Who is responsible for data? An exploratory study of data authorship, ownership, and responsibility

Proceedings of the ASIST Annual Meeting

Volumn 48, Issue , 2011, Pages

  Wallis, Jillian C ^a   Borgman, Christine L ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

Author keywords

Data curation; Data deposit; Data management plans; Data practices; IP; Responsibility; Scientific data

Indexed keywords

EID: 84861439954     PISSN: None     EISSN: 15508390     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/meet.2011.14504801188     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (19)

1. (2005). Long-Lived Digital Data Collections: Enabling Research and Education for the 21st Century. National Science Board. Retrieved from http://www.nsf.gov/nsb/documents/2005/LLDDC-repo rt.pdf on 18 July 2005.
2. (2007). Dealing with Data: Roles, Rights, Responsibilities, and Relationships. UKOLN.
3. (2003). Sharing Data from Large-scale Biological Research Projects: A System of Tripartite Responsibility. Meeting organized by the Wellcome Trust, Fort Lauderdale, Florida, Wellcome Trust. Retrieved on 29 December 2009 from http://www.wellcome.ac.uk/.../groups/corporatesite/@policy-communications/ documents/web-document/wtd003207.pdf.
4. Traweek, S. (1992). Beamtimes and lifetimes: the world of high energy physicists. Cambridge, Mass., Harvard University Press.
5. Galison, P. (1997). Image and Logic: a material culture of microphysics. Chicago, Chicago University Press.
6. Bowker, G. C. (2000). "Biodiversity datadiversity." Social Studies of Science 30(5):643-683.
7. Bowker, G. C. (2000). "Mapping biodiversity." International Journal of Geographical Information Science 14(8):739-754.
8. Bowker, G. C. (2000). Work and information practices in the sciences of biodiversity. VLDB 2000, Proceedings of 26th international conference on very large data bases, Cairo, Egypt, Kaufmann.
9. Bowker, G. C. (2005). Memory Practices in the Sciences. Cambridge, MA, MIT Press.
10. Foucault, M. (1977) What is an author? In Language, counter-memory, and practice. Trans. D. Bouchard and S. Simon. Ithaca, Cornell University Press.
11. NSF Award and Administration Guide, Chapter VI, 4b. http://www.nsf.gov/ pubs/policydocs/pappguide/nsf110 01/aag-6.jsp#VID4
12. McSherry, C. (2001) Who owns academic work? Battling for control of intellectual property. Cambridge, MA, Harvard University Press.
13. Floridi, L. (Ed.). (2010). The Cambridge Handbook of Information and Computer Ethics. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
14. Mitcham, C. (2003). Co-Responsibility for Research Integrity. Science and Engineering Ethics, 9 (2).
15. (1992). Responsible Science, Volume I: Ensuring the Integrity of Research Process. National Academy of Sciences.
16. Environments, C. o. A. I. i. R. (2002). Integrity in Scientific Research: Creating an environment that promotes responsible conduct. National Research Council.
17. Eshleman, A. (2009). Moral Responsibility. Retrieved from http://plato.stanford.edu/entries/moralresponsibility/.
18. (2008). Stewardship of digital research data: a framework of principles and guidelines: responsibilities of research institutions and funders, data managers, learned societies and publishers, Research Information Network.
19. Borgman, C. L., J. C. Wallis, et al. (2007). "Little science confronts the data deluge: habitat ecology, embedded sensor networks, and digital libraries." International Journal on Digital Libraries 7 (1-2).