MS-GF+ makes progress towards a universal database search tool for proteomics

Nature Communications

Volumn 5, Issue , 2014, Pages

  Kim, Sangtae ^a,b   Pevzner, Pavel A ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

^b PACIFIC NORTHWEST NATIONAL LABORATORY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ENZYME; PROTEINASE; PEPTIDE;

BENCHMARKING; DATA SET; DATABASE; GENETIC ENGINEERING; MASS SPECTROMETRY; PROTEOMICS; SOFTWARE;

ALGORITHM; AMINO ACID SEQUENCE; ARTICLE; COMPUTER PROGRAM; MASS SPECTROMETRY; PROTEIN ANALYSIS; PROTEIN DATABASE; PROTEIN PHOSPHORYLATION; PROTEOMICS; SUPPORT VECTOR MACHINE; WORKFLOW; SEARCH ENGINE; TANDEM MASS SPECTROMETRY;

PEPTIDES; PROTEOMICS; SEARCH ENGINE; SOFTWARE; TANDEM MASS SPECTROMETRY;

EID: 84923247212     PISSN: None     EISSN: 20411723     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1038/ncomms6277     Document Type: Article

References (58)

1. Swaney, D. L., Wenger, C. D. & Coon, J. J. Value of using multiple proteases for large-scale mass spectrometry-based proteomics. J. Proteome Res. 9, 1323-1329 (2010).
2. Eng, J., McCormack, A. & Yates, J. An approach to correlate tandem mass spectral data of peptides with amino acid sequences in a protein database. J. Am. Soc. Mass Spectrom. 5, 976-989 (1994).
3. Perkins, D., Pappin, D., Creasy, D. & Cottrell, J. Probability-based protein identification by searching sequence databases using mass spectrometry data. Electrophoresis 20, 3551-3567 (1999).
4. Cox, J. et al. Andromeda: A peptide search engine integrated into the Maxquant environment. J. Proteome Res. 10, 1794-1805 (2011).
5. Wenger, C. D. & Coon, J. J. A proteomics search algorithm specifically designed for high-resolution tandem mass spectra. J. Proteome Res. 12, 1377-1386 (2013).
6. Dorfer, V. et al. MS Amanda, a universal identification algorithm optimized for high accuracy tandem mass spectra. J. Proteome Res. 13, 3679-3684 (2014).
7. Sweet, S. M. M. et al. Database search strategies for proteomic data sets generated by electron capture dissociation mass spectrometry. J. Proteome Res. 8, 5475-5484 (2009).
8. Hsieh, E. J., Hoopmann, M. R., Maclean, B. & Maccoss, M. J. Comparison of database search strategies for high precursor mass accuracy MS/MS data. J. Proteome Res. 9, 1138-1143 (2009).
9. Keller, A., Nesvizhskii, A., Kolker, E. & Aebersold, R. Empirical statistical model to estimate the accuracy of peptide identifications made by MS/MS and database search. Anal. Chem. 74, 5383-5392 (2002).
10. Käll, L., Canterbury, J. D., Weston, J., Noble, W. S. & Maccoss, M. J. Semisupervised learning for peptide identification from shotgun proteomics datasets. Nat. Methods 4, 923-925 (2007).
11. Ma, Z.-Q. et al. Idpicker 2.0: Improved protein assembly with high discrimination peptide identification filtering. J. Proteome Res. 8, 3872-3881 (2009).
12. Kim, S. et al. The generating function of CID, ETD, and CID/ETD pairs of tandem mass spectra: applications to database search. Mol. Cell. Proteomics 9, 2840-2852 (2010).
13. Yates, J. R. et al. Toward objective evaluation of proteomic algorithms. Nat. Methods 9, 455-456 (2012).
14. Noble, W. S. & Maccoss, M. J. Computational and statistical analysis of protein mass spectrometry data. PLoS Comput. Biol. 8, e1002296 (2012).
15. Kim, S., Gupta, N. & Pevzner, P. Spectral probabilities and generating functions of tandem mass spectra: A strike against decoy databases. J. Proteome Res. 7, 3354-3363 (2008).
