On the Temporal Relations between Memory Scanning and Response Preparation

Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance

Volumn 24, Issue 5, 1998, Pages 1501-1520

  Ilan, Aaron B ^a,c   Miller, Jeff ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF OTAGO   (New Zealand)

^c SAM Technology Inc   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ANALYSIS OF VARIANCE; ARTICLE; ASSOCIATION; COLOR VISION; CONFIDENCE INTERVAL; ELECTROMYOGRAPHY; EVOKED RESPONSE; FEMALE; FOREARM; HUMAN; MALE; MEMORY; MOTOR CORTEX; PATTERN RECOGNITION; PERCEPTIVE DISCRIMINATION; PHYSIOLOGY; PSYCHOLOGICAL MODEL; PSYCHOMOTOR PERFORMANCE; REACTION TIME; SKELETAL MUSCLE; TIME;

ADULT; ANALYSIS OF VARIANCE; COLOR PERCEPTION; CONFIDENCE INTERVALS; CUES; DISCRIMINATION (PSYCHOLOGY); ELECTROMYOGRAPHY; EVOKED POTENTIALS; FEMALE; FOREARM; HUMANS; MALE; MEMORY; MODELS, PSYCHOLOGICAL; MOTOR CORTEX; MUSCLE, SKELETAL; PATTERN RECOGNITION, VISUAL; PSYCHOMOTOR PERFORMANCE; REACTION TIME; TIME FACTORS;

EID: 0032175265     PISSN: 00961523     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1037/0096-1523.24.5.1501     Document Type: Article

References (62)

