Measuring college students' reading comprehension ability using cloze tests

Journal of Research in Reading

Volumn 34, Issue 2, 2011, Pages 215-231

  Williams, Rihana Shiri ^a   Ari, Omer ^a   Santamaria, Carmen Nicole ^a  

^a GEORGIA STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 79954571672     PISSN: 01410423     EISSN: 14679817     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1467-9817.2009.01422.x     Document Type: Article

References (54)

1. Abraham, R.G. & Chapelle, C.A. (1992). The meaning of cloze test scores: An item difficulty perspective. Modern Language Journal, 76 (4), 468-479.
2. Alderson, J.C. (1980). Native and nonnative speaker performance on cloze tests. Language Learning, 30, 59-76.
3. Atkinson, R.C. (2001). Achievement versus aptitude in college admissions. Issues in Science and Technology, 18 (2), 31-36.
4. Bell, L.C. & Perfetti, C.A. (1994). Reading skill: Some adult comparisons. Journal of Educational Psychology, 86 (2), 244-255.
5. Board of Regents (2006). Regents' testing program passing rates for examinees repeating the test Fall semester, 2006. Retrieved 9 January 2008, from
6. Brown, J.I., Fishco, V.V. & Hanna, G. (1993). The Nelson-Denny Reading Test. Chicago, IL: Riverside.
7. Brown-Chidsey, R., Davis, L. & Maya, C. (2003). Sources of variance in curriculum-based measures of silent reading. Psychology in the Schools, 40, 363-377.
8. Coleman, C., Lindstrom, J.H., Nelson, J., Lindstrom, W. & Gregg, N. (2008). Passageless comprehension of the Nelson-Denny Reading Test: Well above chance for university students. Paper presented at the 15th Annual Meeting of Society for the Scientific Study of Reading, Asheville, NC.
9. Davis, R., Ari, O. & Williams Smith, R. (2007). Using an open-ended cloze test to assess reading comprehension in adults. Paper presented at the Psychology Undergraduate Research Conference, Georgia State University, Atlanta.
10. Dixon, P., LeFevre, J. & Twilley, L.C. (1988). Word knowledge and working memory as predictors of reading skill. Journal of Educational Psychology, 80 (4), 465-472.
11. Dombrowski, S.C., Kamphaus, R.W. & Reynolds, C.R. (2004). After the demise of the discrepancy: Proposed learning disabilities diagnostic criteria. Professional Psychology: Research and Practice, 35 (4), 364-372.
12. Espin, C.A. & Deno, S.L. (19941995). Curriculum-based measures for secondary students: Utility and task specificity of text-based reading and vocabulary measures for predicting performance on content-area tasks. Diagnostique, 20, 121-142.
13. Everatt, J. (1997). The abilities and disabilities associated with adult developmental dyslexia. Journal of Research in Reading, 20, 13-21.
14. Francis, D.J., Fletcher, J.M., Catts, H.W. & Tomblin, J.B. (2005). Dimensions affecting the assessment of reading comprehension. In S.G. Paris & S.A. Stahl (Eds.), Children's reading comprehension and assessment. (pp. 369-394). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
15. Frey, M.C. & Detterman, D.K. (2004). Scholastic assessment or g? The relationship between the Scholastic Assessment Test and general cognitive ability. Psychological Science: A Journal Of The American Psychological Society/APS, 15 (6), 373-378.
16. Fuchs, L.S. & Fuchs, D. (1990). Relations among the Reading Comprehension subtest of the Stanford Achievement Test and maze, recall, question-answering, and fluency measures. Unpublished manuscript.
17. Fuchs, L.S. & Fuchs, D. (1992). Identifying a measure for monitoring student reading progress. School Psychology Review, 21 (1), 45-58.
18. Fuchs, L.S., Fuchs, D., Hamlett, C.L. & Ferguson, C. (1992). Effects of expert system consultation within curriculum-based measurement, using a reading maze task. Exceptional Children, 58 (5), 436-450.
19. Fuchs, L.S., Fuchs, D. & Maxwell, L. (1988). The validity of informal reading comprehension measures. RASE: Remedial and Special Education, 9 (2), 20-28.
20. Geiser, S. & Studley, R. (2002). UC and the SAT: Predictive validity and differential impact of the SAT I and SAT II at the University of California. Educational Assessment, 8 (1), 1-26.
21. Gottardo, A., Siegel, L.S. & Stanovich, K.E. (1997). The assessment of adults with reading disabilities: What can we learn from experimental tasks? Journal of Research in Reading, 20 (1), 42-54.
22. Greene, B.B. (2001). Testing reading comprehension of theoretical discourse with cloze. Journal of Research in Reading, 24 (1), 82-98.
23. Hannon, B. & Daneman, M. (2001). A new tool for measuring and understanding individual differences in the component process of reading comprehension. Journal of Educational Psychology, 93 (1), 103-128.
24. Haught, P.A. & Walls, R.T. (2002). Adult learners: New norms on the Nelson-Denny reading test for health care professionals. Reading Psychology, 23, 217-238.
25. International Association for the Evaluation of Educational Achievement (2001). Progress in international reading literacy study. Amsterdam: IAEEA.
