Coexistence

Handbook on Agriculture, Biotechnology and Development

Volumn , Issue , 2014, Pages 372-391

  Beckmann, Volker ^a   Soregaroli, Claudio ^b   Wesseler, Justus ^c  

^a UNIVERSITY OF GREIFSWALD   (Germany)

^b UNIVERSITÀ CATTOLICA DEL SACRO CUORE   (Italy)

^c TECHNICAL UNIVERSITY OF MUNICH   (Germany)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 84922948398     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book    
DOI: 10.4337/9780857938350.00031     Document Type: Chapter

References (85)

1. Areal, F.J., L. Riesgo and E. Rodriguez-Cezero (2011), ‘Attitudes of European farmers towards GM crop production’, Plan Biotechnology Journal, 9, 945-57.
2. Beckmann, V. and C. Schleyer (2007), ‘Neue Formen der Kooperation von Landwirten bei der Befürwortung und Ablehnung der Agro-Gentechnik’, in B. Köstner, M. Vogt and B. van Saan-Klein (eds), Agro-Gentechnik im Ländlichen Raum: Potenziale, Konflikte und Perspektiven. Forum für Interdisziplinäre Forschung, Berlin: Brandenburgische Akademie der Wissenschaften and Dettelbach: J.H. Röll, pp. 221-43.
3. Beckmann, V. and J. Wesseler (2007), ‘Spatial dimension of externalities and the Coase Theorem: implications for coexistence of transgenic crops’, in W. Heijman (ed.), Regional Externalities, Berlin: Springer, pp. 215-34.
4. Beckmann, V., C. Soregaroli and J. Wesseler (2006), ‘Co-existence rules and regulations in the European Union’, American Journal of Agricultural Economics, 88(5), 1193-9.
5. Beckmann, V., C. Soregaroli and J. Wesseler (2010), ‘Ex-ante regulation and ex-post liability under uncertainty and irreversibility: governing the coexistence of GM crops’, Economics: The Open-Access, Open-Assessment E-Journal, 4(2010-9).
6. Beckmann V., C. Soregaroli and J. Wesseler (2011), ‘Coexistence of genetically modified (GM) and non-modified (non-GM) crops: are the two main property rights regimes equivalent with respect to the coexistence value?', in C.A. Carter, G. Moschini and I. Sheldon (eds), Genetically Modified Food and Global Welfare, Frontiers of Economics and Globalization, Vol. 10, Bingley: Emerald Group Publishing Limited, pp. 201-24.
7. Belson, N.A. (2000), ‘US regulation of agricultural biotechnology: an overview’, AgBioForum, 3(4), 268-80.
8. Bender, K.L. and R.E. Westgren (2001), ‘Social construction of the market(s) for genetically modified and nonmodified crops’, American Behavioral Scientist, 44, 1350-70.
9. Bernauer, T. and E. Meins (2003), ‘Technological revolution meets policy and the market: explaining cross-national differences in agricultural biotechnology regulation’, European Journal of Political Research, 42(5), 643-83.
10. Boisson de Chazournes, L. and M-M. Mbengue (2005), ‘International legal aspects of the co-existence between GM and non-GM products: approaches under international environment law and international trade law’, in A. Messean (ed.), Proceedings of the Second International Conference on Co-existence between GM and Non-GM based Agricultural Supply Chains, 14-15 November 2005, Montpellier (France), pp. 15-28.
11. Breustedt, G., J. Müller-Scheeßel and U. Latacz-Lohmann (2008), ‘Forecasting the adoption of GM oilseed rape: evidence from a discrete choice experiment in Germany’, Journal of Agricultural Economics, 59(2), 237-56.
12. Brookes, G. (2008), ‘Economic impacts of low level presence of not yet approved GMO s on the EU food sector’, briefing document, GBC Ltd, UK, May 2008, available at: http://www.agrodigital.com/images/estudio.pdf.
13. Brookes, G. and P. Barfoot (2010), ‘Global impact of biotech crops: environmental effects, 1996-2008', AgBioForum, 13(1), 76-94.
