Learning From Doing: Intervention and Causal Inference

Causal Learning: Psychology, Philosophy, and Computation

Volumn , Issue , 2010, Pages

  Schulz, Laura ^a   Kushnir, Tamar ^c   Gopnik, Alison ^b  

^a MASSACHUSETTS INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

^c NONE

Author keywords

Action; Bayes nets; Bayesian inference; Causal knowledge; Causal models; Cognitive development; Models; Preschoolers; Probabilistic; Statistical learning

Indexed keywords

EID: 84922760621     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book    
DOI: 10.1093/acprof:oso/9780195176803.003.0006     Document Type: Chapter

References (75)

1. Ahn, W., Kalish, C. W., Medin, D. L., & Gelman, S. A. (1995). The role of covariation versus mechanism information in causal attribution. Cognition, 57, 299-352.
2. Baillargeon, R., Kotovsky, L., & Needham, A. (1995). The acquisition of physical knowledge in infancy. In D. Sperber & D. Premack (Eds.), Causal cognition: A multidisciplinary debate. Symposia of the Fyssen Foundation; Fyssen Symposium, 6th January 1993, Pavillon Henri IV, St-Germain-en-Laye, France, (pp. 79-115). New York: Clarendon Press/Oxford University Press.
3. Baker, A. G., Berbrier, M., & Vallée-Tourangeau, F. (1989). Judgements of a 2 × 2 contingency table: Sequential processing and the learning curve. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 41B, 65-97.
4. Bickel, P. J., Hammel, E. A., & O'Connell, J. W. (1975). Sex bias in graduate admissions:Data from Berkeley. Science, 187, 389-404.
5. Bullock, M., Gelman, R., & Baillargeon, R. (1982). The development of causal reasoning. In W. J. Friedman (Ed.), The developmental psychology of time, (pp. 209-254). New York:Academic Press.
6. Carey, S. (1985). Conceptual change in childhood. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press/Bradford Books.
7. Casey, B. J., Giedd, J. N., & Thomas, K. M. (2000). Structural and functional brain development and its relation to cognitive development. Biological Psychology, 54, 241-257.
8. Chao, L. L., & Knight, R. T. (1998). Contribution of human prefrontal cortex to delay performance. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 10, 167-177.
9. Cheng, P. W. (1997). From covariation to causation: A causal power theory. Psychological Review, 104, 367-405.
10. Dickinson, A., Shanks, D. R., & Evendon, J. (1984). Judgment of act-outcome contingency:The role of selective attribution. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 36, 29-50.
11. Dowe, P. (2000). Physical causation. New York: Cambridge University Press.
12. Flavell, J. H., Green, F. L., & Flavell, E. R. (1995). Young children's knowledge about thinking. Monographs of the Society for Research in Child Development, 60, v-96.
13. Gelman, S. A., & Wellman, H. M. (1991). Insides and essence: Early understandings of the non-obvious. Cognition, 38, 213-244.
14. Goel, V., & Grafman, J. (1995). Are the frontal lobes implicated in "planning" functions? Interpreting data from the Tower of Hanoi. Neuropsychologia, 33, 623-642.
15. Gopnik, A., Glymour, C., Sobel, D. M., Schulz, L., Kushnir, T., & Danks, D. (2004). A theory of causal learning in children: Causal maps and Bayes nets. Psychological Review, 111, 1-31.
16. Gopnik, A., & Meltzoff, A. N. (1997). Words, thoughts and theories. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
17. Gopnik, A., Sobel, D. M., Schulz, L. E., & Glymour, C. (2001). Causal learning mechanisms in very young children: 2-, 3-, and 4-year-olds infer causal relations from patterns of variation and covariation. Developmental Psychology, 37, 620-629.
18. Gopnik, A., & Wellman, H. M. (1994). The theory theory. In S. A. Gelman & L. A. Hirschfeld (Eds.), Mapping the mind: Domain specificity in cognition and culture; based on a conference entitled "Cultural Knowledge and Domain Specificity," held in Ann Arbor, Michigan, October 13-16, 1990, (pp. 257-293). New York: Cambridge University Press.
19. Griffiths, T. L., & Tenenbaum, J. B. (2001). Randomness and coincidences: Reconciling intuition and probability theory. Proceedings of the 23rd Annual Conference of the Cognitive Science Society. Edinburgh: LEA. pp. 370-375.
20. Harris, P. L., German, T., & Mills, P. (1996). Children's use of counterfactual thinking in causal reasoning. Cognition, 61, 233-259.
21. Inagaki, K., & Hatano, G. (1993). Young children's understanding of the mind body distinction. Child Development, 64, 1534-1549.
22. Kalish, C. (1996). Causes and symptoms in preschoolers' conceptions of illness. Child Development, 67, 1647-1670.
