Monitoring of gene expression in Fibrobacter succinogenes S85 under the co-culture with non-fibrolytic ruminal bacteria

Archives of Microbiology

Volumn 197, Issue 2, 2015, Pages 269-276

  Fukuma, Naoki M ^a   Koike, Satoshi ^a   Kobayashi, Yasuo ^a  

^a HOKKAIDO UNIVERSITY   (Japan)

Author keywords

Co culture; Fiber digestion; Fibrobacter succinogenes; mRNA expression; Rumen bacteria

Indexed keywords

BACTERIAL ENZYME; BACTERIAL RNA; FUMARATE REDUCTASE; GLYCOSIDASE; MESSENGER RNA; RNA 16S; SUCCINIC ACID; SUCCINATE DEHYDROGENASE;

ARTICLE; BACTERIAL GENE; BACTERIAL GENOME; BACTERIAL GROWTH; BACTERIAL STRAIN; COCULTURE; CONTROLLED STUDY; FIBROBACTER SUCCINOGENES; GENE FUNCTION; NONHUMAN; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROTEIN HYDROLYSIS; REAL TIME POLYMERASE CHAIN REACTION; REVERSE TRANSCRIPTION POLYMERASE CHAIN REACTION; RUMEN MICROORGANISM; SELENOMONAS RUMINANTIUM; UPREGULATION; ANIMAL; BACTERIUM; DIETARY FIBER; FIBROBACTER; GENE EXPRESSION PROFILING; GENE EXPRESSION REGULATION; GENETICS; GROWTH, DEVELOPMENT AND AGING; HYDROLYSIS; METABOLISM; MICROBIOLOGY; RUMINANT STOMACH;

BACTERIA (MICROORGANISMS); FIBROBACTER SUCCINOGENES; SELENOMONAS RUMINANTIUM;

ANIMALS; BACTERIA; COCULTURE TECHNIQUES; DIETARY FIBER; FIBROBACTER; GENE EXPRESSION PROFILING; GENE EXPRESSION REGULATION, BACTERIAL; GLYCOSIDE HYDROLASES; HYDROLYSIS; RNA, RIBOSOMAL, 16S; RUMEN; SUCCINATE DEHYDROGENASE;

EID: 84922615553     PISSN: 03028933     EISSN: 1432072X     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s00203-014-1049-0     Document Type: Article

References (42)