16. Zhou, J.-Y. et al. Simple sodium dodecyl sulfate-assisted sample preparation method for LC-MS-based proteomics applications. Anal. Chem. 84, 2862-2867 (2012).
17. Dresang, L. R. et al. Coupled transcriptome and proteome analysis of human lymphotropic tumor viruses: insights on the detection and discovery of viral genes. BMC Genom 12, 625 (2011).
18. Wang, L. et al. Mapping N-linked glycosylation sites in the secretome and whole cells of aspergillus niger using hydrazide chemistry and mass spectrometry. J. Proteome Res. 11, 143-156 (2012).
19. Wrighton, K. C. et al. Fermentation, hydrogen, and sulfur metabolism in multiple uncultivated bacterial phyla. Science 337, 1661-1665 (2012).
20. Frese, C. K. et al. Improved peptide identification by targeted fragmentation using CID, HCD and ETD on an ltq-orbitrap velos. J. Proteome Res. 10, 2377-2388 (2011).
21. Huttlin, E. L. et al. A tissue-specific atlas of mouse protein phosphorylation and expression. Cell 143, 1174-1189 (2010).
22. Starita, L. M., Lo, R. S., Eng, J. K., von Haller, P. D. & Fields, S. Sites of ubiquitin attachment in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Proteomics 12, 236-240 (2012).
23. Meyer, J. G. et al. Expanding proteome coverage with orthogonal-specificity α-lytic proteases. Mol. Cell. Proteomics 13, 823-835 (2014).
24. Gupta, N., Bandeira, N., Keich, U. & Pevzner, P. A. Target-decoy approach and false discovery rate: when things may go wrong. J. Am. Soc. Mass Spectrom. 22, 1111-1120 (2011).
25. Tanner, S. et al. Inspect: identification of posttranslationally modified peptides from tandem mass spectra. Anal. Chem. 77, 4626-4639 (2005).
26. Kim, S., Gupta, N., Bandeira, N. & Pevzner, P. Spectral dictionaries: Integrating de novo peptide sequencing with database search of tandem mass spectra. Mol. Cell. Proteomics 8, 53-69 (2009).
27. Geer, L. Y. et al. Open mass spectrometry search algorithm. J. Proteome Res. 3, 958-964 (2004).
28. Craig, R. & Beavis, R. C. Tandem: matching proteins with tandem mass spectra. Bioinformatics 20, 1466-1467 (2004).
29. Cô té, R. G., Reisinger, F. & Martens, L. jmzMl, an open-source Java API for mzMl, the PSI standard for MS data. Proteomics 10, 1332-1335 (2010).
30. Griss, J., Reisinger, F., Hermjakob, H. & Vizcano, J. A. jmzReader: A Java parser library to process and visualize multiple text and XML-based mass spectrometry data formats. Proteomics 12, 795-798 (2012).
31. Reisinger, F. et al. jmzIdentML API: A Java interface to the mzIdentML standard for peptide and protein identification data. Proteomics 12, 790-794 (2012).
32. Martens, L. et al. mzMl-a community standard for mass spectrometry data. Mol. Cell. Proteomics 10, R110.000133 (2010).
33. Jones, A. R. et al. The mzIdentML data standard for mass spectrometry-based proteomics results. Mol. Cell. Proteomics 11, M111.014381 (2012).
34. Granholm, V., Noble, W. S. & Käll, L. On using samples of known protein content to assess the statistical calibration of scores assigned to peptide-spectrum matches in shotgun proteomics. J. Proteome Res. 10, 2671-2678 (2011).
35. Howbert, J. J. & Noble, W. S. Computing exact p-values for a cross-correlation shotgun proteomics score function. Mol. Cell. Proteomics 13, 2467-2479 (2014).
36. Jeong, K., Kim, S., Bandeira, N. & Pevzner, P. A. Gapped spectral dictionaries and their applications for database searches of tandem mass spectra. Mol. Cell. Proteomics 10, 002220 (2011).
37. Noble, W. S. How does multiple testing correction work? Nat. Biotechnol. 27, 1135-1137 (2009).
