Federalism and the Tug of War Within

Federalism and the Tug of War Within

Volumn , Issue , 2012, Pages 1-432

  Ryan, Erin ^a  

^a Dept of Economics and Thomas Jefferson Program in Public Policy at the College of William and Mary   (United States)

Author keywords

Balanced federalism; Climate change; Collaborative governance; Constitutional interpretation; Cooperative federalism; Dynamic federalism; Environmental federalism; Federalism; Federalism values; Health reform; Hurricane katrina; Intergovernmental bargaining; Interjurisdictional; Judicial federalism constraints; Judicial review; Jurisdiction; Multijurisdictional; New federalism; Nuclear waste; Political safeguards; Rehnquist court; Tea party; Tenth amendment; Tug of war

Indexed keywords

EID: 84922974828     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book    
DOI: 10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199737987.001.0001     Document Type: Book

References (167)

1. Ernest A. Young, The Rehnquist Court's Two Federalisms, 83 TEX. L. REV. 1, 4-5, 13-49 (2004)
2. Allison H. Eid, Federalism and Formalism, 11 WM. & MARY BILL OF RTS. J., 1191, 1221-29 (2003)
3. Roderick M. Hills, Jr., The Political Economy of Cooperative Federalism: Why State Autonomy Makes Sense and "Dual Sovereignty" Doesn't, 96 MICH. L. REV. 813, 850-51 (1998).
4. Andrew Romano, America's Holy Writ: Tea Party Evangelists Claim the Constitution as Their Sacred Text, NEWSWEEK, October 25 (2010), at 34-37;
5. Edward L. Rubin, The Fundamentality and Irrelevance of Federalism, 13 GA. ST. U.L. REV. 1009, 1010 (1997).
6. Vicki C. Jackson, Federalism and the Uses and Limits of Law: Printz and Principle?, 111 HARV. L. REV. 2180, 2213-23 (1998)
7. Felicia Anne Nadborny, Note, "Leap of Faith" into Bankruptcy: An Examination of the Issues Surrounding the Valuation of a Catholic Diocese's Bankruptcy Estate, 13 AM. BANKR. INST. L. REV. 839, 889 (2005).
8. Brian Galle & Mark Seidenfeld, Administrative Law's Federalism: Preemption, Delegation, and Agencies at the Edge of Federal Power, 57 DUKE L.J. 1933, 1940 (2008)
9. Martin S. Flaherty, Byron White, Federalism, and the "Greatest Generation(s), " 74 U. COLO. L. REV. 1573, 1596-97 (2003)
10. Jerry W. Markham, Banking Regulation: Its History and Future, 4 N.C. BANKING INST. 221, 223 (2000).
11. Norman R. Williams, Gibbons, 79 N.Y.U. L. REV. 1398 (2004)
12. Stephen Gardbaum, New Deal Constitutionalism and the Unshackling of the States, 64 U. CHI. L. REV. 483, 511 (1997).
13. Michael J. Phillips, How Many Times Was Lochner-Era Substantive Due Process Effective?, 48 MERCER L. REV. 1049 (2007)
14. Edward A. Purcell, Jr., Ex Parte Young and the Transformation of American Courts, 1890-1917, 40 U. TOLEDO L. REV. 931 (2009)
15. Barry Cushman, Lost Fidelities, 41 WM. & MARY L. REV. 95, 102 (1999);
16. Laura Kalman, Law, Politics, and the New Deal(s), 108 YALE L.J. 2165, 2165-66 (1999).
17. Barry Cushman, The Securities Laws and the Mechanics of Legal Change, 95 VA. L. REV. 927, 939 (2009).
18. William E. Leuchtenburg, The Tenth Amendment over Two Centuries, in THE TENTH AMENDMENT AND STATE SOVEREIGNTY 41, 43 (Mark R. Killenbeck ed., 2002).
19. Patrick M. Garry, Federalism's Battle with History: The Inaccurate Associations with Unpopular Politics, 74 UMKC L. REV. 365, 375 (2005).
20. Jim Chen, Come Back to the Nickel and Five: Tracing the Warren Court's Pursuit of Equal Justice under Law, 59 WASH. & LEE L. REV. 1203 (2002).