14. CEC ‘Commission of the European Communities’ (2001), ‘Directive 2001/18/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 12 March 2001 on the deliberate release into the environment of genetically modified organisms and repealing Council Directive 90/220/EEC’, Official Journal of the European Union, L 106, 17.4.2001, p.1.
15. CEC, Commission of the European Communities (2003a), ‘Regulation (EC) No. 1829/2003 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 22 September 2003 on genetically modified food and feed’, Official Journal of the European Union, L 268/1-23.
16. CEC, Commission of the European Communities (2003b), ‘Recommendation 2003/556/EC on guidelines for the development of national strategies and best practices to ensure the co-existence of genetically modified crops with conventional and organic farming’, Official Journal of the European Union, L 189, 29.7.2003, p. 36.
17. CEC, Commission of the European Communities (2009a), ‘Report from the Commission to the Council and the European Parliament: on the coexistence of genetically modified crops with conventional and organic farming’, COM(2009) 153, Brussels.
18. CEC, Commission of the European Communities (2009b), ‘Annex to the Report from the Commission to the Council and the European Parliament: on the coexistence of genetically modified crops with conventional and organic farming’, Commission Staff Working Document, SEC(2009) 408, Brussels.
19. CEC, Commission of the European Communities (2010), ‘Recommendation 2010/C 200/01 of 13 July 2010 on guidelines for the development of national co-existence measures to avoid the unintended presence of GMOs in conventional and organic crops’, Official Journal of the European Union, C 200, 22.7.2010.
20. CEC, Commission of the European Communities (2011), ‘Commission Regulation (EU) No. 619/2011 of 24 June 2011 laying down the methods of sampling and analysis for the official control of feed as regards presence of genetically modified material for which an authorisation procedure is pending or the authorisation of which has expired’, Official Journal of the European Union, L166/9-15.25.6.2011.
21. Ceddia, M.G., M. Bartlett and C Perrings (2007), ‘Landscape gene flow, coexistence and threshold effect: the case of genetically modified herbicide tolerant oilseed rape (Brassica napus)', Ecological Modelling, 205(1-2), 169-80.
22. Coase, R. (1960), ‘The problem of social costs’, The Journal of Law and Economics, 3(1), 1-44.
23. Consmüller, N., V. Beckmann and M. Petrick (2010), ‘An econometric analysis of regional adoption patterns of Bt maize in Germany’, Agricultural Economics, 41, 275-84.
24. Consmüller, N., V. Beckmann and C. Schleyer (2009), ‘The role of coordination and cooperation in early adoption of GM crops: the case of Bt maize in Brandenburg, Germany’, AgBioForum, 12(1), 47-59.
25. Crespi, J.M. and S. Marette (2003), '“Does contain” vs. “does not contain”: does it matter which GMO label is used?', European Journal of Law and Economics, 16(3), 327-44.
26. Czarnak-Kłos, M. and E. Rodríguez-Cerezo (2010), ‘Best practice documents for coexistence of genetically modified crops with conventional and organic farming: 1. Maize crop production’, Seville: European Coexistence Bureau (ECoB), Joint Research Centre (JEC), Institute for Prospective Technological Studies.
27. Demont, M., J. Wesseler and E. Tollens (2004), ‘Biodiversity versus transgenic sugar beets: the one Euro question’, European Review of Agricultural Economics, 31(1), 1-18.
28. Demont, M., W. Daems, K. Dillen, E. Mathijs, C. Sausse and E. Tollens (2008), ‘Regulating coexistence in Europe: beware of the domino-effect!', Ecological Economics, 64, 683-9.
29. Demont, M., K. Dillen, W. Daems, C. Sausse, E. Tollens and E. Mathijs (2009), ‘On the proportionality of EU spatial ex ante coexistence regulations’, Food Policy, 34(6), 508-18.
30. Devos, Y., D. Reheul and A. De Schrijver (2005), ‘The co-existence between transgenic and non-transgenic maize in the European Union: a focus on pollen flow and cross-fertilization’, Environmental Biosafety Research, 4, 71-87.
