Legal liability issues in agricultural biotechnology

Crop Science

Volumn 44, Issue 2, 2004, Pages 456-463

  Kershen, Drew L ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF OKLAHOMA   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 1542778510     PISSN: 0011183X     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.2135/cropsci2004.4560     Document Type: Review

References (40)

1. Abramson, S., and T. Carrato. 2001. Crop biotechnology: The case for product stewardship. Va. Envtl. L. J. 20:241-266.
2. Blades v. Monsanto Company, WL 775980 (SD Ill 2001).
3. Burk, D.L., and B.A. Boczar. 1994. Biotechnology and tort liability: A strategic industry at risk. U. Pitt. L. Rev. 55:791-864.
4. CDC. 2001. Investigation of human health effects associated with potential exposure to genetically modified corn (June). Center for Disease Control, Atlanta, GA http://www.cdc.gov/nceh/ehhe/ Cry9cReport/recommendations. htm; verified 10 September 2003.
5. Daniell, H. 2002. Molecular strategies for gene containment in transgenic crops. Nat. Biotechol. 20:581-586.
6. Daar, A.S., H. Thorsteinsdottir, D.K. Martin, A.C. Smith, S. Nast, and P.A. Singer. 2002. Top ten biotechnologies for improving health in developing countries. Nat. Genet. 32:229-232.
7. Eastham, K., and J. Sweet. 2002. Genetically modified organisms (GMOs): The significance of gene flow through pollen transfer. Environ. Issue Rep. 28. European Environmental Agency, Copenhagen.
8. Ellickson, R. 1986. Of Coase and cattle: Dispute resolution among neighbors in Shasta County. Stan. L. Rev. 38:623-687.
9. Enders, A.B. 2000. GMO: Genetically modified organism or gigantic monetary obligation? The liability schemes for GMO damage in the USA and the European Union. Loy. L.A. Ent. L. Rev. 22:453-505.
10. EPA. 2001. Regulation under the Federal Insecticide, Fungicide, and Rodenticide Act for Plant-Incorporated Protectants (formerly Plant-Pesticides). 19 Jul. 2001. FR 66:37772.
11. FDA. 1992. Statement of policy: Foods derived from new plant varieties. 29 May 1992. FR 57:22984.
12. FDA. 2002. Guidance for industry: Drugs, biologics, and medical devises derived from bioengineered plants for use in humans and animals. 12 Sep. 2002. FR 67:57828.
13. Gillis, J. 2002. Biotech industry adopts precaution. 22 October, p. E01. Washington Post, Washington, DC.
14. Grossman, M.R. 2002. Biotechnology, property rights and the environment. Am. J. Comp. L. 50:215-248.
15. Harris, A. 2002. Danger uncertain, but suits multiply- Billions could be at stake in farmers' cases. 9 September. Natl. L. J. A12 col. 2.
16. J.E.M. Ag Supply, Inc. v. Pioneer Hi-Bred International, Inc., 534 U.S. 124 (2001).
17. Kershen, D. 2000. The risks of going non-GMO. Okla. L. Rev. 53: 631-652.
18. Monsanto Canada, Inc. v. Schmeiser, 2001 FCT 256 (Sask.) aff'd on appeal, 2002 FCA 309, petition to appeal to Supreme Court of Canada granted May 2003.
19. Monsanto Company v. McFarling, 302 F.3d 1291 (Fed. Cir. 2002).
20. Monsanto Company v. Swann, 2003 WL 1487095 (E.D. Mo. 2003).
21. Monsanto Company v. Trantham, 156 F. Supp.2d 855 (W.D. Tenn. 2001).
22. MfE. 2002. Improving the Operation of the HSNO Act for New Organisms (September). Ministry for the Environment (MfE) New Zealand at http://www.mfe.govt.nz; verified 10 September 2003.
23. Nachtigal, N. 2001. Note, A modern David and Goliath, Farmer v. Monsanto: Advising a grower on the Monsanto Technology Agreement. Great Plains Nat. Resour. 6:50-76.
24. OSTP. 2002. Proposed Federal actions to update field test requirements for biotechnology derived plants and to establish early food safety assessments of new proteins produced by such plants. Office of Sci. & Tech. 2 Aug. 2002. FR 67:50578.
25. Redick, T. 2002. Biopharming, biosafety, and billion dollar debacles: Preventing liability for biotech crops. Session U-1-1. In American Agricultural Law Association Annual Conference, Indianapolis, IN. 19 Oct. 2002. AALA, Ames, IA.
26. Repp, R. 2000. Comment, Biotech pollution: Assessing liability for genetically modified crop production and genetic drift. Idaho L. Rev. 36:585-620.
27. Restatement of the Law. 1965. 2d, Vol. 2, Torts. West, Eagan, MN.
28. Restatement of the Law. 1977. 2d, Vol. 3, Torts. West, Eagan, MN.
29. Restatement of the Law. 1979. 2d, Vol. 4, Torts. West, Eagan, MN.
30. Sample v. Monsanto Company. Civil No 4:01cv00065RWS (ED Mo 2001) available at http://www.cmht.com/casewatch/antitrust/biological.html; verified 10 September 2003.
31. Singer, P., and A. Daar. 2001. Harnessing genomics and biotechnology to improve global health equity. Science 294:87-89.
32. Smyth. S., and P.W.B. Phillips. 2001. Competitors co-operating: Establishing a supply chain to manage genetically modified canola. Int. Food Agribus. Manag. Rev. 4:51-66.
33. StarLink Corn Products Liability Litigation. 2002. WL 1291790 at *1 (MDL. ND Ill 2002a).
34. StarLink Corn Products Liability Litigation. 211 F Supp2d 1060 (MDL, ND Ill 2002b)
35. StarLink Corn Products Liability Litigation. 212 F Supp2d 828 (MDL, ND Ill 2002c).
36. Uchtmann, D. 2002a. StarLink - A case study of agricultural biotechnology regulation. Drake J. Agric. L. 7:159-211.
37. Uchtmann, D. 2002b. Can farmers save Roundup Ready® beans for seed? McFarling and Trantham cases say "no." Agric. Law Update 19:4-7 (October).
38. USDA-APHIS. 1992. Environmental assessment and finding of no significant impact (controlled field test of genetically engineered rapeseed plants) at http://www.isb.vt.edu/biomon/relea/9201701r. eaa; verified 11 November 2003.
39. USDA-APHIS. 2003. Field testing of plants engineered to produce pharmaceutical and industrial compounds. 10 Mar. 2003 FR 68:11337.
40. USDA-NOP. 2000. National Organic Program. 21 Dec. 2000. FR 65:80548.