21. Daniel J. Elazar, Cooperative Federalism, in COMPETITION AMONG STATES AND LOCAL GOVERNMENTS 65, 67-68 (Daphne A. Kenyon & John Kincaid eds., 1991);
22. Phillip J. Weiser, Towards a Constitutional Architecture for Cooperative Federalism, 79 N.C. L. REV. 663, 677-81, 713-19 (2001).
23. Michael S. Greve, Against Cooperative Federalism, 70 MISS. L.J. 557, 559 (2000);
24. Joshua D. Sarnoff, Cooperative Federalism, the Delegation of Federal Power, and the Constitution, 39 ARIZ. L. REV. 205, 270-80 (1997).
25. Lynn A. Baker, Putting the Safeguards Back into the Political Safeguards of Federalism, 46 VILL. L. REV. 951 (2001);
26. Saikrishna B. Prakash & John C. Yoo, The Puzzling Persistence of Process-Based Federalism Theories, 79 TEX. L. REV 1459 (2001);
27. William W. Van Alstyne, The Second Death of Federalism, 83 MICH. L. REV. 1709 (1985).
28. Paul D. Moreno, "So Long as Our System Shall Exist": Myth, History, and the New Federalism, 14 WM. & MARY BILL RTS. J. 711, 721 (2005);
29. Lynn A. Baker, Should Liberals Fear Federalism?, 70 U. CIN. L. REV. 433, 454 (2002).
30. Neal Devins, The Judicial Safeguards of Federalism, 99 NW. U.L. REV. 131, 133 (2004).
31. Neal Devins, The Majoritarian Rehnquist Court?, 67 LAW & CONTEMP. PROBS. 63, 63-65 (2004);
32. Albert C. Lin, Erosive Interpretation of Environmental Law in the Supreme Court's 2003-04 Term, 42 HOUS. L. REV. 565, 626 (2005).
33. Richard W. Garnett, The New Federalism, the Spending Power, and Federal Criminal Law, 89 CORNELL L. REV. 1, 22 (2003)
34. Michael W. McConnell, Federalism: Evaluating the Founders' Design, 54 U. CHI. L. REV. 1484, 1504 (1987)
35. D. Bruce La Pierre, Political Accountability in the National Political Process: The Alternative to Judicial Review of Federalism Issues, 80 NW. L. REV. 577 (1985);
36. H. Geoffrey Moulton, Jr., The Quixotic Search for a Judicially Enforceable Federalism, 83 MINN. L. REV. 849, 877 (1999).
37. Peter R. Orszag, Open Government Directive, Memorandum for the Heads of Executive Department and Agencies, Dec. 8, 2009, http://www.whitehouse.gov/open/documents/open-government-directive.
38. Boehner's First Remarks as House Speaker, N.Y. TIMES, Jan. 5, 2001, http://www.nytimes.com/2011/01/06/us/politics/06cong-text.html?ref=politics.
39. Nicolas Marie Kublicki, An Overview of the French Legal System from an American Perspective, 12 B.U. INT'L L.J. 57, 59-60 (1994).
40. Richard A. Epstein, Exit Rights under Federalism, 55 LAW & CONTEMP. PROBS. 147, 150 (1992).
41. Abraham Bell & Gideon Parchomovsky, Of Property and Federalism, 115 YALE L.J. 72, 77 (2005)
42. Jonathan H. Adler, The Fable of Federal Environmental Regulation: Reconsidering the Federal Role in Environmental Protection, 55 CASE W. RES. L. REV. 93, 103 (2004).
43. California Now World's Fifth-Largest Economy, SILICON VALLEY/SAN JOSE BUS. J., June 15, 2001, http://sanjose.bizjournals.com/sanjose/stories/2001/06/11/daily58.html.
44. Alexander Tabarrok, Presentation at University of California Hastings College of the Law: Arguments for Federalism (Sept. 20, 2001), http://www.independent.org/issues/article.asp?id=485.
45. Robert K. Vischer, Subsidiarity as a Principle of Governance: Beyond Devolution, 35 IND. L. REV. 103, 103 (2001).
46. David P. Currie, Subsidiarity, 1 GREEN BAG 2D 359 (1998);
47. James L. Huffman, Making Environmental Regulation More Adaptive through Decentralization: The Case for Subsidiarity, 52 U. KAN. L. REV. 1377 (2004);
48. John F. Stinneford, Subsidiarity, Federalism, and Federal Prosecution of Street Crime, 2 J. CATH. SOC. THOUGHT 495 (2005);
49. W. Gary Vause, The Subsidiarity Principle in European Union Law-American Federalism Compared, 27 CASE W. RES. J. INT'L L. 61 (1995);
50. Jared Bayer, Comment, Re-Balancing State and Federal Power: Toward a Political Principle of Subsidiarity in the United States, 53 AM. U. L. REV. 1421 (2004).
