Why is there philosophy of mathematics at all?

Why is there Philosophy of Mathematics at All?

Volumn , Issue , 2012, Pages 1-290

  Hacking, Ian ^a  

^a NONE

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 84923191771     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book    
DOI: 10.1017/CBO9781107279346     Document Type: Book

References (358)

1. Almeida, Mauro. and Barbosa, D. 1990. Symmetry and entropy: mathematical metaphors in the work of Lévi-Strauss. Current Anthropology 31: 367–385.
2. Ambrose, Alice. 1959. Proof and the theorem proved. Mind 68: 435–45.
3. Anderson, Philip. 1972. More is different: broken symmetry and the nature of the hierarchical structure of science. Science 177: 393–396.
4. Appel, K. and Haken, W. 1977. Every planar map is four colourable. Part i: Discharging. Illinois Journal of Mathematics 21: 429–490.
5. Appel, K, Haken, W, and Koch, J. 1977. Every planar map is four colourable. Part ii: Reducibility. Illinois Journal of Mathematics 21: 491–567.
6. Aristotle, A. 1984. The Complete Works of Aristotle, revised Oxford translation, ed. Jonathan Barnes, 2 vols. Princeton University Press.
7. Aschbacher, Michael and Smith, Stephen. 2004. The Classification of Quasithin Groups. Mathematical Surveys and Monographs vols. 111, 112. Providence, RI: American Mathematical Society.
8. Asper, Markus. 2009. The two cultures of mathematics in ancient Greece. in E. Robson and J. Stedall (eds.) Oxford Handbook of the History of Mathematics. Oxford University Press, 107–132
9. Aspray, William and Kitcher, Philip. 1988. History and Philosophy of Modern Mathematics. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.
10. Atiyah, Michael. 1984. An interview with Michael Atiyah. The Mathematical Intelligencer 6: 9–19.
11. Atiyah, Michael and Sutcliffe, Paul. 2003. Polyhedra in physics, chemistry and geometry. Milan Journal of Mathematics 71: 33–58.
12. Atiyah, Michael, Dijkgraaf, Robbert, and Hitchin, Nigel. 2010. Geometry and physics. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society 368: 913–926.
13. Austin, John. 1961. The meaning of a word. in Philosophical Papers. Oxford: Clarendon Press, 23–43.
14. Ayer, A. J. 1946. Language, Truth and Logic, second edn, revised. London: Victor Gollancz; first edn 1936.
15. Ayers, Michael. 1991. Locke. London: Routledge.
16. Azzouni, Jody. 2004. Deflating Existential Consequence: A Case for Nominalism. Oxford University Press.
17. Baker, Alan. 2008. Experimental mathematics. Erkenntnis 68: 331–44.
18. Baker, G. P. and Hacker, P. M. S. 2005. Wittgenstein. Understanding and Meaning: An Analytical Commentary on the Philosophical Investigations, second extensively revised edn by Peter Hacker. Oxford: Blackwell; first edn 1980.
19. Balaguer, Mark. 1998. Platonism and Anti-Platonism in Mathematics. Oxford University Press.
20. Baron-Cohen, Simon. 2002. The extreme male brain theory of autism. Trends in Cognitive Sciences 6: 248–54.
21. Baron-Cohen, Simon. 2003. The Essential Difference: Men, Women and the Extreme Male Brain. London: Allen Lane.
22. Baron-Cohen, Simon, Wheelwright, S., Scott, C., Bolton, P., and Goodyear, I. 1997. is there a link between engineering and autism? Autism, 1, 101–109.
23. Barzin, Marcel. 1935. Sur la crise contemporaine des mathématiques. L’Enseignement mathématique 34: 5–11.
24. Benacerraf, Paul. 1965. What numbers could not be. Philosophical Review 74: 47–73.
25. Benacerraf, Paul. 1967. God, the devil, and Gödel. The Monist 51: 9–32.
26. Benacerraf, Paul. 1973. Mathematical truth. Journal of Philosophy 70: 661–79.
27. Benacerraf, Paul and Putnam, Hilary. 1964. Philosophy of Mathematics: Selected Readings. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
28. Benacerraf, Paul and Putnam, Hilary. 1983. Philosophy of Mathematics: Selected Readings, second and much modified edn. Cambridge University Press.
29. Bernays, Paul. 1935a. Sur la platonisme mathématique. L’Enseignement mathématique 34: 52–69.
30. Bernays, Paul. 1935b. Quelques points essentiels de la métamathématique. L’Enseignement mathématique 34: 70–95.
31. Blake, William. 1957. The Complete Writings of William Blake, ed. Geoffrey Keynes. London: Nonesuch Press.
32. Błaszczyk, Piotr, Katz, Mikhail, and Sherry, David. 2013. Ten misconceptions from the history of analysis and their debunking. Foundations of Science 18: 43–74.
33. Bloor, David. 2011. The Enigma of the Aerofoil: Rival Theories in Aerodynamics 1909–1930. Princeton University Press.
34. Boolos, George. 1971. The iterative conception of set. Journal of Philosophy 68: 215–31. Reprinted in Benacerraf and Putnam (1983: 486–502).
35. Boolos, George. 1987. The consistency of Frege’s Foundations of Arithmetic. in Richard Jeffrey (ed.) Logic, Logic and Logic. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 183–201.
36. Boolos, George. 1998. Must we believe in set theory? in Richard Jeffrey (ed.) Logic, Logic, and Logic. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 120–31.
37. Borcherds, Richard. 2011. Renormalization and quantum field theory. Algebra and Number Theory 5: 627–58.
38. Bourbaki, N. 1939. Éléments de mathématique. Paris: Hermann. There are nine postwar volumes of the project; a final fascicule, on commutative algebra, appeared in 1998.
39. Boyer, Carl. 1991. A History of Mathematics, second edn, revised by Uta C. Merzbach. New York: Wiley.
40. Brooks, R. L., Smith, C. A. B., Stone, A.H., and Tutte, W. T. 1940. The dissection of rectangles into squares. Duke Mathematical Journal 7: 312–40.
41. Brown, Gary. 1991. The evolution of the term ‘Mixed Mathematics’. Journal of the History of Ideas 52: 81–102.
42. Brown, James Robert. 2008. Philosophy of Mathematics. A Contemporary Introduction to the World of Proofs and Pictures, second edn. London: Routledge.
43. Brown, James Robert. 2012. Platonism, Naturalism, and Mathematical Knowledge. London: Routledge.
44. Burgess, John P. 2008. Mathematics, Models, and Modality: Selected Philosophical Essays. Cambridge University Press.
45. Burgess, John P. and Rosen, Gideon. 1997. A Subject with no Object: Strategies for a Nominalistic Interpretation of Mathematics. Oxford: Clarendon Press.
