Children's use of counterfactual thinking in causal reasoning

Cognition

Volumn 61, Issue 3, 1996, Pages 233-259

  Harris, Paul L ^a   German, Tim ^a,b   Mills, Patrick ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF OXFORD   (United Kingdom)

^b UNIVERSITY OF ESSEX   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; CHILD DEVELOPMENT; CONCEPT FORMATION; FEMALE; HUMAN; LOGIC; MALE; PRESCHOOL CHILD; THINKING;

CHILD DEVELOPMENT; CHILD, PRESCHOOL; CONCEPT FORMATION; FEMALE; HUMANS; LOGIC; MALE; THINKING;

EID: 0030345289     PISSN: 00100277     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/S0010-0277(96)00715-9     Document Type: Article

References (46)

1. Au, T.K. (1992). Counterfactual reasoning. In G.R. Semin & K. Fiedler (Eds.), Language, interaction and social cognition (pp. 194-213). London: Sage.
2. Baillargeon, R., Gelman, R., & Meck, E. (1981, April). Are preschoolers truly indifferent to causal mechanisms? Paper presented at the biennial meeting of the Society for Research in Child Development, Boston.
3. Bartsch, K., & Wellman, H.M. (1995). Children talk about the mind. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
4. Bloom, A.H. (1981). The linguistic shaping of thought: A study in the impact of language on thinking in China and the West. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
5. Bowerman, M. (1986). First steps in acquiring conditionals. In E.C. Traugott, A. ter Meulen, J.S. Reilly, & C.A. Ferguson (Eds.), On conditionals (pp. 285-307). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
6. Bullock, M., Gelman, R., & Baillargeon, R. (1982). The development of causal reasoning. In W.J. Friedman (Ed.), The developmental psychology of time (pp. 209-254). New York: Academic Press.
7. Cheng, P.W. (1993). Separating causal laws from causal facts: Pressing the limits of statistical relevance. In D.L. Medin (Ed.), The psychology of learning and motivation (Vol. 30, pp. 215-264). San Diego: Academic Press.
8. Cheng, P.W., & Novick, L.R. (1991). Causes versus enabling conditions. Cognition, 40, 83-120.
9. Cheng, P.W., & Novick, L.R. (1992). Covariation in natural causal induction. Psychological Review, 99, 194-213.
10. Dias, M., & Harris, P.L. (1988). The effect of make-believe play on deductive reasoning. British Journal of Developmental Psychology, 6, 207-221.
11. Dias, M., & Harris, P.L. (1990). The influence of the imagination on reasoning by young children. British Journal of Developmental Psychology, 8, 305-318.
12. Hadwin, J., & Perner, J. (1991). Pleased and surprised: Children's cognitive theory of emotion. British Journal of Developmental Psychology, 9, 215-234.
13. Harré, R., & Madden, E.H. (1975). Causal powers: A theory of natural necessity. Oxford: Blackwell.
14. Harris, P.L. (1989). Children and emotion: The development of psychological understanding. Oxford: Blackwell.
15. Harris, P.L., Johnson, C.N., Hutton, D., Andrews, G., & Cooke, T. (1989). Young children's theory of mind and emotion. Cognition and Emotion, 3, 379-400.
16. Harris, P.L., & Kavanaugh, R.D. (1993). Young children's understanding of pretense. Monographs of the Society for Research in Child Development, 58, (1, Serial no. 231).
17. Harris, P.L., Neave, E., & Phillips, N. (1996). Talking about outcomes that almost happen. Paper submitted for publication.
18. Hart, H.L., & Honoré, A.M. (1959/1985). Causation in the law (2nd ed.). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
19. Hume, D. (1978). A treatise of human nature. Oxford: Oxford University Press. (Original work published 1739.)
20. Kahneman. D., & Varey, C.A. (1990). Propensities and counterfactuals: The loser that almost won. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 59, 1101-1110.
21. Kuczaj II, S.A., & Daly, M.J. (1979). The development of hypothetical reference in the speech of young children. Journal of Child Language, 6, 563-579.
