Elective affinities: On the psychological bases of left-right differences

Psychological Inquiry

Volumn 20, Issue 2-3, 2009, Pages 129-141

  Jost, John T ^a  

^a NEW YORK UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

Conservatism; Ideology; Liberalism; Political orientation; Religion; Threat; Uncertainty

Indexed keywords

EID: 68749104573     PISSN: 1047840X     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/10478400903028599     Document Type: Article

References (98)

1. Adorno, T. W., Frenkel-Brunswik, E., Levinson, D. J., & Sanford, R. N. (1950). The authoritarian personality. New York: Harper.
2. Alford, J. R., Funk, C. L., & Hibbing, J. R. (2005). Are political orientations genetically transmitted? American Political Science Review, 99, 153-167.
3. Altemeyer, R. A. (1998). The other "authoritarian personality." In M. P. Zanna (Ed.), Advances in experimental social psychology (Vol. 40, pp. 47-91). New York: Academic Press.
4. Alwin, D. F., Cohen, R. L., & Newcomb, T. M. (1991). Political attitudes over the life span. Madison: University of Wisconsin Press.
5. Amodio, D. M., Jost, J. T., Master, S. L., & Yee, C. M. (2007). Neurocognitive correlates of liberalism and conservatism. Nature Neuroscience, 10, 1246-1247.
6. Barnea, M. F., & Schwartz, S. H. (1998). Values and voting. Political Psychology, 19, 17-10.
7. Block, J., & Block, J. H. (2006). Nursery school personality and political orientation two decades later. Journal of Research in Personality, 40, 734-749.
8. Bobbio, N. (1996). Left and right. Cambridge, UK: Polity Press.
9. Bonanno, G. A., & Jost, J. T. (2006). Conservative shift among highexposure survivors of the September 11th terrorist attacks. Basic and Applied Social Psychology, 28, 311-323.
10. Botvinick, M. M., Braver, T. S., Barch, D. M., Carter, C. S., & Cohen, J. D. (2001). Conflict monitoring and cognitive control. Psychological Review, 108, 624-652.
11. Bouchard, T. J., Segal, N. L., Tellegen, A., McGue, M., Keyes, M., & Krueger, R. (2003). Evidence for the construct validity and heritability of the Wilson-Patterson conservatism scale: A reared-apart twins study of social attitudes. Personality and Individual Differences, 34, 959-969.
12. Bryan, C. J., Dweck, C. S., Ross, L., Kay, A. C., & Mislavsky, N. O. (in press). Political mindsets: Effects of schema priming on liberal-conservative political positions. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology.
13. Burke, E. (1790/1987). Reflections on the revolution in France. In J. G. A. Pocock (Ed.), Reflections on the revolution in France (pp. 1-218). Indianapolis, IN: Hackett.
14. Campbell, A., Converse, P., Miller, W., & Stokes, D. (1965). The American voter. Chicago: Wiley. (Original work published 1960)
15. Carney, D. R., Jost, J. T., Gosling, S. D., & Potter, J. (2008). The secret lives of liberals and conservatives: Personality profiles, interaction styles, and the things they leave behind. Political Psychology, 29, 807-840.
16. Chatard, A., Selimbegović, L., & Kohan, P. (2008). Leftists' and rightists' IQ as a function of stereotype salience. Journal of Research in Personality, 42, 1602-1606.
17. Chirumbolo, A. (2002). The relationship between need for cognitive closure and political orientation: The mediating role of authoritarianism. Personality and Individual Differences, 32, 603-610.
18. Cohen, F., Ogilvie, D. M., Solomon, S., Greenberg. J., & Pyszczynski, T. (2005). American roulette: The effect of reminders of death on support for George W. Bush in the 2004 presidential election. Analyses of Social Issues and Public Policy, 5, 177-187.
19. Conover. P. J., & Feldman, S. (1981). The origins and meaning of liberal/conservative self-identification. American Journal of Political Science, 25, 617-645.
20. Corbetta, P., Cavazza, N., & Roccato, M. (in press). Between ideology and social representations: Four theses plus (a new) one on the relevance and the meaning of the political left and right. European Journal of Political Research.
21. Crowson, H. M., Thoma, S. J., & Hestevold, N. (2005). Is political conservatism synonymous with authoritarianism? Journal of Social Psychology, 145, 571-592.