51. David T. Koyzis, Subsidiarity and Federalism, COMMENT, Jan. 2004, at 3, http://www.cardus.ca/comment/article/230.
52. George A. Bermann, Taking Subsidiarity Seriously: Federalism in the European Community and the United States, 94 COLUM. L. REV. 331, 451-52 (1994).
53. Eric R. Claeys, The Living Commerce Clause: Federalism in Progressive Political Theory and the Commerce Clause after Lopez and Morrison, 11 WM. & MARY BILL RTS. J. 403, 404-05 (2002).
54. Herbert Wechsler, The Political Safeguards of Federalism: The Role of the States in the Composition and Selection of the National Government, 54 Colum. L. Rev. 543, 588 (1954);
55. Jesse H. Choper, Judicial Review and the National Political Process 175-76 (1980).
56. Lynn A. Baker & Ernest A. Young, Federalism and the Double Standard of Judicial Review, 51 Duke L.J. 75, 128 (2001);
57. William Van Alstyne, Federalism, Congress, the States and the Tenth Amendment: Adrift in the Cellophane Sea, 1987 Duke L.J. 769, 782-83, 797-98 (1987).
58. Lynn M. Stuter, Are Public Schools Constitutional?, Jan. 20, 2003, http://www.newswithviews.com/Stuter/stuter9.htm.
59. Radley Balko, The "Tenther" Smear, Reason.com, Sept, 21, 2009, http://reason.com/blog/2009/09/21/the-tenthersmear.
60. Kurt T. Lash, The Inescapable Federalism of the Ninth Amendment, 93 Iowa L. Rev. 801 (2008);
61. Randy E. Barnett, The Ninth Amendment: It Means What It Says, 85 Tex. L. Rev. 1, 80 (2006).
62. Edward L. Rubin & Malcolm Feeley, Federalism: Some Notes on a National Neurosis, 41 UCLA L. Rev. 908-14 (1994);
63. Ernest A. Young, Two Cheers for Process Federalism, 46 Vill. L. Rev. 1349 (2001).
64. Kirsten H. Engel, Whither Subnational Climate Change Initiatives in the Wake of Federal Climate Legislation?, 39 Publius 432 (2009).
65. Erin Ryan, Federalism at the Cathedral: Property Rules, Liability Rules, and Inalienability Rules in Tenth Amendment Infrastructure, 81 U. COLO. L. REV. 1, 4, 14-18 (2010).
66. Neil Siegel, Commandeering and Its Alternatives: A Federalism Perspective, 59 VAND. L. REV. 1629, 1660-64 (2007).
67. Audeen W. Fentiman et al., Legislation Governing Disposal of Low-Level Radioactive Waste, Ohio State University RER-60, http:/ohioonline.osu.edu/rer/rerhtml/rer_60.html (last visited July 14, 2008).
68. R. H. Coase, The Problem of Social Cost, 3 J.L. & ECON. 1, 15 (1960).
69. Anna Kuchment, Into the Wilds of Oakland Calif.: Young Pollution Sleuths and Community Activists Fight for Healthier Air, NEWSWEEK, Aug. 11, 2008, at 50.
70. U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission, Locations of Low-Level Waste Facilities, http://www.nrc.gov/waste/llw-disposal/licensing/locations.html (last visited July 14, 2010).
71. Tripp Baltz, EnergySolutions Drops Plans to Store Low-Level Radioactive Waste at Utah Facility, 41 Envtl. Rep. (BNA) 1580 (2010).
72. Michael L. Buenger & Richard L. Masters, The Interstate Compact on Adult Offender Supervision: Using Old Tools to Solve New Problems, 9 ROGER WILLIAMS U.L. REV. 71 (2003).
