Identification of non-Ser/Thr-Pro consensus motifs for Cdk1 and their roles in mitotic regulation of C2H2 zinc finger proteins and Ect2

Scientific Reports

Volumn 5, Issue , 2015, Pages

  Suzuki, Kazuhiro ^a   Sako, Kosuke ^a   Akiyama, Kazuhiro ^a,b   Isoda, Michitaka ^a,c   Senoo, Chiharu ^a   Nakajo, Nobushige ^a   Sagata, Noriyuki ^a  

^a KYUSHU UNIVERSITY   (Japan)

^b UNIVERSITY OF TOKYO   (Japan)

^c INSTITUTE FOR RESEARCH IN BIOMEDICINE   (Spain)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

CYCLIN DEPENDENT KINASE 1; ONCOPROTEIN; XENOPUS PROTEIN; ZINC FINGER PROTEIN;

ANIMAL; GENETICS; METABOLISM; XENOPUS LAEVIS;

ANIMALS; CDC2 PROTEIN KINASE; PROTO-ONCOGENE PROTEINS; XENOPUS LAEVIS; XENOPUS PROTEINS; ZINC FINGERS;

EID: 84923108400     PISSN: None     EISSN: 20452322     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1038/srep07929     Document Type: Article

References (45)

1. Nurse, P. Universal control mechanism regulating onset of M-phase. Nature 344, 503-508 (1990).
2. Nigg, E. A. Mitotic kinases as regulators of cell division and its checkpoints. Nat. Rev. Mol. Cell Biol. 2, 21-32 (2001).
3. Ubersax, J. A. et al. Targets of the cyclin-dependent kinase Cdk1. Nature 425, 859-864 (2003).
4. Pines, J. & Rieder, C. L. Re-staging mitosis: a contemporary view of mitotic progression. Nat. Cell Biol. 3, E3-6 (2001).
5. Moreno, S. & Nurse, P. Substrates for p34cdc2: in vivo veritas? Cell 61, 549-551 (1990).
6. Nigg, E. A. Cellular substrates of p34(cdc2) and its companion cyclin-dependent kinases. Trends Cell Biol. 3, 296-301 (1993).
7. Songyang, Z. et al. Use of an oriented peptide library to determine the optimal substrates of protein kinases. Curr. Biol. 4, 973-982 (1994).
8. Holmes, J. K. & Solomon, M. J. A predictive scale for evaluating cyclin-dependent kinase substrates. A comparison of p34cdc2 and p33cdk2. J. Biol. Chem. 271, 25240-25246 (1996).
9. Errico, A., Deshmukh, K., Tanaka, Y., Pozniakovsky, A. & Hunt, T. Identification of substrates for cyclin dependent kinases. Adv. Enzyme Regul. 50, 375-399 (2010).
10. Alexander, J. et al. Spatial exclusivity combined with positive and negative selection of phosphorylation motifs is the basis for context-dependent mitotic signaling. Sci. Signal. 4, ra42; DOI:10.1126/scisignal.2001796 (2011).
11. Pines, J. & Hunter, T. p34cdc2: the S and M kinase? New Biol. 2, 389-401 (1990).
12. Chou, Y. H., Ngai, K. L. & Goldman, R. The regulation of intermediate filament reorganization in mitosis. p34cdc2 phosphorylates vimentin at a unique N-terminal site. J. Biol. Chem. 266, 7325-7328 (1991).
13. Kusubata, M. et al. Cdc2 kinase phosphorylation of desmin at three serine/threonine residues in the amino-terminal head domain. Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun. 190, 927-934 (1993).
14. Satterwhite, L. L. et al. Phosphorylation of myosin-II regulatory light chain by cyclin-p34cdc2: A mechanism for the timing of cytokinesis. J. Cell Biol. 118, 595-605 (1992).
15. Harvey, S. L., Charlet, A., Haas, W., Gygi, S. P. & Kellogg, D. R. Cdk1-dependent regulation of the mitotic inhibitor Wee1. Cell 122, 407-420 (2005).
16. McCusker, D. et al. Cdk1 coordinates cell-surface growth with the cell cycle. Nat. Cell Biol. 9, 506-515 (2007).
17. Isoda, M. et al. Dynamic regulation of Emi2 by Emi2-bound Cdk1/Plk1/CK1 and PP2A-B56 in meiotic arrest of Xenopus eggs. Dev. Cell 21, 506-519 (2011).
18. Dephoure, N. et al. A quantitative atlas of mitotic phosphorylation. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 105, 10762-10767 (2008).
19. Wolfe, S. A., Nekludova, L. & Pabo, C. O. DNA recognition by Cys2His2 zinc finger proteins. Annu. Rev. Biophys. Biomol. Struct. 29, 183-212 (2000).
20. Dovat, S.etal.Acommon mechanism for mitotic inactivation of C2H2 zinc finger DNA-binding domains. Genes Dev. 16, 2985-2990 (2002)
