parkinson's disease: A psychophysiological analysis of premotor and motor processes. Brain, 125, 1980-1994.
36. Luce, R. D. (1986). Response times: Their role in inferring elementary mental organization. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
37. Luck, S. J. (2005). An introduction to the event-related potential technique. Cambridge: MIT.
38. Masaki, H., Wild-Wall, N., Sangals, J., & Sommer, W. (2004). The functional locus of the lateralized readiness potential. Psychophysiology, 41, 220-230.
39. Meyer, D. E., Osman, A. M., Irwin, D. E., & Yantis, S. (1988). Modern mental chronometry. Biological Psychology, 26, 3-67.
40. Miller, J. O. (1982). Discrete versus continuous stage models of human information processing: In search of partial output. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 8, 273-296.
41. Miller, J. (1998). Effects of stimulus-response probability on choice reaction time: Evidence from the lateralized readiness potential. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 24, 1521-1534.
42. Miller, J. (2007). Contralateral and ipsilateral motor activation in visual simple reaction time: A test of the hemispheric coactivation model. Experimental Brain Research, 176, 539-558.
43. Miller, J., & Hackley, S. A. (1992). Electrophysiological evidence for temporal overlap among contingent mental processes. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 121, 195-209.
44. Miller, J. O., & Low, K. (2001). Motor processes in simple, go/no-go, and choice reaction time tasks: A psychophysiological analysis. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 27, 266-289.
45. Miller, J., Patterson, T., & Ulrich, R. (1998). Jackknife-based method for measuring LRP onset latency differences. Psychophysiology, 35, 99-115.
46. Miller, J., & Ulrich, R. (1998). Locus of the effect of the number of alternative responses: Evidence from the lateralized readiness potential. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 24, 1215-1231.
47. Miller, J., Ulrich, R., & Rinkenauer, G. (1999). Effects of stimulus intensity on the lateralized readiness potential. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 25, 1454-1471.
48. Mordkoff, J. T., Aderhold, L., Chen, P., Sullivan, B., Von der Heide, R., & Halterman, R. (2007). Response-locked LRPs from the complication procedure: Evidence against pure insertion. Presented at the 48th annual meeting of the Psychonomic Society, November 15-18, Long Beach, CA.
49. Mordkoff, J. T., & Gianaros, P. J. (2000). Detecting the onset of the lateralized readiness potential: A comparison of available methods and procedures. Psychophysiology, 37, 347-360.
50. Mordkoff, J. T., Miller, J., & Roch, A.C. (1996). Absence of coactivation in the motor component: Evidence from psychophysiological measures of target detection. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 22, 25-41.
51. Müller-Gethmann, H., Rinkenauer, G., Stahl, J., & Ulrich, R. (2000). Preparation of response force and movement direction: Onset effects on the lateralized readiness potential. Psychophysiology, 37, 507-514.
52. Müller-Gethmann, H., Ulrich, R., & Rinkenauer, G. (2003). Locus of the effect of temporal preparation: evidence from the lateralized readiness potential. Psychophysiology, 40(4), 597-611.
53. Oostenveld, R., Praamstra, P., Stegeman, D. F., & van Oosterom, A. (2001). Overlap of attention and movementrelated activity in lateralized event-related brain potentials. Clinical Neurophysiology, 112, 477-484.
54. Oostenveld, R., Stegeman, D. F., Praamstra, P., & van Oosterom, A. (2003). Brain symmetry and topographic analysis of lateralized event-related potentials. Clinical Neurophysiology, 114, 1194-1202.
55. Osman, A., Bashore, T. R., Coles, M. G., Donchin, E., & Meyer, D. E. (1992). On the transmission of partial information: Inferences from movement-related brain potentials. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 18, 217-232.
56. Osman, A., Lou, L., Müller-Gethmann, H., Rinkenauer, G., Mattes, S., & Ulrich, R. (2000). Mechanisms of speed-accuracy tradeoff: Evidence from covert motor processes. Biological Psychology, 51, 173-199.
57. Osman, A., & Moore, C. M. (1993). The locus of dual-task interference: Psychological refractory effects on movement-related brain potentials. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 19, 1292-1312.
