South African financial reporting students' reading comprehension of the IASB Conceptual Framework

Journal of Accounting Education

Volumn 32, Issue 4, 2014, Pages 1-15

  Janse van Rensburg, Cecile ^a   Coetzee, Stephen A ^a   Schmulian, Astrid ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF PRETORIA   (South Africa)

Author keywords

Cloze procedure; Framework; IFRS; Readability; Reading comprehension

Indexed keywords

EID: 84922337220     PISSN: 07485751     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.jaccedu.2014.10.003     Document Type: Article

References (120)

1. Adelberg A.H. Narrative disclosures contained in financial reports: Means of communication or manipulation?. Accounting and Business Research 1979, 9(35):179-190.
2. Adelberg A.H. An empirical evaluation of the communication of authoritative pronouncements in accounting. Accounting & Finance 1982, 22(2):73-94.
3. Adelberg A.H., Razek J.H. The Cloze procedure: A methodology for determining the understandability of Accounting textbooks. The Accounting Review 1984, LIX(1):109-122.
4. Akyel A., Ercetin G. Hypermedia reading strategies employed by advanced learners of English. System 2009, 37(1):136-152.
5. Alderson J.C. The effect on the Cloze test of changes in deletion frequency. Journal of Research in Reading 1979, 2(2):108-119.
6. Annisette M. The colour of accountancy: Examining the salience of race in a professionalisation project. Accounting, Organizations and Society 2003, 28:639-674.
7. Bargate K. The readability of managerial accounting and financial management textbooks. Meditari Accountancy Research 2012, 20(1):4-20.
8. Barth M.E. Global financial reporting: Implications for U.S. academics. Accounting Review 2008, 83(5):1159-1179.
9. Beaven M., Calderisi M., Tantral P. Barriers to learning experienced by Asian students in American accounting classes. [Online] Accessed 20.06.14. http://www.fdu.edu/newspubs/barriers.html.
10. Bharuthram S. Making a case for the teaching of reading across the curriculum in higher education. South African Journal of Education 2012, 32(2):205-214.
11. Borasi R., Siegel M., Fonzi J., Smith C.F. Using transactional reading strategies to support sense-making and discussion in mathematics classrooms: An exploratory study. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education 1998, 29:275-305.
12. Bormuth J.R. Readability: A new approach. Reading Research Quarterly 1966, 1:79-132.
13. Bormuth J.R. Cloze test readability: Criterion reference scores. Journal of Educational Measurement 1968, 5(3):189-196.
14. Bormuth J.R. Factor validity of Cloze tests as measures of reading comprehension ability. Reading Research Quarterly 1969, IV(3):358-365.
15. Bray G.B., Barron S. Assessing reading comprehension: The effects of text-based interest, gender and ability. Educational Assessment 2003, 9(3):107-128.
16. Broom Y., Jewson D.D. The Stanford Diagnostic Reading Test: Assessing English reading comprehension and vocabulary in South Africa. Per Linguam: A Journal of Language Learning 2013, 29(2):1-16.
17. Brown R., Pressley M., Van Meter P., Schuder T. A quasi-experimental validation of transactional strategies instruction with low-achieving second-grade readers. Journal of Educational Psychology 1996, 88:18-37.
18. Carlisle J., Rice M. Assessment of reading comprehension. Handbook of language and literacy 2004, 521-555. Guilford, New York, NY. A. Stone, E. Silliman, B. Ehren, K. Apel (Eds.).
19. Chiang W.C., Englebrecht T.D., Phillips T.J., Wang Y. Readability of financial accounting principles textbooks. The Accounting Educators' Journal 2008, XVIII:47-80.
20. Chiu M.M., McBride-Chang C. Gender, context, and reading: A comparison of students in 43 countries. Scientific Studies of Reading 2006, 10(4):331-362.
21. Coetzee, S. A., & Schmulian, A. (2011). A mixed methods pedagogical approach to an introductory course to IFRS. Accounting Instructors Report, Winter.
22. Coetzee S.A., Schmulian A. A critical analysis of the pedagogical approach employed in an introductory course to IFRS. Issues in Accounting Education 2012, 27(1):83-100.
