PepArML: A meta-search peptide identification platform for tandem mass spectra

Current Protocols in Bioinformatics

Volumn , Issue SUPPL.44, 2013, Pages

  Edwards, Nathan J ^a  

^a GEORGETOWN UNIVERSITY MEDICAL CENTER   (United States)

Author keywords

Cloud computing; Machine learning; Proteomics; Tandem mass spectra

Indexed keywords

PEPTIDE; PROTEINASE;

AMINO ACID SEQUENCE; ARTICLE; MACHINE LEARNING; MASS SPECTROMETER; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROTEIN ANALYSIS; PROTEIN PROCESSING; SEARCH ENGINE; SEQUENCE DATABASE; TANDEM MASS SPECTROMETRY; WEB BROWSER; HUMAN; PROCEDURES; SOFTWARE;

HUMANS; PEPTIDES; SEARCH ENGINE; SOFTWARE; TANDEM MASS SPECTROMETRY;

EID: 84896381869     PISSN: 19343396     EISSN: 1934340X     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/0471250953.bi1323s44     Document Type: Article

References (15)

1. Breiman, L. 2001. Random forests. Mach. Learn. 45:5-32.
2. Craig, R. andBeavis, R.C. 2004. TANDEM:Matching proteinswith tandem mass spectra. Bioinformatics 20:1466-1467.
3. Edwards, N., Wu, X., and Tseng, C.-W., 2009. An unsupervised, Model-Free, Machine-Learning combiner for peptide identifications from tandem mass spectra. Clin. Proteomics 5 (1).
4. Elias, J.E. and Gygi, S.P. 2007. Target-decoy search strategy for increased confidence in large-scale protein identifications by mass spectrometry. Nat. Methods 4:207-214.
5. Geer, L.Y., Markey, S.P., Kowalak, J.A., Wagner, L., Xu, M., Maynard, D.M., Yang, X., Shi, W., and Bryant, S.H. 2004. Open mass spectrometry search algorithm. J. Proteome Res. 3:958-964.
6. Keller, A., Nesvizhskii, A.I., Kolker, E., and Aebersold, R. 2002. Empirical statistical model to estimate the accuracy of peptide identifications made by MS/MS and database search. Anal. Chem. 74:5383-5392.
7. Kessner, D., Chambers, M., Burke, R., Agus, D., and Mallick, P. 2008. ProteoWizard: Open source software for rapid proteomics tools development. Bioinformatics 24:2534-2536.
8. Kim, S., Gupta, N., and Pevzner, P.A. 2008. Spectral probabilities and generating functions of tandem mass spectra: A strike against decoy databases. J. Proteome Res. 7:3354-3363.
9. MacLean, B., Eng, J.K., Beavis, R.C., and McIntosh, M. 2006. General framework for developing and evaluating database scoring algorithms using the TANDEMsearch engine. Bioinformatics 22:2830-2832.
10. Mallick, P., Schirle, M., Chen, S.S., Flory, M.R., Lee, H., Martin, D., Ranish, J., Raught, B., Schmitt, R., Werner, T., Kuster, B., and Aebersold, R. 2006. Computational prediction of proteotypic peptides for quantitative proteomics. Nat. Biotechnol. 25:125-131.
11. Nesvizhskii, A.I., Keller, A., Kolker, E., and Aebersold, R. 2003. A statistical model for identifying proteins by tandem mass spectrometry. Anal. Chem. 75:4646-4658.
12. Peng, J., Elias, J.E., Thoreen, C.C., Licklider, L.J., amd Gygi, S.P. 2003. Evaluation of multidimensional chromatography coupled with tandem mass spectrometry (LC/LC-MS/MS) for Large-Scale protein analysis: The yeast proteome. J. Proteome Res. 2:43-50.
13. Perkins, D.N., Pappin, D.J., Creasy, D.M., and Cottrell, J.S. 1999. Probability-based protein identification by searching sequence databases using mass spectrometry data. Electrophoresis 20:3551-3567.
14. Tabb, D.L., Fernando, C.G., and Chambers, M.C. 2007. MyriMatch: Highly accurate tandem mass spectral peptide identification by multivariate hypergeometric analysis. J. Proteome Res. 6:654-661.
15. Tanner, S., Shu, H., Frank, A., Wang, L.C., Zandi, E., Mumby, M., Pevzner, P.A., and Bafna, V. 2005. InsPecT: Identification of post translationally modified peptides from tandem mass spectra. Anal. Chem. 77:4626-4639.