22. Duckitt, J. (2001). A dual-process cognitive-motivational theory of ideology and prejudice. Advances in Experimental Social Psychology, 33, 41-113.
23. Eaves, L. J., & Eysenck, H. J. (1974). Genetics and the development of attitudes. Nature, 249, 288-289.
24. Ekehammar, B., Akrami, N., & Gylje, M. (2004). What matters most to prejudice: Big five personality, social dominance orientation, or right-wing authoritarianism? European Journal of Personality, 18, 463-482.
25. Eysenck, H. J. (1999). The psychology of politics. New York: Routledge. (Original work published 1954)
26. Feather, N. T. (1984). Protestant ethic, conservatism, and values. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 46, 1132-1141.
27. Feldman, S. (1988). Structure and consistency in public opinion: The role of core beliefs and values. American Journal of Political Science, 32, 416-440.
28. Feldman, S. (2003). Values, ideology, and the structure of political attitudes. In D. O. Sears, L. Huddy. & R. Jervis (Eds.), The Oxford handbook of political psychology (pp. 477-508). New York: Oxford University Press.
29. Freeden, M. (2003). Ideology. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
30. Gerber, A. S., Huber, G., Raso, C. & Ha, S. (2008). Personality and political behavior. Working paper. ISPS, Yale University.
31. Gerth, H. H., & Mills, C. W. (1970). Essays from Max Weber. London: Routledge and Kegan Paul. (Original work published in 1948)
32. Goethe, J. W. (1966). Elective affinities. Chicago: Gateway Edition. (Original work published 1809)
33. Gosling, S. D., Rentfrow, P. J., & Swann, W. B., Jr. (2003). A very brief measure of the Big-Five personality domains. Journal of Research in Personality, 37, 504-528.
34. Greenberg, J., & Jonas, E. (2003). Psychological and political orientation-The left, the right, and the rigid: Comment on Jost et al. (2003). Psychological Bulletin, 129, 376-382.
35. Greenwald, A. G., McGhee, D. E., & Schwartz, J. L. K. (1998). Measuring individual differences in implicit cognition: The implicit association test. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 74, 1464-1480.
36. Haidt, J. & Graham, J. (2007). When morality opposes justice: Conservatives have moral intuitions that liberals may not recognize. Social Justice Research, 20, 98-116.
37. Hardin, C. D., & Conley, T. D. (2001). A relational approach to cognition: Shared experience and relationship affirmation in social cognition. In G. B. Moskowitz (Ed.). Cognitive social psychology (pp. 3-17). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
38. Hinich, M. J., & Munger, M. C. (1994). Ideology and the theory of political choice. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.
39. Howe, R. H. (1978). Max Weber's elective affinities: Sociology within the bounds of pure reason. The American Journal of Sociology, 84, 366-385.
40. Jost, J. T. (2006). The end of the end of ideology. American Psychologist, 61, 651-670.
41. Jost, J. T., Banaji, M. R., & Nosek, B. A. (2004). A decade of system justification theory: Accumulated evidence of conscious and unconscious bolstering of the status quo. Political Psychology, 25, 881-920.
42. Jost, J. T., Federico, C. M., & Napier, J. L. (2009). Political ideology: Its structure, functions, and elective affinities. Annual Review of Psychology, 60, 307-337.
43. Jost, J. T., Fitzsimons, G., & Kay, A. C. (2004). The ideological animal: A system justification view. In J. Greenberg, S. L. Koole, & T. Pyszczynski (Eds.), Handbook of experimental existential psychology (pp. 263-283). New York: Guilford.
44. Jost, J. T., Glaser, J., Kruglanski, A. W., & Sulloway, F. (2003a). Exceptions that prove the rule: Using a theory of motivated social cognition to account for ideological incongruities and political anomalies. Psychological Bulletin, 129, 383-393.
45. Jost, J. T., Glaser, J., Kruglanski, A. W., & Sulloway, F. (2003b). Political conservatism as motivated social cognition. Psychological Bulletin, 129, 339-375.
46. Jost, J. T., & Hunyady, O. (2005). Antecedents and consequences of system-justifying ideologies. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 14, 260-265.
