Interaction of rumen bacteria as assumed by colonization patterns on untreated and alkali-treated rice straw

Animal Science Journal

Volumn 85, Issue 5, 2014, Pages 524-531

  Koike, Satoshi ^a   Yabuki, Hiroyoshi ^a   Kobayashi, Yasuo ^a  

^a HOKKAIDO UNIVERSITY   (Japan)

Author keywords

Fiber digestion; Rice straw; Rumen bacteria; Synergy

Indexed keywords

ALKALI; SODIUM HYDROXIDE;

ANIMAL; ANIMAL FOOD; BACTERIA; COMPARATIVE STUDY; GROWTH, DEVELOPMENT AND AGING; MICROBIOLOGY; REAL TIME POLYMERASE CHAIN REACTION; RICE; RUMINANT STOMACH; RUMINOCOCCUS; SHEEP;

ALKALIES; ANIMAL FEED; ANIMALS; BACTERIA; ORYZA SATIVA; REAL-TIME POLYMERASE CHAIN REACTION; RUMEN; RUMINOCOCCUS; SHEEP; SODIUM HYDROXIDE;

EID: 84898814883     PISSN: 13443941     EISSN: 17400929     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/asj.12176     Document Type: Article

References (29)

1. Anderson KL. 1995. Biochemical analysis of starch degradation by Ruminobacter amylophilus 70. Applied and Environmental Microbiology 61, 1488-1491.
2. AOAC. 1990. Official Methods of Analysis, 15th edn. Association of Official Analytical Chemistry, Virginia.
3. Chenost M, Kayouli C. 1997. Roughage Utilisation in Warm Climates. FAO Animal Production and Health Paper 135, FAO, Rome. [cited 3 September 2013]. Available from URL: http://www.fao.org/docrep/003/w4988e/w4988e00.HTM.
4. Fondevila M, Dehority BA. 1996. Interaction between Fibrobacter succinogenes, Prevotella ruminicola, and Ruminococcus flavefaciens in the digestion of cellulose from forage. Journal of Animal Science 74, 678-684.
5. Forsberg CW, Cheng KJ, White BA. 1997. Polysaccharide degradation in the rumen and large intestine. In: Mackie RI, White BA (eds), Gastrointestinal Microbiology, pp. 319- 379. Chapman & Hall, New York.
6. Fukuma N, Koike S, Kobayashi Y. 2012. Involvement of recently cultured group U2 bacterium in ruminal fiber digestion revealed by coculture with Fibrobacter succinogenes S85. FEMS Microbiology Letters 336, 17-25.
7. Goering HK, Van Soest PJ. 1975. Forage Fiber Analysis. Agricultural Research Service. Agricultural handbook No. 379. US Department of Agriculture, Washington.
8. Guan LL, Nkrumah JD, Basarab JA, Moore SS. 2008. Linkage of microbial ecology to phenotype: correlation of rumen microbial ecology to cattle's feed efficiency. FEMS Microbiology Letters 288, 85-91.
9. Kobayashi Y. 2006. Inclusion of novel bacteria in rumen microbiology: needs for basic and applied science. Animal Science Journal 77, 375-385.
10. Koike S, Handa Y, Goto H, Sakai K, Miyagawa E, Matsui H, Ito S, Kobayashi Y. 2010. Molecular monitoring and isolation of previously uncultured bacterial strains from the sheep rumen. Applied and Environmental Microbiology 76, 1887-1894.
11. Koike S, Yabuki H, Kobayashi Y. 2007. Validation and application of real-time polymerase chain reaction assays for representative rumen bacteria. Animal Science Journal 78, 135-141.
12. Koike S, Yoshitani S, Kobayashi Y, Tanaka K. 2003. Phylogenetic analysis of fiber-associated rumen bacterial community and PCR detection of uncultured bacteria. FEMS Microbiology Letters 229, 23-30.
13. Kudo H, Cheng KJ, Costerton JW. 1987. Interactions between Treponema bryantii and cellulolytic bacteria in the in vitro degradation of straw cellulose. Canadian Journal of Microbiology 33, 244-248.
