Effects of task variables on measures of the mean onset latency of LRP depend on the scoring method

Psychophysiology

Volumn 33, Issue 2, 1996, Pages 194-205

  Smulders, Fren T Y ^a   Kenemans, J Leon ^b   Kok, Albert ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF AMSTERDAM   (Netherlands)

^b UTRECHT UNIVERSITY   (Netherlands)

Author keywords

Latency variation; Lateralized readiness potential; Simulations; Stimulus degradation

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ARTICLE; CONTROLLED STUDY; EVOKED CORTICAL RESPONSE; HUMAN; HUMAN EXPERIMENT; LATENT PERIOD; PRIORITY JOURNAL; REACTION TIME; SCORING SYSTEM; SIMULATION; STIMULUS RESPONSE; TASK PERFORMANCE;

ADULT; COMPUTER SIMULATION; EVOKED POTENTIALS; HUMANS; REACTION TIME;

EID: 0029963111     PISSN: 00485772     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1469-8986.1996.tb02123.x     Document Type: Article

References (26)

1. Box, G. E. P., & Müller, M. E. (1958). A note on the generation of random normal deviates. Annals of Mathematical Statistics, 29, 610-613.
2. Callaway, E., Halliday, R., Naylor, R., & Thouvenin, D. (1984). The latency of the average is not the average of the latencies. Psychophysiology, 21, 571.
3. Coles, M. G. H. (1989). Modern mind-brain reading: Psychophysiology, physiology, and cognition. Psychophysiology, 26, 251-269.
4. Coles, M. G. H., Gratton, G., & Donchin, E. (1988). Detecting early communication: Using measures of movement-related potentials to illuminate human information processing. Biological Psychology, 26, 69-89.
5. De Jong, R., Coles, M. G. H., Logan, G. G., & Gratton, G. (1990). In search of the point of no return: The control of response processes. Journal of Experimenial Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 16, 164-182.
6. De Jong, R., Wierda, M., Mulder, G., & Mulder, L. J. M. (1988). Use of partial information in responding. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 14, 682-692.
7. Falkenstein, M., Hohnsbein, J., Hoormann, J., & Blanke, L. (1991). Effects of crossmodal divided attention on late ERP components: II. Error processing in choice reaction tasks. Electroencephalography and Clinical Neurophysiology, 78, 447-455.
8. Gehring, W. J., Coles, M. G. H., Meyer, D. E., & Donchin, E. (1990). The error-related negativity: An event-related brain potential accompanying errors. Psychophysiology, 26, 450.
9. Gratton, G., Coles, M. G. H., Sirevaag, E., Eriksen, C. W., & Donchin, E. (1988). Pre- and post-stimulus activation of response channels: A psychophysiological analysis. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 14, 331-344.
10. Hackley, S. A., & Miller, J. (1995). Response complexity and precue interval effects on the lateralized readiness potential. Psychophysiology, 230-241
11. Hansen, J. C., & Hillyard, S. A. (1980). Endogenous brain potentials associated with selective auditory attention. Electroencephalography and Clinical Neurophysiology, 49, 277-290.
12. Hansen, J. C., & Hillyard, S. A. (1983). Selective attention to multi-dimensional auditory stimuli. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 9, 1-19.
13. Jasper, H. H. (1958). The ten-twenty electrode system of the international federation. Electroencephalography and Clinical Neurophysiology, 10, 371-375.
14. Kenemans, J. L. (1991). DAR: Data reduction with contrast vectors. In L. J. M. Mulder, F. J. Maarse, W. P. B. Sjouw, & A. E. Akkerman (Eds.), Computers in psychology: Applications in education, research, and psychodiagnostics (pp. 140-148). Amsterdam/Lisse: Swets & Zeitlinger.
15. Kutas, M., McCarthy, G., & Donchin, E. (1977). Augmenting mental chronometry: The P300 as a measure of stimulus evaluation time. Science, 197, 792-795.
16. Meyer, D. E., Osman, A. M., Irwin, D. E., & Yantis, S. (1988). Modern mental chronometry. Biological Psychology, 26, 3-67.
17. Miller, J., & Hackley, S. A. (1992). Electrophysiological evidence for temporal overlap among contingent mental processes. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 121, 195-209.
18. Möcks, J., Gasser, T, Köhler, W. (1988). Basic statistical parameters of event-related potentials. Journal of Psychophysiology, 2, 61-70.
19. Osman, A., & Moore, K. (1993). The locus of dual-task interference: Psychological refractory effects on movement-related brain potentials. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 19, 1292-1312.
20. Press, W. H., Flannery, B. P., Teukolsky, S. A., & Vetterling W. T. (1990). Numerical recipes: The art of scientific computing. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
21. Smid, H. G. O. M., Mulder, G., & Mulder, L. J. M. (1987). The continuous flow model revisited: Perceptual and central motor aspects. In R. Johnson Jr., R. Parasuraman, & J. W. Rohrbaugh (Eds.), Current trends in event-related potential research (EEG Suppl. 40). Amsterdam: Elsevier.
22. Smid, H. G. O. M., Mulder, G., & Mulder, L. J. M. (1990). Selective response activation can begin before stimulus recognition is complete: A psychophysiological and error analysis of continuous flow. Acta Psychologica, 74, 169-201.
23. Smulders, F. T. Y., Kenemans, J. L., & Kok, A. (1994). A comparison of different methods for estimating single-trial P300 latencies. Electroencephalography and Clinical Neurophysiology, 92, 107-114.
24. Van Dellen, H. J., Brookhuis, K. A., Mulder, G., Okita, T., & Mulder, L. J. M. (1985). Evoked potential correlates of practice in a visual search task. In D. Papakostopoulos, S. Butler, & I. Martin (Eds.), Clinical and experimental neurophysiology (pp. 132-155). Beckenham, UK: Croom Helm.
25. Van der Molen, M. W., Bashore, T. R., Halliday, R., & Callaway, E. (1991). Chronopsychophysiology: Mental chronometry augmented by psychophysiological time markers. In J. R. Jennings & M. G. H. Coles (Eds.), Handbook of cognitive psychophysiology. Central and autonomic nervous system approaches (pp. 9-178). Chichester, England: Wiley.
26. Woestenburg, J. C., Verbaten, M. N., & Slangen, J. L. (1983). The removal of eye-movement artefact from the EEG by regression analysis in the frequency domain. Biological Psychology, 16, 127-147.