Involvement of recently cultured group U2 bacterium in ruminal fiber digestion revealed by coculture with Fibrobacter succinogenes S85

FEMS Microbiology Letters

Volumn 336, Issue 1, 2012, Pages 17-25

  Fukuma, Naoki ^a   Koike, Satoshi ^a   Kobayashi, Yasuo ^a  

^a HOKKAIDO UNIVERSITY   (Japan)

Author keywords

Coculture; Fiber digestion; Fibrobacter succinogenes; Rumen bacteria

Indexed keywords

BACTERIAL ENZYME; CARBOXYMETHYLCELLULASE; LACTIC ACID; PROPIONIC ACID; RNA 16S; SUCCINIC ACID; UNCLASSIFIED DRUG; XYLAN ENDO 1,3 BETA XYLOSIDASE;

ARTICLE; BACTERIAL GENE; BACTERIAL GROWTH; BACTERIAL METABOLISM; BACTERIAL STRAIN; BACTERIUM CULTURE; BIOMASS PRODUCTION; COCULTURE; CONTROLLED STUDY; ENZYME ACTIVITY; ENZYME ASSAY; FIBROBACTER SUCCINOGENES; GENE DOSAGE; GENE EXPRESSION REGULATION; METABOLITE; MOLECULAR PHYLOGENY; NONHUMAN; NUCLEOTIDE SEQUENCE; PLANT FIBER; PRIORITY JOURNAL; RICE; RUMEN MICROORGANISM; SELENOMONAS RUMINANTIUM; STRAIN DIFFERENCE; STRAW;

ANIMALS; BACTERIA; COCULTURE TECHNIQUES; DIETARY FIBER; DIGESTION; FIBROBACTER; MOLECULAR SEQUENCE DATA; ORYZA SATIVA; PHYLOGENY; RUMEN; SHEEP;

BACTERIA (MICROORGANISMS); FIBROBACTER SUCCINOGENES; SELENOMONAS RUMINANTIUM; UNCULTURED BACTERIUM;

EID: 84867332248     PISSN: 03781097     EISSN: 15746968     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1574-6968.2012.02649.x     Document Type: Article

References (36)

