Rigorous patient-prosthesis matching of Perimount Magna aortic bioprosthesis

Asian Cardiovascular and Thoracic Annals

Volumn 23, Issue 3, 2015, Pages 261-266

  Nakamura, Hiromasa ^a   Yamaguchi, Hiroki ^a   Takagaki, Masami ^a   Kadowaki, Tasuku ^a   Nakao, Tatsuya ^b   Amano, Atsushi ^c  

^a SHOWA UNIVERSITY KOTO TOYOSU HOSPITAL   (Japan)

^b NEW TOKYO HOSPITAL   (Japan)

^c JUNTENDO UNIVERSITY   (Japan)

Author keywords

Aortic valve stenosis; bioprosthesis; echocardiography; heart valve prosthesis implantation; mortality; treatment outcome

Indexed keywords

ADULT; AGED; AORTA VALVE PROSTHESIS; ARTICLE; BACTERIAL ENDOCARDITIS; BICUSPID AORTIC VALVE; BLEEDING; BODY SURFACE; BRAIN INFARCTION; FEMALE; FOLLOW UP; HEART FAILURE; HEART LEFT VENTRICLE OUTFLOW TRACT; HEART TAMPONADE; HEART VALVE BIOPROSTHESIS; HEART VALVE REPLACEMENT; HUMAN; JAPANESE (PEOPLE); MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; MEDIASTINITIS; MEDICAL DEVICE COMPLICATION; MORTALITY; NEW YORK HEART ASSOCIATION CLASS; OUTCOME ASSESSMENT; PATIENT PROSTHESIS MISMATCH; REAL TIME ULTRASOUND SCANNER; RESPIRATORY FAILURE; TRACHEOSTOMY; TRANSESOPHAGEAL ECHOCARDIOGRAPHY; TRANSTHORACIC ECHOCARDIOGRAPHY; TRICUSPID VALVE REGURGITATION; WOUND DEHISCENCE; ADVERSE EFFECTS; AORTA VALVE; AORTIC VALVE STENOSIS; BIOPROSTHESIS; COMPLICATION; ECHOCARDIOGRAPHY; ECHOGRAPHY; HEART VALVE PROSTHESIS; MIDDLE AGED; PROCEDURES; PROSTHESIS; TREATMENT OUTCOME; VERY ELDERLY;

AGED; AGED, 80 AND OVER; AORTIC VALVE; AORTIC VALVE STENOSIS; BIOPROSTHESIS; ECHOCARDIOGRAPHY; FEMALE; FOLLOW-UP STUDIES; HEART VALVE PROSTHESIS; HEART VALVE PROSTHESIS IMPLANTATION; HOSPITAL MORTALITY; HUMANS; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; PROSTHESIS DESIGN; TREATMENT OUTCOME;

EID: 84923113980     PISSN: 02184923     EISSN: 18165370     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1177/0218492314543654     Document Type: Article

References (20)

1. Head SJ, Mokhles MM, Osnabrugge RL, et al. The impact of prosthesis-patient mismatch on long-term survival after aortic valve replacement: a systematic review and meta-analysis of 34 observational studies comprising 27 186 patients with 133 141 patient-years. Eur Heart J. 2012 ; 33: 1518-1529
2. Moon MR, Pasque MK, Munfakh NA, et al. Prosthesis-patient mismatch after aortic valve replacement: impact of age and body size on late survival. Ann Thorac Surg. 2006 ; 81: 481-488
3. Rao V, Jamieson WR, Ivanov J, Armstrong S, David TE. Prosthesis-patient mismatch affects survival after aortic valve replacement. Circulation. 2000 ; 102: 5-9
4. Dalmau MJ, Maríagonzález-Santos J, López-Rodríguez J, Bueno M, Arribas A. The Carpentier-Edwards Perimount Magna aortic xenograft: a new design with an improved hemodynamic performance. Interact Cardiovasc Thorac Surg. 2006 ; 5: 263-267
5. Botzenhardt F, Eichinger WB, Bleiziffer S, et al. Hemodynamic comparison of bioprostheses for complete supra-annular position in patients with small aortic annulus. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2005 ; 45: 2054-2060
6. Suri RM, Michelena HI, Burkhart HM, et al. A prospective, randomized comparison of 3 contemporary bioprosthetic aortic valves: should hemodynamic performance influence device selection?. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2012 ; 144: 1387-1395
7. Okamura H, Yamaguchi A, Yoshizaki T, et al. Clinical outcomes and hemodynamics of the 19-mm Perimount Magna bioprosthesis in an aortic position: comparison with the 19-mm Medtronic Mosaic Ultra Valve. Circ J. 2012 ; 76: 102-108
8. Tabata M, Shibayama K, Watanabe H, Sato Y, Fukui T, Takanashi S. Simple interrupted suturing increases valve performance after aortic valve replacement with a small supra-annular bioprosthesis. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2014 ; 147: 321-325
9. Baumgartner H, Hung J, Bermejo J, et al. Echocardiographic assessment of valve stenosis: EAE/ASE recommendations for clinical practice. Eur J Echocardiogr. 2009 ; 10: 1-25
10. Shahgaldi K, da Silva C, Bäck M, Rück A, Manouras A, Sahlén A. Transesophageal echocardiography measurements of aortic annulus diameter using biplane mode in patients undergoing transcatheter aortic valve implantation. Cardiovasc Ultrasound. 2013 ; 11: 5-5
11. Lang RM, Bierig M, Devereux RB, et al. Recommendations for chamber quantification. Eur J Echocardiogr. 2006 ; 7: 79-108
12. Blais C, Dumesnil JG, Baillot R, Simard S, Doyle D, Pibarot P. Impact of valve prosthesis-patient mismatch on short-term mortality after aortic valve replacement. Circulation. 2003 ; 108: 983-988
13. Pibarot P, Dumesnil JG. Hemodynamic and clinical impact of prosthesis-patient mismatch in the aortic valve position and its prevention. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2000 ; 36: 1131-1141
14. Ruel M, Rubens FD, Masters RG, et al. Late incidence and predictors of persistent or recurrent heart failure in patients with aortic prosthetic valves. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2004 ; 127: 149-159
15. Botzenhardt F, Eichinger WB, Guenzinger R, et al. Hemodynamic performance and incidence of patient-prosthesis mismatch of the complete supra-annular Perimount Magna bioprosthesis in the aortic position. Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2005 ; 53: 226-230
16. De Paulis R, Sommariva L, Colagrande L, et al. Regression of left ventricular hypertrophy after aortic valve replacement for aortic stenosis with different valve substitutes. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 1998 ; 116: 590-598
17. Khan SS, Siegel RJ, DeRobertis MA, et al. Regression of hypertrophy after Carpentier-Edwards pericardial aortic valve replacement. Ann Thorac Surg. 2000 ; 69: 531-535
18. Sim EK, Orszulak TA, Schaff HV, Shub C. Influence of prosthesis size on change in left ventricular mass following aortic valve replacement. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg. 1994 ; 8: 293-297
19. He GW, Grunkemeier GL, Gately HL, Furnary AP, Starr A. Up to thirty-year survival after aortic valve replacement in the small aortic root. Ann Thorac Surg. 1995 ; 59: 1056-1062
20. Fuster RG, Montero Argudo JA, et al. Patient-prosthesis mismatch in aortic valve replacement: really tolerable?. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg. 2005 ; 27: 441-449