58. Osman, A., Moore, C. M., & Ulrich, R. (1995). Bisecting RT with lateralized readiness potentials: Precue effects after LRP onset. Acta Psychologica, 90, 111-127.
59. Pope, P. A., Holton, A., Hassan, S., Kourtis, D., & Praamstra, P. (2007). Cortical control of muscle relaxation: A lateralized readiness potential (LRP) investigation. Clinical Neurophysiology, 118, 1044-1052.
60. Posner, M. I. (1978). Chronometric explorations of mind. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
61. Praamstra, P. (2006). Prior information of stimulus location: Effects on ERP measures of visual selection and response selection. Brain Research, 1072, 153-160.
62. Praamstra, P. (2007). Do's and don'ts with lateralized event-related brain potentials. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 33, 497-502.
63. Praamstra, P., Stegeman, D. F., Horstink, M. W. I. M., & Cools, A. R. (1996). Dipole source analysis suggests selective modulation of the supplementary motor area contribution to the readiness potential. Electroencephalography and Clinical Neurophysiology, 98, 468-477.
64. Rammsayer, T., & Stahl, J. (2004). Extraversion-related differences in response organization: Evidence from lateralized readiness potentials. Biological Psychology, 66, 35-49.
65. Rammsayer, T., & Stahl, J. (2006). Sensorimotor effects of pergolide, a dopamine agonist, in healthy subjects: A lateralized readiness potential study. Psychopharmacology, 187, 36-46.
66. Rammsayer, T. H., & Stahl, J. (2007). Identification of sensorimotor components accounting for individual variability in Zahlen-Verbindungs-Test (ZVT) performance. Intelligence, 35, 623-630.
67. Rinkenauer, G., Osman, A., Ulrich, R., Müller-Gethmann, H., & Mattes, S. (2004). On the locus of speed-accuracy trade-off in reaction time: Inferences from the lateralized readiness potential. Journal of Experimental Psychology:General, 133, 261-282.
68. Rolke, B., & Hofmann, P. (2007). Temporal uncertainty degrades perceptual processing. Psychonomic Bulletin and Review, 14, 522-526.
69. Rosenbaum, D. A. (1980). Human movement initiation-specification of arm, direction, and extent. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 109, 444-474.
70. Rugg, M. D., Lines, C. R., & Milner, A. D. (1984). Visual evoked potentials to lateralized visual stimuli and the measurement of interhemispheric transmission time. Neuropsychologia, 22, 215-225.
71. Sanders, A. F. (1980). Stage analysis of reaction processes. In G. E. Stelmach & J. Requin (Eds.), Tutorials in motor behavior (pp. 331-354). Amsterdam: North Holland.
72. Sanders, A. F. (1983). Towards a model of stress and human performance. Acta Psychologica, 53, 61-97.
73. Sanders, A. F. (1998). Elements of human performance: Reaction processes and attention in human skill. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
74. Schwarzenau, P., Falkenstein, M., Hoormann, J., & Hohnsbein, J. (1998). A new method for the estimation of the onset of the lateralized readiness potential (LRP). Behavior Research Methods Instruments and Computers, 30, 110-117.
75. Simon, J. R., & Rudell, A. P. (1967). Auditory S-R compatibility-Effect of an irrelevant cue on information processing. Journal of Applied Psychology, 51, 300-304.
76. Smid, H. G., Böcker, K. B., van Touw, D. A., Mulder, G., & Brunia, C. H. (1996). A psychophysiological investigation of the selection and the use of partial stimulus information in response choice. Journal of Experimental Psychology:Human Perception and Performance, 22, 3-24.
77. Smid, H. G., Fiedler, R., & Heinze, H. J. (2000). An electrophysiological study of the insertion of overt response choice. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 26, 1053-1071.
78. Smid, H. G. O. M., & Heinze, H. J. (1997). An electrophysiological study of the selection of the color and shape of alphanumeric characters in response choice. Biological Psychology, 44, 161-185.
79. Smid, H. G. O. M., Lamain, W., Hogeboom, M. M., Mulder, G., & Mulder, L. J. M. (1991). Psychophysiological evidence for continuous information transmission between visual search and response processes. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 17, 696-714.