46. Burnyeat, Miles. 2000. Plato on why mathematics is good for the soul. in T. J. Smiley (ed.) Mathematics and Necessity: Essays in the History of Philosophy. Oxford University Press for the British Academy, 1–82.
47. Butler, Joseph. 1827. Fifteen Sermons Preached at the Rolls Chapel. Cambridge: Hilliard and Brown; Boston: Hilliard, Gray, Little, and Wilkins.
48. Buzaglo, Meir. 2002. The Logic of Concept Expansion. Cambridge University Press.
49. Carey, Susan. 2009. The Origin of Concepts. Oxford University Press.
50. Carnap, Rudolf. 1950. Empiricism, semantics, and ontology. Revue Internationale de Philosophie 4: 20–40. Reprinted in Benacerraf and Putnam (1983: 241–57).
51. Cartwright, Nancy. 1983. How the Laws of Physics Lie. Oxford University Press.
52. Cauchy, Augustin-Louis. 1821. Cours d’analyse de l’École Polytechnique. Paris: Imprimerie Royale.
53. Chemla, Karine and Guo, Shuchun. 2004. Les neuf chapitres: le classique mathématique de la Chine ancienne et ses commentaires. Paris:Dunod.
54. Changeux, Jean-Pierre and Connes, Alain. 1995. Conversations on Mind, Matter, and Mathematics, Princeton University Press. French original, Matière à penser. Paris: Odile Jacob, 1989.
55. Chevreul, Eugène. 1816. Recherches chimiques sur les corps gras, et particulièrement sur leurs combinaisons avec les alcalis. Sixième mémoire – examen des graisses d’homme, de mouton, de boeuf, de jaguar et d’oie. Annales de Chimie et de Physique 2: 339–72.
56. Chihara, Charles. 2004. A Structural Account of Mathematics. Oxford University Press. New directions for nominalist philosophers of mathematics. Synthese 176: 153–75.
57. Chomsky, Noam. 1966. Cartesian Linguistics: A Chapter in the History of Rationalist Thought. New York: Harper and Row. 2000. New Horizons in the Study of Language and Mind. Cambridge University Press.
58. Cipra, Barry. 2002. Think and grow rich. in What’s Happening in the Mathematical Sciences, vol. v. Washington: American Mathematical Society, 77–87.
59. Cohen, I. Bernard. 1985. Revolution in Science. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
60. Cohen, Paul. 1966. Set Theory and the Continuum Hypothesis. New York: Benjamin.
61. Coleridge, Samuel Taylor. 1835. Specimens of the Table Talk of Samuel Taylor Coleridge, ed. Henry Nelson Coleridge, 2 vols. London: John Murray.
62. Colyvan, Mark. 2010. There is no easy road to nominalism. Mind 119: 285–306.
63. Conant, J. B. 1952. Modern Science and Modern Man. New York: Columbia University Press.
64. Connelly, Robert. 1999. Tensegrity structures: why are they stable? in M. F. Thorpe and P. M. Duxbury (eds.) Rigidity Theory and Applications. New York: Kluwer Academic/Plenum, 47−54.
65. Connes, Alain. 2000. La réalité mathématique archaïque. La Recherche 332: 109.
66. Connes, Alain and Kreimer, Dirk. 2000. Renormalization in quantum field theory and the Riemann−Hilbert problem. i. The Hopf algebra structure of graphs and the main theorem. Communications in Mathematical Physics 210: 249–273.
67. Connes, Alain, Lichnerowicz, André, and Schützenberger, Marcel Paul. 2001. Triangle of Thoughts. Providence, RI: American Mathematical Society. French original: Triangle des pensées. Paris: Odile Jacob, 2000.
68. Conway, John. 2001. On Numbers and Games, second edn. Natick, MA: A. K. Peters.
69. Conway, John, Burgiel, Heidi, and Goodman, Strauss, Chaim. 2008. The Symmetries of Things. Wellesley, MA: A. K. Peters.
70. Corfield, David. 2003. Towards a Philosophy of Real Mathematics. Cambridge University Press.
71. Corry, Leo. 2009. Writing the ultimate mathematical textbook: Nicolas Bourbaki’s Éléments de mathématique. in E. Robson and J. Stedall (eds.) Oxford Handbook of the History of Mathematics. Oxford University Press, 565–87.
72. Courant, Richard and Robbins, Herbert. 1996. What is Mathematics? An Elementary Approach to Ideas and Methods, second edn, revised by Ian Stewart. Oxford University Press.
73. Crombie, A. C. 1994. Styles of Scientific Thinking in the European Tradition: The History of Argument and Explanation Especially in the Mathematical and Biomedical Sciences and Arts. London: Duckworth.
74. Dahan-Dalmedico, A. 1986. Un texte de philosophie mathématique de Gergonne (mémoire inédit déposé à l’Académie de Bordeaux). Revue de l’ Histoire des Sciences 39: 97–126.
75. Daston, Lorraine. 1988. Fitting numbers to the world: the case of probability theory. in Aspray and Kitcher (1988: 221–37).
76. Davis, Chandler. 1994. Where did twentieth-century mathematics go wrong? in Sasaki Chikara, Sugiura Mitsuo, and Joseph W. Dauben (eds.) The Intersection of History and Mathematics. Boston: Birkhäuser, 120–42.
77. Davis, Martin. 2000. The Universal Computer: The Road from Leibniz to Turing. New York: Norton.
78. Dawson, John. 2008. The reception of Gödel’s incompleteness theorem. in Thomas Drucker (ed.) Perspectives on the History of Mathematical Logic. Boston: Birkhäuser, 84–100.
79. Dedekind, Richard. 1996. What are numbers and what should they be? in Ewald (1996: 787-832).(Translation of Was sind und was sollen die Zahlen? Braunschweig: Vieweg, 1888.)
80. Dehaene, Stanislas. 1997. The Number Sense: How the Mind Creates Mathematics. London: Allen Lane/Penguin.
81. Dennett, Daniel. 2003. Freedom Evolves. New York: Penguin.
82. Derrida, Jacques. 1994. Specters of Marx: The State of the Debt, the Work of Mourning, and the New International. New York: Routledge. Original: Spectres de Marx. Paris: Galilée, 1993.
83. Descartes, René. 1954. The Geometry of René Descartes, trans. from the French of 1637 and Latin of 1649 by D. E. Smith and M. L. Latham. New York: Dover. 1971.
84. Douglas, Mary and Wildavsky, Aaron. 1982. Risk and Culture: An Essay on the Selection of Technological and Environmental Dangers. Berkeley: University of California Press.
85. Doxiadis, Apostolos and Mazur, Barry (eds.). 2012. Circles Disturbed: The Interplay of Mathematics and Narrative. Princeton University Press.
86. Dudeny, Henry Ernest. 1907. The Canterbury Puzzles, and Other Curious Problems. London: Nelson. Available online from Project Gutenberg.