38. Elias, J. E. & Gygi, S. P. Target-decoy search strategy for increased confidence in large-scale protein identifications by mass spectrometry. Nat. Methods 4, 207-214 (2007).
39. Jeong, K., Kim, S. & Bandeira, N. False discovery rates in spectral identification. BMC Bioinformatics 13(Suppl 16): S2 (2012).
40. Liu, X., Segar, M. W., Li, S. C. & Kim, S. Spectral probabilities of top-down tandem mass spectra. BMC Genomics 15(Suppl 1): S9 (2014).
41. Payne, S. H. et al. Phosphorylation-specific MS/MS scoring for rapid and accurate phosphoproteome analysis. J. Proteome Res. 7, 3373-3381 (2008).
42. Stekhoven, D. J., Omasits, U., Quebatte, M., Dehio, C. & Ahrens, C. H. Proteome-wide identification of predominant subcellular protein localizations in a bacterial model organism. J. Proteom 99, 123-137 (2014).
43. Risk, B. A., Edwards, N. J. & Giddings, M. C. A peptide-spectrum scoring system based on ion alignment, intensity, and pair probabilities. J. Proteome Res. 12, 4240-4247 (2013).
44. Lange, P. F., Huesgen, P. F., Nguyen, K. & Overall, C. M. Annotating N termini for the human proteome project: N termini and Na-acetylation status differentiate stable cleaved protein species from degradation remnants in the human erythrocyte proteome. J. Proteome Res. 13, 2028-2044 (2014).
45. Deutsch, E. W. et al. A guided tour of the trans-proteomic pipeline. Proteomics 10, 1150-1159 (2010).
46. Goecks, J., Nekrutenko, A., Taylor, J. & Team, G. Galaxy: a comprehensive approach for supporting accessible, reproducible, and transparent computational research in the life sciences. Genome Biol. 11, R86 (2010).
47. Gonzalez-Galarza, F. F. et al. A critical appraisal of techniques, software packages, and standards for quantitative proteomic analysis. OMICS 16, 431-442 (2012).
48. Vaudel, M., Barsnes, H., Berven, F. S., Sickmann, A. & Martens, L. SearchGUI: An open-source graphical user interface for simultaneous OMSSA and X!Tandem searches. Proteomics 11, 996-999 (2011).
49. MacLean, B. et al. Skyline: an open source document editor for creating and analyzing targeted proteomics experiments. Bioinformatics 26, 966-968 (2010).
50. Granholm, V. et al. Fast and accurate database searches with MSGF+Percolator. J. Proteome Res. 13, 890-897 (2014).
51. Kwon, T., Choi, H., Vogel, C., Nesvizhskii, A. I. & Marcotte, E. M. Msblender: A probabilistic approach for integrating peptide identifications from multiple database search engines. J. Proteome Res. 10, 2949-2958 (2011).
52. Kroksveen, A. C. et al. Cerebrospinal fluid proteome comparison between multiple sclerosis patients and controls. Acta Neurol. Scand. Suppl. 90-96 (2012).
53. Edwards, N. PepArML: A meta-search peptide identification platform for tandem mass spectra. Curr. Protoc. Bioinformatics 44, 13.23.1-13.23.23 (2013).
54. Swaney, D. L., McAlister, G. C. & Coon, J. J. Decision tree-driven tandem mass spectrometry for shotgun proteomics. Nat. Methods 5, 959-964 (2008).
55. Kessner, D., Chambers, M., Burke, R., Agus, D. & Mallick, P. ProteoWizard: open source software for rapid proteomics tools development. Bioinformatics 24, 2534-2536 (2008).
56. von der Haar, T. Optimized protein extraction for quantitative proteomics of yeasts. PLoS ONE 2, e1078 (2007).
57. Hao, P. et al. Novel application of electrostatic repulsion-hydrophilic interaction chromatography (ERLIC) in shotgun proteomics: comprehensive profiling of rat kidney proteome. J. Proteome Res. 9, 3520-3526 (2010).
58. van den Toorn, H. W. P. et al. RockerBox: analysis and filtering of massive proteomics search results. J. Proteome Res. 10, 1420-1424 (2011).