Rumen microbial and fermentation characteristics are affected differently by bacterial probiotic supplementation during induced lactic and subacute acidosis in sheep

BMC Microbiology

Volumn 12, Issue , 2012, Pages

  Lettat, Abderzak ^a,b,c   Nozière, Pierre ^a   Silberberg, Mathieu ^a   Morgavi, Diego P ^a   Berger, Claudette ^b   Martin, Cécile ^a  

^a UMR1213 HERBIVORES   (France)

^b Danisco France SAS   (France)

^c SHERBROOKE RESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENT CENTRE   (Canada)

Author keywords

Acidosis; DGGE; Microbiota; Probiotics; qPCR; Rumen; SARA

Indexed keywords

AMYLASE; BUTYRIC ACID; LACTIC ACID; PROBIOTIC AGENT; PROPIONIC ACID; VOLATILE FATTY ACID; XYLAN ENDO 1,3 BETA XYLOSIDASE;

ANIMAL EXPERIMENT; ANIMAL MODEL; ARTICLE; BEET; CONTROLLED STUDY; DENATURING GRADIENT GEL ELECTROPHORESIS; ENZYME ACTIVITY; FEEDING; FERMENTATION; LACTATE BLOOD LEVEL; LACTIC ACIDOSIS; LACTOBACILLUS; LACTOBACILLUS PLANTARUM; LACTOBACILLUS RHAMNOSUS; MAIZE; MICROBIAL COMMUNITY; MICROFLORA; NONHUMAN; PH; POLYMERASE CHAIN REACTION; PREVOTELLA; PROPIONIBACTERIUM; RUMEN MICROORGANISM; SUBACUTE RUMINAL ACIDOSIS; WETHER; WHEAT;

ACIDOSIS; ANIMALS; BETA VULGARIS; DIET; FERMENTATION; LACTOBACILLUS RHAMNOSUS; PROBIOTICS; PROPIONIBACTERIUM; RUMEN; SHEEP; SHEEP DISEASES; TREATMENT OUTCOME; TRITICUM; ZEA MAYS;

BACTERIA (MICROORGANISMS); BETA VULGARIS SUBSP. VULGARIS; OVIS ARIES; PREVOTELLA; PROPIONIBACTERIUM; TRITICUM AESTIVUM; ZEA MAYS;

EID: 84866094076     PISSN: None     EISSN: 14712180     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1186/1471-2180-12-142     Document Type: Article

References (51)