31. Devos, Y., M. Cougnon, O. Thas and D. Reheul (2008), ‘A method to search for optimal field allocations of transgenic maize in the context of Co-existence’, Environmental Biosafety Research, 7, 97-104.
32. EC oB-European Coexistence Bureau (2012), ‘Background’, available at: http://ecob.jrc.ec.europa.eu/background.html.
33. ECTIL, European Centre of Tort and Insurance Law (2007), ‘Liability and compensation schemes for damage resulting from the presence of genetically modified organisms in non-GM crops’, April 2007, available at: http://ec.europa.eu/agriculture/analysis/external/liability_gmo/index_en.htm.
34. Endres, B.A. (2005), ‘Revising seed purity laws to account for the adventitious presence of genetically modified varieties: a first step towards coexistence’, Journal of Food Law and Policy, 131.
35. Falck-Zepeda, J., J. Wesseler and S. Smyth (2013), ‘The current status of the debate on socio-economic assessments: positions and policies in Canada, the USA, the EU, and developing countries’, World Review of Science, Technology and Sustainable Development, 10(4), 203-27.
36. Furtan, W.H., A. Güzel and A.S. Weseen (2007), ‘Landscape clubs: co-existence of genetically modified and organic crops’, Canadian Journal of Agricultural Economics, 55, 185-95.
37. Gaskell, G., M.W. Bauer, J. Durant and N.C. Allum (1999), ‘Worlds apart? The reception of genetically modified food in Europe and the US’, Science, 285, 384-7.
38. Gaskell, G., S. Stares, A. Allansdottir, N. Allum, P. Castro, Y. Esmer, C. Fischler, J. Jackson, N. Kronberger, J. Hampel, N. Mejlgaard, A. Quintanilha, A. Rammer, G. Revuelta, P. Stoneman, H. Torgersen and W. Wagner (2010), Europeans and Biotechnology in 2010: Winds of Change?, Luxembourg: Publications Office of the European Union.
39. Gomez-Barbero, M., J. Berbel and E. Rodríguez-Cerezo (2008), ‘Adoption and performance of the first GM crop introduced in EU agriculture: Bt Maize in Spain’, JRC Scientific and Technical Reports. European Commission Joint Research Centre, Institute for Prospective Technological Studies, Seville, Spain.
40. Graff, G.D., G. Hochman and D. Zilberman (2009), ‘The political economy of agricultural biotechnology policies’, AgBioForum, 12(1), 34-46.
41. Gray, E., T. Ancev and R. Drynan (2011), ‘Coexistence of GM and non-GM crops with endogenously determined separation’, Ecological Economics, 70(12), 2486-93.
42. Greene, C. and K. Smith (2010), ‘Can genetically engineered and organic crops coexist?', Choices, 25(2).
43. Groeneveld, R., J. Wesseler and P. Berentsen (2013), ‘Dominos in the dairy: an analysis of transgenic maize in Dutch dairy farming’, Ecological Economics, 86(2), 107-16.
44. Gruère, G.P. and S.R. Rao (2007), ‘A review of international labeling policies of genetically modified food to evaluate India’s proposed rule’, AgBioForum, 10(1), 51-64.
45. Gruère, G.P., C.A. Carter and Y.H. Farzin (2008), ‘What labelling policy for consumer choice? The case of genetically modified food in Canada and Europe’, Canadian Journal of Economics, 41(4), 1472-97.
46. Heuberger, S, C. Ellers-Kirk, B.E. Tabashnik and Y. Carriere (2010), ‘Pollen-and seed-mediated transgene flow in commercial cotton seed production fields’, PLoS ONE, 5(11).
47. Jarosz, N., B. Loubet, B. Durand, X. Foueillassar and L. Huber (2005), ‘Variations in maize pollen emission and deposition in relation to microclimate’, Environmental Science and Technology, 39, 4377-84.
48. Kalaitzandonakes, N. and J. Bijman (2003), ‘Who is driving biotechnology acceptance?', Nature Biotechnology, 21, 366-9.
49. Kershen, D. (2004), ‘Legal liability issues in agricultural biotechnology’, Crop Science, 44, 456-63.
50. Kershen, D. (2009), ‘Three separate and distinct spheres: patents, regulation and liability. The selected works of Drew L. Kershen’, available at: http://works.bepress.com/drew_kershen/10.