23. Coetzee S.A., Schmulian A. The effect of IFRS adoption on financial reporting pedagogy in South Africa. Issues in Accounting Education 2013, 28(2):243-251.
24. Coetzee S.A., Schmulian A., Kotzé L. Communication apprehension of South African accounting students: The effect of culture and language. Issues in Accounting Education 2014, In Press. 10.2308/iace-50850.
25. Cohen J.H. The effect of content area material on Cloze test performance. Journal of Reading 1975, December:247-250.
26. Cornachione, E. (2004). Quality of Accounting textbooks: Measuring students' comprehension with the Cloze procedure. Paper presented at the Biennial International Research Conference for Accounting Educators, Durban, 30 June-2 July 2004.
27. Courtis J.K. Readability of annual reports: Western versus Asian evidence. Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal 1995, 8(2):4-17.
28. Courtis J.K. Corporate report obfuscation: Artefact or phenomenon?. British Accounting Review 2004, 36(3):291-312.
29. de Swaan A. Words of the World: The Global Language System 2001, Wiley-Blackwell, Hoboken, NJ.
30. Davidson G. Cognitive assessment of indigenous Australians: Towards a multiaxial model. Australian Psychologist 1995, 30(1):30-34.
31. Davidson R.A. Analysis of the complexity of writing used in Accounting textbooks over the past 100 years. Accounting Education: An International Journal 2005, 14(1):53-74.
32. DeKeyser R.M. Learning second language grammar rules: An experiment with a miniature linguistic system. Studies in Second Language Acquisition 1995, 17:379-410.
33. DeKeyser R.M. Implicit and explicit learning. The handbook of second language acquisition 2003, 313-348. Blackwell, Oxford. C.J. Doughty, M.H. Long (Eds.).
34. Dewitz P., Dewitz P.K. They can read the words, but they can't understand: Refining comprehension assessment. Comprehension problems can be difficult to detect and treat. Here are some suggestions for catching these problems and addressing students' shortcomings [Electronic version]. Reading Teacher 2003, 56:422-435.
35. Dommes A., Chevalier A., Lia S. The role of cognitive flexibility and vocabulary abilities of younger and older users in searching for information on the web. Applied Cognitive Psychology 2011, 25:717-726.
36. Donald J., Jackling B. Approaches to learning accounting: A cross-cultural study. Asian Review of Accounting 2007, 15(2):100-121.
37. Draper R.J. School mathematics reform, constructivism and literacy: A case for literacy instruction in the reform oriented math classroom. Journal of Adolescent and Adult Literacy 2002, 45:520-529.
38. DuBay W.H. The principles of readability. Impact Information 2004, 1-76.
39. Duke N.K., Pearson P.D. Effective practices for developing reading comprehension. What research has to say about reading instruction 2002, Vol. 3:205-242. International Reading Association, Newark, DE.
40. Duke, N. K., Pearson, P. D., Strachan, S. L., & Billman, A. K. (2011). Essential elements of fostering and teaching reading comprehension. What research has to say about reading instruction, 4, 286-314.
41. Ellis R. The definition and measurement of L2 explicit knowledge. Language Learning 2004, 54:227-275.
42. Farr R., Carey R.F. Reading: What can be measured? 1986, International Reading Association, Newark, DE.
43. Field A. Discovering statistics using IBM SPSS 2013, Sage Publications, London.
44. Flood J., Lapp D. Reading comprehension instruction for at-risk students: Research-based practices that can make a difference. Journal of Reading 1990, 33:490-496.
45. Flory S.M., Phillips T.J., Tassin M.F. Measuring readability: A comparison of Accounting textbooks. Journal of Accounting Education 1992, 10:151-161.
46. Fuchs L.S., Fuchs D., Hamlet L. The validity of informal reading comprehension measures. Remedial and Special Education 1988, 9(2):20-28.
47. Gasparini S. Implicit versus explicit learning: Some implications for L2 teaching. European Journal of Psychology of Education 2004, 19:203-219.
48. Gellert A.S., Elbro A. Cloze tests may be quick, but are they dirty? Development and preliminary validation of a cloze test of reading comprehension. Journal of Psychoeducational Assessment 2013, 31(16).
