Evidence for the possible involvement of Selenomonas ruminantium in rumen fiber digestion

FEMS Microbiology Letters

Volumn 325, Issue 2, 2011, Pages 170-179

  Sawanon, Suriya ^a,b   Koike, Satoshi ^a   Kobayashi, Yasuo ^a  

^a HOKKAIDO UNIVERSITY   (Japan)

^b KASETSART UNIVERSITY   (Thailand)

Author keywords

16S rRNA gene; Fiber digestion; Fibrobacter succinogenes; Rumen; Selenomonas ruminantium; Synergism

Indexed keywords

PROPIONIC ACID;

16S RRNA GENE; ARTICLE; BACTERIAL STRAIN; BACTERIUM ADHERENCE; BACTERIUM ISOLATE; BACTERIUM ISOLATION; COCULTURE; CONTROLLED STUDY; DIGESTION; FIBROBACTER SUCCINOGENES; GENE; GENE SEQUENCE; NONHUMAN; NUCLEOTIDE SEQUENCE; PHYLOGENY; POLYMERASE CHAIN REACTION; PRIORITY JOURNAL; QUANTITATIVE ANALYSIS; RUMINANT STOMACH; SELENOMONAS RUMINANTIUM;

ANALYSIS OF VARIANCE; ANIMALS; BACTERIAL ADHESION; CELLULOSE; COCULTURE TECHNIQUES; DIETARY FIBER; DIGESTION; DNA, BACTERIAL; FIBROBACTER; PHYLOGENY; PROPIONATES; RNA, RIBOSOMAL, 16S; RUMEN; SELENOMONAS; SHEEP;

BACTERIA (MICROORGANISMS); FIBROBACTER SUCCINOGENES; OVIS ARIES; SELENOMONAS RUMINANTIUM;

EID: 81855170037     PISSN: 03781097     EISSN: 15746968     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1574-6968.2011.02427.x     Document Type: Article

References (36)