1. Brulc JM, Antonopoulos DA, Berg Miller ME et al. (2009) Gene-centric metagenomics of the fiber-adherent bovine rumen microbiome reveals forage specific glycoside hydrolases. P Natl Acad Sci USA 106: 1948-1953.
2. Bryant MP (1972) Commentary on the Hungate technique for culture of anaerobic bacteria. Am J Clin Nutr 25: 1324-1328.
3. Bryant MP & Burkey LA (1953) Cultural methods and characterization of some of the more numerous groups of bacteria in the bovine rumen. J Dairy Sci 36: 205-217.
4. Cotta MA (1988) Amylolytic activity of selected species of ruminal bacteria. Appl Environ Microbiol 54: 772-776.
5. Cotta MA & Whitehead TR (1998) Xylooligosaccharide utilization by the ruminal anaerobic bacterium Selenomonas ruminantium. Curr Microbiol 36: 183-189.
6. Dehority BA & Scott HW (1967) Extent of cellulose and hemicellulose digestion in various forages by pure culture of the rumen bacteria. J Dairy Sci 50: 1136-1141.
7. Edwards JE, McEwan NR, Travis AJ & Wallace RJ (2004) 16S rDNA library-based analysis of ruminal bacterial diversity. Antonie Van Leeuwenhoek 86: 263-281.
8. Flint HJ (1997) The rumen microbial ecosystem-some recent development. Trends Microbiol 5: 483-488.
9. Flint HJ & Bisset J (1990) Genetic diversity in Selenomonas ruminantium isolated from the rumen. FEMS Microbiol Ecol 73: 351-359.
10. Fondevila M & Dehority BA (1996) Interactions between Fibrobacter succinogenes, Prevotella ruminicola, and Ruminococcus flavefaciens in the digestion of cellulose from forages. J Anim Sci 74: 678-684.
11. Klieve AV & Bauchop T (1988) Morphological diversity of ruminal bacteriophages from sheep and cattle. Appl Environ Microbiol 54: 1637-1641.
12. Kobayashi Y (2006) Inclusion of novel bacteria in rumen microbiology: need for basic and applied science. Anim Sci J 77: 375-385.
13. Koike S & Kobayashi Y (2009) Fibrolytic rumen bacteria: their ecology and functions. Asian-Aust J Anim Sci 22: 131-138.
14. Koike S, Yoshitani S, Kobayashi Y & Tanaka K (2003) Phylogenetic analysis of fiber-associated rumen bacterial community and PCR detection of uncultured bacteria. FEMS Microbiol Lett 229: 23-30.
15. Koike S, Yabuki H & Kobayashi Y (2007) Validation and application of real-time polymerase chain reaction assays for representative rumen bacteria. Anim Sci J 78: 135-141.
16. Koike S, Handa Y, Goto H, Sakai K, Miyagawa E, Matsui H, Ito S & Kobayashi Y (2010) Molecular monitoring and isolation of previously uncultured bacterial strains from the sheep rumen. Appl Environ Microbiol 76: 1887-1894.
17. Kudo H, Cheng KJ & Costerton JW (1987) Interaction between Treponema bryantii and cellulolytic bacteria in the in vitro degradation of straw cellulose. Can J Microbiol 33: 244-248.
18. Latham MJ & Wolin MJ (1977) Fermentation of cellulose by Ruminococcus flavefaciens in the presence and absence of Methanobacterium ruminantium. Appl Environ Microbiol 34: 297-301.
19. Matte A & Forsberg CW (1992) Purification, characterization, and mode of action of endoxylanase 1 and 2 from Fibrobacter succinogenes S85. Appl Environ Microbiol 58: 157-168.
20. Matte A, Forsberg CW & Gibbins AMV (1992) Enzymes associated with metabolism of xylose and other pentose by Prevotella (Bacteroides) ruminicola strains, Selenomonas ruminantium D and Fibrobacter succinogenes S85. Can J Microbiol 38: 370-376.
21. McGavin M, Lam J & Forsberg CW (1990) Regulation and distribution of Fibrobacter succinogenes subsp. succinogenes S85 endoglucanases. Appl Environ Microbiol 56: 1235-1244.
22. Minato H & Suto T (1978) Technique for fractionation of bacteria in rumen microbial ecosystem. II. Attachment of rumen bacteria isolated from bovine rumen to cellulose powder in vitro and elution of bacteria attached therefrom. J Gen Appl Microbiol 24: 1-16.
23. 14. Microbiology 151: 4121-4125.
24. 2-utilizing acetogenic and sulfate-reducing bacteria and metanogenic archaea from digestive tract of different mammals. Curr Microbiol 32: 129-133.
25. Osborne JM & Dehority BA (1989) Synergism in degradation and utilization of intact forage cellulose, hemicellulose and pectin by three pure cultures of ruminal bacteria. Appl Environ Microbiol 55: 2247-2250.
26. Rychlik JL & May T (2000) The effect of methanogen, Methanobrevibacter smithii, on the growth rate, organic acid production, and specific ATP activity of three predominant ruminal cellulolytic bacteria. Curr Microbiol 40: 176-180.
27. Sawanon S & Kobayashi Y (2006) Synergistic fibrolysis in the rumen by cellulolytic Ruminococcus flavefaciens and non-cellulolytic Selenomonas ruminantium: evidence in defined cultures. Anim Sci J 77: 208-214.
28. Sawanon S, Koike S & Kobayashi Y (2011) Evidence for the possible involvement of Selenomonas ruminantium in rumen fiber digestion. FEMS Microbiol Lett 325: 170-179.
29. Shinkai T, Ohji R, Matsumoto N & Kobayashi Y (2009) Fibrolytic capabilities of ruminal bacterium Fibrobacter succinogenes in relation to its phylogenetic grouping. FEMS Microbiol Lett 294: 183-190.
30. Shinkai T, Ueki T & Kobayashi Y (2010) Detection and identification of rumen bacteria constituting fibrolytic consortium dominated by Fibrobacter succinogenes. Anim Sci J 81: 72-79.
31. Strobel HJ & Russell JB (1991) Succinate transport by ruminal selenomonad and its regulation by carbohydrate availability and osmic strength. Appl Environ Microbiol 57: 248-254.
32. Suen G, Weimer PJ, Stevenson DM et al. (2011) The complete genome sequence of Fibrobacter succinogenes S85 reveals a cellulolytic and metabolic specialist. PLoS ONE 6: e18814.
33. Tajima K, Aminov RI, Nagamine T, Matsui H, Nakamura M & Benno Y (2001) Diet-dependent shifts in the bacterial population of the rumen revealed with real-time PCR. Appl Environ Microbiol 67: 2766-2774.
34. Williams AG, Withers SE & Joblin KN (1994) The effect of cocultivation with hydrogen-consuming bacteria on xylanolysis by Ruminococcus flavefaciens. Curr Microbiol 29: 133-138.
35. Yu Z & Morrison M (2004) Improved extraction of PCR-quality community DNA from digesta and fecal samples. BioTechniques 36: 808-812.
36. Yu Z, Yu M & Morrison M (2006) Improved serial analysis of V1 ribosomal sequence tags (SARST-V1) provides a rapid, comprehensive, sequence-based characterization of bacterial diversity and community composition. Environ Microbiol 8: 603-611.