73. Stewart E. Sterk, Property Rules, Liability Rules, and Uncertainty about Property Rights, 106 MICH. L. REV. 1285 (2008);
74. Henry Smith, Property and Property Rules, 79 N.Y.U. L. REV. 1719 (2004);
75. Ian Ayres & J. M. Balkin, Legal Entitlements as Auctions: Property Rules, Liability Rules, and Beyond, 106 YALE L.J. 703,748 (1997).
76. Margaret Jane Radin, Market-Inalienability, 100 HARV. L. REV. 1849 (1987).
77. Janet Raloff, California May Yet Get the First Greenhouse Gas Limits for Cars, SCIENCENEWS, Feb. 6, 2009, http://www.sciencenews.org/view/generic/id/40664.
78. John R. Nolon, Katrina's Lament: Reconstructing Federalism, 23 PACE ENVTL. L. REV. 987, 987-91 (2006).
79. Philip J. Weiser, Federal Common Law, Cooperative Federalism, and the Enforcement of the Telecom Act, 76 N.Y.U.L. REV. 1692 (2001);
80. William W. Buzbee, Contextual Environmental Federalism, 14 N.Y.U. ENVTL. L.J. 108, 108-09 (2005).
81. William W. Buzbee, Recognizing the Regulatory Commons: A Theory of Regulatory Gaps, 89 IOWA L. REV. 1, 8-14 (2003).
82. James Gerstenzang, Bird Flu Warning Would Ravage U.S., White House Warns, L.A. TIMES, May 4, 2006, at A6.
83. Kirsten H. Engel & Scott R. Saleska, "Facts Are Stubborn Things": An Empirical Reality Check in the Theoretical Debate over the Race-to-the-Bottom in State Environmental Standard-Setting, 8 CORNELL J.L. & PUB. POL'Y 55, 60-61 (1998).
84. Jeff Kinney, Internal EPA Memo Finds Enforcement Decreased Following Rapanos Decision, 39 ENV'T REP. (BNA) 1392 (2008).
85. John Dinan, Congressional Responses to the Rehnquist Court's Federalism Decisions, 32 PUBLIUS 12 (2002).
86. Associated Press, Stolen E-mails Embolden Climate Skeptics, CBSNEWS, Dec. 10, 2009, http://www.cbsnews.com/stories/2009/12/10/tech/main5963892.shtml.
87. Katherine N. Probst & Sarah Jo Szambelan, The Role of the States in a Federal Climate Program 6 (Resources for the Future Discussion Paper, Nov. 2009), http://www.rff.org/RFF/Documents/RFF-DP-09-46.pdf.
88. Senate Urged to Let States Keep Climate Plans, REUTERS, Sept. 2, 2009, http://www.reuters.com/article/idUSTRE58064F20090902.
89. Catherine S. Hill & Margreta Morgulas, Regional and State-Based Climate Change Initiatives in the United States, 10 GOV'T L. & POL'Y J. 41 (2008), http://www.woh.com/img/document_files/State%20Based%20Climate%20Initiatives%20article.pdf.
90. Rip Watson, New Orleans Port Opens to Relief Ships after Katrina, BLOOMBERG.COM, Sept. 6, 2005, http://www.bloomberg.com/apps/news?pid=10000082&sid=adNXIjdn4Z8Q;
91. Brandon L. Garrett & Tania Tetlow, Criminal Justice Collapse: The Constitution after Hurricane Katrina, 56 DUKE L.J. 127, 135-54 (2006).
92. Adam Nossiter, Storm Left New Orleans Ripe for Violence, N.Y. TIMES, Jan. 11, 2007, at A24 (same).
93. EPA, Response to 2005 Hurricanes: Frequent Questions, http://www.epa.gov/katrina/faqs.htm (last visited Mar. 15, 2007).
94. Erin Ryan, Negotiating Federalism, 52 B.C. L. REV. 1 (2011).
95. Ashira Pelman Ostrow, Process Preemption in Federal Siting Regimes, 48 HARV. J. ON LEGIS. 289 (2011).
96. Lee Anne Fennell, Hard Bargains and Real Steals: Land Use Exactions Revisited, 86 IOWA L. REV. 1, 26-27 (2000).
97. Carol M. Rose, Planning and Dealing: Piecemeal Land Controls as Problem of Local Legitimacy, 71 CAL. L. REV. 837, 849 (1983).
98. Erin Ryan, Zoning, Taking & Dealing, The Problems and Promise of Bargaining in Land Use Planning Conflicts, 7 HARV. NEGOT. L. REV. 337, 348 (2002).