47. Jost, J. T., Ledgerwood, A., & Hardin, C. D. (2008). Shared reality, system justification, and the relational basis of ideological beliefs. Social and Personality Psychology Compass, 2, 171-186.
48. Jost, J. T., Napier, J. L., Thorisdottir, H., Gosling, S.D., Palfai, T. P., & Ostafin, B. (2007). Are needs to manage uncertainty and threat associated with political conservatism or ideological extremity? Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 33, 989-1007.
49. Jost, J. T., Nosek, B. A., & Gosling, S. D. (2008). Ideology: Its resurgence in social, personality, and political psychology. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 3, 126-136.
50. Jost, J. T., & Thompson, E. P. (2000). Group-based dominance and opposition to equality as independent predictors of self-esteem, ethnocentrism, and social policy attitudes among African Americans and European Americans. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 36, 209-232.
51. Kalberg, S. (1994). Max Weber's comparative historical sociology. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
52. Kemmelmeier, M. (2007). Political conservatism, rigidity, and dogmatism in American foreign policy officials: The 1996 Mennis data. Journal of Psychology: Interdisciplinary and Applied, 141, 77-90.
53. Kemmelmeier. M. (2008). Is there a relationship between political orientation and cognitive ability? A test of three hypotheses in two studies. Personality and Individual Differences, 45, 767-772.
54. Kerlinger, F. N. (1984). Liberalism and conservatism: The nature and structure of social attitudes. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
55. Kruglanski, A. W. (2004). The psychology of closed mindedness. New York: Psychology Press.
56. Landau, M. J., Solomon, S., Greenberg, J., Cohen, F., Pyszczynski, T., Arndt, J., et al. (2004). Deliver us from evil: The effects of mortality salience and reminders of 9/11 on support for President George W. Bush. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 30, 1136-1150.
57. Laponce, J. A. (1981). Left and right: The topography of political perception. Toronto, Ontario, Canada: University of Toronto Press.
58. Lasch, C. (1991). The true and only heaven. New York: Norton.
59. Levin, B., & Schalmo, G. B. (1974). Self-rated liberalism is correlated with sensation seeking. Psychological Reports, 34, 298.
60. Lewins, F. (1989). Recasting the concept of ideology: A content approach. British Journal of Sociology, 40, 678-693.
61. Lipset, S. M. (1960). Political man. Garden City, NY: Doubleday.
62. Lipset, S. M., & Raab, E. (1978). The politics of unreason: Rightwing extremism in America, 1790-1977. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
63. Lipset, S. M., Lazarsfeld, P., Barton, A., & Linz, J. (1962). The psychology of voting: An analysis of political behavior. In G. Lindzey (Ed.), Handbook of social psychology (pp. 1124-1175). Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley. (Original work published 1954)
64. Marx. K. (1977). The eighteenth brumaire of Louis Bonaparte. In D. McLellan (Ed.), Karl Marx: Selected writings (pp. 300-325). Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press. (Original work published 1852)
65. McClosky, H., & Chong, D. (1985). Similarities and differences between left-wing and right-wing radicals. British Journal of Political Science, 15, 329-363.
66. McCrae, R. R. (1996). Social consequences of experiential openness. Psychological Bulletin, 120, 323-337.
67. McGuire, W. J. (1985). The nature of attitudes and attitude change. In G. Lindzey & E. Aronson (Eds.), Handbook of social psychology (3rd ed., Vol. 2, pp. 233-346). New York: Random House.
68. Mill, J. S. (2001). On liberty. Kitchener, Ontario, Canada: Batoche Books. (Original work published 1859)
69. Nail, P. R., McGregor, I., Drinkwater, A. E., Steele, G. M., & Thompson. A. W. (in press). Threat causes liberals to think like conservatives. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology.
70. Newcomb, T. M. (1943). Personality and social change. New York: Dry den.
71. Nisbet, R. (1973). The social philosophers: Community and conflict in Western thought. New York: Crowell.
