Quantification of myocardial blood flow in absolute terms using 82Rb PET imaging the RUBY-10 study

JACC: Cardiovascular Imaging

Volumn 7, Issue 11, 2014, Pages 1119-1127

  Nesterov, Sergey V ^a,b   Deshayes, Emmanuel ^c,d   Sciagrà, Roberto ^e   Settimo, Leonardo ^e   Declerck, Jerome M ^f   Pan, Xiao Bo ^f   Yoshinaga, Keiichiro ^g   Katoh, Chietsugu ^g   Slomka, Piotr J ^h   Germano, Guido ^h   Han, Chunlei ^a   Aalto, Ville ^a   Alessio, Adam M ⁱ   Ficaro, Edward P ⁱ   Lee, Benjamin C ^j   Nekolla, Stephan G ^k   Gwet, Kilem L ^l   De Kemp, Robert A ^m   Klein, Ran ⁿ   Dickson, John ^o   Case, James A ^p   Bateman, Timothy ^p   Prior, John O ^b   Knuuti, Juhani M ^a   more..

^a TURKU UNIVERSITY HOSPITAL   (Finland)

^b SECHENOV INSTITUTE OF EVOLUTIONARY PHYSIOLOGY AND BIOCHEMISTRY   (Russian Federation)

^c LAUSANNE UNIVERSITY HOSPITAL   (Switzerland)

^d CENTRE VAL D AURELLE   (France)

^e UNIVERSITY OF FLORENCE   (Italy)

^f SIEMENS AG   (Germany)

^g HOKKAIDO UNIVERSITY GRADUATE SCHOOL OF MEDICINE   (Japan)

^h CEDARS SINAI MEDICAL CENTER   (United States)

ⁱ UNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON   (United States)

^j UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN HEALTH SYSTEM   (United States)

^k INVIA Medical Imaging Solutions   (United States)

^l TECHNICAL UNIVERSITY OF MUNICH   (Germany)

^m Advanced Analytics   (United States)

ⁿ UNIVERSITY OF OTTAWA HEART INSTITUTE   (Canada)

^o UNIVERSITY COLLEGE LONDON   (United Kingdom)

^p Cardiovascular Imaging Technologies LLC   (United States)

more..

Author keywords

CAD; Imaging software; PET; Reproducibility; Rubidium 82

Indexed keywords

ADENOSINE; RUBIDIUM 82; RADIOPHARMACEUTICAL AGENT; RUBIDIUM;

ADULT; AGED; ARTICLE; CLINICAL ARTICLE; COMPARTMENT MODEL; EXERCISE TEST; FEMALE; FRACTIONAL FLOW RESERVE; HEART MUSCLE BLOOD FLOW; HUMAN; IMAGE ANALYSIS; IMAGING SYSTEM; MALE; MULTICENTER STUDY; POSITRON EMISSION TOMOGRAPHY; PRIORITY JOURNAL; BIOLOGICAL MODEL; CANADA; CLINICAL TRIAL; COMPARATIVE STUDY; COMPUTER ASSISTED DIAGNOSIS; COMPUTER PROGRAM; CORONARY ARTERY DISEASE; EUROPE; HEMODYNAMICS; JAPAN; MIDDLE AGED; MYOCARDIAL PERFUSION IMAGING; OBSERVER VARIATION; PATHOPHYSIOLOGY; PREDICTIVE VALUE; PROCEDURES; REPRODUCIBILITY; SCINTISCANNING; UNITED STATES; VERY ELDERLY;

ADULT; AGED; AGED, 80 AND OVER; CORONARY ARTERY DISEASE; EUROPE; FEMALE; HEMODYNAMICS; HUMANS; IMAGE INTERPRETATION, COMPUTER-ASSISTED; JAPAN; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; MODELS, CARDIOVASCULAR; MYOCARDIAL PERFUSION IMAGING; OBSERVER VARIATION; ONTARIO; POSITRON-EMISSION TOMOGRAPHY; PREDICTIVE VALUE OF TESTS; RADIOPHARMACEUTICALS; REPRODUCIBILITY OF RESULTS; RUBIDIUM RADIOISOTOPES; SOFTWARE; UNITED STATES;

