Building digital libraries for scientific data: An exploratory study of data practices in habitat ecology

Lecture Notes in Computer Science (including subseries Lecture Notes in Artificial Intelligence and Lecture Notes in Bioinformatics)

Volumn 4172 LNCS, Issue , 2006, Pages 170-183

  Borgman, Christine ^a   Wallis, Jillian C ^a   Enyedy, Noel ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

COMPUTER ARCHITECTURE; DATA ACQUISITION; DATA REDUCTION; ECOLOGY;

DIGITAL DATA LIBRARIES; HABITAT ECOLOGY; HAND-COLLECTED DATA;

DIGITAL LIBRARIES;

EID: 33750247420     PISSN: 03029743     EISSN: 16113349     Source Type: Book Series    
DOI: 10.1007/11863878_15     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (27)

1. Atkins, D.E., et al, Revolutionizing Science and Engineering Through Cyberinfrastructure: Report of the National Science Foundation Blue-Ribbon panel on Cyberinfrastructure, 2003, National Science Foundation: Washington, D.C.
2. Unsworth, J., et al. Draft Report of the American Council of Learned Societies' Commission on Cyberinfrastructure for Humanities and Social Sciences. Last visited 5 November 2005 http://www.acls.org/cyberinfrastructure/acls-ci- public.pdf.
3. Berman, F. and H. Brady. Final Report: NSF SBE-CISE Workshop on Cyberinfrastructure and the Social Sciences. Last visited 18 May 2005 http://vis.sdsc.edu/sbe/reports/SBE-CISE-FTNAL.pdf.
4. Schroder, P., Digital Research Data as Floating Capital of the Global Science System, in Promise and Practice in Data Sharing, P. Wouters and P. Schroder, Editors. 2003, NIWI-KNAW: Amsterdam, p. 7-12.
5. Hey, T. and A. Trefethen, The Data Deluge: An e-Science Perspective, in Grid Computing - Making the Global Infrastructure a Reality. 2003, Wiley.
6. Hey, T. and A. Trefethen, Cyberinfrastructure and e-Science. Science, 2005. 308: p. 818-821.
7. International Virtual Observatory Alliance. Last visited 2 March 2005 http://www.ivoa.net/.
8. Incorporated Research Institutions for Seismology. Last visited 25 November 2004 http://www.iris.edu.
9. Biomedical Informatics Research Network. Last visited 19 March 2005 http://www.nbirn.net/.
10. GEON. Last visited 19 March 2005 http://www.geongrid.org/.
11. Star, S.L., The politics of formal representations: Wizards, gurus and organizational complexity, in Ecologies of Knowledge: Work and Politics in Science and Technology, S.L. Star, Editor. 1995, State University of New York Press: Albany, NY.
12. Estrin, D., W.K. Michener, and G. Bonito, Environmental Cyberinfrastructure needs for distributed sensor networks: A report from a National Science Foundation sponsored workshop. 2003, Scripps Institute of Oceanography.
13. Zimmerman, A., New Knowledge from Old Data: The Role of Standards in the Sharing and Reuse of Ecological Data. Science, Technology, & Human Values, under review.
14. Pritchard, S.M., L. Carver, and S. Anand, Collaboration for knowledge management and campus informatics. 2004, University of California, Santa Barbara: Santa Barbara, CA. Retrieved from http://www.library.ucsb.edu/ informatics/informatics/documents/UCSB_Campus_Informatics_Project_Report.pdf on 14 November 2005.
15. Schnase, J.L., et al. Building the next generation biological information infrastructure, in Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences Forum on Nature and Human Society: The Quest for a Sustainable World. 1997. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.
16. Michener, W.K. and J.W. Brunt, eds. Ecological Data: Design, Management and Processing. 2000, Blackwell Science: Oxford.
17. Bowker, G.C., Biodiversity datadiversity. Social Studies of Science, 2000. 30(5): p. 643-683.
18. Brown, C., Lineage metadata standard for land parcels in colonial states. GIS/LIS '95 Annual Conference and Exposition. American Soc. Photogrammetry & Remote Sensing & American Congress on Surveying & Mapping. Bethesda, MD, USA., 1995. Part 1, Vol 1: p. 121-130.
19. Kwa, C., Local ecologies and global science: Discourses and strategies of the International Geospher-Biosphere Programme. Social Studies of Science, 2005. 35(6): p. 923-950.
20. Shankar, K., Scientific data archiving: the state of the art in information, data, and metadata management. 2003.
21. Sandoval, W.A. and B.J. Reiser, Explanation-driven inquiry: Integrating conceptual and epistemic supports for science inquiry. Science Education, 2003. 87: p. 1-29.
22. Glaser, B.G. and A.L. Strauss, The discovery of grounded theory: Strategies for qualitative research. 1967, Chicago: Aldine Publishing Co.
23. Engeström, Y., Activity theory and individual and social transformation, in Perspectives on activity theory. 1999, New York: Cambridge University Press: p. 19-38.
24. Engeström, Y., Learning by Expanding: An activity-theoretical approach to developmental research. 1987, Helsinki: Orienta-Konsultit.
25. Cole, M. and Y. Engeström, eds. A Cultural-historical Approach to Distributed Cognition. 1993, New York: Cambridge University Press.
26. Cummings, J.N. and S. Kiesler, Collaborative research across disciplinary and organizational boundaries. Social Studies of Science, 2005. 35(5): p. 703-722.
27. Arzberger, P., et al., An International Framework to Promote Access to Data. Science, 2004. 303 (5665): p. 1777-1778.