1. Béra-Maillet C, Broussolle V, Pristas P, Girardeau J-P, Gaudet G, Forano E (2000a) Characterisation of endoglucanases EGB and EGC from Fibrobacter succinogenes. Biochim Biophys Acta 1476:191–202
2. Béra-Maillet C, Gaudet G, Forano E (2000b) Endoglucanase activity and relative expression of glycoside hydrolase genes of Fibrobacter succinogenes S85 grown on different substrates. Biochim Biophys Acta 1543:77–85
3. Béra-Maillet C, Mosoni P, Kwasiborski A, Suau F, Ribot Y, Forano E (2009) Development of a RT-qPCR method for the quantification of Fibrobacter succinogenes S85 glycoside hydrolase transcripts in the rumen content of gnotobiotic and conventional sheep. J Microbiol Methods 77:8–16
4. Berg Miller ME, Antonopoulos DA, Rincon MT et al (2009) Diversity and strain specificity of plant cell wall degrading enzymes revealed by the draft genome of Ruminococcus flavefaciens FD-1. PLoS ONE 4:e6650
5. Brulc JM, Antonopoulos DA, Berg Miller ME et al (2009) Gene-centric metagenomics of the fiber-adherent bovine rumen microbiome reveals forage specific glycoside hydrolases. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 106:1948–1953
6. Bryant MP, Burkey LA (1953) Cultural methods and characterization of some of the more numerous groups of bacteria in the bovine rumen. J Dairy Sci 36:205–217
7. Cavicchioli R, Watson K (1991) Molecular cloning, expression, and characterization of endoglucanase genes from Fibrobacter succinogenes AR1. Appl Environ Microbiol 57:359–365
8. Cotta MA (1988) Amylolytic activity of selected species of ruminal bacteria. Appl Environ Microbiol 54:772–776
9. Dehority BA, Scott HW (1967) Extent of cellulose and hemicellulose digestion in various forages by pure culture of the rumen bacteria. J Dairy Sci 50:1136–1141
10. Flint HJ (1997) The rumen microbial ecosystem -some recent developments. Trends Microbiol 5:483–488
11. Fondevila M, Dehority BA (1996) Interactions between Fibrobacter succinogenes, Prevotella ruminicola, and Ruminococcus flavefaciens in the digestion of cellulose from forages. J Anim Sci 74:678–684
12. Fukuma N, Koike S, Kobayashi Y (2012) Involvement of recently cultured group U2 bacterium in ruminal fiber digestion revealed by coculture with Fibrobacter succinogenes S85. FEMS Microbiol Lett 336:17–25
13. Huang L, Forsberg CW (1987) Isolation of a cellodextrinase from Bacteroides succinogenes. Appl Environ Microbiol 53:1034–1041
14. Jun HS, Ha JK, Malburg LM, Verrinder GAM, Forsberg CW (2003) Characteristics of a cluster of xylanase genes in Fibrobacter succinogenes S85. Can J Microbiol 49:171–180
15. Kobayashi Y, Shinkai T, Koike S (2008) Ecological and physiological characterization shows that Fibrobacter succinogenes is important in rumen fiber digestion—review. Folia Microbiol 53:195–200
16. Koike S, Kobayashi Y (2009) Fibrolytic rumen bacteria: their ecology and functions. Asian-Aust J Anim Sci 22:131–138
17. Koike S, Yoshitani S, Kobayashi Y, Tanaka K (2003) Phylogenetic analysis of fiber-associated rumen bacterial community and PCR detection of uncultured bacteria. FEMS Microbiol Lett 229:23–30
18. Koike S, Yabuki H, Kobayashi Y (2007) Validation and application of real-time polymerase chain reaction assays for representative rumen bacteria. Anim Sci J 78:135–141
19. Koike S, Handa Y, Goto H, Sakai K, Miyagawa E, Matsui H, Ito S, Kobayashi Y (2010) Molecular monitoring and isolation of previously uncultured bacterial strains from the sheep rumen. Appl Environ Microbiol 76:1887–1894
20. Koike S, Yabuki H, Kobayashi Y (2014) Interaction of rumen bacteria as assumed by colonization patterns on untreated and alkali-treated rice straw. Anim Sci J 85:524–531
21. Krause DO, Denman SE, Mackie RI, Morrison M, Rae AL, Attwood GT, McSweeney CS (2003) Opportunities to improve fiber degradation in the rumen: microbiology, ecology, and genomics. FEMS Microbiol Rev 27:663–693
22. Kudo H, Cheng KJ, Costerton JW (1987) Interaction between Treponema bryantii and cellulolytic bacteria in the in vitro degradation of straw cellulose. Can J Microbiol 33:244–248
