A new method for the estimation of the onset of the lateralized readiness potential (LRP)

Behavior Research Methods, Instruments, and Computers

Volumn 30, Issue 1, 1998, Pages 110-117

  Schwarzenau, P ^a   Falkenstein, M ^a,b   Hoormann, J ^a   Hohnsbein, J ^a  

^a TU DORTMUND UNIVERSITY   (Germany)

^b LEIBNIZ RESEARCH CENTRE FOR WORKING ENVIRONMENT AND HUMAN FACTORS   (Germany)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 0000750219     PISSN: 07433808     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.3758/BF03209421     Document Type: Article

References (14)

1. COLLS, M. G. H., & GRATTON, G. (1986). Cognitive psychophysiology and the study of states and processes. In G. R. J. Hockey, A. W. K. Gaillard, & M. G. H. Coles (Eds.), Energetics and human information processing (pp. 409-424). Dordrecht: Martinus Nijhoff.
2. DE JONG, R., WIERDA, M., MULDER, G., & MULDER, L. J. M. (1988). Use of partial stimulus information in response processing. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance, 14, 682-692.
3. EIMER, M. (1998). The lateralized readiness potential as an on-line measure of central response activation processes. Behavior Research Methods, Instruments, & Computers, 30, 146-156.
4. FALKENSTEIN, M., HOHNSBEIN, J., & HOORMANN, J. (1994). Effects of choice complexity on different subcomponents of the late positive complex of the event-related potential. Electroencephalography & Clinical Neurophysiology, 92, 148-160.
5. FALKENSTEIN, M., HOHNSBEIN, J., & HOORMANN, J. (1996). Reflections of performance quality in pre- and poststimulus ERP components. In C. Ogura, Y. Koga, & M. Shimokochi (Eds.), Recent advances in event-related brain potential research (pp. 152-156). Amsterdam: Elsevier.
6. HOHNSBEIN, J., FALKENSTEIN, M., HOORMANN, J., & BLANKE, L. (1991). Effects of crossmodal divided attention on late ERP components: I. Simple and choice reaction tasks. Electroencephalography & Clinical Neurophysiology, 78, 438-446.
7. LEUTHOLD, H., & SOMMER, W. (1993). Stimulus presentation rate dissociates sequential effects in event-related potentials and reaction times. Psychophysiology, 30, 510-517.
8. MEYER, D. E., OSMAN, A. M., IRWIN, D. E., & YANTIS, S. (1988). Modern mental chronometry. Biological Psychology, 26, 3-67.
9. MILLER, J., PATTERSON, T., & ULRICH, R. (1998). A jackknife-based method for measuring LRP onset latency differences. Psychophysiology, 35, 99-115.
10. OSMAN, A. M., & MOORE, C. M. (1993). The locus of dual-task interference: Psychological refractory effects on movement-related brain potentials. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance, 19, 1292-1312.
11. SEBER, G. A. F., & WILD, C. J. (1989). Nonlinear regression. New York: Wiley.
12. SMID, H. G. O. M., MULDER, G., & MULDER, L. J. M. (1987). The continuous flow model revisited: Perceptual and central motor aspects. In R. Johnson, Jr., J. W. Rohrbaugh, & R. Parasuraman (Eds.), Current trends in event-related potential research (EEG Suppl. 40, pp. 270-278). Amsterdam: Elsevier.
13. SMULDERS, F. T. Y., KENEMANS, J. L., & KOK, A. (1996). Effects of task variables on measures of the mean onset latency of LRP depend on the scoring method. Psychophysiology, 33, 194-205.
14. ULRICH, R., MOORE, C., & OSMAN, A. (1993). Lateralisiertes Bereitschaftspotential und Reaktionsgeschwindigkeit bei partieller Vor-information eines Handlungsparameters. Zeitschrift für experimentelle und angewandte Psychologie, 40, 310-325.