High-Throughput Screening of Inhibitory Compounds on Growth and Ethanol Production of Saccharomyces cerevisiae

Bioenergy Research

Volumn 8, Issue 1, 2015, Pages 423-430

  Wood, Jeffery A ^a   Orr, Valerie C A ^a   Luque, Luis ^a   Nagendra, Vivek ^a   Berruti, Franco ^a   Rehmann, Lars ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF WESTERN ONTARIO   (Canada)

Author keywords

Biofuel; Ethanol; Growth kinetics; High throughput screening; Inhibition; Yeast

Indexed keywords

ALDEHYDES; BIOFUELS; CELL PROLIFERATION; CELLS; CELLULOSIC ETHANOL; CYTOLOGY; DESIGN OF EXPERIMENTS; ENZYME INHIBITION; ETHANOL; FERMENTATION; LIGNOCELLULOSIC BIOMASS; THROUGHPUT; YEAST;

96-WELL MICROTITER PLATE; CENTRAL COMPOSITE DESIGNS; CONCENTRATION RANGES; HIGH THROUGHPUT SCREENING; INHIBITOR CONCENTRATION; INHIBITORY COMPOUNDS; LIGNOCELLULOSIC HYDROLYSATES; PHYSIOLOGICAL STRESS;

GROWTH KINETICS;

SACCHAROMYCES CEREVISIAE;

EID: 84923223595     PISSN: 19391234     EISSN: 19391242     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s12155-014-9535-4     Document Type: Article

References (29)

