The simplified reference tissue model: Model assumption violations and their impact on binding potential

Journal of Cerebral Blood Flow and Metabolism

Volumn 35, Issue 2, 2015, Pages 304-311

  Salinas, Cristian A ^a,b   Searle, Graham E ^a   Gunn, Roger N ^a,c,d  

^a IMPERIAL COLLEGE LONDON   (United Kingdom)

^b MERCK RESEARCH LABORATORIES   (United States)

^c IMPERIAL COLLEGE LONDON   (United Kingdom)

^d UNIVERSITY OF OXFORD   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

binding potential; PET; PRTM; reference tissue models; SRTM

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; BLOOD VOLUME; COMPARTMENT MODEL; COMPUTER SIMULATION; KINETICS; MODEL; MONTE CARLO METHOD; POSITRON EMISSION TOMOGRAPHY; PRIORITY JOURNAL; SIMPLIFIED REFERENCE TISSUE MODEL; TARGET ORGAN; VOLUME OF DISTRIBUTION; ANIMAL; BIOLOGICAL MODEL; BRAIN; HUMAN; PROCEDURES; RADIOGRAPHY; VASCULARIZATION;

ANIMALS; BRAIN; COMPUTER SIMULATION; HUMANS; MODELS, CARDIOVASCULAR; POSITRON-EMISSION TOMOGRAPHY;

EID: 84922337313     PISSN: 0271678X     EISSN: 15597016     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1038/jcbfm.2014.202     Document Type: Article

References (26)