87. Dudeny, Henry Ernest. 1917. Amusements in Mathematics. London: Nelson. Available online from Project Gutenberg.
88. Dummett, Michael. 1973. Frege: Philosophy of Language. London: Duckworth.
89. Dummett, Michael. 1978. Truth and Other Enigmas. London: Duckworth.
90. Dummett, Michael. 1980. Frege and analytical philosophy. London Review of Books, 18 September.
91. Dummett, Michael. 1991. Frege: Philosophy of Mathematics. London: Duckworth.
92. Edwards, Harold M. 1987. An appreciation of Kronecker. Mathematical Intelligencer 9: 28–35.
93. Edwards, Harold M. 2005. Essays in Constructive Mathematics. New York: Springer.
94. Eckert, Michael. 2006. The Dawn of Fluid Dynamics: A Discipline Between Science and Technology. New York: Wiley.
95. Everitt, C. W. F. 1975. James ClerkMaxwell: Physicist and Natural Philosopher. New York: Scribner.
96. Ewald, William. 1996. From Kant to Hilbert: Readings in the Foundations of Mathematics, 2 vols. Oxford University Press.
97. Ferreirós, José. 1999. Labyrinth of Thought: AHistory of Set Theory and its Role in Modern Mathematics. Basel: Birkhäuser; revised edn with similar pagination, 2007.
98. Ferreirós, José. 2007. Ό Θεός Άριθμητίζει: The rise of pure mathematics as arithmetic with Gauss. in Goldstein, Schappacher, and Schwermer (2007: 235 268).
99. Field, Hartry. 1980. Science without Numbers: A Defence of Nominalism. Oxford: Blackwell.
100. Fine, Kit. 1998. Cantorian abstraction: A reconstruction and a defense. Journal of Philosophy 95: 599–634.
101. Fitzgerald, Michael. 2004. Autism and Creativity: Is there a Link between Autism in Men and Exceptional Ability? Hove, East Sussex: Brunner-Routledge.
102. Fitzgerald, Michael. 2005. The Genesis of Artistic Creativity: Asperger’s Syndrome and the Arts. London: Jessica Kingsley.
103. Fitzgerald, Michael. 2009. Attention Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder: Creativity, Novelty Seeking, and Risk. New York: Nova.
104. Fitzgerald, Michael and James, Ioan. 2007. The Mind of the Mathematician. Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins University Press.
105. Fitzgerald, Michael and O’Brien, Brendan. 2007. Genius Genes: How Asperger Talents Changed the World. Shawnee Mission, KS: Autism Asperger Publishing Company.
106. Frege, Gottlob. 1884. Die Grunlagen der Arithmetic. Eine logisch-mathematische Untersuchung u¨ber den Begriff der Zahl. Breslau. The Foundations of Arithmetic: A Logico-Mathematical Enquiry into the Concept of Number, trans. J. L. Austin, second revised edn. Oxford: Blackwell, 1953.
107. Frege, Gottlob. 1892. Über Sinn und Bedeutung. Zeitschrift fu¨r Philosophie und philosophische Kritik 100: 25–50.
108. Frege, Gottlob. 1949. On sense and nominatum. Herbert Feigl’s translation of Frege 1892. in H. Feigl and W. Sellars, Readings in Philosophical Analysis. New York: Appleton-Century-Croft, 85–102.
109. Frege, Gottlob. 1952. Translations from the Philosophical Writings of Gottlob Frege, trans. Peter Geach and Max Black. Oxford: Blackwell; third revised edn. 1980.
110. Frege, Gottlob. 1967. The Basic Laws of Arithmetic: Exposition of the System. Montgomery Furth’s translation of selections from Grundgesetze der Arithmetik. Berkeley: University of California Press.
111. Frege, Gottlob. 1997. The Frege Reader, ed. Michael Beaney. Oxford: Blackwell.
112. Friedman, Michael. 1992. Kant and the Exact Sciences. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
113. Gabbay, Dov. 1994. What is a Logical System? Oxford: Clarendon Press.
114. Galison, Peter. 1979. Minkowski’s space-time: from visual thinking to the absolute world. Historical Studies in the Physical Sciences 10: 85–121.
115. Garber, Daniel. 1992. Descartes’ Metaphysical Physics. University of Chicago Press.
116. Gardner, Martin. 1978. Aha! Aha! Insight. New York: Scientific American.
117. Gauss, Karl Friedrich. 1900. Werke, vol. VIII: Arithmetik und Algebra. Leibniz: Teubner; reproduced Hildesheim: Olms, 1981.
118. Gaukroger, Stephen. 1989. Cartesian Logic: An Essay on Descartes’ Conception of Inference. Oxford University Press.
119. Gaukroger, Stephen. 1995. Descartes: An Intellectual Biography. Oxford: Clarendon Press.
120. Gelbart, Stephen. 1984. An elementary introduction to the Langlands program. Bulletin of the American Mathematical Society 10: 177–219.
121. Gergonne, JosephDiaz. 1810. Prospectus. Annales de mathématiques pures et appliqués 1: i−iv.
122. Gergonne, JosephDiaz. 1818. Essai sur la théorie des définitions. Annales de mathématiques pures et appliquées 9: 1–35.
123. Gingras, Yves. 2001. What did mathematics do to physics? History of Science 39: 383–416.
124. Gödel, Kurt. 1983. What is Cantor’s continuum problem? A revised version of the paper in American Mathematical Monthly 54 (1947): 515–25.
125. Goodman, Nelson, and Quine, W. V. 1947. Steps toward a constructive nominalism. Journal of Symbolic Logic 12: 105–22.
126. Gowers, Timothy. 2002. Mathematics: A Very Short Introduction. Oxford University Press.
127. Gowers, Timothy. 2006. Does mathematics need a philosophy? in Reuben Hersh (ed.) 18 Unconventional Essays on the Nature of Mathematics. New York: Springer Science+Business Media, 182–201.
128. Gowers, Timothy. 2008. The Princeton Companion to Mathematics. Princeton University Press.
129. Gowers, Timothy. 2012. Vividness in mathematics and narrative. in Doxiadis and Mazur (2012:211–31).
130. Grabiner, Judith. 1981. The Origins of Cauchy’s Rigorous Calculus. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
131. Grattan-Guinness, Ivor. 2000. A sideways look at Hilbert’s twenty-three problems of 1900. Notices of the American Mathematical Society 47: 752–7.
132. Griess, Robert. 1982. The friendly giant. Inventiones Mathematicae 69: 1–102.
133. Guéroult, Martial. 1953. Descartes selon l’ordre des raisons, 2 vols. Paris: Aubier.
134. Hacker, Andrew. 2012. is algebra necessary? New York Times Sunday Review, 29 July.
135. Hacker, P. M. S. 1996. Wittgenstein’s Place in Twentieth-Century Analytic Philosophy. Oxford: Blackwell.
136. Hacking, Ian MacDougall. 1962. Part i: Proof; Part ii: Strict implication and natural deduction. Cambridge University PhD, 4160.
