Quantification of regional myocardial blood flow estimation with three-dimensional dynamic rubidium-82 PET and modified spillover correction model

Journal of Nuclear Cardiology

Volumn 19, Issue 4, 2012, Pages 763-774

  Katoh, Chietsugu ^a   Yoshinaga, Keiichiro ^a   Klein, Ran ^a,b   Kasai, Katsuhiko ^a   Tomiyama, Yuuki ^a   Manabe, Osamu ^a   Naya, Masanao ^a   Sakakibara, Mamoru ^a   Tsutsui, Hiroyuki ^a   DeKemp, Robert A ^b   Tamaki, Nagara ^a  

^a HOKKAIDO UNIVERSITY GRADUATE SCHOOL OF MEDICINE   (Japan)

^b UNIVERSITY OF OTTAWA HEART INSTITUTE   (Canada)

Author keywords

82Rb; Myocardial blood flow; Positron emission tomography; Spillover correction

Indexed keywords

ADENOSINE TRIPHOSPHATE; RUBIDIUM 82; WATER O 15;

ACCURACY; ADULT; ALGORITHM; ARTICLE; CARDIOVASCULAR PARAMETERS; COMPARTMENT MODEL; CORONARY FLOW RESERVE; HEART LEFT VENTRICLE WALL; HEART MUSCLE BLOOD FLOW; HUMAN; HUMAN EXPERIMENT; INTERMETHOD COMPARISON; MALE; NORMAL HUMAN; PHARMACOLOGIC STRESS TESTING; POSITRON EMISSION TOMOGRAPHY; PRIORITY JOURNAL; QUANTITATIVE ANALYSIS; REST; SPILLOVER CORRECTION; THREE DIMENSIONAL IMAGING;

ADULT; ALGORITHMS; COMPUTER SIMULATION; CORONARY CIRCULATION; ELECTROCARDIOGRAPHY; FEMALE; HUMANS; IMAGING, THREE-DIMENSIONAL; LEAST-SQUARES ANALYSIS; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; MYOCARDIUM; OBSERVER VARIATION; OXYGEN RADIOISOTOPES; POSITRON-EMISSION TOMOGRAPHY; REGIONAL BLOOD FLOW; REPRODUCIBILITY OF RESULTS; RUBIDIUM RADIOISOTOPES;

EID: 84865063117     PISSN: 10713581     EISSN: 15326551     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s12350-012-9558-1     Document Type: Article

References (36)