1. Akin DE, Morrison WH III & Himmelsbach DS (1993) Characterisation of digestion residues of alfalfa and orchardgrass leaves by microscopic, spectroscopic and chemical analysis. J Sci Food Agric 63: 339-347.
2. Bekele ZA, Koike S & Kobayashi Y (2010) Genetic diversity and diet specificity of ruminal Prevotella revealed by 16S rRNA gene-based analysis. FEMS Microbiol Lett 305: 49-57.
3. Bekele ZA, Koike S & Kobayashi Y (2011) Phylogenetic diversity and dietary association of rumen Treponema revealed using group-specific 16S rRNA gene-based analysis. FEMS Microbiol Lett 316: 51-60.
4. Bhat S, Wallace RJ & Orskov ER (1990) Adhesion of cellulolytic ruminal bacteria to barley straw. Appl Environ Microbiol 56: 2698-2703.
5. Bryant MP (1972) Commentary on the Hungate technique for culture of anaerobic bacteria. Am J Clin Nutr 25: 1324-1328.
6. Bryant MP & Burkey LA (1953) Cultural methods and some characterization of some of the more numerous groups of bacteria in the bovine rumen. J Dairy Sci 36: 205-217.
7. 12 analogues by pure cultures of ruminal bacteria. Nature 195: 201-202.
8. Evans JD & Martin SA (1997) Factors affecting lactate and malate utilization by Selenomonas ruminantium. Appl Environ Microbiol 63: 4853-4858.
9. Fondevila M & Dehority BA (1996) Interactions between Fibrobacter succinogenes, Prevotella ruminicola, and Ruminococcus flavefaciens in the digestion of cellulose from forages. J Anim Sci 74: 678-684.
10. Forsberg CW, Cheng KJ & White BA (1997) Polysaccharide degradation in the rumen and large intestine. Gastrointestinal Microbiology, Vol. 1 (Mackie RI, White BA & Isaacson RE, eds), pp. 319-379. Chapman and Hall, New York.
11. Hespell RB, Wolf F & Bohtast RJ (1987) Fermentation of xylans by Butyrivibrio fibrisolvens and other ruminal bacteria. Appl Environ Microbiol 53: 2849-2853.
12. Huang L & Forsberg CW (1990) Cellulose digestion and cellulase regulation and distribution in Fibrobacter succinogenes subsp. succinogenes S85. Appl Environ Microbiol 56: 1221-1228.
13. Hungate RE (1950) The anaerobic mesophilic cellulolytic bacteria. Bacteriol Rev 14: 1-49.
14. John A, Isaacson H & Bryant MP (1974) Isolation and characteristics of a ureolytic strain of Selenomonas ruminantium. J Dairy Sci 57: 1003-1014.
15. Kingsley VV & Hoeniger JFM (1973) Growth, structure, and classification of Selenomonas. Bacteriol Rev 37: 479-521
16. Kobayashi Y, Shinkai T & Koike S (2008) Ecological and physiological characterization shows that Fibrobacter succinogenes is important in rumen fiber digestion. Folia Microbiol 53: 195-200.
17. Koike S, Pan J, Kobayashi Y & Tanaka K (2003a) Kinetics of in sacco fiber-attachment of representative ruminal cellulolytic bacteria monitored by competitive PCR. J Dairy Sci 86: 1429-1435.
18. Koike S, Yoshitani S, Kobayashi Y & Tanaka K (2003b) Phylogenetic analysis of fiber-associated rumen bacterial community and PCR detection of uncultured bacteria. FEMS Microbiol Lett 229: 23-30.
19. Koike S, Yabuki H & Kobayashi Y (2007) Validation and application of real-time polymerase chain reaction assays for representative rumen bacteria. Anim Sci J 78: 135-141.
20. Kudo H, Cheng KJ & Costerton JW (1987) Interactions between Treponema bryantii and cellulolytic bacteria in the in vitro degradation of straw cellulose. Can J Microbiol 33: 244-248.
21. Lane DJ (1991) 16S/23S rRNA sequencing. Nucleic Acid Techniques in Bacterial Systematics (Stackebrandt E & Goodfellow M, eds), pp. 115-175. Wiley, New York.
22. Maglione G, Russell JB & Wilson DB (1997) Kinetics of cellulose digestion by Fibrobacter succinogenes S85. Appl Environ Microbiol 63: 665-669.
23. Miller GL (1959) Use of dinitrosalicylic acid reagent for determination of reducing sugars. Analyt Chem 31: 426-428.
24. Mitsumori M & Minato H (1993) Presence of several cellulose-binding proteins in cell lysate of Fibrobacter succinogenes S85. J Gen Appl Microbiol 39: 273-283.
25. Ogimoto K & Imai S (1981) Atlas of Rumen Microbiology. Japan Scientific Societies Press, Tokyo, Japan.
26. Pristas P, Piknova M, Sprincova A & Javorsky P (2008) Genetic variability of rumen Selenomonads. Folia Microbiol (Praha) 53: 165-172.
27. Russell JB (1985) Fermentation of cellodextrins by cellulolytic and noncellulolytic rumen bacteria. Appl Environ Microbiol 49: 572-576.
28. SAS (1989) SAS User's Guide: Statistics, Version 6.12 Edition. SAS Inst., Inc., Cary, NC.
29. Sawanon S & Kobayashi Y (2006) Synergistic fibrolysis in the rumen by cellulolytic Ruminococcus flavefaciens and non-cellulolytic Selenomonas ruminantium: evidence in defined cultures. Anim Sci J 77: 208-214.
30. Scheifinger CC & Wolin MJ (1973) Propionate formation from cellulose and soluble sugars by combined cultures of Bacteroides succinogens and Selenomonas ruminantium. Appl Microbiol 26: 789-795.
31. Shinkai T & Kobayashi Y (2007) Localization of ruminal cellulolytic bacteria on plant fibrous materials as determined by fluorescence in situ hybridization and real-time PCR. Appl Environ Microbiol 73: 1646-1652.
32. Shinkai T, Ueki T & Kobayashi Y (2010) Detection and identification of rumen bacteria constituting a fibrolytic consortium dominated by Fibrobacter succinogenes. Anim Sci J 81: 72-79.
33. Stanton BA & Canale-Parola E (1980) Treponema bryantii sp. nov., a rumen spirochete that interacts with cellulolytic bacteria. Arch Microbiol 127: 145-156.
34. Stewart CS, Flint HJ & Bryant MP (1997) The rumen bacteria. The Rumen Microbial Ecosystem, 2nd edn (Hobson PN & Stewart CS, eds), pp. 10-72. Blackie Academic and Professional, London.
35. Strobel HJ & Russell JB (1991) Succinate transport by a ruminal selenomonad and its regulation by carbohydrate availability and osmotic strength. Appl Environ Microbiol 57: 248-254.
36. Wolin MJ, Miller TL & Stewart CS (1997) Microbe-microbe interactions. The Rumen Microbial Ecosystem, 2nd edn (Hobson PN & Stewart CS, eds), pp. 467-491. Blackie Academic and Professional, London.