21. Rizkallah, R. & Hurt, M. M. Regulation of the transcription factor YY1 in mitosis through phosphorylation of its DNA-binding domain. Mol. Biol. Cell 20, 4766-4776 (2009).
22. Rizkallah, R., Alexander, K. E. & Hurt, M. M. Global mitotic phosphorylation of C2H2 zinc finger protein linker peptides. Cell Cycle 10, 3327-3336 (2011).
23. Tatsumoto, T., Xie, X., Blumenthal, R., Okamoto, I. & Miki, T. Human ECT2is an exchange factor for Rho GTPases, phosphorylated in G2/M phases, and involved in cytokinesis. J. Cell Biol. 147, 921-928 (1999).
24. Matthews, H. K. et al. Changes in Ect2 localization couple actomyosin-dependent cell shape changes to mitotic progression. Dev. Cell 23, 371-383 (2012).
25. Matsuoka, Y. et al. Two different protein kinases act on a different time schedule as glial filament kinases during mitosis. EMBO J. 11, 2895-2902 (1992).
26. Ando, S. et al. Phosphorylation of synthetic vimentin peptides by cdc2 kinase. Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun. 195, 837-843 (1993).
27. Roskoski, R. Jr. ERK1/2 MAP kinases: structure, function, and regulation. Pharmacol. Res. 66, 105-143 (2012).
28. Gonzalez, F. A., Raden, D. L. & Davis, R. J. Identification of substrate recognition determinants for human ERK1 and ERK2 protein kinases. J. Biol. Chem. 266, 22159-22163 (1991).
29. Miller, M. L. et al. Linear motif atlas for phosphorylation-dependent signaling. Sci. Signal. 1, ra2; DOI:10.1126/scisignal.1159433 (2008).
30. Chen, C. et al. Identification of a major determinant for serine-threonine kinase phosphoacceptor specificity. Mol. Cell 53, 140-147 (2014).
31. Elia, A. E., Cantley, L. C. & Yaffe, M. B. Proteomic screen finds pSer/pThr-binding domain localizing Plk1 to mitotic substrates. Science 299, 1228-1231 (2003).
32. Vassilev, L. T. et al. Selective small-molecule inhibitor reveals critical mitotic functions of human CDK1. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA. 103, 10660-10665 (2006).
33. Stewart, M. Molecular mechanism of the nuclear protein import cycle. Nat. Rev. Mol. Cell Biol. 8, 195-208 (2007).
34. Saito, S. et al. Deregulation and mislocalization of the cytokinesis regulator ECT2 activate the Rho signaling pathways leading to malignant transformation. J. Biol. Chem. 279, 7169-7179 (2004).
35. Zou, Y. et al. Characterization of nuclear localization signal in the N terminus of CUL4B and its essential role in cyclin E degradation and cell cycle progression. J. Biol. Chem. 284, 33320-33332 (2009).
36. Jans, D. A. The regulation of protein transport to the nucleus by phosphorylation. Biochem. J. 311, 705-716 (1995).
37. Jackson, S. & Xiong, Y. CRL4s: the CUL4-RING E3 ubiquitin ligases. Trends Biochem. Sci. 34, 562-570 (2009).
38. Brown, N. R., Noble, M. E., Endicott, J. A. & Johnson, L. N. The structural basis for specificity of substrate and recruitment peptides for cyclin-dependent kinases. Nat. Cell Biol. 1, 438-443 (1999).
39. Malumbres, M. & Barbacid, M. Mammalian cyclin-dependent kinases. Trends Biochem. Sci. 30, 630-641 (2005).
40. Jantz, D. & Berg, J. M. Reduction in DNA-binding affinity of Cys2His2 zinc finger proteins by linker phosphorylation. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 101, 7589-7593 (2004).
41. Chen, Y. J. et al. A conserved phosphorylation site within the forkhead domain of FoxM1B is required for its activation by cyclin-CDK1. J. Biol. Chem. 284, 30695-30707 (2009).
42. Kraft, C. et al. Mitotic regulation of the human anaphase-promoting complex by phosphorylation. EMBO J. 22, 6598-6609 (2003).
43. Kõivomägi, M. et al. Multisite phosphorylation networks as signal processors for Cdk1. Nat. Struct. Mol. Biol. 20, 1415-1424 (2013).
44. Holt, L. J. et al. Global analysis of Cdk1 substrate phosphorylation sites provides insights into evolution. Science 325, 1682-1686 (2009).
45. Sako, K. et al. Emi2 mediates meiotic MII arrest by competitively inhibiting the binding of Ube2S to the APC/C. Nat. Commun. 5, 3667; DOI:10.1038/ncomms4667 (2014).