22. Leslie, A.M. (1988). The necessity of illusion. In L. Weiskrantz (Ed.), Thought without language (pp. 185-210). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
23. Leslie, A.M., & Keeble, S. (1987). Do six-month-olds infants perceive causality? Cognition, 25, 265-288.
24. Liu, L.G. (1985). Reasoning counterfactually in Chinese: Are there any obstacles? Cognition, 21, 239-270.
25. Mackie, J.L. (1974). The cement of the universe: A study of causation. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
26. McCloskey, M. (1983). Naive theories of motion. In D. Gentner & A.L. Stevens (Eds.), Mental models (pp. 299-324). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
27. Michotte, A.E. (1963). The perception of causality. New York: Basic Books. (Original work published in 1946.)
28. Millar, W.S. (1972). A study of operant conditioning under delayed reinforcement in early infancy. Monographs of the Society for Research in Child Development, 37 (Serial no. 147).
29. Millar, W.S., & Schaffer, H.R. (1972). The influence of spatially displaced feedback on infant operant conditioning. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 14, 442-453.
30. Miller, D.T., Turnbull, W., & McFarland, C. (1990). Counterfactual thinking and social perception: Thinking about what might have been. In P. Zanna (Ed.), Advances in experimental social psychology (Vol. 23, pp. 305-331). Orlando, FL: Academic Press.
31. Oakes, L.M., & Cohen, L.B. (1990). Infant perception of a causal event. Cognitive Development, 5, 193-207.
32. Perner, J. (1991). Understanding the representational mind. Cambridge, MA: Bradford Books/MIT.
33. Reilly, J.S. (1983). What are conditionals for? Papers and Reports in Child Language Development, 22.
34. Reilly, J.S. (1986). The acquisition of temporals and conditionals. In E.C. Traugott, A. ter Meulen, J.S. Reilly, & C.A. Ferguson (Eds.), On conditionals (pp. 309-331). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
35. Scribner, S. (1977). Modes of thinking and ways of speaking: Culture and logic reconsidered. In P.N. Johnson-Laird & P.C. Wason (Eds), Thinking. New York: Cambridge University Press.
36. Shaklee, H., & Mims, M. (1981). Development of rule use in judgements of covariation between events. Child Development, 52, 317-325.
37. Shultz, T.R. (1982). Rules of causal attribution. Monographs of the Society for Research in Child Development, 47 (Serial no. 194).
38. Shultz, T.R., & Mendelson R. (1975). The use of covariation as a principle of causal analysis. Child Development, 46, 394-399.
39. Siegler, R.S. (1976). Three aspects of cognitive development. Cognitive Psychology, 8, 481-520.
40. Siegler, R.S., & Liebert, R.M. (1974). Effects of contiguity, regularity, and age on children's inferences. Developmental Psychology, 10, 574-579.
41. Sosa, E., & Tooley, M. (1993). Introduction. In E. Sosa & M. Tooley (Eds.), Causation (pp. 1-32). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
42. Tversky, A., & Kahneman, D. (1973). Availability: a heuristic for judging frequency and probability. Cognitive Psychology, 5, 207-232.
43. Wasserman, E.A. (1990). Detecting response-outcome relations: Toward an understanding of the causal texture of the environment. In G.H. Bower (Ed.), The psychology of learning and motivation (Vol. 26, pp. 27-82). San Diego: Academic Press.
44. Wellman, H.M. (1990). Children's theories of mind. Cambridge, MA: Bradford Books/MIT Press.
45. Wellman, H.M., & Banerjee, M. (1991). Mind and emotion: Children's understanding of the emotional consequences of beliefs and desires. British Journal of Developmental Psychology, 9, 191-214.
46. Wells, G.L., & Gavinski, I. (1989). Mental simulation and causality. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 56, 161-169.