Why Causation Need Not Follow from Statistical Association: Boundary Conditions for the Evaluation of Generative and Preventive Causal Powers

Psychological Science

Volumn 10, Issue 2, 1999, Pages 92-97

  Wu, Melissa ^a   Cheng, Patricia W ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 0348047724     PISSN: 09567976     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/1467-9280.00114     Document Type: Article

References (27)

1. Ahn, W., Kalish, C.W., Medin, D.L., & Gelman, S.A. (1995). The role of covariation versus mechanism information in causal attribution. Cognition, 54, 299-352.
2. Allan, L.G. (1980). A note on measurements of contingency between two binary variables in judgment tasks. Bulletin of the Psychonomic Society, 15, 147-149.
3. Anderson, J.R., & Sheu, C.-F. (1995). Causal inferences as perceptual judgments. Memory & Cognition, 23, 510-524.
4. Cartwright, N. (1989). Nature's capacities and their measurement. Oxford, England: Clarendon Press.
5. Cheng, P.W. (1993). Separating causal laws from casual facts: Pressing the limits of statistical relevance. In D.L. Medin (Ed.), The psychology of learning and motivation: Vol. 30 (pp. 215-264). New York: Academic Press.
6. Cheng, P.W. (1997). From covariation to causation: A causal power theory. Psychological Review, 104, 367-405.
7. Cheng, P.W. (in press). Inferring simple and conjunctive direct causes. In F. Keil & R. Wilson (Eds.), Cognition and explanation. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
8. Cheng, P.W., & Lien, Y. (1995). The role of coherence in differentiating genuine from spurious causes. In D. Sperber, D. Premack, & A.J. Premack (Eds.), Causal cognition: A multidisciplinary debate (pp. 463-494). New York: Oxford University Press.
9. Cheng, P.W., & Novick, L.R. (1990). A probabilistic contrast model of causal induction. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 58, 545-567.
10. Glymour, C. (1998). Psychological and normative theories of causal power and the probabilities of causes. In G.F. Cooper & S. Moral (Eds.), Uncertainty in artificial intelligence (pp. 166-172). San Francisco: Morgan Kaufmann.
11. Glymour, C., & Cheng, P.W. (1998). Causal mechanism and probability: A normative approach (pp. 295-313). In M. Oaksford & N. Chater (Eds.), Rational models of cognition. Oxford, England: Oxford University Press.
12. Jenkins, H., & Ward, W. (1965). Judgment of contingency between responses and outcomes. Psychological Monographs, 7, 1-17.
13. Kelley, H.H. (1967). Attribution theory in social psychology. In D. Levine (Ed.), Nebraska Symposium on Motivation: Vol. 15 (pp. 192-238). Lincoln: University of Nebraska Press.
14. Koslowski, B. (1996). Theory and evidence: The development of scientific reasoning. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
15. Lien, Y., & Cheng, P.W. (1998). Distinguishing genuine from spurious causes: A coherence hypothesis. Unpublished manuscript, University of California, Los Angeles.
16. Novick, L.R., & Cheng, P.W. (1998). A power theory of conjunctive causes. Unpublished manuscript, University of California, Los Angeles.
17. Pearce, J.M. (1994). Similarity and discrimination: A selective review and a connectionist model. Psychological Review, 101, 587-607.
18. Pearl, J. (1988). Probabilistic reasoning in intelligent systems: Networks of plausible inference. San Mateo, CA: Morgan Kaufmann.
19. Pearl, J. (1995). Causal diagrams for experimental research. Biometrika, 82, 669-710.
20. Rescorla, R.A., & Wagner, A.R. (1972). A theory of Pavlovian conditioning: Variations in the effectiveness of reinforcement and nonreinforcement. In A.H. Black & W.F. Prokasy (Eds.), Classical conditioning II: Current theory and research (pp. 64-99). New York: Appleton-Century-Crofts.
21. Schustack, M.W., & Sternberg, R.J. (1981). Evaluation of evidence in causal inference. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 110, 101-120.
22. Shanks, D., & Dickinson, A. (1987). Associative accounts of causality judgment. In G. Bower (Ed.), The psychology of learning and motivation (Vol. 21, pp. 229-261). San Diego: Academic Press.
23. Shultz, T.R. (1982). Rules of causal attribution. Monographs of the Society for Research in Child Development, 47(1).
24. Spellman, B.A. (1996). Acting as intuitive scientists: Contingency judgments are made while controlling for alternative potential causes. Psychological Science, 7, 337-342.
25. Spirtes, P., Glymour, C., & Scheines, R. (1993). Causation, prediction and search. New York: Springer-Verlag.
26. White, P.A. (1989). A theory of causal processing. British Journal of Psychology, 80, 431-454.
27. White, P.A. (1995). Use of prior beliefs in the assignment of causal roles: Causal powers versus regularity-based accounts. Memory & Cognition, 23, 243-254.