137. Hacking, Ian MacDougall. 1973. Leibniz and Descartes: proof and eternal truth. Proceedings of the British Academy 59: 175–188. Reprinted in Hacking (2002: 200–13).
138. Hacking, Ian MacDougall. 1974. Infinite analysis. Studia Leibniz 6: 126–30.
139. Hacking, Ian MacDougall. 1979. What is logic? Journal of Philosophy 86: 285–319.
140. Hacking, Ian MacDougall. 1982. Wittgenstein as philosophical psychologist. New York Review of Books, 1 April. Reprinted in Hacking (2002: 214–26).
141. Hacking, Ian MacDougall. 1984. Where does math come from? New York Review of Books, 16 February.
142. Hacking, Ian MacDougall. 1990. The Taming of Chance. Cambridge University Press.
143. Hacking, Ian MacDougall. 1996. The disunities of the sciences. in P. Galison and D. J. Stump (eds.) The Disunity of Science: Boundaries, Contexts and Power. Stanford University Press, 37–74.
144. Hacking, Ian MacDougall. 1999. The Social Construction of What? Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
145. Hacking, Ian MacDougall. 2000a. How inevitable are the results of successful science? Philosophy of Science 67: 58−71.
146. Hacking, Ian MacDougall. 2000b. What mathematics has done to some and only some philosophers. in T. J. Smiley (ed.)Mathematics and Necessity: Essays in the History of Philosophy. Oxford University Press for the British Academy, 83–138.
147. Hacking, Ian MacDougall. 2002. Historical Ontology. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
148. Hacking, Ian MacDougall. 2006. Casimir Lewy 1919–1991. Proceedings of the British Academy 138: 170–7.
149. Hacking, Ian MacDougall. 2007. Trees of logic, trees of porphyry. in J. Heilbron (ed.) Advancements of Learning: Essays in Honour of Paolo Rossi. Florence: Olshki, 146–97.
150. Hacking, Ian MacDougall. 2011a. Why is there philosophy of mathematics AT ALL? South African Journal of Philosophy 30: 1–15. Reprinted in Mircea Pitti (ed.) Best Writing in Mathematics 2011, Princeton University Press, 2012.
151. Hacking, Ian MacDougall. 2011b. Wittgenstein, necessity and the application of mathematics. South African Journal of Philosophy 30: 80–92.
152. Hacking, Ian MacDougall. 2012a. ‘Language, truth and reason’ thirty years later. Studies in History and Philosophy of Science 43: 599−609.
153. Hacking, Ian MacDougall. 2012b. The lure of Pythagoras. Iyyun: The Jerusalem Philosophical Quarterly 61: 1−26.
154. Hadot, Pierre. 2006. The Veil of Isis: An Essay on the History of the Idea of Nature. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press. Original: Paris: Gallimard, 2004.
155. Hale, Bob. 1987. Abstract Objects. Oxford: Blackwell.
156. Hamilton, William Rowan. 1833. Introductory lecture on astronomy. Dublin University Review and Quarterly Magazine 1: 72–85.
157. Hamilton, William Rowan. 1837. Theory of conjugate functions, or algebraic concepts, with a preliminary and elementary essay on algebra as the science of pure time. Transactions of the Royal Irish Academy 17: 293–422.
158. Hamilton, William Rowan. 1853. Lectures on quaternions; containing a systematic statement of a new mathematical method; of which the principles were communicated in 1843 to the Royal Irish academy; &c. Dublin: Hodges and Smith.
159. Hardy, G. H. 1908. A Course of Pure Mathematics. Cambridge University Press.
160. Hardy, G. H. 1929. Mathematical proof. Mind 38: 1–25.
161. Hardy, G. H. 1940. A Mathematician’s Apology. Cambridge University Press.
162. Hardy, G. H. and Wright, E. M. 1938. An Introduction to the Theory of Numbers. Oxford: Clarendon Press.
163. Heilbron, John. 2010. Galileo. Oxford University Press.
164. Hellman, Geoffrey. 1989. Mathematics without Numbers. Oxford University Press. 2001. Three varieties of mathematical structuralism. Philosophia Mathematica 9: 184–211.
165. Hempel, C. G. 1945. On the nature of mathematical truth. American Mathematical Monthly 52: 543–56.
166. Herbrand, Jacques. 1967a. Investigations in proof theory: The properties of true propositions. in Van Heijenoort (1967: 525–81). French original 1930. 1967b. On the consistency of arithmetic. in Van Heijenoort (1967: 618–28). French original 1931.
167. Hersh, Reuben. 1997. What is Mathematics, Really? Oxford University Press.
168. Hersh, Reuben. 2006. 18 Unconventional Essays on the Nature of Mathematics. New York: Springer Science+Business Media.
169. Hesse, Mary. 1966. Models and Analogies in Science. University of Notre Dame Press.
170. Hobbs, Arthur M. and Oxley, James G. 2004. William T. Tutte (1917–2002). Notices of the American Mathematical Society 51: 320–30.
171. Hofweber, Thomas. 2005. Number determiners, numbers, and arithmetic. Philosophical Review 114: 179–225.
172. Hofweber, Thomas. 2007. Innocent statements and their metaphysically loaded counterparts. The Philosophers Imprint.
173. Hon, Giora and Goldstein, Bernard. 2008. From Summetria to Symmetry: The Making of a Revolutionary Scientific Concept. Berlin: Springer.
174. Høyrup, Jens. 1990. Sub-scientific mathematics: observations on a pre-modern phenomenon. History of Science 28: 63–86.
175. Høyrup, Jens. 2005. Leonardo Fibonacci and the abbaco culture: a proposal to invert the roles. Revue d’Histoire des Mathématiques 11: 23–56.
176. Husserl, Edmund. 1970. The Crisis of European Sciences and Transcendental Phenomenology: An Introduction to Phenomenological Philosophy, trans. From the German edition of 1954 by David Carr. Evanston, IL: Northwestern University Press.
177. Huizinga, Johan. 1949. Homo Ludens: A Study of the Play-element in Culture. London: Routledge. Trans. from German (Swiss) edition of 1940. Dutch original online in Digitale Biblioteek voor de Nederlandse Letteren, DBNL.
178. Institute for Advanced Study. 2010. The fundamental lemma: from minor irritant to central problem. The Institute Letter. Princeton, NJ: IAS,7.
179. Jaffe, Arthur and Quinn, Frank. 1993. ‘Theoretical mathematics’: toward a cultural synthesis of mathematics and theoretical physics. Bulletin of the American Mathematical Society 29: 1–13.