99. Laurence H. Tribe, The Puzzling Persistence of Process-Based Constitutional Theories, 89 YALE L.J. 1063, 1065-72 (1980).
100. Jesse H. Choper, The Scope of National Power vis-à-vis the States, 86 YALE L.J. 1552, 1554-57 (1977).
101. Alejandro E. Camacho, Lawrence E. Susskind & Todd Schenk, Collaborative Planning and Adaptive Management in Glen Canyon: A Cautionary Tale, 35 COLUM. J. ENVTL. L. 1 (2010).
102. A. Brooke Overby, Our New Commercial Law Federalism, 76 TEMP. L. REV. 297, 299-300 (2003).
103. Ernest A. Young, Dual Federalism, Concurrent Jurisdiction, and the Foreign Affairs Exception, 69 GEO. WASH. L. REV. 139, 145 (2001).
104. Molly Farrell, The Blackmun Papers: Key Blackmun Opinions and Dissents, PBS NEWSHOUR ONLINE, http://www.pbs.org/newshour/bb/law/supreme_court/blackmun/blackmun_opinions.html.
105. Erwin Chemerinsky, Empowering States: A Rebuttal to Dr. Greve, 33 PEPP. L. REV. 91, 93-94 (2005).
106. John O. McGinnis, Reviving Tocqueville's America: The Rehnquist Court's Jurisprudence of Social Discovery, 90 CAL. L. REV. 485, 487 (2002).
107. David J. Barron, Reclaiming Federalism, DISSENT MAG., Spring 2005, http://www.dissentmagazine.org/article/?article=249.
108. Thomas W. Merrill, The Making of the Second Rehnquist Court: A Preliminary Analysis, 47 ST. LOUIS U.L.J. 569, 571, 611-12 (2003).
109. Duncan Kennedy, Form and Substance in Private Law Adjudication, 89 HARV. L. REV. 1685, 1685 (1976).
110. Carol M. Rose, Crystals and Mud in Property Law, 40 STAN. L. REV. 577 (1988).
111. John Yoo, Commentary, What Became of Federalism?, L.A. TIMES, June 21, 2005, at 13.
112. Robert L. Stern, That Commerce Which Concerns More States than One, 47 HARV. L. REV. 1335, 1344-45, 1364-65 (1934).
113. Ronald J. Allen & Ross M. Rosenberg, Legal Phenomena, Knowledge and Theory: A Cautionary Tale of Hedgehogs and Foxes, 77 CHI.-KENT L. REV. 683, 695 (2002).
114. Frank I. Michelman, Property, Utility, and Fairness: Comments on the Ethical Foundations of "Just Compensation" Law, 80 HARV. L. REV. 1165, 1226-45 (1967).
115. Steve Tetreault, Washington State Continues Push to Halt Yucca Shutdown, LAS VEGAS REV. -J., Apr. 13, 2010, http://www.lvrj.com/news/washington-state-continues-pushto-halt-yucca-shut-down-90781169.html.
116. Randy E. Barnett, Is Health Care Reform Constitutional?, WASH. POST, Mar. 21, 2010, http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2010/03/19/AR2010031901470.html.
117. Erwin Chemerinsky, Health Care Reform Is Constitutional, POLITICO, Oct. 23, 2009, http://www.politico.com/news/stories/1009/28620.html (arguing that objections to the bill have no basis in law).
118. Stephen E. Gottlieb, The Paradox of Balancing Significant Interests, 45 HASTINGS L.J. 825, 828 (1994).
119. Iddo Porat, The Dual Model of Balancing: A Model for the Proper Scope of Balancing in Constitutional Law, 27 CARDOZO L. REV. 1393 (2006).
120. Michel Rosenfeld, Judicial Balancing in Times of Stress: Comparing the American, British, and Israeli Approaches to the War on Terror, 27 CARDOZO L. REV. 2079 (2006).
121. Cass R. Sunstein, Incommensurability and Valuation in Law, 92 MICH. L. REV. 779 (1994).
122. Alexandra B. Klass, Common Law and Federalism in the Age of the Regulatory State, 92 IOWA L. REV. 545, 582-84 (2007).
123. John Dinan & Dale Krane, The State of American Federalism, 2005: Federalism Resurfaces in the Political Debate, 36 PUBLIUS 327, 343-44 (2006).