49. Grabe W. Current developments in second language reading research. TESOL Quarterly 1991, 25:375-406.
50. Greene B.B. Testing reading comprehension of theoretical discourse with cloze. Journal of Research in Reading 2001, 24(1):82-98.
51. Hammond T., Clayton B.M., Arnold P.J. South Africa's transition from apartheid: The role of professional closure in the experiences of black chartered accountants. Accounting, Organizations and Society 2009, 34(6):705-721.
52. Hartley J., Trueman M. The effects of the typographical layout of Cloze-tests on reading comprehension scores. Journal of Research in Reading 1986, 9(2):116-124.
53. Helms J.E. Why is there no study of cultural equivalence in standardized cognitive ability testing?. American Psychologist 1992, 47(9):1083-1101.
54. Hill, R., Dickinson, A., Arnott, J., Gregor, P., & McIver, L. (2011). Older web users' eye movements: Experience counts. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI conference on human factors in computing systems, Vancouver, BC, Canada, May 7-12.
55. Hodgdon C., Hughes S., Street D.L. Framework-based teaching of IFRS judgements. Accounting Education: An International Journal 2011, 20(4):415-439.
56. Huang H., Chern C., Lin C. EFL learners' use of online reading strategies and comprehension of texts: An exploratory study. Computers & Education 2009, 52:13-26.
57. Hulstijn J.H. Theoretical and empirical issues in the study of implicit and explicit second-language learning: Introduction. Studies in Second Language Acquisition 2005, 27(02):129-140.
58. International Accounting Standards Board (IASB). (2003). IAS 8, Accounting Policies, Changes in Accounting Estimates and Errors. IASCF Publications Department, International Accounting Standards Board, London. Accessed 24.04.13.
59. International Accounting Standards Board (IASB) The conceptual framework for financial reporting 2010, IFRS Foundation, London, UK.
60. International Accounting Standards Board (IASB) IASB publishes a discussion paper on the conceptual framework Accessed 15.10.2014. http://www.ifrs.org/Alerts/ProjectUpdate/Pages/IASB-publishes-a-Discussion-Paper-on-the-Conceptual-Framework.aspx.
61. International Accounting Standards Board (IASB) About the IFRS Foundation and the IASB Accessed 24.04.13. http://www.ifrs.org/The-organisation/Pages/IFRS-Foundation-and-the-IASB.aspx.
62. Jenkins J.R., Jewell M. Examining the validity of two measures for formative teaching: Reading aloud and maze. Exceptional Children 1993, 59(5):421-432.
63. Jones M.J. Critical appraisal of the Cloze procedure's use in the accounting domain. Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal 1997, 10:105-128.
64. Jones M., Smith M. Traditional and alternative methods of measuring the understandability of accounting narratives. Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal 2014, 27(1):183-208.
65. Keenan J.M., Betjemann R.S., Olson R.K. Reading comprehension tests vary in the skills they assess: Differential dependence on decoding and oral comprehension. Scientific Studies of Reading 2008, 12:281-300.
66. Kim J.Y., Anderson T. Reading across the curriculum: A framework for improving the reading abilities and habits of college students. Journal of College Literacy and Learning 2011, 37:29-40.
67. Kintsch W. Comprehension - a paradigm for cognition 1998, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK.
68. Klapwijk N.M. Cloze tests and word reading tests: Enabling teachers to measure learners' reading-related abilities. Per Linguam: A Journal of Language Learning 2013, 29(1):49-62.
69. Koda K. Insights into second language reading: A cross-linguistic approach 2005, Cambridge University Press, New York, NY.
70. Koda K. The role of reading in fostering transcultural competence. Reading in a Foreign Language 2010, 22(1):5-10.
71. Lehavy R., Li F., Merkley K. The effect of annual report readability on analyst following and the properties of their earnings forecasts. The Accounting Review 2011, 86(3):1087-1115.
72. Lei S.A., Rhinehart P.J., Howard H.A., Cho J.K. Strategies for improving reading comprehension among college students. Reading Improvement 2010, 47(1):30-42.
