A novel mutation in TFL1 homolog affecting determinacy in cowpea (Vigna unguiculata)

Molecular Genetics and Genomics

Volumn 290, Issue 1, 2015, Pages 55-65

  Dhanasekar, P ^a   Reddy, K S ^a  

^a BHABHA ATOMIC RESEARCH CENTRE   (India)

Author keywords

Cowpea; Determinate growth habit; Point mutation; Terminal flower; Vigna unguiculata; VuTFL1

Indexed keywords

ADENINE; CYTOSINE; VEGETABLE PROTEIN;

AMINO ACID SUBSTITUTION; APICAL MERISTEM; ARTICLE; COWPEA; GENE MUTATION; NUCLEOTIDE SEQUENCE; PLANT GENE; POINT MUTATION; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROTEIN FUNCTION; PROTEIN STABILITY; SINGLE NUCLEOTIDE POLYMORPHISM; TERMINAL FLOWER 1 GENE; AMINO ACID SEQUENCE; ANATOMY AND HISTOLOGY; CHEMISTRY; FABACEAE; GENETICS; GROWTH, DEVELOPMENT AND AGING; MERISTEM; MOLECULAR GENETICS; MUTATION; PHYLOGENY; SEQUENCE ALIGNMENT; SEQUENCE HOMOLOGY;

VIGNA UNGUICULATA;

AMINO ACID SEQUENCE; FABACEAE; MERISTEM; MOLECULAR SEQUENCE DATA; MUTATION; PHYLOGENY; PLANT PROTEINS; POLYMORPHISM, SINGLE NUCLEOTIDE; PROTEIN STABILITY; SEQUENCE ALIGNMENT; SEQUENCE HOMOLOGY, AMINO ACID;

EID: 84922201255     PISSN: 16174615     EISSN: 16174623     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s00438-014-0899-0     Document Type: Article

References (53)