72. Nosek, B. A., Banaji, M. R., & Jost, J. T. (2009). The politics of intergroup attitudes. In J. T. Jost, A. C. Kay, & H. Thorisdottir (Eds.), Social and psychological bases of ideology and system justification. New York: Oxford University Press.
73. Olson, J. M., Vernon, PH., Harris, J. A., & Jang, K. L. (2001). The heritability of attitudes: A study of twins. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 80, 845-860.
74. Oxley, D. R., Smith, K. B., Alford, J., Hibbing, J. R., Miller, M. S., Hatěmi, P. K., et al. (2008). Political attitudes vary with physiological traits. Science, 321, 1667-1670.
75. Pocock, J. G. A. (1987). Introduction. In J. G. A. Pocock (Ed.), Reflections on the revolution in France (pp. vii-lvi). Indianapolis, IN: Hackett.
76. Poole, K. T., & Rosenthal, H. (1997). Congress: A political-economic history of roll-call voting. New York: Oxford University Press.
77. Riemann. R., Grubich, C., Hempel, S., Mergl, S., & Richter, M. (1993). Personality and attitudes towards current political topics. Personality and Individual Differences, 15, 313-321.
78. Rokeach, M. (1960). The open and closed mind. New York: Basic Books.
79. Sears, D. O., & Levy, S. (2003). Childhood and adult political development. In D. O. Sears, L. Huddy, & R. Jervis (Eds.), The Oxford handbook of political psychology (pp. 60-109). New York: Oxford University Press.
80. Shermer, M. (2008). The conscience of the conservative. Message posted to Edge at http://www.edge.org/discourse/ vote-morality.html
81. Shils, E. A. (1954). Authoritarianism: "right" and "left." In R. Christie & M. Jahoda (Eds.), Studies in the scope and method of "The Authoritarian Personality" (pp. 24-49). Glencoe, IL: Free Press.
82. Sidanius, J. (1978). Intolerance of ambiguity and socio-politico ideology: A multidimensional analysis. European Journal of Social Psychology, 8, 215-235.
83. Sidanius, J., & Pratto, F. (1999). Social dominance: An intergroup theory of social hierarchy and oppression. New York: Cambridge University Press.
84. Sniderman, P. M., & Bullock, J. (2004). A consistency theory of public opinion and political choice: The hypothesis of menu dependence, In W. E. Saris & P. M. Sniderman (Eds.), Studies in public opinion: Attitudes, nonattitudes, measurement error; and change (pp. 337-357). Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
85. Stenner. K. (2005). The authoritarian dynamic. New York: Cambridge University Press.
86. Tedin, K. L. (1987). Political ideology and the vote. Research in Micropolitics, 2, 63-94.
87. Tesser, A. (1993). The importance of heritability in psychological research: The case of attitudes. Psychological Review, 100, 129142.
88. Thorisdottir, H., & Jost, J.T. (2009). Closed-mindedness as a mediator of the effect of threat on political conservatism. Manuscript in preparation.
89. Tomkins, S.S. (1963). Left and right: A basic dimension of ideology and personality. In R. W. White (Ed.), The study of lives (pp. 388-411). Chicago: Atherton.
90. Trapnell, P. D. (1994). Openness versus intellect: A lexical left turn. European Journal of Personality, 8, 273-290.
91. Van Hiel, A., & Mervielde, I. (2004). Openness to Experience and boundaries in the mind: Relationships with cultural and economic conservatism. Journal of Personality, 72, 659-686.
92. Viereck, P. (1956). Conservatism. Princeton, NJ: Van Nostrand.
93. Webster, D. M., & Kruglanski, A. W. (1994). Individual differences in need for cognitive closure. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 67, 1049-1062.
94. White, R. J. (1950). The conservative tradition. New York: New York University Press.
95. Wildavsky, A. (1989). Choosing preferences by constructing institutions: A cultural theory of preference formation. In A. Berger (Ed.), Political culture and public opinion (pp. 21-46). New Brunswick, NJ: Transaction.
96. Wilier, R. (2004). The effects of government-issued terror warnings on presidential approval ratings. Current Research in Social Psychology, 10, 1-12.
97. Wilson, G. D. (Ed.). (1973). The psychology of conservatism. London: Academic Press.
98. Zaller, J. R. (1992). The nature and origins of mass opinion. New York: Cambridge University Press.