1. Arezzo, J., & Vaughan, H. G., Jr. (1975). Cortical potentials associated with voluntary movements in monkey. Brain Research, 88, 99-104.
2. Atkinson, R. C., Hermann, D. J., & Wescourt, K. T. (1974). Search processes in recognition memory. In R. L. Solso (Ed.), Theories in cognitive psychology: The Loyola Symposium (pp. 101-146). Potomac, MD: Erlbaum.
3. Band, G. P. H., & Miller, J. (1997). Mental rotation interferes with response preparation. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 23, 319-338.
4. Brunia, C. H. M., & Vingerhoets, A. J. J. M. (1980). CNV and EMG preceding a plantar flexion of the foot. Biological Psychology, 11, 181-191.
5. Burrows, D., & Okada, R. (1973). Parallel scanning of semantic and formal information. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 97, 254-257.
6. Callaway, E., Halliday, R., Naylor, H., & Thouvenin, D. (1984). The latency of the average is not the average of the latencies. Psychophysiology, 21, 571.
7. Carrier, M., & Pashler, H. (1995). Attentional limits in memory retrieval. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition, 21, 1339-1348.
8. Cavanagh, J. P. (1972). Relation between the immediate memory span and the memory search rate. Psychological Review, 79, 525-530.
9. Checkosky, S. F. (1971). Speeded classification of multidimensional stimuli. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 87, 383-388.
10. Coles, M. G. H. (1989). Modem mind-brain reading: Psychophysiology, physiology, and cognition. Psychophysiology, 26, 251-269.
11. Coles, M. G. H., Gratton, G., & Donchin, E. (1988). Detecting early communication: Using measures of movement-related potentials to illuminate human information processing. Biological Psychology, 26, 69-89.
12. Corballis, M. C., Roldan, C. E., & Zbrodoff, J. (1974). Response set effects in recognition memory. Memory & Cognition, 2, 501-508.
13. Cruse, D., & Clifton, C., Jr. (1971). Recoding strategies and the retrieval of information from memory (Cognitive Processes Laboratory Rep. No. 71-1). Amherst: University of Massachusetts.
14. Deecke, L. (1987). Bereitschaftspotential as an indicator of movement preparation in supplementary motor area and motor cortex. In G. Bock, M. O'Conner, & J. Marsh (Eds.), Motor areas of the cerebral cortex (pp. 231-245). New York: Wiley.
15. De Jong, R. (1993). Multiple bottlenecks in overlapping task performance. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 19, 965-980.
16. Ellis, S. H., & Chase, W. G. (1971). Parallel processing in item recognition. Perception & Psychophysics, 10, 379-384.
17. Eriksen, B. A., Eriksen, C. W., & Hoffman, J. E. (1986). Recognition memory and attentional selection: Serial scanning is not enough. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 12, 476-483.
18. Eriksen, C. W., & Schultz, D. W. (1979). Information processing in visual search: A continuous flow conception and experimental results. Perception & Psychophysics, 25, 249-263.
19. Graboi, D. (1971). Searching for targets: The effects of specific practice. Perception & Psychophysics, 10, 300-304.
20. Hackley, S. A., & Miller, J. O. (1995). Response complexity and precue interval effects on the lateralized readiness potential. Psychophysiology, 32, 230-241.
21. Juola, J. F., Fischler, I., Wood, C. T., & Atkinson, R. C. (1971). Recognition time for information stored in long-term memory. Perception & Psychophysics, 10, 8-14.
22. Kahneman, D. (1973). Attention and effort. New York: Prentice Hall.
23. Kornhuber, H. H., & Deecke, L. (1965). Hirnpotentialänderungen bei willkurbewegungen und passiven bewegungen des menschen: Bereitschaftpotential und reafferente potentiale [Changes in brain potential for voluntary and passive movements in humans: Readiness potential and afferent potential]. Pflügers Archiv für die Gesammte Physiologie, 248, 1-17.
24. Kramer, A., Schneider, W., Fisk, A., & Donchin, E. (1986). The effects of practice and task structure on components of the event-related brain potential. Psychophysiology, 23, 33-47.
25. Kramer, A. F., & Strayer, D. L. (1988). Assessing the development of automatic processing: An application of dual-task and event-related brain potential methodologies. Biological Psychology, 26, 231-267.
26. Kristofferson, M. W. (1972a). Effects of practice on character-classification performance. Canadian Journal of Psychology, 26, 540-560.
27. Kristofferson, M. W. (1972b). When item recognition and visual search functions are similar. Perception & Psychophysics, 12, 379-384.
28. Kutas, M., & Donchin, E. (1980). Preparation to respond as manifested by movement-related brain potentials. Brain Research, 202, 95-115.
29. McClelland, J. L. (1979). On the time relation of mental processes: A framework for analyzing processes in cascade. Psychological Review, 86, 287-330.
30. McCleod, P. (1977). Parallel processing and the psychological refractory period. Acta Psychologica, 41, 381-391.
31. Meyer, D. E., Osman, A. M., Irwin, D. E., & Yantis, S. (1988). Modern mental chronometry. Biological Psychology, 26, 3-67.
32. Miller, J. (1982). Discrete versus continuous stage models of human information processing: In search of partial output. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 8, 273-296.
