Risk-based microbiological criteria for Campylobacter in broiler meat: A comparison of two approaches

Food Control

Volumn 53, Issue , 2015, Pages 177-184

  Nauta, Maarten ^a   Andersen, Jens Kirk ^a   Tuominen, Pirkko ^b   Ranta, Jukka ^b   Lindqvist, Roland ^c,d  

^a TECHNICAL UNIVERSITY OF DENMARK   (Denmark)

^b NATL VET AND FOOD RES INSTITUTE   (Finland)

^c National Food Agency   (Sweden)

^d SWEDISH UNIVERSITY OF AGRICULTURAL SCIENCES   (Sweden)

Author keywords

Control; Food safety standards; Relative risk; Risk assessment; Uncertainty analysis

Indexed keywords

CAMPYLOBACTER;

EID: 84922816076     PISSN: 09567135     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.foodcont.2015.01.019     Document Type: Article

References (24)

1. Andersen J.K., Nørrung B., Machado S.C.A., Nauta M. Arisk-based microbiological criterion that uses the relative risk as the critical limit 2015, submitted manuscript.
2. Bouwknegt M., Knol A.B., Van der Sluijs J.P., Evers E.G. Uncertainty of population risk estimates for pathogens based on QMRA or epidemiology: a case study of Campylobacter in the Netherlands. Risk Analysis 2014, 34:847-864.
3. Christensen B., Nauta M., Korsgaard H., Sørensen A.I., Rosenquist H., Boysen L., et al. Case-by-case risk assessment of broiler meat batches: an effective control strategy for Campylobacter. Food Control 2013, 31:485-490.
4. Christensen B., Sommer H., Nielsen N., Rosenquist H. Risk assessment of Campylobacter jejuni in chicken products 2001, 138. The Danish Veterinary and Food Administration, Copenhagen, Denmark.
5. Codex Alimentarius Commission Principles and guidelines for the establishment and application of microbiological criteria related to foods CAC/GL 21 - 1997 2013, Rev. 2013.
6. EFSA Analysis of the baseline survey on the prevalence of Campylobacter in broiler batches and of Campylobacter and Salmonella on broiler carcasses in the EU, 2008, part A: Campylobacter and Salmonella prevalence estimates. EFSA Journal 2010, 8(03):1503.
7. EFSA Scientific opinion on Campylobacter in broiler meat production: control options and performance objectives and/or targets at different stages of the food chain. EFSA Journal 2011, 9(4):2105.
8. Gelman A., Carlin J.B., Stern H., Dunson D.B., Vehtari A., Rubin D.B. Bayesian data analysis 2013, Chapman & Hall/CRC. 3rd ed.
9. Hansson I., Pudas N., Harbom B., Olsson Engvall E. Within-flock variations of Campylobacter loads in caeca and on carcasses from broilers. International Journal of Food Microbiology 2010, 141:51-55.
10. Havelaar A.H., Evers E.G., Nauta M.J. Challenges of quantitative microbial risk assessment at EU level. Trends in Food Science & Technology 2008, 19:S22-S29.
11. Lindblad M., Lindmark H., Thisted Lambertz S., Lindqvist R. Microbiological baseline study of broiler chickens at Swedish slaughterhouses. Journal of Food Protection 2006, 69:2875-2882.
12. Lunn D., Spiegelhalter D., Thomas A., Best N. The BUGS project: evolution, critique, and future directions. Statistics in Medicine 2009, 28:3049-3067.
13. Nauta M. Establishment of risk based microbiological criteria in the Nordic countries: A case study on Campylobacter in broiler meat 2013, 86. DTU, Søborg, NMDDReport. http://www.food.dtu.dk/%7E/media/Institutter/Foedevareinstituttet/Publikationer/Pub-2013/Report-microbiological_criteria.ashx.
14. Nauta M., Christensen B. The impact of consumer phase models in microbial risk analysis. Risk Analysis 2011, 31:255-265.
15. Nauta M.J., Fischer A.R.H., Van Asselt E.D., De Jong A.E.I., Frewer L.J., De Jonge R. Food safety in the domestic environment: the effect of consumer risk information on human disease risks. Risk Analysis 2008, 28:179-192.
16. Nauta M.J., Havelaar A.H. Risk-based standards for Campylobacter in the broiler meat chain. Food Control 2008, 19:372-381.
17. Nauta M.J., Hill A., Rosenquist H., Brynestad S., Fetsch A., Van der Logt P., et al. Acomparison of risk assessments on Campylobacter in broiler meat. International Journal of Food Microbiology 2009, 129:107-123.
18. Nauta M.J., Sanaa M., Havelaar A.H. Risk based microbiological criteria for Campylobacter in broiler meat in the European Union. International Journal of Food Microbiology 2012, 158:209-217.
19. Ranta J., Lindqvist R., Hansson I., Tuominen P., Nauta M. ABayesian approach to the evaluation of microbiological criteria for Campylobacter in broiler 2015, submitted manuscript.
20. Stern N.J., Georgsson F., Lowman R., Bissailon B.-R., Reiersen J., Callicot K.A., et al. Frequency and enumeration of Campylobacter species from processed broiler carcasses by weep and Rinse samples. Poultry Science 2007, 86:394-399.
21. Teunis P.F., Havelaar A.H. The Beta Poisson dose-response model is not a single-hit model. Risk Analysis 2000, 20:513-520.
22. Van Schothorst M., Zwietering M.H., Ross T., Buchanan R.L., Cole M.B., International Commission on Microbiological Specifications for Foods (ICMSF) Relating microbiological criteria to food safety objectives and performance objectives. Food Control 2009, 20:967-979.
23. Vose D. Risk analysis: A quantitative guide 2000, John Wiley & Sons, Chichester, England, UK. 2nd ed.
24. Xie M., Singh K. Confidence distribution, the frequentist distribution estimator of a parameter: a review. International Statistical Review 2013, 81:3-39.