23. Keil, F. C. (2003). Folkscience: Coarse interpretations of a complex reality. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 18, 663-692.
24. Kuhn, D. (1989). Children and adults as intuitive scientists. Psychological Review, 96, 674-689.
25. Kuhn, D., Amsel, E. & O'Laughlin, M. (1988). The development of scientific thinking skills. Orlando, FL: Academic Press.
26. Kushnir, T. (2003, April). Seeing versus doing: The effect of direct intervention on preschooler's understanding of probabilistic causes. Poster presented at the biennial meeting of the Society for Research in Child Development, Tampa, FL.
27. Kushnir, T., & Gopnik, A. (2005). Children infer causal strength from probabilities and interventions. Psychological Science, 16(9), 678-683.
28. Kushnir, T., Gopnik, A., & Schaefer, C. (2005, April). Children infer hidden causes from probabilistic evidence. Paper presented at the biennial meeting of the Society for Research in Child Development, Atlanta, GA.
29. Kushnir, T., Gopnik, A., Schulz, L., & Danks, D. (2003). Inferring hidden causes. In R. Alterman & D. Kirsh (Eds.), Proceedings of the 25th Annual Meeting of the Cognitive Science Society. Boston, pp. 699-703.
30. Leslie, A. M., & Keeble, S. (1987). Do 6-month-old infants perceive causality? Cognition, 25, 265-288.
31. Masnick, A. M., & Klahr, D. (2003). Error matters: An initial exploration of elementary school children's understanding of experimental error. Journal of Cognition & Development, 4, 67-98.
32. Meltzoff, A. N. (1995). Understanding the intentions of others: Re-enactment of intended acts by 18-month-old children. Developmental Psychology, 31, 838-850.
33. Michotte, A. (1962). The perception of causality. New York: Basic Books. (Original work published 1946).
34. Novick, L. R., & Cheng, P. W. (2004). Assessing interactive causal influence. Psychological Review, 111, 455-485.
35. Pearl, J. (2000). Causality. New York: Oxford University Press.
36. Perner, J. (1991). Understanding the representational mind. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
37. Piaget, J. (1930). The child's conception of physical causality. London: Kegan Paul.
38. Rovee-Collier, C. (1980). Reactivation of infant memory. Science, 208, 1159-1161.
39. Rosenblit, L. R., & Keil, F. C. (2002). The misunderstood limits of folk science: an illusion of explanatory depth. Cognitive Science, 26, 521-562.
40. Saffran, J. R., Aslin, R. N., & Newport, E. L. (1996). Statistical learning by 8-month-old infants. Science, 274, 1926-1928.
41. Salmon, W. (1984). Scientific explanation and the causal structure of the world. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
42. Salmon, W. (1998). Causality and explanation. Oxford, England: Oxford University Press.
43. Schaefer, C., & Gopnik, A. (2003, April). Causal reasoning in young children: The role of unobserved variables. Paper presented at the biennial meeting of the Society for Research in Child Development, Tampa, FL.
44. Schlottman, A. (2001). Perception versus knowledge of cause and effect in children: When seeing is believing. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 10, 111-115.
45. Schulz, L. E., (2001, December). Spinning wheels and bossy ones: Children, causal structure and the calculus of intervention. Paper presented at the Causal Inference in Humans and Machines Workshop of the Neural Information Processing Systems annual meeting, Vancouver, BC.
46. Schulz, L. (2003, April). The play's the thing: Interventions and causal inference. Paper presented at the biennial meeting of the Society for Research in Child Development, Tampa, FL.
47. Schulz, L., & Gopnik, A. (2004). Causal learning across domains. Developmental Psychology, 40, 162-176.
48. Schulz, L., Gopnik, A., & Glymour, C. (in press). Preschool children learn causal structure from conditional interventions. Developmental Science.
49. Shanks, D. R. (1985). Forward and backward blocking in human contingency judgment. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology: Comparative and Physiological Psychology, 37, 1-21.
50. Shanks, D. R., & Dickinson, A. (1987). Associative accounts of causality judgment. In G. H. Bower (Ed.), The psychology of learning and motivation: Advances in research and theory (Vol. 21, pp. 229-261). San Diego, CA: Academic Press.
51. Shultz, T. R. (1982). Rules of causal attribution. Monographs of the Society for Research in Child Development, 47, 1-51.
52. Sloman, S. A., & Lagnado, D. A. (2005). Do we "do"? Cognitive Science, 29, 5-39.