33. Miller, J. (1985). Discrete and continuous models of divided attention. In M. I. Posner & O. S. M. Marin (Eds.), Attention and performance XI: Mechanisms of attention (pp. 513-528) Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
34. Miller, J. (1988). Discrete versus continuous stage models of human information processing: Theoretical distinctions and empirical results. Acta Psychologica, 67, 191-257.
35. Miller, J., Coles, M. G. H., & Chakraborty, S. (1996). Dissociation between behavioral and psychophysiological measures of response preparation. Acta Psychologica, 94, 189-208.
36. Miller, J., & Hackley, S. A. (1992). Electrophysiological evidence for temporal overlap among contingent mental processes. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 121, 195-209.
37. Miller, J., & Pachella, R. G. (1973). Locus of the stimulus probability effect. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 101, 227-231.
38. Miller, J., Patterson, T., & Ulrich, R. (1998). A jackknife-based method for measuring LRP onset latency differences. Psychophysiology, 35, 99-115.
39. Mosteller, F., & Tukey, J. (1977). Data analysis and regression. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.
40. Neisser, U. (1974). Practiced card sorting for multiple targets. Memory & Cognition, 2, 781-785.
41. Okada, Y. C., Williamson, S. J., & Kaufman, L. (1982). Magnetic fields of the human sensorimotor cortex. International Journal of Neurophysiology, 17, 33-38.
42. Oldfield, R. C. (1971). The assessment and analysis of handedness: The Edinburgh Inventory. Neuropsychologia, 9, 97-113.
43. Osman, A., Bashore, T. R., Coles, M. G. H., Donchin, E., & Meyer, D. E. (1992). On the transmission of partial information: Inferences from movement-related brain potentials. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance 18, 217-232.
44. Pashler, H. (1984). Processing stages in overlapping tasks: Evidence for a central bottleneck. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 10, 358-377.
45. Pashler, H. (1994). Dual-task interference in simple tasks: Data and theory. Psychological Bulletin, 116, 220-244.
46. Requin, J. (1985). Looking forward to moving soon: Ante factum selective processes in motor control. In M. I. Posner & O. S. M. Marin (Eds.), Attention and performance X (pp. 147-167) Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
47. Riehle, A., & Requin, J. (1989). Monkey primary motor and pre-motor cortex: Single-cell activity related to prior information about direction and extent of an intended movement. Journal of Neurophysiology, 61, 534-549.
48. Rosenbaum, D. A., & Kornblum, S. (1982). A priming method for investigating the selection of motor responses. Acta Psychologica, 51, 223-243.
49. Ross, J. (1970). Extended practice with a single-character classification task. Perception & Psychophysics, 8, 276-278.
50. Sanders, A. F. (1980). Stage analysis of reaction processes. In G. E. Stelmach & J. Requin (Eds.), Tutorials in motor behavior (pp. 331-354). Amsterdam: North-Holland.
51. Sanders, A. F. (1990). Issues and trends in the debate on discrete vs. continuous processing of information. Acta Psychologica, 74, 123-167.
52. Schneider, W., & Shiffrin, R. M. (1977). Controlled and automatic human information processing I: Detection, search, and attention. Psychological Review, 84, 1-66.
53. Smid, H. G. O. M., Lamain, W., Hogeboom, M. M., Mulder, G., & Mulder, L. J. M. (1991). Electrophysiological evidence for continuous information transmission between visual search and response processes. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 17, 696-714.
54. Smid, H. G. O. M., Mulder, G., & Mulder, L. J. M. (1990). Selective response activation can begin before stimulus recognition is complete: A psycho-physiological and error analysis of continuous flow. Acta Psychologica, 74, 169-201.
55. Smid, H. G. O. M., Mulder, G., Mulder, L. J. M., & Brands, G. J. (1992). A psychophysiological study of the use of partial information in stimulus-response translation. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 18, 1101-1119.
56. Sternberg, S. (1969a). The discovery of processing stages: Extensions of Donders' method. Acta Psychologica, 30, 276-315.
57. Sternberg, S. (1969b). Memory scanning: Mental processes revealed by reaction-time experiments. American Scientist, 57, 421-57.
58. Townsend, J. T., & Schweickert, R. (1989). Toward the trichotomy method of reaction times: Laying the foundation of stochastic mental networks. Journal of Mathematical Psychology, 33, 309-327.
59. Vaughan, H. G., Costa, L. D., & Ritter, W. (1968). Topography of the human motor potential. Electroencephalography and Clinical Neurophysiology, 25, 1-10.
60. Welford, A. T. (1952). The "psychological refractory period" and the timing of high speed performance: A review and a theory. British Journal of Psychology, 43, 2-19.
61. Welford, A. T. (1980). The single-channel hypothesis. In A. T. Welford (Ed.), Reaction time (pp. 215-252). New York: Academic Press.
62. Wijers, A. A., Mulder, G., Okita, T., Mulder, L. J. M., & Scheffers, M. K. (1989). Attention to color: An analysis of selection, controlled search, and motor activation, using event-related potentials. Psychophysiology, 26, 89-109.