80. Smid, H. G. O. M., Mulder, G., & Mulder, L. J. M. (1987). The continuous flow model revisited: Perceptual and central motor aspects. In J. J. R., Parasuraman & J. W. Rohrbaugh (Eds.), Current trends in event-related potential research EEG supplement 40; (pp. 270-278), Amsterdam, Elsevier.
81. Smid, H. G., Mulder, G., Mulder, L. J., & Brands, G. J. (1992). A psychophysiological study of the use of partial information in stimulus-response translation. Journal of Experimental Psychology Human Perception and Performance, 18(4), 1101-1119.
82. Smid, H., Trumper, B. G., Pottag, G., Wagner, K., Lobmann, R., Scheich, H., et al. (1997). Differentiation of hypoglycaemia induced cognitive impairments-An electrophysiological approach. Brain, 120, 1041-1056.
83. Smulders, F. T. Y., Kenemans, J. L., & Kok, A. (1996). Effects of task variables on measures of the mean onset latency of LRP depend on the scoring method. Psychophysiology, 33, 194-205.
84. Smulders, F. T. Y., Kok, A., Kenemans, J. L., & Bashore, T. R. (1995). The temporal selectivity of additive factor effects on the reaction process revealed in ERP component latencies. Acta Psychologica, 90, 97-109.
85. Smulders, F. T. Y., & Meijer, E. H. (2008). Extraversion and performance: A cognitive-energetical approach. Personality and Individual Differences, 44, 475-486.
86. Sommer, W., Leuthold, H., & Schubert, T. (2001). Multiple bottlenecks in information processing? An electrophysiological examination. Psychonomic Bulletin and Review, 8, 81-88.
87. Sommer, W., Leuthold, H., & Ulrich, R. (1994). The lateralized readiness potential preceding brief isometric force pulses of different peak force and rate of force production. Psychophysiology, 31, 503-512.
88. Stahl, J., & Gibbons, H. (2004). The application of jackknife-based onset detection of lateralized readiness potential in correlative approaches. Psychophysiology, 41, 845-860.
89. Sternberg, S. (1969). The discovery of processing stages: Extensions of Donders' method. Acta Psychologica, 30, 276-315.
90. Sternberg, S. (2001). Separate modifiability, mental modules, and the use of pure and composite measures to reveal them. Acta Psychologica, 106, 147-246.
91. Stürmer, B., Leuthold, H., Soetens, E., Schroeter, H., & Sommer, W. (2002). Control over location-based response activation in the Simon task: Behavioral and electrophysiological evidence. Journal of Experimental Psychology:Human Perception and Performance, 28, 1345-1363.
92. Tandonnet, C., Burle, B., Vidal, F., & Hasbroucq, T. (2003). The influence of time preparation on motor processes assessed by surface Laplacian estimation. Clinical Neurophysiology, 114, 2376-2384.
93. Ulrich, R., & Miller, J. (2001). Using the jackknife-based scoring method for measuring LRP onset effects in factorial designs. Psychophysiology, 38, 816-827.
94. Valle-Inclán, F. (1996). The locus of interference in the Simon effect: An ERP study. Biological Psychology, 43, 147-162.
95. Vallesi, A., Mapelli, D., Schiff, S., Amodio, P., & Umilta, C. (2005). Horizontal and vertical Simon effect: Different underlying mechanisms? Cognition, 96, B33-B43.
96. Van der Lubbe, R. H. J., Jaskowśki, P., Wauschkuhn, B., & Verleger, R. (2001). Influence of time pressure in a simple response task, a choice-by-location task, and the Simon task. Journal of Psychophysiology, 15, 241-255.
97. Wagenmakers, E. J., & Brown, S. (2007). On the linear relation between the mean and the standard deviation of a response time distribution. Psychological Review, 114, 830-841.
98. Wascher, E., & Wauschkuhn, B. (1996). The interaction of stimulus-and response-related processes measured by event-related lateralizations of the EEG. Electroencephalography and Clinical Neurophysiology, 99, 149-162.
99. Wiegand, K., & Wascher, E. (2005). Dynamic aspects of stimulus-response correspondence: Evidence for two mechanisms involved in the Simon effect. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 31, 453-464.
100. Wild-Wall, N., Sangals, J., Sommer, W., & Leuthold, H. (2003). Are fingers special? Evidence about movement preparation from event-related brain potentials. Psychophysiology, 40, 7-16.