1. Banati RB, Goerres GW, Myers R, Gunn RN, Turkheimer FE, Kreutzberg GW et al. [11C](R)-PK11195 positron emission tomography imaging of activated microglia in vivo in Rasmussen's encephalitis. Neurology 1999; 53: 2199-2203.
2. Gunn RN, Lammertsma AA, Cunningham VJ. Parametric imaging of ligandreceptor interactions using a reference tissue model and cluster analysis. Quantitative Functional Brain Imaging with Positron Emission Tomography. Academic Press: San Diego, 1998, pp 401-406.
3. Innis RB, Cunningham VJ, Delforge J, Fujita M, Gjedde A, Gunn RN et al. Consensus nomenclature for in vivo imaging of reversibly binding radioligands. J Cereb Blood Flow Metab 2007; 27: 1533-1539.
4. Mintun MA, Raichle ME, Kilbourn MR, Wooten GF, Welch MJ. A quantitative model for the in vivo assessment of drug binding sites with positron emission tomography. Ann Neurol 1984; 15: 217-227.
5. Gunn RN, Gunn SR, Cunningham VJ. Positron emission tomography compartmental models. J Cereb Blood Flow Metab 2001; 21: 635-652.
6. Blomqvist G, Pauli S, Farde L, Eriksson L, Persson A, Halldin C. Maps of receptor binding parameters in the human brain - a kinetic analysis of PET measurements. Eur J Nucl Med 1990; 16: 257-265.
7. Cunningham VJ, Hume SP, Price GR, Ahier RG, Cremer JE, Jones AK. Compartmental analysis of diprenorphine binding to opiate receptors in the rat in vivo and its comparison with equilibrium data in vitro. J Cereb Blood Flow Metab 1991; 11: 1-9.
8. Lammertsma AA, Hume SP. Simplified reference tissue model for PET receptor studies. NeuroImage 1996; 4: 153-158.
9. Gunn RN, Lammertsma AA, Hume SP, Cunningham VJ. Parametric imaging of ligand-receptor binding in PET using a simplified reference region model. NeuroImage 1997; 6: 279-287.
10. Wu Y, Carson RE. Noise reduction in the simplified reference tissue model for neuroreceptor functional imaging. J Cereb Blood Flow Metab 2002; 22: 1440-1452.
11. Ichise M, Liow JS, Lu JQ, Takano A, Model K, Toyama H et al. Linearized reference tissue parametric imaging methods: application to [11C]DASB positron emission tomography studies of the serotonin transporter in human brain. J Cereb Blood Flow Metab 2003; 23: 1096-1112.
12. Zhou Y, Endres CJ, Brasic JR, Huang SC, Wong DF. Linear regression with spatial constraint to generate parametric images of ligand-receptor dynamic PET studies with a simplified reference tissue model. NeuroImage 2003; 18: 975-989.
13. Asselin MC, Montgomery AJ, Grasby PM, Hume SP. Quantification of PET studies with the very high-affinity dopamine D2/D3 receptor ligand [11C]FLB 457: re-evaluation of the validity of using a cerebellar reference region. J Cereb Blood Flow Metab 2007; 27: 378-392.
14. Christian BT, Narayanan T, Shi B, Morris ED, Mantil J, Mukherjee J. Measuring the in vivo binding parameters of [18F]-fallypride in monkeys using a PET multipleinjection protocol. J Cerebral Blood Flow Metab 2004; 24: 309-322.
15. Gunn RN, Murthy V, Catafau AM, Searle G, Bullich S, Slifstein M et al. Translational characterization of [11C]GSK931145, a PET ligand for the glycine transporter type 1. Synapse 2011; 65: 1319-1332.
16. Turkheimer FE, Selvaraj S, Hinz R, Murthy V, Bhagwagar Z, Grasby P et al. Quantification of ligand PET studies using a reference region with a displaceable fraction: application to occupancy studies with [(11)C]-DASB as an example. J Cereb Blood Flow Metab 2012; 32: 70-80.
17. Parsey RV, Slifstein M, Hwang DR, Abi-Dargham A, Simpson N, Mawlawi O et al. Validation and reproducibility of measurement of 5-HT1A receptor parameters with [carbonyl-11C]WAY-100635 in humans: comparison of arterial and reference tisssue input functions. J Cereb Blood Flow Metab 2000; 20: 1111-1133.
18. Slifstein M, Parsey RV, Laruelle M. Derivation of [(11)C]WAY-100635 binding parameters with reference tissue models: effect of violations of model assumptions. Nucl Med Biol 2000; 27: 487-492.
19. Knudsen G, Svarer C. Neuroreceptor imaging: considerations for design, data anlysis, and interpretation. Brain Imaging Using PET. Academic Press: Amsterdam, 2002, pp 23-25.
20. Rabiner EA, Slifstein M, Nobrega J, Plisson C, Huiban M, Raymond R et al. In vivo quantification of regional dopamine-D3 receptor binding potential of (+)-PHNO: studies in non-human primates and transgenic mice. Synapse 2009; 63: 782-793.
21. Gunn RN, Lammertsma AA, Grasby PM. Quantitative analysis of [carbonyl-(11)C] WAY-100635 PET studies. Nucl Med Biol 2000; 27: 477-482.
22. Gunn RN, Sargent PA, Bench CJ, Rabiner EA, Osman S, Pike VW et al. Tracer kinetic modeling of the 5-HT1A receptor ligand [carbonyl-11C]WAY-100635 for PET. NeuroImage 1998; 8: 426-440.
23. Carson RE, Channing MA, Blasberg RG, Dunn BB, Cohen RM, Rice KC et al. Comparison of bolus and infusion methods for receptor quantitation: application to [18F]cyclofoxy and positron emission tomography. J Cereb Blood Flow Metab 1993; 13: 24-42.
24. Logan J, Fowler JS, Volkow ND, Wang GJ, Ding YS, Alexoff DL. Distribution volume ratios without blood sampling from graphical analysis of PET data. J Cereb Blood Flow Metab 1996; 16: 834-840.
25. Slifstein M, Laruelle M. Effects of statistical noise on graphic analysis of PET neuroreceptor studies. J Nucl Medicine 2000; 41: 2083-2088.
26. Kimura Y, Naganawa M, Shidahara M, Ikoma Y, Watabe H. PET kinetic analysis - pitfalls and a solution for the Logan plot. Ann Nucl Med 2007; 21: 1-8.