EID: 84922560700     PISSN: 1936878X     EISSN: 18767591     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.jcmg.2014.08.003     Document Type: Article

References (35)

1. Knuuti J, Saraste A. Advances in clinical application of quantitative myocardial perfusion imaging. J Nucl Cardiol 2012;19:643-6.
2. Nakazato R, Berman DS, Dey D, et al. Automated quantitative Rb-82 3D PET/CT myocardial perfusion imaging: normal limits and correlation with invasive coronary angiography. J Nucl Cardiol 2012;19:265-76.
3. Gould KL. Coronary flow reserve and pharmacologic stress perfusion imaging: beginnings and evolution. J Am Coll Cardiol Img 2009;2:664-9.
4. Saraste A, Kajander S, Han C, Nesterov SV, Knuuti J. PET: is myocardial flow quantification a clinical reality J Nucl Cardiol 2012;19: 1044-59.
5. Schindler TH, Schelbert HR, Quercioli A, Dilsizian V. Cardiac PET imaging for the detection and monitoring of coronary artery disease and microvascular health. J Am Coll Cardiol Img 2010; 3:623-40.
6. Ziadi MC, Dekemp RA, Williams K, et al. Does quantification of myocardial flow reserve using rubidium-82 positron emission tomography facilitate detection of multivessel coronary artery disease J Nucl Cardiol 2012;19:670-80.
7. Dorbala S, Di Carli MF, Beanlands RS, et al. Prognostic value of stress myocardial perfusion positron emission tomography: results from a multicenter observational registry. J Am Coll Cardiol 2013;61:176-84.
8. Yoshinaga K, Katoh C, Manabe O, et al. Incremental diagnostic value of regional myocardial blood flow quantification over relative perfusion imaging with generator-produced rubidium-82 PET. Circ J 2011;75:2628-34.
9. Farhad H, Dunet V, Bachelard K, Allenbach G, Kaufmann PA, Prior JO. Added prognostic value of myocardial blood flow quantitation in rubidium-82 positron emission tomography imaging. Eur Heart J Cardiovasc Imaging 2013;14:1203-10.
10. Gould KL. Clinical cardiac PET using generatorproduced Rb-82: a review. Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol 1989;12:245-51.
11. Yoshinaga K, Chow BJ, Williams K, et al. What is the prognostic value of myocardial perfusion imaging using rubidium-82 positron emission tomography J Am Coll Cardiol 2006;48:1029-39.
12. Herrero P, Markham J, Shelton ME, Bergmann SR. Implementation and evaluation of a two-compartment model for quantification of myocardial perfusion with rubidium-82 and positron emission tomography. Circ Res 1992;70:496-507.
13. Yoshida K, Mullani N, Gould KL. Coronary flow and flow reserve by PET simplified for clinical applications using rubidium-82 or nitrogen-13-Ammonia. J Nucl Med 1996;37:1701-12.
14. Lortie M, Beanlands RSB, Yoshinaga K, Klein R, Dasilva JN, Dekemp RA. Quantification of myocardial blood flow with 82Rb dynamic PET imaging. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging 2007;34:1765-74.
15. El Fakhri G, Kardan A, Sitek A, et al. Reproducibility and accuracy of quantitative myocardial blood flow assessment with (82)Rb PET: comparison with (13)N-Ammonia PET. J Nucl Med 2009; 50:1062-71.
16. Lautamäki R, George RT, Kitagawa K, et al. Rubidium-82 PET-CT for quantitative assessment of myocardial blood flow: validation in a canine model of coronary artery stenosis. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging 2009;36:576-86.
17. Sitek A, Di Bella EV, Gullberg GT. Factor analysis with a priori knowledge-Application in dynamic cardiac SPECT. Phys Med Biol 2000;45: 2619-38.