73. Li F. Annual report readability, current earnings, and earnings persistence. Journal of Accounting and Economics 2008, 45(2-3):221-247.
74. Litz D.R.A., Smith A.K. Semantically acceptable scoring procedures (SEMAC) versus exact replacement scoring methods (ERS) for Cloze tests: A case study. Asian EFL Journal 2006, 8(1):1-19.
75. Lynch J. Parents' self-efficacy beliefs, parents' gender, children's reader self-perceptions, reading achievement and gender. Journal of Research in Reading 2002, 25(1):54-67.
76. Maarof N., Yaacob R. Meaning-making in the first and second language: Reading strategies of Malaysian students. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences 2011, 12:211-223.
77. Mayer R.E. Multimedia learning: Are we asking the right questions?. Educational Psychologist 1997, 32:1-19.
78. McKenna M.C., Layton K. Concurrent validity of cloze as a measure of intersentential comprehension. Journal of Educational Psychology 1990, 82(2):372-377.
79. McNamara D.S. SERT: Self-explanation reading training. Discourse Processes 2004, 38(1):1-30.
80. Melby-Lervåg M., Lervåg A. Reading comprehension and its underlying components in second-language learners: A meta-analysis of studies comparing first-and second-language learners. Psychological Bulletin 2013, 140(2):409-433.
81. Nation K., Snowling M. Assessing reading difficulties: The validity and utility of current measures of reading skill. British Journal of Educational Psychology 1997, 67:359-370.
82. National Institute for Literacy Developing early literacy: A scientific analysis of early literacy development and implications for intervention http://lincs.ed.gov/publications/pdf/NELPReport09.pdf.
83. Nunan D. Second language teaching and learning 1999, Heinle & Heinle, Boston.
84. OECD Knowledge and skills for life. First results from the OECD Programme for International Student assessment (PISA) 2000 http://www.oecd.org/edu/preschoolandschool/programmeforinternationalstudentassessmentpisa/33691596.pdf.
85. Pacter P. Global accounting standards-from vision to reality. The CPA Journal 2014, January:6-10.
86. Palincsar A.S., Brown A.L. Reciprocal teaching of comprehension-fostering and comprehension-monitoring activities. Cognition and Instruction 1984, 1:117-175.
87. Park H., Kim D. Reading-strategy use by English as a second language learners in online reading tasks. Computers & Education 2011, 57:2156-2166.
88. Patel C., Day R. The influence of cognitive style on the understandability of a professional accounting pronouncement by accounting students. The British Accounting Review 1996, 28(2):139-154.
89. Pearson P.D., Hamm D. The assessment of reading comprehension: A review of practices - past, present, and future. Children's reading comprehension and assessment 2005, 13-69. Erlbaum, Mahwah, NJ. S.G. Paris, S.A. Stahl (Eds.).
90. Poplin M., Omar M.H. Do reading passages about war provide factorially invariant scores for men and women?. Applied Measurement in Education 2001, 14(2):171-189.
91. Pressley M., Afflerbach P. Verbal protocols of reading: The nature of constructively responsive reading 1995, Lawrence Erlbaum, Hillsdale, NJ.
92. QS World University Rankings (2013). <> Accessed 15.10.2014. http://www.topuniversities.com/university-rankings/world-university-rankings/2013#sorting=rank+region=+country=+faculty=+stars=false+search=pretoria.
93. Quintana-Murci L., Harmant C., Quach H., Balanovsky O., Zaporozhchenko V., Bormans C., et al. Strong maternal Khoisan contribution to the South African coloured population: A case of gender-biased admixture. The American Journal of Human Genetics 2010, 86(4):611-620.
94. Raabe A., Stevens K.C., Stevens W.P. Tax textbooks readability: An application of the Cloze method. Journal of the American Taxation Association 1984, 6(1):66-73.
95. Rankin E.F., Culhane J.W. Comparable Cloze and multiple-choice comprehension test scores. Journal of Reading 1969, December:193-198.
96. Razek J.R., Hosch G.R., Pearl D. Readability of Accounting textbooks. Journal of Business Education 1982, October:23-26.
