What lies beneath?: Knowledge infrastructures in the subseafloor biosphere and beyond

International Journal on Digital Libraries

Volumn 16, Issue 1, 2015, Pages 61-77

  Darch, Peter T ^a   Borgman, Christine L ^a   Traweek, Sharon ^a   Cummings, Rebekah L ^a   Wallis, Jillian C ^a   Sands, Ashley E ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

Author keywords

Big science; Data deluge; Knowledge infrastructures; Little science; Multidisciplinary scholarship

Indexed keywords

EID: 84923013332     PISSN: 14325012     EISSN: 14321300     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s00799-015-0137-3     Document Type: Article

References (55)

1. Altman, M.: Digital preservation through archival collaboration: the data preservation alliance for the social sciences. Am. Arch. 72(1), 169–182 (2009)
2. Anderson C.: The long tail. Wired Mag., 12(10) (2004, October). http://www.wired.com/wired/archive/12.10/tail_pr.html
3. Aronova, E., Baker, K.S., Oreskes, N.: Big science and big data in biology: from the international geophysical year through the international biological program to the long term ecological research (LTER) network, 1957-present. Hist. Stud. Nat. Sci. 40(2), 183–224 (2010). doi:10.1525/hsns.2010.40.2.183
4. Association of Research Libraries: The research library’s role in digital repository services: final report of the ARL digital repository issues task force. Association of Research Libraries. Washington, DC (2009b). www.arl.org/bm~doc/repository-services-report.pdf
5. Bechhofer, S., Ainsworth, J., Bhagat, J., Buchan, I., Couch, P., Cruickshank, D., Sufi, S.: Why linked data is not enough for scientists. In: Sixth IEEE e-science conference. Brisbane, Australia (2010). http://eprints.ecs.soton.ac.uk/21587/
6. Berman, F., Lavoie, B., Ayris, P., Choudhury, G. S., Cohen, E., Courant, P., Van Camp, A.: Sustaining the digital investment: issues and challenges of economically sustainable digital preservation (Interim Report of the Blue Ribbon Task Force on Sustainable Digital Preservation and Access). San Diego (2008). http://brtf.sdsc.edu/publications.html
7. Bijker, W.E., Hughes, T.P., Pinch, T.J.: The Social Construction of Technological Systems: New Directions in the Sociology and History of Technology. MIT Press, Cambridge (1987)
8. Borgman, C. L.: Big data, little data, no data: scholarship in the networked world. MIT Press, Cambridge, MA (2015)
9. Borgman, C. L.: The premise and promise of the global information infrastructure. First Monday, 5 (2000). http://www.firstmonday.dk/issues/issue5_8/borgman/index.html
10. Borgman, C.L.: Scholarship in the Digital Age: Information, Infrastructure, and the Internet. MIT Press, Cambridge (2007)
11. Borgman, C.L.: The conundrum of sharing research data. J. Am. Soc. Inf. Sci. Technol. 63(6), 1059–1078 (2012). doi:10.1002/asi.22634
12. Borgman, C.L., Wallis, J.C.: Building digital libraries for scientific data: an exploratory study of data practices in habitat ecology. In: Gonzalo, J., Thanos, C., Verdejo, M.F., Carrasco, R.C. (eds.) Proceedings of the 10th European Conference on Research and Advanced Technology for Digital Libraries, pp. 170–183. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg, Alicante, Spain (2006)
13. Borgman, C.L., Wallis, J.C., Enyedy, N.D.: Little science confronts the data deluge: habitat ecology, embedded sensor networks, and digital libraries. Int. J. Digit. Libr. 7(1–2), 17–30 (2007). doi:10.1007/s00799-007-0022-9
14. Borgman, C.L., Wallis, J.C., Mayernik, M.S.: Who’s got the data? Interdependencies in science and technology collaborations. Comput. Support. Coop. Work 21(6), 485–523 (2012). doi:10.1007/s10606-012-9169-z
15. Bozeman, B., Fay, D., Slade, C.P.: Research collaboration in universities and academic entrepreneurship: the-state-of-the-art. J. Technol. Transf. 38(1), 1–67 (2013). doi:10.1007/s10961-012-9281-8
16. Callon, M.: The sociology of an actor–network: the case of the electric vehicle. In: Mapping the Dynamics of Science and Technology: Sociology of Science in the Real World, pp. 19–34. Macmillan, London (1986)
