GALILEO AND THE MIXED SCIENCES*

Method and Order in Renaissance Philosophy of Nature: The Aristotle Commentary Tradition

Volumn , Issue , 2016, Pages 253-270

  Laird, W Roy ^a  

^a NONE

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 85136431510     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book    
DOI: 10.4324/9781315249070-15     Document Type: Chapter

References (23)

1. J. H. Randall, “The development of scientific method in the school of Padua, " in: Journal of the History of Ideas 1 (1940), 177-206.
2. The School of Padua and the Emergence of Modern Science (Saggi e Testi 1), Padua 1961.
3. E. P. Mahoney (ed.), Philosophy and Humanism: Renaissance Essays in Honor of Paul Oskar Kristeller, Leiden 1976, 275-82.
4. C. H. Lohr, Latin Aristotle Commentaries II: Renaissance Authors, Florence 1988.
5. J. H. Randall, Career of Philosophy, New York 1962, vol. 1, 282.
6. A. C. Crombie, “Sources of Galileo’s Early Natural Philosophy, " in: M. L. Righini Bonelli and W. R. Shea (eds.), Reason, Experiment, and Mysticism in the Scientific Revolution, New York 1975, 157-75, 303-5.
7. A. Carago and A. C. Crombie, “The Jesuits and Galileo’s Ideas of Science and of Nature, " in: Annali dell’ Istituto e Museo di Storia delta Scienza di Firenze 8 (1983), fasc. 2, 3-68.
8. W. A. Wallace, “Galileo and the Thomists, " in: St. Thomas Aquinas 1274-1974 Commemorative Studies, Toronto 1974, vol. 2, 293-330.
9. Galileo Galilei, Tractatio de praecognitionibus et praecognitis and Tractatio de demonstration, ed. W. F. Edwards and W. A. Wallace (Saggi e Testi 22), Padua 1988.
10. W. A. Wallace, Galileo’s Logical Treatises (Boston Studies in the Philosophy of Science 138), Dordrecht/Boston/London 1992.
11. J. A. Weisheipl, “The Evolution of Scientific Method, " in: V. E. Smith (ed.), The Logic of Science, New York, 1964, 59-86.
12. J. G. Lennox, “Aristotle, Galileo, and ‘Mixed Sciences’, " in: W. A. Wallace (ed.), Reinterpreting Galileo (Studies in Philosophy and the History of Philosophy 15), Washington 1986, 29-51.
13. M. F. Reidy, “Aristotle’s Doctrines Concerning Applied Mathematics, " PhD thesis, Univ. Toronto 1968
14. R. D. McKirahan, Jr., “Aristotle’s Subordinate Sciences, " in: British Journal for the History of Science 11 (1978), 197-220.
15. W. R. Laird, “The Scientiae Mediae in Medieval Commentaries on Aristotle’s Posterior Analytics, " PhD thesis, Univ. Toronto 1983.
16. J. Gagné, “Du quadrivium aux scientiae mediae, " in: Arts libéraux et philosophie au moyen âge: Actes du quatrième congrès internationale de philosophie médiévale, Montreal 1969, 975-86.
17. W. R. Laird, “Robert Grosseteste on the Intermediate Sciences, " in: Traditio 43 (1987), 147-169.
18. W. A. Wallace, “Galileo and Reasoning Ex supposition: The Methodology of the Two New Sciences, " in: R. S. Cohen, et al., (eds.), Proceedings of the 1974 Biennial Meeting of the Philosophy of Science Association, Dordrecht-Boston 1976, 79-104.
19. S. Drake and I. E. Drabkin, Mechanics in Sixteenth-Century Italy, Madison 1969, 329-77.
20. S. Drake, Galileo at Work: His Scientific Biography, Chicago 1978, 100-3.
21. W. R. Shea, Galileo’s Intellectual Revolution, New York 1972, 34-5.
22. G. Hatfield, “Metaphysics and the New Science, " in: D. C. Lindberg and R. S. Westman (eds.), Reappraisals of the Scientific Revolution, Cambridge 1990, 93-166.
23. Galileo’s Logic of Discovery and Proof (as note 4), 301-2.