1. Opportunities to improve fiber degradation in the rumen: microbiology, ecology, and genomics. Krause DO, Denman SE, Mackie RI, Morrison M, Rae AL, Attwood GT, McSweeney CS, FEMS Microbiol Rev 2003 27 5 663 693 (Pubitemid 37456863)
2. Rumen microbiome composition determined using two nutritional models of subacute ruminal acidosis. Khafipour E, Li S, Plaizier JC, Krause DO, Appl Environ Microbiol 2009 75 22 7115 7124
3. The monitoring, prevention and treatment of sub-acute ruminal acidosis (SARA): A review. Enemark JMD, Vet J 2008 176 1 32 43
4. Mécanismes dapparition de lacidose ruminale latente et conséquences physiopathologiques et zootechniques. Martin C, Brossard L, Doreau M, INRA Prod Anim 2006 19 93 108
5. Subacute ruminal acidosis (SARA): A review. Kleen JL, Hooijer GA, Rehage J, Noordhuizen JPTM, J Vet Med A 2003 50 8 406 414 (Pubitemid 41748067)
6. Analyse quantitative des réponses des vaches laitières l'apport de substances tampon. Meschy F, Bravo D, Sauvant D, INRA Prod Anim 2004 17 11 18 (Pubitemid 38587671)
7. Rumen fermentation and liveweight gain in beef cattle treated with monensin and grazing lush forage. Packer EL, Clayton EH, Cusack PMV, Aust Vet J 2011 89 9 338 345
8. Effects of active dry yeasts on the rumen microbial ecosystem: Past, present and future. Chaucheyras-Durand F, Walker ND, Bach A, Anim Feed Sci Technol 2008 145 1-4 5 26
9. Meta-analysis of the influence of Saccharomyces cerevisiae supplementation on ruminal parameters and milk production of ruminants. Desnoyers M, Giger-Reverdin S, Bertin G, Duvaux-Ponter C, Sauvant D, J Dairy Sci 2009 92 4 1620 1632
10. Ruminal acidosis: a review with detailed reference to the controlling agent Megasphaera elsdenii NCIMB 41125. Meissner HH, Henning PH, Horn CH, Leeuw K-J, Hagg FM, Fouché G, S Afr J Anim Sci 2010 40 2 79 100
11. Direct-fed microbial supplementation on the performance of dairy cattle during the transition period. Nocek JE, Kautz WP, Leedle JAZ, Block E, J Dairy Sci 2003 86 1 331 335 (Pubitemid 39067185)
12. Evaluation of the protective effect of probiotics fed to dairy cows during a subacute ruminal acidosis challenge. Chiquette J, Anim Feed Sci Technol 2009 153 3-4 278 291
13. Experimental feed induction of ruminal lactic, propionic, or butyric acidosis in sheep. Lettat A, Noziere P, Silberberg M, Morgavi DP, Berger C, Martin C, J Anim Sci 2010 88 9 3041 3046
14. Characterization of the dynamics of initial bacterial colonization of nonconserved forage in the bovine rumen. Edwards JE, Huws SA, Kim EJ, Kingston-Smith AH, FEMS Microbiol Ecol 2007 62 3 323 335 (Pubitemid 350076060)
15. Dominance of Prevotella and low abundance of classical ruminal bacterial species in the bovine rumen revealed by relative quantification real-time PCR. Stevenson DM, Weimer PJ, ApplMicrobiolBiotechnol 2007 75 1 165 174 (Pubitemid 46669229)
16. Comparative assessment of human and farm animal faecal microbiota using real-time quantitative PCR. Furet J-P, Firmesse O, Gourmelon M, Bridonneau C, Tap J, Mondot S, Doré J, Corthier G, FEMS Microbiol Ecol 2009 68 3 351 362
17. Evidence for limited microbial transfer of methane in a planktonic food web. Jones S, Lennon J, AquatMicrobEcol 2009 58 1 45 53
18. Identification of dominant microbial community in aerophilic biofilm reactors by fluorescence in situ hybridization and PCR-denaturing gradient gel electrophoresis. Kim YG, Lee TH, Park TJ, Park HS, Lee SH, Korean J Chem Eng 2009 26 3 685 690
19. Detection and identification of gastrointestinal Lactobacillus species by using denaturing gradient gel electrophoresis and species-specific PCR primers. Walter J, Tannock GW, Tilsala-Timisjarvi A, Rodtong S, Loach DM, Munro K, Alatossava T, Appl Environ Microbiol 2000 66 1 297 303 (Pubitemid 30030531)
20. Effect of condensed tannins on bacterial diversity and metabolic activity in the rat gastrointestinal tract. Smith AH, Mackie RI, Appl Environ Microbiol 2004 70 2 1104 1115 (Pubitemid 38568237)
21. Statistical analysis of denaturing gel electrophoresis (DGE) fingerprinting patterns. Fromin N, Hamelin J, Tarnawski S, Roesti D, Jourdain-Miserez K, Forestier N, Teyssier-Cuvelle S, Gillet F, Aragno M, Rossi P, Environ Microbiol 2002 4 11 634 643 (Pubitemid 35442251)
22. Influence des ciliés du rumen sur l'utilisation digestive de différents régimes riches en glucides solubles et sur les produits terminaux formés dans le rumen. Il. Régimes contenant de l'inuline, du saccharose et du lactose. Jouany J-P, Senaud J, ReprodNutrDévelop 1983 23 3 607 623
23. Variations in mass and enzyme activity of rumen microorganisms: Effect of barley and buffer supplements. Martin C, Michalet-Doreau B, J Sci Food Agric 1995 67 3 407 413
24. Carbohydrate determination with 4-hydroxybenzoic acid hydrazide (PAHBAH): Effect of bismuth on the reaction. Lever M, Anal Biochem 1977 81 1 21 27 (Pubitemid 8141263)