1. Adzhubei IA, Schmidt S, Peshkin L, Ramensky VE, Gerasimova A, Adzhube PIA, Kondrashov AS, Sunyaev SR (2010) A method and server for predicting damaging missense mutations. Nat Methods 7:248–249
2. Ahn JH, Miller D, Winter VJ, Banfield MJ, Lee JH, Yoo SY, Henz SR, Brady RL, Weigel D (2006) A divergent external loop confers antagonistic activity on floral regulators FT and TFL1. EMBO J 25:605–614
3. Alvarez J, Guli CL, Yu XH, Smyth DR (1992) Terminal flower: a gene affecting inflorescence development in Arabidopsis thaliana. Plant J 2:103–116
4. Banfield MJ, Brady RL (2000) The structure of Antirrhinum centroradialis protein (CEN) suggests a role as a kinase regulator. J Mol Biol 297:1159–1170
5. Bendl J, Stourac J, Salanda O, Pavelka A, Wieben ED, Zendulka J, Brezovsky J, Damborsky J (2014) PredictSNP: robust and accurate consensus classifier for prediction of disease-related mutations. PLoS Comput Biol 10:e1003440. doi:10.1371/journal.pcbi.1003440
6. Berezin C, Glaser F, Rosenberg J, Paz I, Pupko T, Fariselli P, Casadio R, Ben-Tal N (2004) ConSeq: the identification of functionally and structurally important residues in protein sequences. Bioinformatics 20:1322–1324
7. Bernard RL (1972) Two genes affecting stem termination in soybeans. Crop Sci 12:235–239
8. Boote KJ, Jones JW, Batchelor WD, Nafziger ED, Myers O (2003) Genetic coefficients in the CROPGRO-soybean model: links to field performance and genomics. Agron J 95:32–51
9. Boss PK, Bastow RM, Mylne JS, Dean C (2004) Multiple pathways in the decision to flower: enabling, promoting, and resetting. Plant Cell 16:S18–S31
10. Bradley D, Carpenter R, Copsey L, Vincent C, Rothstein S, Coen E (1996) Control of inflorescence architecture in Antirrhinum. Nature 379:791–797
11. Capriotti E, Fariselli P, Casadio R (2004) A neural network-based method for predicting protein stability changes upon single point mutations. In: Proceedings of the 2004 conference on intelligent systems for molecular biology (ISMB04), Bioinformatics (Suppl. 1), vol 20. Oxford University Press, New York, pp 190–201
12. Capriotti E, Fariselli P, Casadio R (2005) I-Mutant2.0: predicting stability changes upon mutation from the protein sequence or structure. Nucleic Acids Res 33:W306–W310. doi:10.1093/nar/gki375
13. Cheng J, Randall A, Baldi P (2006) Prediction of protein stability changes for single site mutations using support vector machines. Proteins: structure, function. Bioinformatics 62:1125–1132
14. Cober E, Tanner J (1995) Performance of related indeterminate and tall determinate soybean lines in short-season areas. Crop Sci 35:361–364
15. Coen ES (1991) The role of homeotic genes in flower development and evolution. Annu Rev Plant Phys 42:241–279
16. Dehouck Y, Grosfils A, Folch B, Gilis D, Bogaerts P, Rooman M (2009) Fast and accurate predictions of protein stability changes upon mutations using statistical potentials and neural networks: poPMuSiC-2.0. Bioinformatics 25:2537–2543. doi:10.1093/bioinformatics/btp445
17. Dellaporta SL, Wood J, Hicks JB (1983) A plant DNA minipreparation version II. Plant Mol Biol Rep 1:19–21
18. Dhanasekar P, Dhumal KN, Reddy KS (2010) Identification of RAPD marker linked to plant type gene in pigeonpea. Ind J Biotechnol 9:58–63
19. Flanagan SE, Patch AM, Ellard S (2010) Using SIFT and PolyPhen to predict loss-of-function and gain-of-function mutations. Genet Test Mol Biomark 14:533–537
20. Foucher F, Morin J, Courtiade J, Cadioux S, Ellis NI, Banfield MJ, Rameau C (2003) Determinate and late flowering are two Terminal Flower 1/Centroradialis homologs that control two distinct phases of flowering initiation and development in pea. Plant Cell 15:2742–2754
21. Hanano S, Goto K (2011) Arabidopsis TERMINAL FLOWER1 is involved in the regulation of flowering time and inflorescence development through transcriptional repression. Plant Cell 23:3172–3184
22. Hanzawa Y, Money T, Bradley D (2005) A single amino acid converts a repressor to an activator of flowering. PNAS 102:7748–7753
23. Henikoff S, Comai L (2003) Single nucleotide mutations for plant functional genomics. Annu Rev Plant Biol 54:375–401
24. Julio E, Laporte F, Reis S, Rothan C, de Borne FD (2008) Reducing the content of nornicotine in tobacco via targeted mutation breeding. Mol Breed 21:369–381
25. Kardailsky I, Shukla VK, Ahn JH, Dagenais N, Christensen SK, Nguyen JT, Chory J, Harrison MJ, Weigel D (1999) Activation tagging of the floral inducer FT. Science 286:1962–1965
26. Kelly JD (2001) Remaking bean plant architecture for efficient production. Adv Agron 71:109–143
27. Kobayashi Y, Kaya H, Goto K, Iwabuchi M, Araki T (1999) A pair of related genes with antagonistic roles in mediating flowering signals. Science 286:1960–1962