1. Manabe O, Yoshinaga K, Katoh C, Naya M, DeKemp RA, Tamaki N. Repeatability of rest and hyperemic myocardial blood flow measurements with 82Rb dynamic PET. J NuclMed 2009;50:68-71.
2. LortieM,BeanlandsRS,YoshinagaK,KleinR,DasilvaJN,DeKemp RA. Quantification of myocardial blood flow with 82Rb dynamic PET imaging. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging 2007;34:1765-74.
3. Yoshinaga K, Manabe O, Katoh C, Chen L, Klein R, Naya M, et al. Quantitative analysis of coronary endothelial function with generator-produced 82Rb PET: Comparison with 15O-labelled water PET. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging 2010;37:2233-41.
4. Lin JW, Sciacca RR, Chou RL, Laine AF, Bergmann SR. Quantification of myocardial perfusion in human subjects using 82Rb and wavelet-based noise reduction. J Nucl Med 2001;42:201-8.
5. El Fakhri G, Kardan A, Sitek A, Dorbala S, Abi-Hatem N, Lahoud Y, et al. Reproducibility and accuracy of quantitative myocardial blood flow assessment with (82)Rb PET: Comparison with (13)Nammonia PET. J Nucl Med 2009;50:1062-71.
6. Yoshinaga K, Klein R, Tamaki N. Generator-produced rubidium- 82 positron emission tomography myocardial perfusion imaging: From basic aspects to clinical applications. J Cardiol 2010;55:163-73.
7. Yoshinaga K, Chow BJ, deKemp RA, Thorn S, Ruddy TD, Davies RA, et al. Application of cardiac molecular imaging using positron emission tomography in evaluation of drug and therapeutics for cardiovascular disorders. Curr Pharm 2005;11:903-32.
8. Klein R, Beanlands RS, deKemp RA. Quantification of myocardial blood flow and flow reserve - technical aspects. J Nucl Cardiol 2010;17:555-70.
9. Slomka PJ, Le Meunier L, Hayes SW, Acampa W, Oba M, Haemer GG, et al. Comparison of myocardial perfusion 82Rb PET performed with CT- and transmission CT-based attenuation correction. J Nucl Med 2008;49:1992-8.
10. Bateman TM, Heller GV, McGhie AI, Friedman JD, Case JA, Bryngelson JR, et al. Diagnostic accuracy of rest/stress ECG-gated Rb-82 myocardial perfusion PET: Comparison with ECG-gated Tc-99m sestamibi SPECT. J Nucl Cardiol 2006;13:24-33.
11. Beanlands RS, Chow BJ, Dick A, Friedrich MG, Gulenchyn KY, Kiess M, et al. CCS/CAR/CANM/CNCS/CanSCMR joint position statement on advanced noninvasive cardiac imaging using positron emission tomography, magnetic resonance imaging and multidetector computed tomographic angiography in the diagnosis and evaluation of ischemic heart disease - executive summary. Can J Cardiol 2007;23:107-19.
12. Sampson UK, Dorbala S, Limaye A, Kwong R, Di Carli MF. Diagnostic accuracy of rubidium-82 myocardial perfusion imaging with hybrid positron emission tomography/computed tomography in the detection of coronary artery disease. J Am Coll Cardiol 2007;49:1052-8.
13. Lertsburapa K, Ahlberg AW, Bateman TM, Katten D, Volker L, Cullom SJ, et al. Independent and incremental prognostic value of left ventricular ejection fraction determined by stress gated rubidium 82 PET imaging in patients with known or suspected coronary artery disease. J Nucl Cardiol 2008;15:745-53.
14. Yoshinaga K, Chow BJ, Williams K, Chen L, deKemp RA, Garrard L, et al. What is the prognostic value of myocardial perfusion imaging using rubidium-82 positron emission tomography? J Am Coll Cardiol 2006;48:1029-39.
15. Bengel FM, Higuchi T, Javadi MS, Lautamaki R. Cardiac positron emission tomography. J Am Coll Cardiol 2009;54:1-15.
16. Yoshinaga K, Tamaki N, Ruddy T, DeKemp RA, Beanlands R. Evaluation of myocardial perfusion. Principles and practice of PET and PET/CT. 2nd ed., 2009Philadelphia, PA: Lippincott Williams and Wilkins; 2009. p. 541-64.
17. Yoshinaga K, Katoh C, Noriyasu K, Iwado Y, Furuyama H, Ito Y, et al. Reduction of coronary flow reserve in areas with and without ischemia on stress perfusion imaging in patients with coronary artery disease: A study using oxygen 15-labeled water PET. J Nucl Cardiol 2003;10:275-83.
18. Parkash R, deKemp RA, Ruddy TD, Kitsikis A, Hart R, Beauchesne L, et al. Potential utility of rubidium 82 PET quantification in patients with 3-vessel coronary artery disease. J Nucl Cardiol 2004;11:440-9.
19. Camici PG, Crea F. Coronary microvascular dysfunction. N Engl J Med 2007;356:830-40.
20. Klein R, Renaud JM, Ziadi MC, Thorn SL, Adler A, Beanlands RS, et al. Intra- and inter-operator repeatability of myocardial blood flow and myocardial flow reserve measurements using Rubidium-82 PET and a highly automated analysis program. J Nucl Cardiol 2010;17:600-16.
21. Lautamäki R, George RT, Kitagawa K, Higuchi T, Merrill J, Voicu C, et al. Rubidium-82 PET-CT for quantitative assessment of myocardial blood flow: Validation in a canine model of coronary artery stenosis. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging 2009;36:576-86.
22. Schepis T, Gaemperli O, Treyer V, Valenta I, Burger C, Koepfli P, et al. Absolute quantification of myocardial blood flow with 13N-ammonia and 3-dimensional PET. J NuclMed 2007;48:1783-9.
23. Diamond GA, Forrester JS. Analysis of probability as an aid in the clinical diagnosis of coronary-artery disease. N Engl J Med 1979;300:1350-8.
24. Naya M, Tsukamoto T, Morita K, Katoh C, Furumoto T, Fujii S, et al. Olmesartan, but not amlodipine, improves endotheliumdependent coronary dilation in hypertensive patients. J Am Coll Cardiol 2007;50:1144-9.
25. Siegrist PT, Gaemperli O, Koepfli P, Schepis T, Namdar M, Valenta I, et al. Repeatability of cold pressor test-induced flow increase assessed with H(2)(15)O and PET. J Nucl Med 2006;47:1420-6.
26. Furuyama H, Odagawa Y, Katoh C, Iwado Y, Yoshinaga K, Ito Y, et al. Assessment of coronary function in children with a history of Kawasaki disease using (15)O-water positron emission tomography. Circulation 2002;105:2878-84.
27. Herrero P, Markham J, Shelton ME, Bergmann SR. Implementation and evaluation of a two-compartment model for quantification of myocardial perfusion with rubidium-82 and positron emission tomography. Circ Res 1992;70:496-507.
28. Katoh C, Morita K, Shiga T, Kubo N, Nakada K, Tamaki N. Improvement of algorithm for quantification of regional myocardial bloodflowusing 15O-water withPET. J NuclMed2004;45:1908-16.
29. Yoshinaga K, Katoh C, Manabe O, Klein R, Naya M, Sakakibara M, et al. Incremental diagnostic value of regional myocardial blood flow quantification over relative perfusion imaging with generator-produced rubidium-82 PET. Circ J 2011;75:2628-34.
30. deKemp RA, Yoshinaga K, Beanlands RS. Will 3-dimensional PET-CT enable the routine quantification of myocardial blood flow? J Nucl Cardiol 2007;14:380-97.
31. Nesterov SV, Han C, Mäki M, Kajander S, Naum AG, Helenius H, et al. Myocardial perfusion quantitation with 15O-labelled water PET: High reproducibility of the new cardiac analysis software (Carimas). Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging 2009;36:1594-602.
32. Schindler TH, Zhang XL, Prior JO, Cadenas J, Dahlbom M, Sayre J, et al. Assessment of intra- and interobserver reproducibility of rest and cold pressor test-stimulated myocardial blood flow with (13)N-ammonia and PET. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging 2007; 34:1178-88.
33. Esteves FP, Nye JA, Khan A, Folks RD, Halkar RK, Garcia EV, et al. Prompt-gamma compensation in Rb-82 myocardial perfusion 3D PET/CT. J Nucl Cardiol 2010;17:247-53.
34. Machac J, Bacharach SL, Bateman TM, Bax JJ, Beanlands R, Bengel F, et al. Positron emission tomography myocardial perfusion and glucose metabolism imaging. J Nucl Cardiol 2006;13: e121-51.
35. Alessio AM, Kinahan PE, Champley KM. Attenuation-emission alignment in cardiac PET/CT based on consistency conditions. Med Phys 2010;37:1191-200.
36. Hunt DC, Easton H, Caldwell CB. Design and construction of a quality control phantom for SPECT and PET imaging. Med Phys 2009;36:5404-11.