180. Johnson, W. E. 1892. The logical calculus i. General principles. Mind new series 1: 3–30.
181. Kahn, Charles. 2001. Pythagoras and Pythagoreans. Indianapolis: Hackett.
182. Kahn, Charles. 2001. Pythagoras and Pythagoreans. Indianapolis: Hackett.
183. Kanovei, Vladimir, Katz, Mikhail G., and Mormann, Thomas. 2013. Tools, objects, and chimeras: Connes on the role of hyperreals in mathematics. Foundations of Science.
184. Kant, Immanuel. 1992. Concerning the ultimate ground of the differentiation of directions in space. in D. Walford and R. Meerbote, Immanuel Kant: Theoretical Philosophy 1775–1770, Cambridge University Press, 365–72. Original 1768.
185. Kant, Immanuel. 1997a. Prolegomena to Any Future Metaphysics that Will Be Able to Come Forward as Science, trans. Gary Hatfield. Cambridge University Press.
186. Kant, Immanuel. 1997b. Lectures on Metaphysics, trans. K. Ameriks and S. Naragon. Cambridge University Press.
187. Kant, Immanuel. 1998. Critique of Pure Reason, trans. Paul Guyer and Allen Wood. Cambridge University Press.
188. Kaplan, David. 1975. How to Russell a Frege-Church. Journal of Philosophy, 772: 716–29.
189. Kapustin, Anton and Witten, Edward. 2006. Electric-magnetic duality and the geometric Langlands program. Available at: http://arXiv:hep-th/0604151.pdf.
190. Kästner, Abraham Gotthelf. 1780. Anfangsgru¨nde der angewandten Mathematik. I. Mechanische und Optische Wissenschaften. Göttingen: Vandenhoeck.
191. Kennedy, Christopher and Stanley, Jason. 2009. On ‘average’. Mind 118: 583–646.
192. Kitcher, Philip. 1983. The Nature of Mathematical Knowledge. Oxford University Press.
193. Klein, Jacob. 1968. Greek Mathematical Thought and the Origin of Algebra, trans. E. Brann. Cambridge MA: MIT Press.
194. Kline, Morris. 1953. Mathematics in Western Culture. Oxford University Press. 1980. Mathematics: The Loss of Certainty. Oxford University Press.
195. Kochan, Jeff. 2006. Rescuing the Gorgias from Latour. Philosophy of the Social Sciences 36: 395–422.
196. Knorr, Wilbur. 1975. The Evolution of the Euclidean Elements: A Study of the Theory of Incommensurable Magnitudes and its Significance for Early Greek Geometry. Dordrecht: Reidel.
197. Knorr, Wilbur. 1986. The Ancient Tradition of Geometric Problems. Boston: Birkhäuser.
198. Kremer, Michael. 2008. Soames on Russell’s logic: a reply. Philosophical Studies 139: 209–12.
199. Kreisel, Georg. 1958. Wittgenstein’s remarks on the Foundations of Mathematics. British Journal for the Philosophy of Science, 9: 135–58.
200. Krieger, MartinH. 1987. The physicist’s toolkit. American Journal of Physics 55: 1033–8.
201. Krieger, MartinH. 1992. Doing Physics: How Physicists Take Hold of the World. Bloomington and Indianapolis: Indiana University Press.
202. Kripke, Saul. 1965. Semantical analysis of intuitionistic logic. in J. Crossley and M. A. E. Dummett (eds.) Formal Systems and Recursive Functions. Amsterdam: North-Holland, 92–130.
203. Kripke, Saul. 1980. Naming and Necessity. Oxford: Blackwell.
204. Kuhn, Thomas S. 1962. The Structure of Scientific Revolutions. University of Chicago Press.
205. Kuhn, Thomas S. 1977. Second thoughts on paradigms. in Thomas S. Kuhn, The Essential Tension: Selected Studies in Scientific Tradition and Change. University of Chicago Press, 293–319; first published 1974.
206. Ladyman, James. 2009. Structural realism. in Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy, ed. Edward N. Zalta (summer 2009 edn). Available at: http://plato.stanford. edu/archives/sum2009/entries/structural-realism/.
207. Laird, W. R. 1997. Galileo and the mixed sciences. in Daniel A. Di Liscia et al. (eds.) Method and Order in the Renaissance Philosophy of Nature. Aldershot: Ashgate, 253–70.
208. Lakatos, Imre. 1963. Proofs and refutations. British Journal for the Philosophy of Science, 296–342.
209. Lakatos, Imre. 1976. Proofs and Refutations: The Logic of Mathematical Discovery. Expanded version of Lakatos (1963–4), ed. John Worrall and Elie Zahar. Cambridge University Press.
210. Langlands, Robert. 2010. is there beauty in mathematical theories? Available at: http://publications.ias.edu/sites/default/files/ND.pdf.
211. Latour, Bruno. 1999. Pandora’s Hope: Essays on the Reality of Science Studies. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
212. Latour, Bruno. 2008. The Netz-works of Greek deductions. Social Studies of Science 38: 441–59.
213. Lennox, James G. 1986. Aristotle, Galileo, and ‘mixed sciences’. in W. Wallace (ed.) Reinterpreting Galileo. Washington, DC: Catholic University of America, 29–51.
214. Lévi-Strauss, Claude. 1954. The mathematics of man. International Social Science Bulletin 6: 581–90.
215. Lévi-Strauss, Claude. 1969. The Elementary Structures of Kinship. London: Eyre and Spottiswoode. French original: Les structures élémentaires de la parenté, Paris: Presses Universitaires de France, 1949.
216. Liggins, David. 2008. Quine, Putnam, and the ‘Quine−Putnam’ indispensability argument. Erkenntnis 68: 113–27.
217. Littlewood, J. E. 1953. A Mathematician’s Miscellany. London: Methuen.
218. Linsky, Bernard. 2009. Logical constructions. in Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy, ed. Edward N. Zalta (winter 2009 edn). Available at: http://plato.stanford.edu/ archives/win2009/entries/logical-construction/.
219. Lloyd, Geoffrey. 1990. Demystifying Mentalities. Cambridge University Press.
220. Lucas, John. 1961. Minds, machines and Gödel. Philosophy 36: 112–27.
221. Lyotard, Jean. 1984. The Postmodern Condition: A Report on Knowledge. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press. Translated from the French 1979.
222. MacFarlane, John. 2009. Logical constants. in Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy, ed. Edward N. Zalta (fall 2009 edn).
223. MacKenzie, Donald. 1993. Negotiating arithmetic, constructing proof: the sociology of mathematics and information technology. Social Studies of Science 23(1): 27-65.
224. MacKenzie, Donald. 2001. Mechanizing Proof: Computing, Risk, and Trust.Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
225. Maddy, Penelope. 1997. Naturalism in Mathematics. Oxford University Press.
226. Maddy, Penelope. 1998. How to be a naturalist about mathematics. in H. G. Dales and G. Oliveri (eds.) Truth in Mathematics. Oxford University Press.