1. Huang R, Su R, Qi W, He Z (2011) Bioconversion of lignocellulose into bioethanol: process intensification and mechanism research. BioEnergy Res 4:225–245. doi:10.1007/s12155-011-9125-7
2. Kudakasseril Kurian J, Raveendran Nair G, Hussain A, Vijaya Raghavan GS (2013) Feedstocks, logistics and pre-treatment processes for sustainable lignocellulosic biorefineries: a comprehensive review. Renew Sustain Energy Rev 25:205–219. doi:10.1016/j.rser.2013.04.019
3. Yu Z, Zhang H (2003) Pretreatments of cellulose pyrolysate for ethanol production by Saccharomyces cerevisiae, Pichia sp. YZ-1 and Zymomonas mobilis. Biomass Bioenergy 24:257–262. doi:10.1016/S0961-9534(02)00147-2
4. Garcia-Perez M, Wang S, Shen J et al (2008) Effects of temperature on the formation of lignin-derived oligomers during the fast pyrolysis of mallee woody biomass. Energy Fuel 22:2022–2032.
5. Hendriks TWM, Zeeman G (2009) Pretreatments to enhance the digestibility of lignocellulosic biomass. Bioresour Technol 100:10–18. doi:10.1016/j.biortech.2008.05.027
6. Chandel AK, Silva SS, Singh OV (2012) Detoxification of lignocellulose hydrolysates: biochemical and metabolic engineering toward white biotechnology. BioEnergy Res 6:388–401. doi:10.1007/s12155-012-9241-z
7. Westman JO, Taherzadeh MJ, Franzén CJ (2012) Inhibitor tolerance and flocculation of a yeast strain suitable for second generation bioethanol production. Electron J Biotechnol. doi:10.2225/vol15-issue3-fulltext-8
8. Schwab K, Wood JA, Rehmann L (2013) Pyrolysis by-products as feedstocks for fermentative bio-fuel production: an evaluation of inhibitory compounds via a synthetic aqueous phase. Ind Eng Chem Res 52:18234–18240. doi:10.1021/ie403354k
9. Franden MA, Pienkos PT, Zhang M (2009) Development of a high-throughput method to evaluate the impact of inhibitory compounds from lignocellulosic hydrolysates on the growth of Zymomonas mobilis. J Biotechnol 144:259–267. doi:10.1016/j.jbiotec.2009.08.006
10. Huang H, Guo X, Li D et al (2011) Identification of crucial yeast inhibitors in bio-ethanol and improvement of fermentation at high pH and high total solids. Bioresour Technol 102:7486–7493. doi:10.1016/j.biortech.2011.05.008
11. Palmqvist E, Grage H, Meinander NQ, Hahn-Hägerdal B (1999) Main and interaction effects of acetic acid, furfural, and p-hydroxybenzoic acid on growth and ethanol productivity of yeasts. Biotechnol Bioeng 63:46–55
12. Jørgensen H (2009) Effect of nutrients on fermentation of pretreated wheat straw at very high dry matter content by Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Appl Biochem Biotechnol 153:44–57. doi:10.1007/s12010-008-8456-0
13. Mei X, Liu R, Shen F, Wu H (2009) Optimization of fermentation conditions for the production of ethanol from stalk juice of sweet sorghum by immobilized yeast using response surface methodology. Energy Fuel 23:487–491. doi:10.1021/ef800429u
14. Franden MA, Pilath HM, Mohagheghi A et al (2013) Inhibition of growth of Zymomonas mobilis by model compounds found in lignocellulosic hydrolysates. Biotechnol Biofuels 6:99. doi:10.1186/1754-6834-6-99
15. Palmqvist E, Hahn-Hägerdal B (2000) Fermentation of lignocellulosic hydrolysates. II: inhibitors and mechanisms of inhibition. Bioresour Technol 74:25–33. doi:10.1016/S0960-8524(99)00161-3
16. Klinke HB, Thomsen AB, Ahring BK (2004) Inhibition of ethanol-producing yeast and bacteria by degradation products produced during pre-treatment of biomass. Appl Microbiol Biotechnol 66:10–26. doi:10.1007/s00253-004-1642-2
17. Ding M-Z, Wang X, Yang Y, Yuan Y-J (2011) Metabolomic study of interactive effects of phenol, furfural, and acetic acid on Saccharomyces cerevisiae. OMICS 15:647–653. doi:10.1089/omi.2011.0003
18. Larsson S, Quintana-Sáinz A, Reimann A et al (2000) Influence of lignocellulose-derived aromatic compounds on oxygen-limited growth and ethanolic fermentation by Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Appl Biochem Biotechnol 84–86:617–632
19. Baranyi J, Roberts TAT (1994) A dynamic approach to predicting bacterial growth in food. Int J Food Microbiol 23:277–294. doi:10.1016/0168-1605(94)90157-0
20. Oki S, Omori T, Suzuki N (1964) Some applications of the regular solution theory to solvent extraction—I. J Inorg Nucl Chem 26:2255–2264
21. Levin M, Redelius P (2008) Determination of three-dimensional solubility parameters and solubility spheres for naphthenic mineral oils. Energy Fuel 22:3395–3401
22. Hansen CM (2012) Hansen solubility parameters: a user’s handbook, 2nd edn. 544.
23. Hansen CM (2004) Polymer additives and solubility parameters. Prog Org Coat 51:109–112. doi:10.1016/j.porgcoat.2004.05.003
24. Delgenes JP, Moletta R, Navarro JM (1996) Effects of lignocellulose degradation products on ethanol fermentations of glucose and xylose by Saccharomyces cerevisiae, Zymomonas mobilis, Pichia stipitis, and Candida shehatae. Enzym Microb Technol 19:220–225. doi:10.1016/0141-0229(95)00237-5
25. Palmqvist E, Almeida JS, Hahn-Hägerdal B (1999) Influence of furfural on anaerobic glycolytic kinetics of Saccharomyces cerevisiae in batch culture. Biotechnol Bioeng 62:447–454
26. Klinke HB, Olsson L, Thomsen AB, Ahring BK (2003) Potential inhibitors from wet oxidation of wheat straw and their effect on ethanol production of Saccharomyces cerevisiae: wet oxidation and fermentation by yeast. Biotechnol Bioeng 81:738–747. doi:10.1002/bit.10523
27. Cao D, Tu M, Xie R et al (2014) Inhibitory activity of carbonyl compounds on alcoholic fermentation by Saccharomyces cerevisiae. J Agric Food Chem 62:918–926. doi:10.1021/jf405711f
28. Zhao XQ, Bai FW (2009) Mechanisms of yeast stress tolerance and its manipulation for efficient fuel ethanol production. J Biotechnol 144:23–30. doi:10.1016/j.jbiotec.2009.05.001
29. Parawira W, Tekere M (2011) Biotechnological strategies to overcome inhibitors in lignocellulose hydrolysates for ethanol production: review. Crit Rev Biotechnol 31:20–31. doi:10.3109/07388551003757816