124. William G. Howell, Unilateral Powers: A Brief Overview, 35 PRESIDENTIAL STUD. Q. 417, 418 (2005).
125. Matthew Stephenson, Optimal Political Control of the Bureaucracy, 107 MICH. L. REV. 53, 73 (2008).
126. Cass R. Sunstein, Deliberative Trouble? Why Groups Go to Extremes, 110 YALE L.J. 71 (2000).
127. James Sebenius, Sequencing to Build Coalitions: With Whom Should I Talk First?, in WISE CHOICES: DECISIONS, GAMES, AND NEGOTIATIONS (Richard Zeckhauser et al. eds., 1996).
128. William H. Simon, Toyota Jurisprudence: Legal Theory and Rolling Rule Regimes, in LAW AND NEW GOVERNANCE IN THE EU AND THE US 37 (Grainne de Burca & Joanne Scott eds., 2006)
129. Amy J. Cohen, Negotiation, Meet New Governance: Interests, Skills, and Selves, 33 LAW & SOC. INQUIRY 503 (2008).
130. Michael C. Dorf & Charles F. Sabel, A Constitution of Democratic Experimentalism, 98 COLUM. L. REV. 267 (1998).
131. Sarah H. Burghart, Survey: Overcompensating Much? The Impact of Preemption on Emerging Federal and State Efforts to Limit Executive Compensation, 2009 COLUM. BUS. L. REV. 669, 673 (2009).
132. Sam Dillon, Obama to Seek Sweeping Change of the "No Child" Law, N.Y. TIMES, Feb. 1, 2010, at A1.
133. Krista Kafer, No Child Left Behind: Where Do We Go from Here?, BACKGROUNDER (The Heritage Found., Wash., D.C.), July 6, 2004, http://www.heritage.org/research/education/bg1775.cfm (full state participation).
134. Gregory A. Thomas, Where Property Rights and Biodiversity Converge, Part I: Conservation Planning at the Regional Scale, 17 ENDANGERED SPECIES UPDATE 139, 140 (2000), http://deepblue.lib.umich.edu/bitstream/2027.42/39357/1/als9527.0017.006.pdf.
135. John M. Gaffin, Can We Conserve California's Threatened Fisheries through Natural Community Conservation Planning?, 27 ENVTL. L. 791, 793 (1997).
136. Joshua Secunda & Lawrence Susskind, The Risks and the Advantages of Agency Discretion: Evidence from EPA's Project XL, 17 UCLA J. ENVTL. L. & POL'Y 67, 112-16 (1999).
137. John Graham, Adm'r, White House Office of Info. & Regulatory Affairs, Speech at the Kennedy School of Government (Sept. 25, 2003), http://www.whitehouse.gov/omb/inforeg_speeches_030925graham/.
138. Jeffrey H. Wood, Protecting Native Coastal Ecosystems: CZMA and Alaska's Coastal Plan, 19 NAT. RESOURCES & ENV'T 57 (2004).
139. Office of Ocean & Coastal Res. Mgmt., Coastal Zone Management Act Performance System 2 (2006), http://coastalmanagement.noaa.gov/resources/docs/npmsupdate.pdf.
140. William W. Buzbee, Asymmetrical Regulation: Risk, Preemption, and the Floor/Ceiling Distinction, 82 N.Y.U.L. REV. 1547, 1590-92 (2007).
141. David E. Adelman & Kirsten H. Engel, Adaptive Federalism: The Case against Reallocating Environmental Regulatory Authority, 92 MINN. L. REV. 1796, 1840 (2008).
142. Robert L. Glicksman & Richard E. Levy, A Collective Action Perspective on Ceiling Preemption by Federal Environmental Regulation: The Case of Global Climate Change, 102 NW. U.L. REV. 579, 579-80 (2008).
143. Bob Egelko, Pot Advocate Convicted on Three Charges, But "Ganga Guru" Won't Face Further Punishment, SAN FRAN. CHRON., May 30, 2007, http://www.sfgate.com/cgi-bin/article.cgi?f=/c/a/2007/05/30/BAGTPQ420H5.DTL.
144. Randal C. Archibold, Arizona Enacts Stringent Law on Immigration, N.Y. TIMES, APR. 24, 2010, at A1, http://www.nytimes.com/2010/04/24/us/politics/24immig.html.
