Erratum: Quantum dot/antibody conjugates for in vivo cytometric imaging in mice (Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America (2015) 112 (1350-1355) doi: 10.1073/pnas.1421632111);Quantum dot/antibody conjugates for in vivo cytometric imaging in mice

Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America

Volumn 112, Issue 5, 2015, Pages 1350-1355

  Han, Hee Sun ^a   Niemeyer, Elisabeth ^b   Huang, Yuhui ^b   Kamoun, Walid S ^b   Martin, John D ^b,c   Bhaumik, Jayeeta ^b   Chen, Yunching ^b   Roberge, Sylvie ^b   Cui, Jian ^a   Martin, Margaret R ^b   Fukumura, Dai ^b   Jainb, Rakesh K ^b   Bawendi, Moungi G ^b   Duda, Dan G ^b  

^a MASSACHUSETTS INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY   (United States)

^b Massachusetts Institute of Technology   (United States)

^c MASSACHUSETTS GENERAL HOSPITAL   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ANTIBODY CONJUGATE; ATAXIN 1; NORBORNENE DERIVATIVE; QUANTUM DOT; STEM CELL FACTOR; TETRAZINE DERIVATIVE; ANTIBODY; BIOMATERIAL;

ANIMAL EXPERIMENT; ARTICLE; BONE MARROW CELL; CELL LABELING; CELL POPULATION; CONTROLLED STUDY; CYCLOADDITION; CYTOMETRY; HEMATOPOIETIC STEM CELL; HYDRODYNAMICS; IN VIVO CYTOMETRY; IN VIVO STUDY; MOUSE; NONHUMAN; PRIORITY JOURNAL; STEM CELL; SYNTHESIS; ANIMAL; IMMUNOLOGY; TRANSGENIC MOUSE;

MUS;

ANIMALS; ANTIBODIES; BIOCOMPATIBLE MATERIALS; MICE; MICE, TRANSGENIC; QUANTUM DOTS;

EID: 84922247326     PISSN: 00278424     EISSN: 10916490     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1073/pnas.1501954112     Document Type: Erratum

References (27)

1. Kiel MJ, et al. (2005) SLAM family receptors distinguish hematopoietic stem and progenitor cells and reveal endothelial niches for stem cells. Cell 121(7):1109-1121.
2. Xie Y, et al. (2009) Detection of functional haematopoietic stem cell niche using realtime imaging. Nature 457(7225):97-101.
3. Lo Celso C, et al. (2009) Live-animal tracking of individual haematopoietic stem/progenitor cells in their niche. Nature 457(7225):92-96.
4. Livet J, et al. (2007) Transgenic strategies for combinatorial expression of fluorescent proteins in the nervous system. Nature 450(7166):56-62.
5. Kedrin D, et al. (2008) Intravital imaging of metastatic behavior through a mammary imaging window. Nat Methods 5(12):1019-1021.
6. Swirski FK, et al. (2009) Identification of splenic reservoir monocytes and their deployment to inflammatory sites. Science 325(5940):612-616.
7. Dabbousi BO, et al. (1997) (CdSe)ZnS core-shell quantum dots: Synthesis and characterization of a size series of highly luminescent nanocrystallites. J Phys Chem B 101(46):9463-9475.
8. Bruchez M, Jr, Moronne M, Gin P, Weiss S, Alivisatos AP (1998) Semiconductor nanocrystals as fluorescent biological labels. Science 281(5385):2013-2016.
9. Peng ZA, Peng X (2001) Formation of high-quality CdTe, CdSe, and CdS nanocrystals using CdO as precursor. J Am Chem Soc 123(1):183-184.
10. Zimmer JP, et al. (2006) Size series of small indium arsenide-zinc selenide core-shell nanocrystals and their application to in vivo imaging. J Am Chem Soc 128(8): 2526-2527.
11. Gao X, Cui Y, Levenson RM, Chung LWK, Nie S (2004) In vivo cancer targeting and imaging with semiconductor quantum dots. Nat Biotechnol 22(8):969-976.
12. Popovi-c Z, et al. (2010) A nanoparticle size series for in vivo fluorescence imaging. Angew Chem Int Ed Engl 49(46):8649-8652.
13. Wong C, et al. (2011) Multistage nanoparticle delivery system for deep penetration into tumor tissue. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 108(6):2426-2431.
14. So M-K, Xu C, Loening AM, Gambhir SS, Rao J (2006) Self-illuminating quantum dot conjugates for in vivo imaging. Nat Biotechnol 24(3):339-343.
15. Stroh M, et al. (2005) Quantum dots spectrally distinguish multiple species within the tumor milieu in vivo. Nat Med 11(6):678-682.
16. Han H-S, et al. (2010) Development of a bioorthogonal and highly efficient conjugation method for quantum dots using tetrazine-norbornene cycloaddition. J Am Chem Soc 132(23):7838-7839.
17. Liu W, et al. (2010) Compact biocompatible quantum dots via RAFT-mediated synthesis of imidazole-based random copolymer ligand. J Am Chem Soc 132(2):472-483.
18. Choi HS, et al. (2007) Renal clearance of quantum dots. Nat Biotechnol 25(10): 1165-1170.
19. Howarth M, et al. (2008) Monovalent, reduced-size quantum dots for imaging receptors on living cells. Nat Methods 5(5):397-399.
20. Xiao K, et al. (2011) The effect of surface charge on in vivo biodistribution of PEGoligocholic acid based micellar nanoparticles. Biomaterials 32(13):3435-3446.
21. Yang L, et al. (2005) Identification of Lin(-)Sca1(+)kit(+) CD34(+)Flt3- short-term hematopoietic stem cells capable of rapidly reconstituting and rescuing myeloablated transplant recipients. Blood 105(7):2717-2723.
22. Kiel MJ, Morrison SJ (2008) Uncertainty in the niches that maintain haematopoietic stem cells. Nat Rev Immunol 8(4):290-301.
23. Nombela-Arrieta C, et al. (2013) Quantitative imaging of haematopoietic stem and progenitor cell localization and hypoxic status in the bone marrow microenvironment. Nat Cell Biol 15(5):533-543.
24. Larson DR, et al. (2003) Water-soluble quantum dots for multiphoton fluorescence imaging in vivo. Science 300(5624):1434-1436.
25. Brown EB, et al. (2001) In vivo measurement of gene expression, angiogenesis and physiological function in tumors using multiphoton laser scanning microscopy. Nat Med 7(7):864-868.
26. Resch-Genger U, Grabolle M, Cavaliere-Jaricot S, Nitschke R, Nann T (2008) Quantum dots versus organic dyes as fluorescent labels. Nat Methods 5(9):763-775.
27. Kim S, et al. (2004) Near-infrared fluorescent type II quantum dots for sentinel lymph node mapping. Nat Biotechnol 22(1):93-97.