14. Lam TB, Kadoya TK, Iiyama K. 2001. Bonding of hydroxycinnamic acids to lignin: ferulic and p-coumaric acids are predominantly linked at the benzyl position of lignin, not the beta-position, in grass cell walls. Phytochemistry 57, 987-992.
15. Mullins CR, Mamedova LK, Carpenter AJ, Ying Y, Allen MS, Yoon I, Bradford BJ. 2013. Analysis of rumen microbial populations in lactating dairy cattle fed diets varying in carbohydrate profiles and Saccharomyces cerevisiae fermentation product. Journal of Dairy Science 96, 5872-5881.
16. Nouaille R, Matulova M, Delort AM, Forano E. 2005. Oligosaccharide synthesis in Fibrobacter succinogenes S85 and its modulation by the substrate. FEBS Journal 272, 2416-2427.
17. Nouaille R, Matulova M, Pätoprstý V, Delort AM, Forano E. 2009. Production of oligosaccharides and cellobionic acid by Fibrobacter succinogenes S85 growing on sugars, cellulose and wheat straw. Applied Microbiology Biotechnology 83, 425-433.
18. Prasad RDD, Reddy MR, Reddy GVN. 1998. Effect of feeding baled and stacked urea treated rice straw on the performance of crossbred cows. Animal Feed Science and Technology 73, 347-352.
19. Sarnklong C, Cone JW, Pellikaan W, Hendriks WH. 2010. Utilization of rice straw and different treatments to improve its feed value for ruminants: a review. Asian-Australasian Journal of Animal Sciences 23, 680-692.
20. Sawanon S, Kobayashi Y. 2006. Synergistic fibrolysis in the rumen by cellulolytic Ruminococcus flavefaciens and non-cellulolytic Selenomonas ruminantium: evidence in defined cultures. Animal Science Journal 77, 208-214.
21. Sawanon S, Koike S, Kobayashi Y. 2011. Evidence for the possible involvement of Selenomonas ruminantium in rumen fiber digestion. FEMS Microbiology Letters 325, 170-179.
22. Scheifinger CC, Wolin MJ. 1973. Propionate formation from cellulose and soluble sugars by combined cultures of Bacteroides succinogenes and Selenomonas ruminantium. Applied Microbiology 26, 789-795.
23. Selim ASM, Pan J, Takano T, Suzuki T, Koike S, Kobayashi Y, Tanaka K. 2004. Effect of ammonia treatment on physical strength of rice straw, distribution of straw particles and particle-associated bacteria in sheep rumen. Animal Feed Science and Technology 115, 117-128.
24. Shen HS, Sundstøl F, Eng ER, Eik LO. 1999. Studies on untreated and urea-treated rice straw from three cultivation seasons: 3. histological investigations by light and scanning electron microscopy. Animal Feed Science and Technology 80, 151-159.
25. Stanton TB, Canale-Parola E. 1980. Treponema bryantii sp. nov., a rumen spirochete that interacts with cellulolytic bacteria. Archives of Microbiology 127, 145-156.
26. Stevenson DM, Weimer PJ. 2007. Dominance of Prevotella and low abundance of classical ruminal bacterial species in the bovine rumen revealed by relative quantification real-time PCR. Applied Microbiology and Biotechnology 75, 165-174.
27. Suksombat W. 2004. Comparison of different alkali treatment of bagasse and rice straw. Asian-Australasian Journal of Animal Sciences 17, 1430-1433.
28. Wanapat M, Sundstol F, Garmo TH. 1985. A comparison of alkali treatment methods to improve the nutritive value of straw. I. digestibility and metabolizability. Animal Feed Science and Technology 12, 295-309.
29. Yu Z, Morrison M. 2004. Improved extraction of PCR-quality community DNA from digesta and fecal samples. BioTechniques 36, 808-812.