23. Latham MJ, Wolin MJ (1977) Fermentation of cellulose by Ruminococcus flavefaciens in the presence and absence of Methanobacterium ruminantium. Appl Environ Microbiol 34:297–301
24. Lettat A, Nozière P, Silberberg M, Morgavi DP, Berger C, Martin C (2012) Rumen microbial and fermentation characteristics are affected differently by bacterial probiotic supplementation during induced lactic and subacute acidosis in sheep. BMC Microbiol 12:142
25. Malburg SR, Malburg LM, Liu T, Iyo AH, Forsberg CW (1997) Catalytic properties of the cellulose-binding endoglucanase F from Fibrobacter succinogenes S85. Appl Environ Microbiol 63:2449–2453
26. McGavin MJ, Forsberg CW, Crosby B, Bell AW, Dignard D, Thomas DY (1989) Structure of the cel-3 gene from Fibrobacter succinogenes S85 and characteristics of the encoded gene product, endoglucanase 3. J Bacteriol 171:5587–5595
27. McGavin M, Lam J, Forsberg CW (1990) Regulation and distribution of Fibrobacter succinogenes subsp. succinogenes S85 endoglucanases. Appl Environ Microbiol 56:1235–1244
28. Mosoni P, Martin C, Forano E, Morgavi DP (2011) Long-term defaunation increases the abundance of cellulolytic ruminococci and methanogens but does not affect the bacterial and methanogen diversity in the rumen of sheep. J Anim Sci 89:783–791
29. Muttray A, Mohn W (1999) Quantitation of the population size and metabolic activity of a resin acid degrading bacterium in activated sludge using slot-blot hybridization to measure the rRNA:rDNA ratio. Microb Ecol 38:348–357
30. Muttray AF, Yu Z, Mohn WW (2001) Population dynamics and metabolic activity of Pseudomonas abietaniphila BKME-9 within pulp mill wastewater microbial communities assayed by competitive PCR and RT-PCR. FEMS Microbiol Ecol 38:21–31
31. Paradis FW, Zhu H, Krell PJ, Phillips JP, Forsberg CW (1993) The xynC gene from Fibrobacter succinogenes S85 codes for a xylanase with two similar catalytic domains. J Bacteriol 175:7666–7672
32. Pérez-Osorio AC, Williamson KS, Franklin MJ (2010) Heterogeneous rpoS and rhlR mRNA levels and 16S rRNA/rDNA (rRNA gene) ratios within Pseudomonas aeruginosa biofilms, sampled by laser capture microdissection. J Bacteriol 192:2991–3000
33. Rychlik JL, May T (2000) The effect of methanogen, Methanobrevibacter smithii, on the growth rate, organic acid production, and specific ATP activity of three predominant ruminal cellulolytic bacteria. Curr Microbiol 40:176–180
34. Saro C, Ranilla MJ, Carro MD (2012) Postprandial changes of fiber-degrading microbes in the rumen of sheep fed diets varying in type of forage as monitored by real-time PCR and automated ribosomal intergenic spacer analysis. J Anim Sci 90:4487–4494
35. Sawanon S, Koike S, Kobayashi Y (2011) Evidence for the possible involvement of Selenomonas ruminantium in rumen fiber digestion. FEMS Microbiol Lett 325:170–179
36. Shinkai T, Ohji R, Matsumoto N, Kobayashi Y (2009) Fibrolytic capabilities of ruminal bacterium Fibrobacter succinogenes in relation to its phylogenetic grouping. FEMS Microbiol Lett 294:183–190
37. Shinkai T, Ueki T, Koike S, Kobayashi Y (2014) Determination of bacteria constituting ruminal fibrolytic consortia developed on orchard grass hay stem. Anim Sci J 85:254–261
38. Suen G, Stevenson DM, Bruce DC et al (2011a) Complete genome of the cellulolytic ruminal bacterium Ruminococcus albus 7. J Bacteriol 193:5574–5575
39. Suen G, Weimer PJ, Stevenson DM et al (2011b) The complete genome sequence of Fibrobacter succinogenes S85 reveals a cellulolytic and metabolic specialist. PLoS ONE 6:e18814
40. Tajima K, Aminov RI, Nagamine T, Matsui H, Nakamura M, Benno Y (2001) Diet-dependent shifts in the bacterial population of the rumen revealed with real-time PCR. Appl Environ Microbiol 67:2766–2774
41. Williams AG, Withers SE, Joblin KN (1994) The effect of cocultivation with hydrogen-consuming bacteria on xylanolysis by Ruminococcus flavefaciens. Curr Microbiol 29:133–138
42. Yu Z, Morrison M (2004) Improved extraction of PCR-quality community DNA from digesta and fecal samples. Biotechniques 36:808–812