227. Maddy, Penelope. 2001. Naturalism: friends and foes. Philosophical Perspectives 15: 37–67.
228. Maddy, Penelope. 2005. Three forms of naturalism. in S. Shapiro (ed.) Oxford Handbook of the Philosophy of Mathematics and Logic. Oxford University Press, 437–59.
229. Maddy, Penelope. 2007. Second Philosophy: A Naturalistic Method. Oxford University Press.
230. Maddy, Penelope. 2008. How applied mathematics became pure. Review of Symbolic Logic 1: 16–41.
231. Mancosu, Paolo. 1998. From Brouwer to Hilbert: The Debate on the Foundations of Mathematics in the 1920s. Oxford University Press.
232. Mancosu, Paolo. 2009a. Measuring the size of infinite collections of natural numbers: was Cantor’s theory of infinite number inevitable? Review of Symbolic Logic 2: 612–46.
233. Mancosu, Paolo. 2009b. Mathematical style. in Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy, ed. Edward N. Zalta (spring 2010 edn). Available at: http://plato.stanford.edu/archives/.
234. Manders, Kenneth. 1989. Domain extension and the philosophy of mathematics. Journal of Philosophy 86: 553–62.
235. Martin-Löf, Per. 1996. On the meanings of the logical constants and the justifications of the logical laws. Nordic Journal of Philosophical Logic 1: 11–60.
236. Mashaal, Maurice. 2006. Bourbaki: A Secret Society of Mathematicians. Providence, RI: American Mathematical Society. Translation of Bourbaki: une société secrète de mathématiciens. Paris: Belin, 2002.
237. Masters, Alexander. 2011. Simon: The Genius in my Basement. London: Fourth Estate.
238. Masters, Alexander. 2012. Meet the mathematical ‘genius in my basement’. An interview on 26 February with (US) National Public Radio. Available at: npr.org.
239. Maxwell, James Clerk. 1882. Does the progress of Physical Science tend to give any advantage to the opinion of Necessity (or Determinism) over that of the Contingency of Events and the Freedom of the Will? (read 11 February 1873). in L. Campbell and W.Garnett, The Life of James Clerk Maxwell, with Selections from his Correspondence and Occasional Writings. London: Macmillan, 434–44.
240. Melia, Joseph. 1995. On what there’s not. Analysis 55: 223–9.
241. Melia, Joseph. 2000. Weaseling away the indispensability argument. Mind 109: 455–79.
242. Mews, Constant J. 1992. Nominalism and theology before Abelard: new light on Roscelin of Compiègne. Vivarium 30: 4–33.
243. Mews, Constant J. 2002. Reason and Belief in the Age of Roscelin and Abelard. Aldershot: Ashgate.
244. Mialet, Hélène. 2012. Hawking Incorporated: Stephen Hawking and the Anthropology of the Knowing Subject. University of Chicago Press.
245. Mill, John Stuart. 1965. Collected Works of John Stuart Mill, ed. J. Robson, 28 vols. Toronto University Press.
246. Minkowski, Hermann. 1909. Raum und Zeit. Jahresberichte der Deutschen Mathematiker-Vereinigung 20: 1–14.
247. Moore, G. E. 1900. Necessity. Mind new series 9: 283–304.
248. Mühlhölzer, Felix. 2006. ‘A mathematical proof must be surveyable’ – what Wittgenstein meant by this and what it implies. Grazer Philosophische Studien 71: 57–86.
249. Murakami, Haruki. 2011. IQ84. New York: Knopf. Translated from the Japanese original of 2009–10.
250. Ne’eman, Yuval. 2000. Pythagorean and Platonic conceptions of xxth century physics. in N. Alon et al. (eds.) GAFA 2000: Visions in Mathematics Towards 2000. Basel: Birkhäuser, 383–405.
251. Nelson, Edward. 1977. Internal set theory: a new approach to nonstandard analysis. Bulletin of the American Mathematical Society 83: 1165–98.
252. Netz, Reviel. 1999. The Shaping of Deduction in Greek Mathematics: A Study in Cognitive History. Cambridge University Press.
253. Netz, Reviel. 2009. Ludic Proof: Greek Mathematics and the Alexandrian Aesthetic. Cambridge University Press.
254. Netz, Reviel and Noel, William. 2007. The Archimedes Codex: Revealing the Secrets of the World’s Greatest Palimpsest. London: Wiedenfeld and Nicolson.
255. Núñez, Rafael. 2011. No innate number line in the human brain. Journal of Cross- Cultural Psychology 45: 651−68.
256. Parsons, Charles. 1964. Frege’s theory of number. in Max Black (ed.) Philosophy in America. New York: Cornell University Press, 180–203.
257. Parsons, Charles. 1990. The structuralist view of mathematical objects. Synthese 84: 303–46.
258. Parsons, Charles. 2008. Mathematical Thought and its Objects. Cambridge University Press.
259. Peirce, Benjamin. 1881. Linear associative algebra. American Journal of Mathematics 4: 97−229.
260. Peirce, Charles Sanders. 1931–58. Collected Papers, ed. Charles Hartshorne and Paul Weiss, 8 vols. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press. References are given by volume and paragraph number, thus CP 4: 235 (1902) means paragraph 235 in vol. 4, dating from 1902.
261. Pierce, Roy. 1966. Contemporary French Political Thought. Oxford University Press.
262. Penrose, Roger. 1997. The Large, the Small and the Human Mind. Cambridge University Press.
263. Pickering, Andrew. 1995. The Mangle of Practice: Time, Agency, and Science. University of Chicago Press.
264. Polya, Georg. 1948. How to Solve It: A New Aspect of Mathematical Method. Princeton University Press. Reprinted 2004 with a valuable foreword by John Conway.
265. Polya, Georg. 1954. Mathematics and Plausible Reasoning, vol. I: Induction and Analogy in Mathematics. Princeton University Press.
266. Poncelet, Jean-Victor. 1822. Traité des propriétés projectives des figures. Paris: Bachelier.
267. Poncelet, Jean-Victor. 1836. Expériences faites à Metz, en 1834 … sur les batteries de brèche, sur la pénétration des projectiles dans divers milieux résistans, et sur la rupture des corps par le choc, suivies du rapport fait, sur ces expériences, à l’Académie des sciences … le 12 octobre 1835.
268. Poncelet, Jean-Victor. 1839. Introduction à la mécanique industrielle, physique ou expérimentale. Metz: Mme Thiel; Paris: Eugène André; first edn 1829.
269. Popper, Karl. 1962. The Open Society and its Enemies, vol. i: Plato. London: Routledge; first edn 1945.
270. Putnam, Hilary. 1971. Philosophy of Logic. New York:Harper. Reprinted in Putnam.
271. Putnam, Hilary. 1975a. What is mathematical truth? in Hilary Putnam, Philosophical Papers, vol. i: Mathematics, Matter and Method. Cambridge University Press, 60–78.