51. Kikulwe, E., E. Birol, J. Wesseler and J. Falck-Zepeda (2011), ‘A latent class approach to investigating developing country consumers’ demand for genetically modified staple food crops: the case of GM banana in Uganda’, Agricultural Economics, 42, 547-60.
52. Koch, B. (ed.) (2008), Economic Loss Caused by Genetically Modified Organisms, Vienna: Springer Verlag.
53. Kolstad, C.D., T.S. Ulen and G.V. Johnson (1990), ‘Ex post liability for harm vs. ex ante safety regulation: substitutes or complements?', American Economic Review, 80, 888-901.
54. Krauss, M.I. (1999), ‘Property rules vs. liability rules’, in B. Bouckaert and G. De Geest (eds), Encyclopedia of Law and Economics, Cheltenham, UK and Northampton, MA, USA: Edward Elgar Publishing.
55. Krueger, J.K. (2007), If Your Farm is Organic, Must it be GMO-Free? Organic Farmers, Genetically Modified Organisms, and the Law, St Paul, MO: Farmer’s Legal Action Group, Inc.
56. Ma, B.L., K.D. Subedi and L.M. Reid (2004), ‘Extent of cross-fertilization in maize by pollen from neighboring transgenic hybrids’, Crop Science, 44, 1273-82.
57. Maltsbarger, R. and N. Kalaitzanodakes (2000), ‘Direct and hidden costs in identity preserved supply chains’, AgBioForum, 3(4), Article 10.
58. Moschini, G., H. Bulut and L. Cembalo (2005), ‘On the segregation of genetically modified, conventional and organic products in European agriculture: a multi-market equilibrium analysis’, Journal of Agricultural Economics, 56(3), 347-72.
59. Munro, A. (2008), ‘The spatial impact of genetically modified crops’, Ecological Economics, 67, 658-66.
60. Non-GMO Project (2013), Non-GMO project standard v. 10, available at: http://www.nongmoproject.org/wp-content/uploads/2013/06/Non-GMO-Project-Standard-v10.pdf, accessed 22 July 2013.
61. Nowicki, P.L, L.H. Aramyan, W. Baltussen, L. Dvortsin, R.A. Jongeneel, I. Perez Dominguez, C.P.A. Wagenberg, N. Kalaitzandonakes, J. Kaufman and D. Miller (2010), ‘Study on the implications of asynchronous GMO approvals for EU imports of animal feed products’, final report for Contract no.30-CE-0317175/00-74, Brussels: Directorate-General for Agriculture and Rural Development European Commission, available at: http://ec.europa.eu/agriculture/analysis/external/asynchronous-gmo-approvals/full-text_en.pdf.
62. Pelaez, V.M., D. Aquino, R. Hofmann and M. Melo (2010), ‘Implementation of a traceability and certification system for non-genetically modified soybeans: the experience of Imcopa Co. in Brazil’, International Food and Agribusiness Management Review, 13(1).
63. Phillips, P.W.B. and G. Isaac (1998), ‘GMO labeling: threat or opportunity?', AgBioForum, 1(1), 25-30.
64. Posner, R. (2007), The Economic Analysis of Law, 7th edn, New York: Aspen Publishers.
65. Qaim, M. (2009), ‘The economics of genetically modified crops’, Annual Review of Resource Economics, 1, 665-94.
66. Ramessar, K., T. Capell, R.M. Twyman and P. Christou (2010), ‘Going to ridiculous lengths: European coexistence regulations for GM crops’, Nature Biotechnology, 28(2), 133-6.
67. Ryan, C.D. and S.J. Smyth (2012), ‘Economic implications of low-level presence in a zero-tolerance European import market: the case of Canadian triffid flax’, AgBioForum, 15(1), 21-30.
68. Shavell, S. (1987), Economic Analysis of Accident Law, Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
69. Shleifer, A. (2010), ‘Efficient regulation’, in D.P. Kessler (ed.), Regulation vs. Litigation: Perspectives from Economics and Law, Chicago: University of Chicago Press, pp. 27-43.