17. Center for Dark Energy Biosphere Investigations: Center for dark energy biosphere investigations STC annual report 2013 (2014). http://www.darkenergybiosphere.org/internal/docs/C-DEBI-Annual-Report-2013.pdf
18. CODATA-ICSTI Task Group on Data Citation Standards Practices: Out of cite, out of mind: the current state of practice, policy, and technology for the citation of data. Data Sci. J., 12, CIDCR1–CIDCR75 (2013). doi:10.2481/dsj.OSOM13-043
19. Data’s shameful neglect. Nature, 461(7261), 145 (2009). doi:10.1038/461145a
20. Dealing with data. Science, 331(6018), 692–729 (2011)
21. Deuten, J. J.: Cosmopolitanising technologies: a study of four emerging technological regimes. Twente University Press, Enschede (2003).http://doc.utwente.nl/38695/1/t0000007.pdf
22. Edwards, K.: Center for dark energy biosphere investigations (C-DEBI): a center for resolving the extent, function, dynamics and implications of the subseafloor Biosphere (2009). http://www.darkenergybiosphere.org/internal/docs/2009C-DEBI_FullProposal.pdf
23. Edwards, P.N.: A Vast Machine: Computer Models, Climate Data, and the Politics of Global Warming. MIT Press, Cambridge, MA (2010)
24. Edwards, P. N., Jackson, S. J., Bowker, G. C., Knobel, C. P.: Understanding infrastructure: dynamics, tensions, and design: report of a workshop on history and theory of infrastructure, lessons for new scientific cyberinfrastructures. National Science Foundation, Washington, DC (2007). http://hdl.handle.net/2027.42/49353
25. Edwards, P. N., Jackson, S. J., Chalmers, M. K., Bowker, G. C., Borgman, C. L., Ribes, D., Calvert, S.: Knowledge infrastructures: intellectual frameworks and research challenges (p. 40). University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI (2013). http://deepblue.lib.umich.edu/handle/2027.42/97552
26. Faniel, I.M., Jacobsen, T.E.: Reusing scientific data: how earthquake engineering researchers assess the reusability of colleagues’ data. J. Comput. Support. Coop. Work 19(3–4), 355–375 (2010). doi:10.1007/s10606-010-9117-8
27. Glaser, B.G., Strauss, A.L.: The Discovery of Grounded Theory: Strategies for Qualitative Research. Aldine Pub. Co, Chicago (1967)
28. Hammersley, M., Atkinson, P.: Ethnography: Principles in Practice. Routledge, London (2007)
29. Helland, P.: If you have too much data, then “good enough” is good enough. Commun. ACM 54, 40–47 (2011). doi:10.1145/1953122.1953140
30. Hey, A.J.G., Trefethen, A.: The data deluge: an e-science perspective. In: Berman, F. Fox, G., Hey, A.J.G. (Eds.) Grid computing: making the global infrastructure a reality, pp. 809–824. Wiley, West Sussex, England (2003). http://www.rcuk.ac.uk/escience/documents/report_datadeluge.pdf
31. Hine, C.: Connective ethnography for the exploration of e-science. J. Comput. Media. Commun. 12(2), 618–634 (2007). doi:10.1111/j.1083-6101.2007.00341.x
32. Hughes, T.P.: Technological momentum. In: Smith, M.R., Marx, L. (eds.) Does Technology Drive History? The Dilemma of Technological Determinism. pp. 101–113. MIT Press, Cambridge, MA (1994)
33. Kallmeyer, J., Pockalny, R., Adhikari, R.R., Smith, D.C., D’Hondt, S.: Global distribution of microbial abundance and biomass in subseafloor sediment. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. 109(40), 16213–16216 (2012)
34. Karasti, H., Baker, K.S., Millerand, F.: Infrastructure time: long-term matters in collaborative development. Comput. Support. Coop. Work (CSCW) 19(3–4), 377–415 (2010). doi:10.1007/s10606-010-9113-z
35. Kearse, M., Moir, R., Wilson, A., Stones-Havas, S., Cheung, M., Sturrock, S., et al.: Geneious basic: an integrated and extendable desktop software platform for the organization and analysis of sequence data. Bioinformatics 28(12), 1647–1649 (2012)
36. Knorr-Cetina, K.: The manufacture of knowledge. Pergamon Press Oxford, (1981). http://sites.google.com/site/sciencestudies09/reader/Knorr-Cetina_ManKnow-Chapter1.doc
37. Knorr-Cetina, K.: Epistemic Cultures: How the Sciences Make Knowledge. Harvard University Press, Cambridge (1999)
