Young children infer causal strength from probabilities and interventions

Psychological Science

Volumn 16, Issue 9, 2005, Pages 678-683

  Kushnir, Tamar ^a   Gopnik, Alison ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ASSOCIATION; CHILD; COGNITION; CONCEPT FORMATION; DECISION MAKING; HUMAN; PRESCHOOL CHILD; REVIEW;

CHILD; CHILD, PRESCHOOL; COGNITION; CONCEPT FORMATION; CUES; HUMANS; JUDGMENT;

EID: 25144455943     PISSN: 09567976     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1467-9280.2005.01595.x     Document Type: Review

References (19)

1. Bullock, M., Gelman, R., & Baillargeon, R. (1982). The development of causal reasoning. In W.J. Friedman (Ed.), The developmental psychology of time (pp. 209-254). New York: Academic Press.
2. Cheng, P.W. (1997). From covariation to causation: A causal power theory. Psychological Review, 104, 367-405.
3. Gopnik, A., Glymour, C., Sobel, D.M., Schulz, L.E., Kushnir, T., & Danks, D. (2004). A theory of causal learning in children: Causal maps and Bayes nets. Psychological Review, 111, 1-30.
4. Gopnik, A., & Sobel, D.M. (2000). Detecting buckets: How young children use information about novel causal powers in categorization and induction. Child Development, 71, 1205-1222.
5. Gopnik, A., Sobel, D.M., Schulz, L.E., & Glymour, C. (2001). Causal learning mechanisms in very young children: Two-, three-, and four-year-olds infer causal relations from patterns of variation and covariation. Developmental Psychology, 37, 620-629.
6. Gopnik, A., & Wellman, H.M. (1994). The theory theory. In L. Hirsch-field & S. Gelman (Eds.), Mapping the mind: Domain specificity in cognition and culture (pp. 257-293). New York: Cambridge University Press.
7. Lagnado, D.A., & Sloman, S. (2004). The advantage of timely intervention. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 30, 856-876.
8. Pearl, J. (2000). Causality. New York: Oxford University Press.
9. Schulz, L.E. (2001, December). Spinning wheels and bossy ones; Children, causal structure and the calculus of intervention. Paper presented at the Causal Inference in Humans and Machines Workshop at the Neural Information Processing Systems Conference. Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada.
10. Shanks, D.R., & Dickinson, A. (1987). Associative accounts of causality judgment. In G.H. Bower (Ed.), The psychology of learning and motivation: Advances in research and theory (Vol. 21, pp. 229-261). San Diego, CA: Academic Press.
11. Shultz. T.R. (1982). Rules of causal attribution. Monographs of the Society for Research in Child Development, 47(1, Serial No. 194).
12. Shultz, T.R., & Mendelson, R. (1975). The use of covariation as a principle of causal analysis. Child Development, 46, 394-399.
13. Siegler, R.S. (1976). The effects of simple necessity and sufficiency relationships on children's causal inferences. Child Development, 47, 1058-1063.
14. Sobel, D.M., & Kushnir, T. (in press). The importance of decision-making to causal learning from interventions. Memory & Cognition.
15. Spellman, B.A. (1996). Acting as intuitive scientists: Contingency judgments are made while controlling for alternative potential causes. Psychological Science, 7, 337-342.
16. Spirtes, P., Glymour, C., & Scheines, R. (2001). Causation, prediction, and search (2nd ed., rev.). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
17. Steyvers, M., Tenenhaum, J.B., Wagenmakers, E.J., & Blum, B. (2003). Inferring causal networks from observations and interventions. Cognitive Science, 27, 453-489.
18. Waklmann, M.R., & Hagmayer, Y. (2001). Estimating causal strength: The role of structural knowledge and processing effort. Cognition, 82, 27-58.
19. Woodward, J. (2004). Making things happen: A theory of causal explanation. New York: Oxford University Press.