28. Koinange EMK, Singh SP, Gepts P (1996) Genetic control of the domestication syndrome in common bean. Crop Sci 36:1037–1045
29. Kumar P, Henikoff S, Ng PC (2009) Predicting the effects of coding non-synonymous variants on protein function using the SIFT algorithm. Nat Protoc 4:1073–1081
30. Kwak M, Toro O, Debouck DG, Gepts P (2012) Multiple origins of the determinate growth habit in deomesticated common bean (Phaseolus vulgaris). Ann Bot 110:1573–1580
31. Li B, Krishnan VG, Mort ME, Xin F, Kamati KK, Cooper DN, Mooney SD, Radivojac P (2009) Automated inference of molecular mechanisms of disease from amino acid substitutions. Bioinformatics 25:2744–2750
32. McCallum CM, Slade AJ, Colbert TG, Knauf VC, Hurst S (2008) Tomatoes having reduced polygalacturonase activity caused by non-transgenic mutations in the polygalacturonase gene. US Patent 7.393.996
33. McGarry RC, Ayre BG (2012) Manipulating plant architecture with members of the CETS gene family. Plant Sci 188–189:71–81
34. Michaels SD, Amasino RM (1999) FLOWERING LOCUS C encodes a novel MADS domain protein that acts as a repressor of flowering. Plant Cell 11:949–956
35. Oshima S, Murata M, Sakamoto W, Ogura F, Motoyoshi F (1997) Cloning and molecular analysis of the Arabidopsis gene Terminal Flower 1. Mol Gen Genet 254:186–194
36. Pandey RN, Dhanasekar P (2003) Radiation-induced high yielding determinate mutant in cowpea. In: Henri A, Kumar D, Singh NB (eds) Advances in arid legumes research. Scientific Publishers, Jodhpur (India), pp 30–33
37. Parcy F, Nilsson O, Busch MA, Lee I, Weigel D (1998) A genetic framework for floral patterning. Nature 395:561–566
38. Pidkowich MS, Klenz JE, Haughn GW (1999) The making of a flower: control of floral meristem identity in Arabidopsis. Trends Plant Sci 4:64–70
39. Pnueli L, Carmel-Goren L, Hareven D, Gutfinger T, Alvarez J, Ganal M, Zamir D, Lifschitz E (1998) The SELF-PRUNING gene of tomato regulates vegetative to reproductive switching of sympodial meristems and is the ortholog of CEN and TFL1. Development 125:1979–1989
40. Pnueli L, Gutfinger T, Hareven D, Ben-Naim O, Ron N, Adir N, Lifschitz E (2001) Tomato SP-interacting proteins define a conserved signaling system that regulates shoot architecture and flowering. Plant Cell 13:2687–2702
41. Ratcliffe OJ, Amaya I, Vincent CA, Rothstein S, Carpeneter R, Coen ES, Bradley DJ (1998) A common mechanism controls the life cycle and architecture of plants. Development 125:1609–1615
42. Samach A, Onouchi H, Gold SE, Ditta GS, Schwarz-Sommer Z, Yanofsky MF, Coupland G (2000) Distinct roles of CONSTANS target genes in reproductive development of Arabidopsis. Science 288:1613–1616
43. Sato Y, Shirasawa K, Takahashi Y, Nishimura M, Nishio T (2006) Mutant selection from progeny of gamma-ray-irradiated rice by DNA heteroduplex cleavage using Brassica petiole extract. Breed Sci 56:179–183
44. Schultz EA, Haughn GW (1993) Genetic analysis of the floral initiation process (FLIP) in Arabidopsis. Development 119:745–765
45. Shannon S, Meeks-Wagner DR (1991) A mutation in the Arabidopsis TFL1 gene affects inflorescence meristem development. Plant Cell 3:877–892
46. Sheldon CC, Burn JE, Perez PP, Metzger J, Edwards JA, Peacock WJ, Dennis ES (1999) The FLF MADS box gene: a repressor of flowering in Arabidopsis regulated by vernalization and methylation. Plant Cell 11:445–458
47. So Yeon Y, Kardailsky I, JongSeob L, Weigel D, JiHoon A (2004) Acceleration of flowering by overexpression of MFT (Mother of FT and TFL1). Mol Cells 17:95–101
48. Tahery Y, Abhul-Hamid H, Tahery E (2011) Terminal Flower 1 (TFL1) homolog genes in dicot plants. World Appl Sci J 12(545):551
49. Thomas PD, Campbell MJ, Kejariwal A, Mi H, Karlak B, Daverman R, Diemer K, Muruganujan A, Narechania A (2003) PANTHER: a library of protein families and subfamilies indexed by function. Genome Res 13:2129–2141
50. Thomas PD, Kejariwal A, Guo N, Mi H, Campbell MJ, Muguganujan A, Lazareva-Ulitsky B (2006) Applications for protein sequence-function evolution data: mRNA/protein expression analysis and coding SNP scoring tools. Nucleic Acids Res 34:W645–W650. doi:10.1093/nar/gkl229
51. Thompson JD, Gibson TJ, Plewniak F, Jeanmougin F, Higgins DG (1997) The CLUSTAL_X windows interface: flexible strategies for multiple sequence alignment aided by quality analysis tools. Nucleic Acids Res 25:4876–4882
52. Wigge PA, Kim MC, Jaeger KE, Busch W, Schmid M, Lohmann JU, Weigel D (2005) Integration of spatial and temporal information during floral induction in Arabidopsis. Science 309:1056–1059
53. Ye J, Coulouris G, Zaretskaya I, Cutcutache I, Rozen S, Madden T (2012) Primer-BLAST: a tool to design target-specific primers for polymerase chain reaction. BMC Bioinform 13:134