26. Jackson, J.R. & Brookes, C.M. (1985). Relationships among the MCAT reading subtest, Nelson-Denny Reading Test, and medical school achievement. Journal of Medical Education, 60, 478-480.
27. Jastak, S. & Wilkinson, G.S. (1984). Wide range achievement test-revised. Wilmington, DE: Jastak Associates.
28. Jenkins, J.R. & Jewell, M. (1993). Examining the validity of two measures for formative teaching: Reading aloud and maze. Exceptional Children, 59 (5), 421-432.
29. Keenan, J.M. & Betjemann, R.S. (2006). Comprehending the Gray Oral Reading Test without reading it: Why comprehension tests should not include passage-independent items. Scientific Studies of Reading, 10 (4), 363-380.
30. Keenan, J.M., Betjemann, R.S. & Olson, R.K. (2008). Reading comprehension tests vary in the skills they assess: Differential dependence on decoding and oral comprehension. Scientific Studies of Reading, 12 (3), 281-300.
31. Kobayashi, M. (2002). Cloze tests revisited: Exploring item characteristics with special attention to scoring methods. Modern Language Journal, 86 (4), 571-586.
32. Labov, W. (2003). When ordinary children fail to read. Reading Research Quarterly, 38 (1), 128-131.
33. Lesaux, N.K., Pearson, M.R. & Siegel, L.S. (2006). The effects of timed and untimed testing conditions on the reading comprehension performance of adults with reading disabilities. Reading and Writing, 19 (1), 21-48.
34. Liau, T., Bassin, E., Martin, C. & Coleman, E. (1976). Modification of the Coleman readability formulas. Journal of Reading Behavior, 8, 381-386.
35. Masterson, J. & Hayes, M. (2004). UK data from 197 undergraduates for the Nelson Denny Reading Test. Journal of Research in Reading, 27 (1), 30-35.
36. McKenna, M.C. & Layton, K. (1990). Concurrent validity of cloze as a measure of intersentential comprehension. Journal of Educational Psychology, 82 (2), 372-377.
37. Mcleod, J. & Anderson, J. (1973). GAPADOL reading comprehension. Oxford: Heinemann.
38. Nation, K. & Snowling, M. (1997). Assessing reading difficulties: The validity and utility of current measures of reading skill. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 67, 359-370.
39. National Center for Educational Statistics (2001). The national assessment of educational progress. Washington, DC: Institute of Education Sciences, US Department of Education.
40. National Center for Education Statistics (2003). Literacy in everyday life: Results from the 2003 National Assessment of Adult Literacy. Washington, DC: Institute of Education Sciences.
41. Organisation for Economic Cooperation and Development (2001). Programme for international student assessment. Paris: OECD Publications.
42. Orozco, J. (2007). VENEZUELA: Chavez scraps university entrance exam. University World News. Retrieved 29 September 2008, from
43. Palmer, J., Macleod, C.M., Hunt, E. & Davidson, J.E. (1985). Information processing correlates of reading. Journal of Memory and Language, 24 (1), 59-88.
44. Schatschneider, C., Harrell, E.R. & Buck, J. (2007). An individual-differences approach to the study of reading comprehension. In R.K. Wagner, A.E. Muse & K.R. Tannenbaum (Eds.), Vocabulary acquisition: Implications for reading comprehension. (pp. 249-275). New York: The Guilford Press.
45. Schmidt, P. (2008). Researchers accuse selective colleges of giving admission tests too much weight. Chronical of Higher Education, 2 May.
46. Shanahan, T., Kamil, M.L. & Tobin, A.W. (1982). Cloze as a measure of intersentential comprehension. Reading Research Quarterly, 17 (2), 229-255.
47. Shin, J., Deno, S.L. & Espin, C. (2000). Technical adequacy of the maze task for curriculum-based measurement of reading growth. Journal of Special Education, 34 (3), 164-172.
48. Simmons, F. & Singleton, C. (2000). The reading comprehension abilities of dyslexic students in higher education. Dyslexia, 6 (3), 178-192.
49. Storey, P. (1997). Examining the test-taking process: A cognitive perspective on the discourse cloze test. Language Testing, 14 (2), 214-231.
50. UNESCO Institute for Statistics/OECD (2005). Education trends in perspective - Analysis of the world education indicators. Retrieved 29 September 2008, from
51. Van Dijk, T.A. & Kintsch, W. (1983). Strategies of discourse comprehension. New York: Academic Press.
52. Wiley, H.I. & Deno, S.L. (2005). Oral reading and maze measures as predictors of success for English learners on a state standards assessment. Remedial and Special Education, 26 (4), 207-214.
53. Williams, R.S. (2004). Incidental vocabulary acquisition: The role of the reader in the utilization of sentence context to develop and retain new word meanings. Unpublished Dissertation, University of South Carolina, Columbia, SC.
54. Yamashita, J. (2003). Processes of taking a gap-filling test: Comparison of skilled and less skilled EFL readers. Language Testing, 20 (3), 267-293.