97. Rosenblatt L.M. The transactional theory of reading and writing. Theoretical models and processes of reading 1994, 1057-1092. International Reading Association, Newark, NJ. 4th ed. R.B. Ruddell, M.R. Ruddell, H. Singer (Eds.).
98. Sartorius K., Sartorius B. The comparative performance of chartered accountancy students in South Africa: The impact of historical legacies. Development Southern Africa 2013, 30(3):401-416.
99. Schuder T. The genesis of transactional strategies instruction in a reading program for at-risk students. The Elementary School Journal 1993, 94:183-200.
100. Scottish Education Curriculum for excellence: Literacy across learning principles and practice http://www.educationscotland.gov.uk/Images/literacy_across_learning_principles_practice:tcm4-540108.pdf.
101. Shaffer R.J., Stevens K.T., Stevens W.P. Assessing the readability of government accounting standards: The cloze procedure. Journal of Technical Writing and Communication 1993, 23(3):259-267.
102. Shepherd M.D., Selden A., Selden J. University students' reading of their first-year mathematics textbooks. Mathematical Thinking and Learning 2012, 14(3):226-256.
103. Shuttleworth-Jordan A.B. On not reinventing the wheel: A clinical perspective on culturally relevant test usage in South Africa. South African Journal of Psychology 1996, 26(2):96-102.
104. Siegel M., Borasi R., Fonzi J.M., Sanridge L.G., Smith C. Using reading to construct mathematical meaning. Communication in mathematics, K-12 and beyond 1996, 66-75. National Council of Teachers of Mathematics, Reston, VA. P. Elliott (Ed.).
105. Smith M., Taffler R. Readability and understandability: Different measures of the textual complexity of accounting narrative. Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal 1992, 5(4).
106. Stanat P., Becker M., Baumert J., Lüdtke O., Eckhardt A.G. Improving second language skills of immigrant students: A field trial study evaluating the effects of a summer learning program. Learning and Instruction 2012, 22(3):159-170.
107. Stead B.A. Content analysis and readability formulas as applied to the accounting principles board "opinions". Journal of Business Communication 1977, 14(3):23-34.
108. Stevens K.C., Stevens K.T., Stevens W.P. A response to 'measuring readability: A comparison of accounting textbooks'. Journal of Accounting Education 1993, 11:287-292.
109. Stevens W.P., Stevens K.C., Raabe W. Communication in accounting: Readability of FASB statements. Review of Business and Economic Research 1983, 19:110.
110. Sullivan M.C., Benke R.L. Comparing introductory Financial Accounting textbooks. Journal of Accounting Education 1997, 15(1):181-220.
111. Tabatabaei O., Mirzaei E. Correlational validation of Cloze test and C-Test against IELT. Journal of Educational and Social Research 2014, 4(1):345-356.
112. Taylor W.L. Cloze procedure: A new tool for measuring readability. Journalism Quarterly 1953, 30:413-433.
113. Taylor W.L. Recent developments in the use of the Cloze procedure. Journalism Quarterly 1956, 33:42-48. 99.
114. Taylor W.L. Cloze' readability scores as indices of individual differences in comprehension and aptitude. Journal of Applied Psychology 1957, 41(1):19-26.
115. Traugh H.M., Powers O.S., Adedokun A.J. Readability of Accounting principles texts. Journal of Education for Business 1987, 63(1):159-162.
116. Wells M.J.C. Framework-based approach to teaching principles-based Accounting standards. Accounting Education: An International Journal 2011, 20(4):303-316.
117. White H. Nursing instruction must also teach reading and study skills. Reading improvement 2004, 41:38-50.
118. Williams R.S., Ari O., Santamaria C.N. Measuring college students' reading comprehension ability using Cloze tests. Journal of Research in Reading 2011, 34(2):215-231.
119. Yang S.C. Language learning on the World Wide Web: An investigation of EFL learners' attitude and perceptions. Journal of Educational Computing Research 2001, 24(2):155-181.
120. Zoghi M., Mustapha R., Rizan N., Maasum M. Looking into EFL reading comprehension. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences 2010, 7:439-445.