25. An evaluation of the Coomassie brilliant blue G-250 dye-binding method for quantitative protein determination. Pierce J, Suelter CH, Anal Biochem 1977 81 2 478 480 (Pubitemid 8175062)
26. Improvement of the ammonia analysis by the phenate method in water and wastewater. Park G, Oh H, Ahn S, Bull Korean Chem Soc 2009 30 2032 2038
27. Acidosis in cattle: a review. Owens FN, Secrist DS, Hill WJ, Gill DR, J Anim Sci 1998 76 1 275 286 (Pubitemid 128439632)
28. A grain-based subacute ruminal acidosis challenge causes translocation of lipopolysaccharide and triggers inflammation. Khafipour E, Krause DO, Plaizier JC, J Dairy Sci 2009 92 3 1060 1070
29. Effects of bacterial direct-fed microbials and yeast on site and extent of digestion, blood chemistry, and subclinical ruminal acidosis in feedlot cattle. Beauchemin KA, Yang WZ, Morgavi DP, Ghorbani GR, Kautz W, Leedle JA, J Anim Sci 2003 81 6 1628 1640 (Pubitemid 38571753)
30. Components of ruminal acidosis and acidogenic effects of diets. Sauvant D, Meschy F, Mertens D, INRA Prod Anim 1999 12 49 60
31. Effect of acarbose on acute acidosis. McLaughlin CL, Thompson A, Greenwood K, Sherington J, Bruce C, J Dairy Sci 2009 92 6 2758 2766
32. Role of Megasphaera elsdenii in the fermentation of DL-[2-13C]lactate in the rumen of dairy cattle. Counotte GHM, Prins RA, Janssen RHAM, deBie MJA, Appl Environ Microbiol 1981 42 4 649 655 (Pubitemid 12175532)
33. Invited review: Essential oils as modifiers of rumen microbial fermentation. Calsamiglia S, Busquet M, Cardozo PW, Castillejos L, Ferret A, J Dairy Sci 2003 90 2580 2595 (Pubitemid 350049652)
34. Ethanol accumulation in the rumen after overfeeding with readily fermentable carbohydrate. Allison MJ, Dougherty RW, Bucklin JA, Snyder EE, Science 1964 144 3614 54 55
35. Relationship of rumen gram-negative bacteria and free endotoxin to lactic acidosis in cattle. Nagaraja TG, Bartley EE, Fina LR, Anthony HD, J Anim Sci 1978 47 6 1329 1337
36. Les lactobacilles: propriétés, habitats, rôle physiologique et intérêt en santé humaine. Tailliez P, Antibiotiques 2004 6 1 35 41 (Pubitemid 38325265)
37. Immunization with a Streptococcus bovis vaccine administered by different routes against lactic acidosis in sheep. Shu Q, Gill HS, Leng RA, Rowe JB, Vet J 2000 159 3 262 269 (Pubitemid 30312543)
38. Ruminal fermentation. Hungate RE, Handbook of Physiology American physiology Society Washington, Code CF, 1968 2725 2745
39. Regulation of lactate production in Streptococcus bovis: A spiraling effect that contributes to rumen acidosis. Russell JB, Hino T, J Dairy Sci 1985 68 7 1712 1721
40. Protozoa involved in butyric rather than lactic fermentative pattern during latent acidosis in sheep. Brossard L, Martin C, Chaucheyras-Durand F, Michalet-Doreau B, ReprodNutrDev 2004 44 3 195 206 (Pubitemid 39198963)
41. Repeated ruminal acidotic challenges in sheep: effects on pH and microbial ecosystem and influence of Active Dry Yeasts. Silberberg M, Chaucheyras-Durand F, Commun L, Richard-Mialon MM, Martin C, Morgavi DP, J Dairy Sci 2009 92 1 E-Suppl
42. Biopathological studies in experimentally induced ruminal acidosis in goat. Lal SB, Dwivedi SK, Sharma MC, Swarup D, Indian J Anim Sci 1992 62 200 204
43. An atypical ase of ruminal fermentations leading to ketosis in early lactating cows. Doreau M, Ollier A, Michalet-Doreau B, Rev Med Vet 2001 152 301 306
44. Ruminal lipopolysaccharide concentration and inflammatory response during grain-induced subacute ruminal acidosis in dairy cows. Gozho GN, Krause DO, Plaizier JC, J Dairy Sci 2007 90 2 856 866 (Pubitemid 350199351)
45. Alfalfa pellet-induced subacute ruminal acidosis in dairy cows increases bacterial endotoxin in the rumen without causing inflammation. Khafipour E, Krause DO, Plaizier JC, J Dairy Sci 2009 92 4 1712 1724
46. Effects of amount and availability of starch on amylolytic activity of ruminal solid-associated microorganisms. Nozière P, Michalet-Doreau B, J Sci Food Agric 1997 73 4 471 476 (Pubitemid 27191062)
47. Effects of bacterial direct-fed microbials on ruminal fermentation, blood variables, and the microbial populations of feedlot cattle. Ghorbani GR, Morgavi DP, Beauchemin KA, Leedle JA, J Anim Sci 2002 80 7 1977 1985 (Pubitemid 41138426)
48. Effect of direct-fed microbials on performance, diet digestibility, and rumen characteristics of Holstein dairy cows. Raeth-Knight ML, Linn JG, Jung HG, J Dairy Sci 2007 90 4 1802 1809 (Pubitemid 350045404)
49. Effects of feeding propionibacteria to dairy cows on milk yield, milk components, and reproduction. Stein DR, Allen DT, Perry EB, Bruner JC, Gates KW, Rehberger TG, Mertz K, Jones D, Spicer LJ, J Dairy Sci 2006 89 1 111 125 (Pubitemid 43105914)
50. Prevotella bryantii 25A used as a probiotic in early-lactation dairy cows: effect on ruminal fermentation characteristics, milk production, and milk composition. Chiquette J, Allison MJ, Rasmussen MA, J Dairy Sci 2008 91 9 3536 3543
51. Probiotics in animal nutrition and health. Chaucheyras-Durand F, Durand H, Beneficial Microbes 2010 1 1 3 9