Clinical outcomes and hemodynamics of the 19-mm Perimount Magna bioprosthesis in an aortic position-comparison with the 19-mm Medtronic Mosaic Ultra valve

Circulation Journal

Volumn 76, Issue 1, 2012, Pages 102-108

  Okamura, Homare ^a   Yamaguchi, Atsushi ^a   Yoshizaki, Takamichi ^a   Nagano, Hiroshi ^a   Itoh, Satoshi ^a   Morita, Hideki ^a   Naito, Kazuhiro ^a   Yuri, Koichi ^a   Adachi, Hideo ^a  

^a JICHI MEDICAL UNIVERSITY   (Japan)

Author keywords

Surgery; Valves; Valvular diseases

Indexed keywords

AGED; AORTA STENOSIS; AORTA VALVE REPLACEMENT; ARTICLE; CARPENTIER EDWARDS BIOPROSTHESIS; CLINICAL EFFECTIVENESS; COMPARATIVE STUDY; CONTROLLED STUDY; FEMALE; FOLLOW UP; HEART LEFT VENTRICLE AORTIC PRESSURE GRADIENT; HEART LEFT VENTRICLE MASS; HEMODYNAMIC PARAMETERS; HEMODYNAMICS; HUMAN; M MODE ECHOCARDIOGRAPHY; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; MORTALITY; OUTCOME ASSESSMENT; PATIENT SATISFACTION; POSTOPERATIVE PERIOD; TRANSTHORACIC ECHOCARDIOGRAPHY;

AGED; AGED, 80 AND OVER; AORTIC VALVE; AORTIC VALVE STENOSIS; ECHOCARDIOGRAPHY; FEMALE; FOLLOW-UP STUDIES; HEART VALVE PROSTHESIS; HEART VALVE PROSTHESIS IMPLANTATION; HEART VENTRICLES; HEMODYNAMICS; HUMANS; MALE; PROSTHESIS DESIGN; PROSTHESIS FITTING; RETROSPECTIVE STUDIES; TREATMENT OUTCOME;

EID: 84255168610     PISSN: 13469843     EISSN: 13474820     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1253/circj.CJ-11-0728     Document Type: Article

References (20)

1. Hara H, Schwartz RS. Transcatheter aortic valve implantation in high-risk patients with severe aortic stenosis. Circ J 2010; 74: 1513-1517.
2. Spaccarotella C, Mongiardo A, Indolfi C. Pathophysiology of aortic stenosis and approach to treatment with percutaneous valve implantation. Circ J 2010; 75: 11-19.
3. Pibarot P, Dumesnil JG. Hemodynamic and clinical impact of prosthesis- patient mismatch in the aortic valve position and its prevention. J Am Coll Cardiol 2000; 36: 1131-1141.
4. Hirooka K, Kawazoe K, Kosakai Y. Prediction of postoperative exercise tolerance after aortic valve replacement. Ann Thorac Surg 1994; 58: 1626-1630.
5. Devereux RB, Reichek N. Echocardiographic determination of left ventricular mass in man: Anatomic validation of the method. Circulation 1977; 55: 613-618.
6. Pibarot P, Dumesnil JG, Lemieux M, Cartier P, Metras J, Durand LG. Impact of prosthesis-patient mismatch on hemodynamic and symptomatic status, morbidity, and mortality after aortic valve replacement with a bioprosthetic heart valve. J Heart Valve Dis 1998; 7: 211-218.
7. Blais C, Dumesnil JG, Baillot R, Simard S, Doyle D, Pibarot P. Impact of prosthesis-patient mismatch on short-term mortality after aortic valve replacement. Circulation 2003; 108: 983-988.
8. Ruzicka DJ, Hettich I, Hutter A, Bleiziffer S, Badiu CC, Bauernschmitt R, et al. The complete supraannular concept. In vivo hemodynamics of bovine and porcine aortic bioprostheses. Circulation 2009; 120 (Suppl): S139-S145.
9. Dalmau MJ, Maríagonzález-Santos J, López-Rodríguez J, Bueno M, Arribas A. The Carpentier-Edwards Perimount Magna aortic xenograft: A new design with an improved hemodynamic performance. Interact Cardiovasc Thorac Surg 2006; 5: 263-267.
10. Sakamoto Y, Hashimoto K, Okuyama H, Sasaki T, Takakura H, Onoguchi K. Patient-prosthesis mismatch may be irrelevant after aortic valve replacement with the 19-mm Perimount pericardial bioprosthesis in patients aged 65 years or older. J Artif Organs 2007; 10: 206-211.
11. Narayan P, Reeves BC, Rizvi SI, Shokrollahi K, Ismail H, Angelini GD, et al. Hemodynamic evaluation and midterm outcome of aortic valve replacement with size 19 Perimount prosthetic valve. Ann Thorac Surg 2008; 86: 1799-1803.
12. Borger MA, Nette AF, Maganti M, Feindel CM. Carpentier-Edwards Perimount Magna valve versus Medtronic Hancock II: A matched hemodynamic comparison. Ann Thorac Surg 2007; 83: 2054-2058.
13. Totaro P, Degno N, Zaidi A, Youhana A, Argano V. Carpentier-Edwards PERIMOUNT Magna bioprosthesis: A stented valve with stentless performance? J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 2005; 130: 1668-1674.
14. Botzenhardt F, Eichinger WB, Guenzinger R, Bleiziffer S, Wagner I, Bauernschmitt R, et al. Hemodynamic performance and incidence of patient-prosthesis mismatch of the complete supraannular perimount magna bioprosthesis in the aortic position. Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 2005; 53: 226-230.
15. Dalmau MJ, Maríagonzález-Santos J, López-Rodríguez J, Bueno M, Arribas A, Nieto F. One year hemodynamic performance of the Perimount Magna pericardial xenograft and the Medtronic Mosaic bioprosthesis in the aortic position: A prospective randomized study. Interact Cardiovasc Thorac Surg 2007; 6: 345-349.
16. Wendt D, Buck T, Jánosi RA, Thielmann M, Pul U, Neuhäuser M, et al. Results of a propensity score-matched comparison of the Perimount Magna and Mosaic Ultra aortic valve prostheses. J Heart Valve Dis 2009; 18: 703-711.
17. Sakamoto Y, Yoshitake M, Naganuma H, Kawada N, Kinouchi K, Hashimoto K. Reconsideration of patient-prosthesis mismatch definition from the valve indexed effective orifice area. Ann Thorac Surg 2010; 89: 1951-1955.
18. Levy D, Garrison RJ, Savage DD, Kennel WB, Castelli WP. Prognostic implications of echocardiographically determined left ventricular mass in the Framingham heart study. N Engl J Med 1990; 322: 1561-1566.
19. Roscitano A, Benedetto U, Sciangula A, Merico E, Barberi F, Bianchini R, et al. Indexed effective orifice area after mechanical aortic valve replacement does not affect left ventricular mass regression in elderly. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg 2006; 29: 139-143.
20. Aoyagi S, Arinaga K, Fukunaga S, Kawano H, Kawara T. Aortic valve replacement with a small mechanical valve prosthesis: A clinical and echocardiographic study of a St Jude Medical valve prosthesis. Jpn Circ J 1998; 62: 244-248.