272. Putnam, Hilary. 1975b. The meaning of ‘meaning’. in Hilary Putnam, Philosophical Papers, vol. II: Mind, Language and Reality. Cambridge University Press, 215–271.
273. Putnam, Hilary. 1979. Philosophy of logic. in Hilary Putnam, Philosophical Papers, vol. I: Mathematics, Matter and Method, second edn. Cambridge University Press, 323?357. Reprint of Putnam.
274. Putnam, Hilary. 1982. Peirce the logician. Historia Mathematica 9: 290–301. Reprinted in his Realism with a Human Face. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1990, 252–260.
275. Putnam, Hilary. 1994. Rethinking mathematical necessity. in Words and Life ed. James Conant. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 245–63.
276. Quine, W. V. 1953. On what there is. in From a Logical Point of View. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1-19.
277. Quine, W. V. 1960. Word and Object. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
278. Quine, W. V.1967. Accompanying note on Whitehead and Russell on Incomplete Symbols. in van Heijenoort (216–17).
279. Quine, W. V. 1969. Epistemology naturalized. in Ontological Relativity, and Other Essays. New York: Columbia University Press, 69–90.
280. Quine, W. V. 2008. Naturalism; or, living within one’s means. in D. Føllesdal and D. B. Quine (eds.) Confessions of a Confirmed Extensionalist and Other Essays. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 461–72; reprinted from Dialectica 49 (1995): 251–61.
281. Ramsey, F. P. 1950. The Foundations of Mathematics and other Logical Essays. London: Routledge.
282. Reck, Erich. 2003. Dedekind’s structuralism: an interpretation and partial defense. Synthese 137: 369–419.
283. Reck, Erich. 2011. Dedekind’s contributions to the foundations of mathematics. in Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy, ed. Edward N. Zalta (fall 2011 edn). Available at: http://plato.stanford.edu/archives/fall2011/entries/dedekind-foundations/.
284. Reck, Erich and Price, Michael. 2000. Structures and structuralism in contemporary philosophy of mathematics. Synthese 125: 341–83.
285. Resnik, Michael. 1981. Mathematics as a science of patterns: ontology and reference. Noûs 15: 529–50.
286. Resnik, Michael. 1988. Mathematics from the structural point of view. Revue Internationale de Philosophie 42: 400–24.
287. Robinson, Abraham. 1966. Non-Standard Analysis. Amsterdam: North-Holland.
288. Ronan, Mark. 2006. Symmetry and the Monster: One of the Greatest Quests in Mathematics. Oxford University Press.
289. Rosen, Joe. 1998. Symmetry Discovered: Concepts and Applications in Nature and Science. Minneola, NY: Dover; first edn 1975. Cambridge University Press.
290. Rothstein, Edward. 2010. ‘Before Pythagoras’ at New York University. New York Times, 26 November.
291. Russell, Bertrand. 1900. A Critical Exposition of the Philosophy of Leibniz. Cambridge University Press.
292. Russell, Bertrand. 1903. The Principles of Mathematics. Cambridge University Press.
293. Russell, Bertrand. 1905. On denoting. Mind new series 14: 479–93.
294. Russell, Bertrand. 1912. The Problems of Philosophy. London: Williams and Norgate; The Home University Library of Modern Knowledge.
295. Russell, Bertrand. 1917. The relation of sense data to physics. in Bertrand Russell, Mysticism and Logic. London: Allen and Unwin, 145−79.
296. Russell, Bertrand. 1924. Logical atomism. in J. H. Muirhead, Contemporary British Philosophy: Personal Statements, first series. London: Allen and Unwin, 359–84.
297. Russell, Bertrand. 1967. The Autobiography of Bertrand Russell, London: Allen and Unwin.
298. Scharlau, Walter. 2008. Who is Alexander Grothendieck? Notices of the American Mathematical Society 55: 930–41.
299. Schärlig, Alain. 2001. Compter avec des cailloux: le calcul élémentaire sur l’abaque chez les anciens Grecs. Lausanne: Presses Polytechniques et Universitaires Romandes.
300. Schmandt-Besserat, Denise. 1992. Before Writing, vol. I: From Counting to Cuneiform. Austin: University of Texas Press.
301. Sebald, W.G. 1996. The Emigrants.New York:NewDirections. (Die Ausgewanderten. Frankfurt am Main: Eichborn, 1993.)
302. Serre, Jean-Pierre. 2004. Interview with J.-P. Serre, by Martin Raussen and Christian Skau. Notices of the American Mathematical Society 51: 210–14.
303. Shapiro, Stewart. 1997. Philosophy of Mathematics: Structure and Ontology. Oxford University Press.
304. Shapiro, Stewart. 2000. Thinking about Mathematics: The Philosophy of Mathematics. Oxford University Press.
305. Shen, Kangsheng, Crossley, John, and Lun, Anthony W.-C. 1999. The Nine Chapters on the Mathematical Art: Companion and Commentary. Oxford University Press.
306. Siegmund-Schultze, Reinhard. 2004. A non-conformist longing for unity in the fractures of modernity: towards a scientific biography of Richard von Mises. Science in Context 17: 333–70.
307. Soames, Scott. 2008. No class: Russell on contextual definition and the elimination of sets. Philosophical Studies 139: 213–18.
308. Sober, Elliott. 1993. Mathematics and indispensability. Philosophical Review, 102: 35–57.
309. Solomon, Ronald. 2005. Review of Aschbacher and Smith 2004. Bulletin of the American Mathematical Society new series 43: 115–21.
310. Spencer, Joel and Graham, Ronald. 2009. The elementary proof of the prime number theorem. The Mathematical Intelligencer 31: 18–23.
311. Sprague, Roland. 1939. Beispiel einer Zerlegung des Quadrats in lauter verschiedene Quadrate. Mathematische Zeitschrift 45: 607.
312. Stein, Howard. 1988. Logos, logic, and Logistiké: some philosophical remarks on nineteenth-century transformation of mathematics. in Aspray and Kitcher (1988: 238–59).
313. Steiner, Mark. 1973. Mathematical Knowledge. New York: Cornell University Press.
314. Steiner, Mark. 1998. The Applicability of Mathematics as a Philosophical Problem. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
315. Steiner, Mark. 2009. Empirical regularities in Wittgenstein’s philosophy of mathematics. Philosophia Mathematica 17: 1−34.
316. Stewart, Ian. 2007. Why Beauty is Truth: A History of Symmetry. New York: Basic Books.
317. Stigler, Stephen. 1980. Stigler’s law of eponymy. Transactions of the New York Academy of Sciences, 39: 147–58.
318. Strawson, P. F. 1950. On referring. Mind 59: 320–44.
319. Tait, William. 1996. Frege versus Carnap and Dedekind: on the concept of number. in W. Tait (ed.), Early Analytic Philosophy: Frege, Russell, Wittgenstein: Essays in Honor of Leonard Linsky. Chicago: Open Court, 213–48.