53. Sobel, D. M. (2004). Emploring the coherence of young children's explanatory abilities:Evidence from generating counter factuals. British Journal of Developmental Psychology, 22, 37-58.
54. Sobel, D. M., Tenenbaum, J. B., & Gopnik, A. (2004). Children's causal inferences from indirect evidence: Backwards blocking and Bayesian reasoning in preschoolers. Cognitive Science, 28, 303-333.
55. Sommer, S., & Wehner, R. (2004). The ant's estimation of distance travelled: Experiments with desert ants, Cataglyphis fortis. Journal of Comparative Physiology A, Neuroethology Sensory Neural Behavioral Physiology, 190, 1-6.
56. Spelke, E. S., Breinlinger, K., Macomber, J., & Jacobson, K. (1992). Origins of knowledge. Psychological Review, 99, 605-632.
57. Spelke, E. S., Katz, G., Purcell, S. E., Ehrlich, S. M., & Breinlinger, K. (1994). Early knowledge of object motion: Continuity and inertia. Cognition, 51, 131-176.
58. Spirtes, P., Glymour, C., & Scheines, R. (1993). Causation, prediction, and search (Springer Lecture Notes in Statistics). New York: Springer-Verlag.
59. Strevens, M. (2000). The essentialist aspect of naive theories. Cognition, 74(2), 149-175.
60. Steyvers, M., Tenenbaum, J., Wagenmakers, E. J., & Blum, B. (2003). Inferring causal networks from observations and interventions. Cognitive Science, 27, 453-489.
61. Tenenbaum, J. B., & Griffiths, T. L., (2003). Theory-based causal inference. In S. Becker, S. Thrun, & K. Obemayer (Eds.), Advances in neural information processing systems 15. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press (pp. 35-42).
62. Tolman, E. C. (1932). Purposive behavior in animals and men. New York: Century.
63. Wasserman, E. A., Elek, S. M., Chatlosh, D. L., & Baker, A. G. (1993). Rating causal relations: Role of probability in judgments of response-outcome contingency. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 19, 174-188.
64. Watson, J. S., & Ramey, C. T. (1987). Reactions to response-contingent stimulation in early infancy. In J. Oates, & S. Sheldon (Eds.), Cognitive development in infancy; cognitive development in infancy; portions of this paper were initially reported at the biennial meeting of the Society for Research in Child Development, Santa Monica, CA, 1969, (pp. 77-85). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
65. Wellman, H. M., Hickling, A. K., & Schult, C. A. (1997). Young children's psychological, physical, and biological explanations. In H. M. Wellman & K. Inagaki (Eds.), The emergence of core domains of thought: Children's reasoning about physical, psychological, and biological phenomena (New Directions for Child Development, No. 75, pp. 7-25). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass/Pfeiffer.
66. Tenenbaum, J., & Griffiths, T. L. (2003). Theory-based causal inference. In S. Becker, S. Thrun, & K. Obemayer (Eds.), Advances in neural information processing systems 15, (pp. 67-74). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
67. Tenenbaum, J., & Niyogi, S. (2003). Learning causal laws. In R. Alterman & D. Kirsh (Eds.), Proceedings of the 25th Annual Conference of the Cognitive Science Society. Boston, pp. 1152-1157.
68. Waldmann, M. R. (2000). Competition among causes but not effects in predictive and diagnostic learning. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 26, 53-76.
69. Waldmann, M. R. (2001). Predictive versus diagnostic causal learning: Evidence from an overshadowing paradigm. Psychonomic Bulletin and Review, 8, 600-608.
70. Waldmann, M. R., & Hagmayer, Y. (2005). Seeing versus doing: Two modes of accessing causal knowledge. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 31, 216-227.
71. Wellman, H. M., Hickling, A. K., & Schult, C. A. (1997). Young children's psychological, physical, and biological explanations. New Directions for Child Development, 75, 7-25.
72. Woodward, A. L. (1998). Infants selectively encode the goal object of an actor's reach. Cognition, 69, 1-34.
73. Woodward, A. L., Phillips, A. T., & Spelke, E. S. (1993). Infants' expectations about the motion of animate versus inanimate objects. In Proceedings of the 15th annual meeting of the Cognitive Science Society, (pp. 1087-1091). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
74. Woodward, J. (2003). Making things happen: A theory of causal explanation. New York:Oxford University Press.
75. Wu, M., & Cheng, P. W. (1999). Why causation need not follow from statistical association:Boundary conditions for the evaluation of generative and preventive causal powers. Psychological Science, 10, 92-97.