18. Alessio AM, Bassingthwaighte JB, Glenny R, Caldwell JH. Validation of an axially distributed model for quantification of myocardial blood flow using 13N-Ammonia PET. J Nucl Cardiol 2013;20: 64-75.
19. Katoh C, Yoshinaga K, Klein R, et al. Quantification of regional myocardial blood flow estimation with three-dimensional dynamic rubidium-82 PET and modified spillover correction model. J Nucl Cardiol 2012;19:763-74.
20. Dekemp RA, Declerck J, Klein R, et al. Multisoftware reproducibility study of stress and rest myocardial blood flow assessed with 3D dynamic PET/CT and a 1-tissue-compartment model of 82Rb kinetics. J Nucl Med 2013;54:571-7.
21. Tahari AK, Lee A, Rajaram M, et al. Absolute myocardial flow quantification with (82)Rb PET/CT: comparison of different software packages and methods. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging 2014; 41:126-35.
22. Nesterov SV, Han C, Mäki M, et al. Myocardial perfusion quantitation with 15O-labelled water PET: high reproducibility of the new cardiac analysis software (Carimas). Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging 2009;36:1594-602.
23. Ficaro EP, Lee BC, Kritzman JN, Corbett JR. Corridor4DM: the Michigan method for quantitative nuclear cardiology. J Nucl Cardiol 2007;14: 455-65.
24. Klein R, Renaud JM, Ziadi MC, et al. Intra-And inter-operator repeatability of myocardial blood flow and myocardial flow reserve measurements using rubidium-82 pet and a highly automated analysis program. J Nucl Cardiol 2010;17:600-16.
25. Saha K. Automated quantification of rubidium-82 myocardial perfusion images using wavelet based approach [PhD dissertation]. University of Missouri-Columbia, 2007; Columbia, MO.
26. Slomka PJ, Alexanderson E, Jácome R, et al. Comparison of clinical tools for measurements of regional stress and rest myocardial blood flow assessed with 13N-Ammonia PET/CT. J Nucl Med 2012;53:171-81.
27. Coxson PG, Huesman RH, Borland L. Consequences of using a simplified kinetic model for dynamic PET data. J Nucl Med 1997;38:660-7.
28. Cerqueira MD, Weissman NJ, Dilsizian V, et al. Standardized myocardial segmentation and nomenclature for tomographic imaging of the heart. A statement for healthcare professionals from the Cardiac Imaging Committee of the Council on Clinical Cardiology of the American Heart Association. Circulation 2002;105:539-42.
29. Bland JM, Altman DG. Statistical methods for assessing agreement between two methods of clinical measurement. Lancet 1986;1:307-10.
30. Davis CS. Statistical methods for the analysis of repeated measurements. New York, NY: Springer, 2002.
31. Rosner B. Fundamentals of biostatistics. 7th edition. Boston, MA: Brooks/Cole, Cengage Learning, 2011.
32. Khorsand A, Graf S, Pirich C, et al. Assessment of myocardial perfusion by dynamic N-13 ammonia PET imaging: comparison of 2 tracer kinetic models. J Nucl Cardiol 2005;12:410-7.
33. Lee BC, Moody JB, Sitek A. Effects of filtering on Rb-82 myocardial blood flow estimates. J Nucl Med 2013;54 Suppl:1659.
34. Renaud JM, Mylonas I, McArdle B, et al. Clinical interpretation standards and quality assurance for the multicenter PET/CT trial rubidium-ARMI. J Nucl Med 2014;55:58-64.
35. Efseaff M, Klein R, Ziadi MC, Beanlands RS, Dekemp RA. Short-term repeatability of resting myocardial blood flow measurements using rubidium-82 PET imaging. J Nucl Cardiol 2012;19: 997-1006.