145. Randal C. Archibold, Judge Blocks Arizona's Immigration Law, N.Y. TIMES, July 28, 2010, at A1, http://www.nytimes.com/2010/07/29/us/29arizona.html?_r=1&ref=immigration-and-emigration.
146. Ilya Somin, The Limits of Backlash: Assessing the Political Response to Kelo, 93 MINN. L. REV. 2100, 2114-48 (2009).
147. Gerald Frug, The Judicial Power of the Purse, 126 U. PA. L. REV. 715 (1978).
148. Eric D. Blumenson & Eva S. Nilsen, Contesting Government's Financial Interest in Drug Cases, 13 CRIM. JUST. 4, 5 (1999).
149. Kate Galbraith, Texas Leads Resistance to EPA Climate Action, THE TEXAS TRIBUNE, Sep. 23, 2010, http://www.texastribune.org/texas-stateagencies/attorney-generals-office/texas-leads-resistance-to-epa-climateaction/.
150. Brian Laskowski, Coast Guard Considers New Rules to Regulate Ballast, GREAT LAKES ECHO, Oct. 8, 2009, http://greatlakesecho.org/2009/10/08/coast-guard-considers-new-rules-to-regulateballast-takes-up-where-congress-left-off/.
151. Akhil Reed Amar, The Bill of Rights and the Fourteenth Amendment, 101 YALE L.J. 1193 (1992);
152. Louis Henkin, "Selective Incorporation" in the Fourteenth Amendment, 73 YALE L.J. 74 (1963).
153. Text of Justice David Souter's Speech (Harvard Commencement remarks, as delivered), HARVARD GAZETTE, May 27, 2010, http://news.harvard.edu/gazette/story/2010/05/text-of-justice-david-souters-speech/.
154. Robert H. Bork, The Constitution, Original Intent, and Economic Rights, 23 SAN DIEGO L. REV. 823, 824-25 (1986);
155. Edwin Meese III, Toward a Jurisprudence of Original Intent, 11 HARV. J.L. & PUB. POL'Y 5, 7 (1988);
156. William H. Rehnquist, The Notion of a Living Constitution, 54 TEX. L. REV. 693, 698 (1976);
157. Antonin Scalia, Originalism: The Lesser Evil, 57 U. CIN. L. REV. 849 (1989).
158. William Van Alstyne, Interpreting This Constitution: The Unhelpful Contributions of Special Theories of Judicial Review, 35 U. FLA. L. REV. 209 (1983).
159. John M. Broder, Guard Units' New Mission: From Combat to Flood Duty, N.Y. TIMES, Aug. 30, 2005, at A13.
160. Michael Greenberger, Yes, Virginia: The President Can Deploy Federal Troops to Prevent the Loss of a Major American City from a Devastating Natural Catastrophe, 26 MISS. C.L. REV. 107, 115 (2006).
161. Barbara Kantrowitz & Karen Breslau, Some Are Found, All Are Lost, NEWSWEEK, Sept. 19, 2005, at 51.
162. Lester R. Brown, Global Warming Forcing U.S. Coastal Population to Move Inland, EARTH POL'Y INST., Aug. 16, 2006, http://www.earth-policy.org/Updates/2006/Update57.htm.
163. Pam Radtke Russell, Gulf Platform Damage Still Being Assessed, NEWHOUSE NEWS SERV., Mar. 23, 2006.
164. Mike Taibbi, Oil Coats Homes, Water After Katrina, MSNBC.COM, Nov. 8, 2005, http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/9972220.
165. Stefan Rahmstorf et al., Hurricanes and Global Warming-Is There a Connection?, REAL CLIMATE, Sept. 2, 2005, http://www.realclimate.org/index.php?p=181.
166. Douglas L. Marriott, Keep Out Federal Bureaucracy in Katrina Recovery, USA Today Opinion Blog, http://blogs.usatoday.com/oped/2007/09/keep-out-federa.html.
167. Ralph A. Cossa, President of the Pacific Forum Center for Strategic and International Studies, South Asian Tsunami: U.S. Military Provides "Logistical Backbone" for Relief Operation, EJOURNAL USA: FOREIGN POLICY AGENDA (Nov. 2004), http://usinfo.state.gov/journals/itps/1104/ijpe/cossa.htm.