38. Latour, B.: Science in Action: How to Follow Scientists and Engineers through Society. Harvard University Press, Cambridge (1987)
39. Latour, B., Woolgar, S.: Laboratory Life: The Construction of Scientific Facts, 2nd edn. Princeton University Press, Princeton (1986)
40. Lloyd, K.G., May, M.K., Kevorkian, R.T., Steen, A.D.: Meta-analysis of quantification methods shows that archaea and bacteria have similar abundances in the subseafloor. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 79(24), 7790–7799 (2013)
41. Lynch, M.: Art and artifact in laboratory science: a study of shop work and shop talk in a research laboratory. Routledge & Kegan Paul, London (1985)
42. Meng, X.-L.: Multi-party inference and uncongeniality. In: Lovric, M. (ed.), International Encyclopedia of Statistical Science, pp. 884–888. Springer, Berlin Heidelberg (2011). http://link.springer.com/referenceworkentry/10.1007/978-3-642-04898-2_381
43. O’Donoghue, T., Punch, K.: Qualitative Educational Research in Action: Doing and Reflecting. Routledge, London (2004)
44. Office of Science and Technology Policy: Harnessing the power of digital data for science and society: Report of the Interagency Working Group on Digital Data to the Committee on Science of the National Science and Technology Council. Washington, D.C. (2009). http://www.nitrd.gov/About/Harnessing_Power.aspx
45. Østerlund, C., Carlile, P.: Relations in practice: sorting through practice theories on knowledge sharing in complex organizations. Inf. Soc. 21(2), 91–107 (2005)
46. Palmer, C. L., Cragin, M. H., Heidorn, P. B., Smith, L. C.: Data curation for the long tail of science: the case of environmental studies. In: Presented at the 3rd International Digital Curation Conference, Washington, DC (2007). https://apps.lis.uiuc.edu/wiki/download/attachments/32666/Palmer_DCC2007.rtf?version=1
47. Ribes, D., Bowker, G.C.: Between meaning and machine: learning to represent the knowledge of communities. Inf. Org. 19(4), 199–217 (2009). doi:10.1016/j.infoandorg.2009.04.001
48. Schloss, P.D., Westcott, S.L., Ryabin, T., Hall, J.R., Hartmann, M., Hollister, E.B., et al.: Introducing mothur: open-source, platform-independent, community-supported software for describing and comparing microbial communities. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 75(23), 7537–7541 (2009)
49. Star, S.L., Ruhleder, K.: Steps toward an ecology of infrastructure: design and access for large information spaces. Inf. Syst. Res. 7(1), 111–134 (1996). doi:10.1287/isre.7.1.111
50. Traweek, S.: Beamtimes and Lifetimes: The World of High Energy Physicists (1st Harvard University Press pbk.). Harvard University Press, Cambridge (1988)
51. Uhlir, P. F. (Ed.): For attribution-developing data attribution and citation practices and standards: summary of an International Workshop. The National Academies Press, Washington, D.C (2012). http://www.nap.edu/catalog.php?record_id=13564
52. Wallis, J.C., Borgman, C.L.: Who is responsible for data? An exploratory study of data authorship, ownership, and responsibility. In: Annual meeting of the American Society for Information Science and Technology (Vol. 48, pp. 1–10). New Orleans, LA. Information (2011). doi:10.1002/meet.2011.14504801188
53. Wallis, J.C., Borgman, C.L., Mayernik, M.S., Pepe, A.: Moving archival practices upstream: an exploration of the life cycle of ecological sensing data in collaborative field research. Int. J. Digital Curation 3(1), 114–126 (2008). doi:10.2218/ijdc.v3i1.46
54. Wallis, J.C., Borgman, C.L., Mayernik, M.S., Pepe, A., Ramanathan, N., Hansen, M. A.: Know thy sensor: trust, data quality, and data integrity in scientific digital libraries. In: Proceedings of the 11th European Conference on Research and Advanced Technology for Digital Libraries, Vol. LINCS 4675, pp. 380–391. Springer, Budapest, Hungary:Berlin (2007). doi:10.1007/978-3-540-74851-9_32
55. Wallis, J.C., Rolando, E., Borgman, C.L.: If we share data, will anyone use them? Data sharing and reuse in the long tail of science and technology. PLoS ONE 8(7), e67332 (2013). doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0067332