Multisoftware reproducibility study of stress and rest myocardial blood flow assessed with 3D dynamic PET/CT and a 1-tissue-compartment model of 82Rb kinetics

Journal of Nuclear Medicine

Volumn 54, Issue 4, 2013, Pages 571-577

  DeKemp, Robert A ^a   Declerck, Jerome ^b   Klein, Ran ^a   Pan, Xiao Bo ^b   Nakazato, Ryo ^c   Tonge, Christine ^d   Arumugam, Parthiban ^d   Berman, Daniel S ^c   Germano, Guido ^c   Beanlands, Rob S ^a   Slomka, Piotr J ^c  

^a UNIVERSITY OF OTTAWA   (Canada)

^b Caernarfon   (United Kingdom)

^c CEDARS SINAI MEDICAL CENTER   (United States)

^d MANCHESTER UNIVERSITY NHS FOUNDATION TRUST   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

Coronary flow reserve; Myocardial blood flow quantification; Myocardial perfusion imaging; Myocardial perfusion reserve; Rubidium positron emission tomography

Indexed keywords

RUBIDIUM 82;

AGED; ARTICLE; AUTOMATION; CARDIOVASCULAR PARAMETERS; COMPARTMENT MODEL; COMPUTED TOMOGRAPHY SCANNER; COMPUTER ASSISTED EMISSION TOMOGRAPHY; COMPUTER PROGRAM; CONTROLLED STUDY; CORONARY ARTERY CIRCUMFLEX BRANCH; FEMALE; HEART LEFT VENTRICLE; HUMAN; INTERMETHOD COMPARISON; ISCHEMIC HEART DISEASE; KINETICS; LEFT ANTERIOR DESCENDING CORONARY ARTERY; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; MYOCARDIAL FLOW RESERVE; PRIORITY JOURNAL; QUANTITATIVE ANALYSIS; REPRODUCIBILITY; REST; RIGHT CORONARY ARTERY; STRESS; THREE DIMENSIONAL IMAGING;

AGED; FEMALE; HEMODYNAMICS; HUMANS; IMAGING, THREE-DIMENSIONAL; KINETICS; MALE; MODELS, BIOLOGICAL; POSITRON-EMISSION TOMOGRAPHY AND COMPUTED TOMOGRAPHY; REPRODUCIBILITY OF RESULTS; REST; RUBIDIUM RADIOISOTOPES; SOFTWARE; STRESS, PHYSIOLOGICAL;

EID: 84875761035     PISSN: 01615505     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.2967/jnumed.112.112219     Document Type: Article

References (24)

1. Bengel FM, Higuchi T, Javadi MS, Lautamäki R. Cardiac positron emission tomography. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2009;54:1-15.
2. Ziadi MC, Beanlands RS. The clinical utility of assessing myocardial blood flow using positron emission tomography. J Nucl Cardiol. 2010;17:571-581.
3. 99m sestamibi SPECT. J Nucl Cardiol. 2006;13:24-33.
4. Klein R, Beanlands RSB, deKemp RA. Quantification of myocardial blood flow and flow reserve: technical aspects. J Nucl Cardiol. 2010;17:555-570.
5. Slomka PJ, Alexanderson E, Jácome R, et al. Comparison of clinical tools for measurements of regional stress and rest myocardial blood flow assessed with 13N-ammonia PET/CT. J Nucl Med. 2012;53:171-181.
6. Sunderland J, Pan XB, Ponto L, Riggert J, Casey M, Declerk J. Interobserver variability of myocardial blood flow and coronary flow reserve with Rb-82 from 3D PET scanners [abstract]. J Nucl Cardiol. 2010;17:738.
7. Klein R, Renaud JM, Ziadi MC, et al. Intra- and inter-operator repeatability of myocardial blood flow and myocardial flow reserve measurements using rubidium- 82 PET and a highly automated analysis program. J Nucl Cardiol. 2010; 17:600-616.
8. El Fakhri G, Kardan A, Sitek A, et al. Reproducibility and accuracy of quantitative myocardial blood flow assessment with 82Rb PET: comparison with 13Nammonia PET. J Nucl Med. 2009;50:1062-1071.
9. Kajander S, Joutsiniemi E, Saraste M, et al. Cardiac positron emission tomography/computed tomography imaging accurately detects anatomically and functionally significant coronary artery disease. Circulation. 2010;122:603-613.
10. Lortie M, Beanlands RS, Yoshinaga K, Klein R, Dasilva JN, deKemp RA. Quantification of myocardial blood flow with 82Rb dynamic PET imaging. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging. 2007;34:1765-1774.
11. Khorsand A, Graf S, Pirich C, et al. Assessment of myocardial perfusion by dynamic N-13 ammonia PET imaging: comparison of 2 tracer kinetic models. J Nucl Cardiol. 2005;12:410-417.
12. Choi Y, Huang SC, Hawkins RA, et al. Quantification of myocardial blood flow using 13N-ammonia and PET: comparison of tracer models. J Nucl Med. 1999;40:1045-1055.
13. Cerqueira MD, Weissman NJ, Dilsizian V, et al. Standardized myocardial segmentation and nomenclature for tomographic imaging of the heart: a statement for healthcare professionals from the Cardiac Imaging Committee of the Council on Clinical Cardiology of the American Heart Association. Circulation. 2002; 105:539-542.
14. Klein R, Adler A, Beanlands RS, deKemp RA. Precision-controlled elution of a 82Sr/82Rb generator for cardiac perfusion imaging with positron emission tomography. Phys Med Biol. 2007;52:659-673.
15. Pan XB, Declerck J. White Paper: Validation syngo.PET Myocardial Blood Flow. Hoffman Estates, IL: Siemens Medical Solutions; 2011:1-17.
16. Pan XB, Schindler TH, Ratib O, Nekolla S, Declerck J. Effect of reorientation on myocardial blood flow estimation from dynamic 13NH3PET imaging. IEEE Nucl Sci Symp Med Imaging Conf Rec. 2009;1:3715-3717.
17. Bond S, Pan XB, Declerck J. A study of consistency of myocardial blood flow calculation using motion correction in dynamic PET [abstract]. J Nucl Med. 2010;51(suppl 2):253P.
18. Nakazato R, Berman DS, Dey D, et al. Automated quantitative Rb-82 3D PET/CT myocardial perfusion imaging: normal limits and correlation with invasive coronary angiography. J Nucl Cardiol. 2012;19:265-276.
19. Germano G, Kavanagh PB, Chen J, et al. Operator-less processing of myocardial perfusion SPECT studies. J Nucl Med. 1995;36:2127-2132.
20. Coxson PG, Huesman RH, Borland L. Consequences of using a simplified kinetic model for dynamic PET data. J Nucl Med. 1997;38:660-667.
21. Renkin EM. Transport of potassium-42 from blood to tissue isolated mammalian skeletal muscles. Am J Physiol. 1959;197:1205-1210.
22. Crone C. Permeability of capillaries in various organs as determined by use of the indicator diffusion method. Acta Physiol Scand. 1963;58:292-305.
23. Ziadi MC, deKemp RA, Williams KA, et al. Impaired myocardial flow reserve on rubidium-82 positron emission tomography imaging predicts adverse outcomes in patients assessed for myocardial ischemia. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2011; 58:740-748.
24. deKemp RA, Klein R, Renaud J, et al. 3D listmode cardiac PET for simultaneous quantification of myocardial blood flow and ventricular function. IEEE Nucl Sci Symp Med Imaging Conf Rec. 2008:5215-5218.