320. Tait, William. 2001. Beyond the axioms: the question of objectivity in mathematics. Philosophia Mathematica 9: 21–36.
321. Tait, William. 2006. Review of Gödel’s correspondence on proof theory and constructive mathematics in the Collected Works. Philosophia Mathematica 14: 76–111.
322. Tappenden, Jamie. 2009.Mathematical concepts and definitions. in Paolo Mancosu (ed.) Philosophy of Mathematical Practice. Oxford University Press, 256–75.
323. Tegmark, Max. 2008. The mathematical universe. Foundations of Physics 38: 101–50.
324. Thomson, William (Lord Kelvin) and Tait, Peter Guthrie. 1867. A Treatise of Natural Philosophy. Oxford: Clarendon Press.
325. Thurston, William P. 1994. On proof and progress in mathematics. Bulletin of the American Mathematical Society 30: 161–177. (Anthologized in Tymoczko (1998) and Hersh (2006).)
326. Toledo, Sue. 2011. Sue Toledo’s notes of her conversations with Gödel in 1972−5. in Juliette Kennedy and Roman Kossak (eds.) Set Theory, Arithmetic, and Foundations of Mathematics: Theorems, Philosophies. Cambridge University Press, 200−7.
327. Tutte, William. 1958. Originally in Martin Gardner’s ‘Mathematical Games’ column, Scientific American 199 (November): 136–44;reprinted as ‘Squaring the square’, in Martin Gardner, More Mathematical Puzzles and Diversions. London: Penguin, 1961.
328. Tymoczko, Thomas (ed.). 1998. New Directions in the Philosophy of Mathematics. An Anthology, revised and expanded edn. Princeton University Press.
329. Van Bendegem, J. P. 1998. What, if anything, is experiment in mathematics? in D. Anapolitanos et al. (eds.) Philosophy and the Many Faces of Science. London: Rowman and Littlefield.
330. Van Heijenoort, Jean. 1967. From Frege to Gödel: A Source Book in Mathematical Logic, 1879–1931. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
331. Waismann, Friedrich. 1945. Verifiability. Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society, supplementary vol. 19: 119–50.
332. Wang, Hao. 1961. Proving theorems by pattern recognition ii. Bell Systems Technical Journal 40: 1–41.
333. Weber, Heinrich. 1893. Leopold Kronecker. Mathematische Annalen 43: 1-26.Reprinted from Jahresbericht der deutschen Mathematiker-Vereinigung 2 (1891-2): 5-31.
334. Weil, André. 2005. A 1940 letter of André Weil on analogy in mathematics, trans. Martin Krieger. Notices of the American Mathematical Society 52: 334–41.
335. Weinberg, Steven. 1997. Changing attitudes and the standard model. in Lillian Hoddeson et al. (eds.) The Rise of the Standard Model: Particle Physics in the 1960s and 1970s. Cambridge University Press, 36–44.
336. Weyl, Hermann. 1921. Über die neue Grundlagenkrise der Mathematik. Mathematische Zeitschrift 10: 39–79.
337. Weyl, Hermann. 1952. Symmetry. Princeton University Press.
338. Weyl, Hermann. 1987. The Continuum: A Critical Examination of the Foundation of Analysis, trans. from the German of 1918. Kirksville, MO: Thomas Jefferson University Press.
339. Weyl, Hermann. 2009. Mind and Nature: Selected Writings on Philosophy, Mathematics and Physics, ed. and intro. Peter Pesic. Princeton University Press.
340. Whately, Richard. 1831. Elements of Logic Comprising the Substance of the Article in the Encyclopaedia Metropolitana, fourth revised edn. London: B. Fellowes.
341. Whately, Richard. 1874. An Abstract of Bishop Whately’s Logic, to the End of chapter 3, book 2, with Examination Papers, ed. Bion Reynolds. Cambridge: W. Tomlin.
342. Wigner, Eugene. 1960. The unreasonable effectiveness of mathematics in the natural sciences. Communications in Pure and Applied Mathematics, 13: 1−14.
343. Wilson, Mark. 1992. Frege: the royal road from geometry. Noûs 26: 149–80.
344. Wittgenstein, Ludwig. 1922. Tractatus Logico-Philosophicus, trans. C. K. Ogden. London: Routledge and Kegan Paul.
345. Wittgenstein, Ludwig. 1956. Remarks on the Foundations of Mathematics, ed. G. H. von Wright, R. Rhees, and G. E. M. Anscombe, trans. G. E.M. Anscombe. Oxford: Blackwell.
346. Wittgenstein, Ludwig. 1961. Tractatus Logico-Philosophicus, trans. D. F. Pears and B. F. McGuinness. London: Routledge and Kegan Paul.
347. Wittgenstein, Ludwig. 1969. On Certainty. Oxford: Blackwell.
348. Wittgenstein, Ludwig. 1974. Philosophical Grammar, ed. Rush Rhees, trans. Anthony Kenny. Oxford: Blackwell.
349. Wittgenstein, Ludwig. 1976. Wittgenstein’s Lectures on the Foundations ofMathematics, Cambridge, 1939: from the notes of R. G. Bosanquet, Norman Malcolm, Rush Rhees, and Yorick Smythies, ed. Cora Diamond. University of Chicago Press.
350. Wittgenstein, Ludwig. 1978. Remarks on the Foundations of Mathematics. ed. G. H. von Wright, R. Rhees, and G. E. M. Anscombe, trans. G. E. M. Anscombe, third revised edn. Oxford: Blackwell.
351. Wittgenstein, Ludwig. 1979. Wittgenstein’s Lectures, Cambridge 1932–1935, ed. Alice Ambrose. Totowa, NJ: Rowman and Littlefield.
352. Wittgenstein, Ludwig. 2001. Philosophical Investigations, trans. G. E. M. Anscombe, third revised edn.Oxford: Blackwell.
353. Worrall, John. 1989. Structural realism: the best of both worlds? Dialectica 43: 99–124.
354. Wright, Crispin. 1983. Frege’s Conception of Numbers as Objects. Aberdeen University Press.
355. Wronski, J. Hoëné de. 1811. Introduction à la philosophie des mathématiques et technie d’algorithmie. Paris: Courcier.
356. Wylie, Alexander. 1853. Jottings on the Sciences of the Chinese. Shanghai: Northern Herald.
357. Yablo, Stephen. 1998. Does ontology rest upon a mistake? Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society, supplement 72: 229–61.
358. Zeilberger, Doron. Opinions. Available at: www.math.rutgers.edu/~zeilberg/ Opinion110.html.