70. Skevas, T., P. Fevereiro and J. Wesseler (2010), ‘Coexistence regulations and agricultural production: a case study of five Bt maize producers in Portugal’, Ecological Economics, 69, 2402-8.
71. Skevas, T., J. Wesseler and P. Fevereiro (2009), ‘Coping with ex ante regulations for planting Bt-maize: the Portuguese experience’, AgBioForum, 12(1), 60-69.
72. Smyth, S.J., A.B. Endres, T. Redick and D. Kershen (2010), Innovation and Liability in Biotechnology: Transnational and Comparative Perspectives, Cheltenham, UK and Northampton, MA, USA: Edward Elgar Publishing.
73. Smyth, S.J., M. Gusta, K. Belcher, P.W.B. Phillips and D. Castle (2011), ‘Environmental impacts from herbicide tolerant Canola production in Western Canada’, Agricultural Systems, 104(5), 403-10.
74. Soregaroli, C. and J. Wesseler (2005), ‘Minimum distance requirements and liability: implications for coexistence’, in J. Wesseler (ed.), Environmental Costs and Benefits of Transgenic Crops, Wageningen UR Frontis Series, Vol. 7, Dordrecht: Springer, pp. 165-82.
75. Stein, A.J. and E. Rodriguez-Cerezo (2009), ‘The global pipeline of new GM crops: implications of asynchronous approval for international trade’, Joint Research Centre Institute for Prospective Technological Studies report no. 23846 EN, available at: http://ipts.jrc.ec.europa.eu/publications/pub.cfm?id52420.
76. Stokstad, E. (2011), ‘Can biotech and organic framers get along’, Science, 322, 166-9.
77. USDA (2011a), ‘USDA actions to support continued dialogue and constructive coexistence in US agriculture’, available at: http://www.usda.gov/documents/USDAC ontinuedDialogueConstructiveCoexistence.pdf.
78. USDA (2011b), ‘AC 21 plenary meeting: draft meeting summary’, version 1 9-12-11, 30-31 August, available at: http://www.usda.gov.
79. USDA-APHIS (2011), ‘Glyphosate-tolerant alfalfa events J101 and J163: request for nonregulated status’, Record of Decision, 27 January, available at:http://www.aphis.usda.gov/brs/aphisdocs/04_11001p_rod.pdf.
80. USDA-APHIS (2012), ‘Glyphosate-tolerant events H7-1 sugar beet: petition for nonregulated status’, Record of Decision, 19 July, available at: http://www.aphis.usda.gov/brs/aphisdocs/03_32301p_feis_rod.pdf.
81. Venus, T. and J. Wesseler (2012), ‘Bereits doppelt so viel “ohne Gentechnik”: Milch als Biomilch in Deutschland: Welche Bedeutung hat GVO-freie Milch für unsere Milchwirtschaft?', Deutsche Molkerei Zeitung, 133(2), 24-6.
82. Weber, W.E., T. Bringezy, I. Broer, F. Holz and J. Eder (2005), ‘Koexistenz von gentechnisch verändertem und konventionellem Mais’, Mais, 112, Special issue, 1-6.
83. Wesseler, J. and N. Kalaitzandonakes (2011), ‘Present and future EU GMO policy’, in A. Oskam, G. Meesters and H. Silvis (eds), EU Policy for Agriculture, Food and Rural Areas, 2nd edn, Wageningen: Wageningen Academic Publishers, pp. 23-323.
84. Wesseler, J., S. Scatasta and E. Hadji Fall (2011), ‘Environmental benefits and costs of GM crops’, in C. Carter, G. Moschini and I. Sheldon (eds), Genetically Modified Food and Global Welfare, Frontiers of Economics and Globalization, Vol. 10. Bingley: Emerald Group Publishing, pp. 173-99.
85. Wesseler, J., S. Scatasta and E. Nillesen (2007), ‘The maximum incremental social tolerable irreversible costs (MISTICs) and other benefits and costs of introducing transgenic maize in the EU-15', Pedobiologia, 51(3), 261-9.