Multiple origins of the determinate growth habit in domesticated common bean (Phaseolus vulgaris)

Annals of Botany

Volumn 110, Issue 8, 2012, Pages 1573-1580

  Kwak, Myounghai ^a,c   Toro, Orlando ^b   Debouck, Daniel G ^b   Gepts, Paul ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

^b INTERNATIONAL CENTER FOR TROPICAL AGRICULTURE CIAT   (Colombia)

^c National Institute of Biological Resources   (South Korea)

Author keywords

centroradialis; common bean; Determinate growth habit; domestication; mutability; Phaseolus vulgaris; TFL1y

Indexed keywords

ARABIDOPSIS PROTEIN; TFL1 PROTEIN, ARABIDOPSIS; VEGETABLE PROTEIN;

BIOMARKER; DOMESTICATION; GENE EXPRESSION; GENETIC ANALYSIS; GENETIC STRUCTURE; GENOME; GROWTH RATE; LEGUME; LIFE HISTORY TRAIT; MAIZE; MOLECULAR ANALYSIS; MUTATION; PHENOTYPE; RELATEDNESS; STEM;

ARTICLE; DNA SEQUENCE; GENE POOL; GENETIC VARIABILITY; GENETICS; GENOTYPE; GROWTH, DEVELOPMENT AND AGING; HAPLOTYPE; MOLECULAR GENETICS; NUCLEOTIDE SEQUENCE; PHASEOLUS; PHENOTYPE;

ARABIDOPSIS PROTEINS; BASE SEQUENCE; GENE POOL; GENETIC VARIATION; GENOTYPE; HAPLOTYPES; MOLECULAR SEQUENCE DATA; PHASEOLUS; PHENOTYPE; PLANT PROTEINS; SEQUENCE ANALYSIS, DNA;

ARABIDOPSIS; PHASEOLUS VULGARIS; ZEA MAYS;

EID: 84870229874     PISSN: 03057364     EISSN: 10958290     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1093/aob/mcs207     Document Type: Article

References (51)

1. Ahn JH, Miller D, Winter VJ, et al. 2006. A divergent external loop confers antagonistic activity on floral regulators FT and TFL1. EMBO Journal 25: 605-614. (Pubitemid 43237667)
2. Barabaschi D, Guerra D, Lacrima K, et al. 2012. Emerging knowledge from genome sequencing of crop species. Molecular Biotechnology 50: 250-256.
3. Benlloch R, Berbel A, Serrano-Mislata A, Madueno F. 2007. Floral initiation and inflorescence architecture: a comparative view. Annals of Botany 100: 659-676. (Pubitemid 47327702)
4. Boote KJ, Jones JW, Batchelor WD, Nafziger ED, Myers O. 2003. Genetic coefficients in the CROPGRO-soybean model: links to field performance and genomics. Agronomy Journal 95: 32-51. (Pubitemid 36178253)
5. Carmel-Goren L, Liu YS, Lifschitz E, Zamir D. 2003. The SELF-PRUNING gene family in tomato. Plant Molecular Biology 52: 1215-1222. (Pubitemid 37514741)
6. Chen DH, Ronald PC. 1999. A rapid DNA minipreparation method suitable for AFLP and other PCR applications. Plant Molecular Biology Reporter 17: 53-57. (Pubitemid 129640670)
7. Clark RM, Wagler TN, Quijada P, Doebley J. 2006. A distant upstream enhancer at the maize domestication gene tb1 has pleiotropic effects on plant and inflorescent architecture. Nature Genetics 38: 594-597.
8. Clement M, Posada D, Crandall KA. 2000. TCS: a computer program to estimate gene genealogies. Molecular Ecology 9: 1657-1659.
9. Cober E, Tanner J. 1995. Performance of related indeterminate and tall determinate soybean lines in short-season areas. Crop Science 35: 361-364.
10. Darwin C. 1859. On the origin of species by means of natural selection. London
11. J. Murray, Debouck DG. 1991. Systematics and morphology. In: Van Schoonhoven A, Voysest O. eds. Common beans; research for crop improvement. Wallingford, UK: CAB Publishing.
12. Debouck DG, Toro O, Paredes OM, Johnson WC, Gepts P. 1993. Genetic diversity and ecological distribution of Phaseolus vulgaris in northwestern South America. Economic Botany 47: 408-423. (Pubitemid 2040902)
13. Delgado-Salinas A, Bibler R, Lavin M. 2006. Phylogeny of the genus Phaseolus (Leguminosae): a recent diversification in an ancient landscape. Systematic Botany 31: 779-791. (Pubitemid 46376842)
14. Dickau R, Ranere AJ, Cooke RG. 2007. Starch grain evidence for the preceramic dispersals of maize and root crops into tropical dry and humid forests of Panama. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, USA 104: 3651-3656. (Pubitemid 46364213)
15. Evans LT. 1993. Crop evolution, adaptation, and yield. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
16. Foucher F, Morin J, Courtiade J, et al. 2003. DETERMINATE and LATE FLOWERING are two TERMINAL FLOWER1/CENTRORADIALIS homologs that control two distinct phases of flowering initiation and development in pea. The Plant Cell 15: 2742-2754. (Pubitemid 37470673)
17. Freyre R, Ríos R, Guzmán L, Debouck D, Gepts P. 1996. Ecogeographic distribution of Phaseolus spp. (Fabaceae) in Bolivia. Economic Botany 50: 195-215. (Pubitemid 26397206)
18. Gepts P, Debouck DG. 1991. Origin, domestication, and evolution of the common bean, Phaseolus vulgaris. In: Voysest O, Van Schoonhoven A. eds. Common beans: research for crop improvement. Wallingfor, UK: CAB Publishing.
19. Guo XZ, Zhao Z, Chen JH, Hu XH, Luo D. 2006. A putative CENTRORADIALIS/TERMINAL FLOWER 1-like gene, Ljcen1, plays a role in phase transition in Lotus japonicus. Journal of Plant Physiology 163: 436-444. (Pubitemid 43175718)
20. HannahMA, Kramer KM, Geffroy V, et al. 2007. Hybrid weakness controlled by the dosage-dependent lethal (DL) gene system in common bean (Phaseolus vulgaris) is caused by a shoot-derived inhibitory signal leading to salicylic acid-associated root death. New Phytologist 176: 537-549. (Pubitemid 47620408)
21. Jaenicke-Despres V, Buckler ES, Smith BD, Gilbert MTP, Cooper A, Doebley J, Paabo S. 2003. Early allelic selection in maize as revealed by ancient DNA. Science 302: 1206-1208. (Pubitemid 37421024)
22. Kaplan L, Lynch T. 1999. Phaseolus (Fabaceae) in archaeology: AMS radiocarbon dates and their significance for pre-Columbian agriculture. Economic Botany 53: 261-272. (Pubitemid 29452284)
23. Kejnovsky E, Hawkins JS, Feschotte C. 2012. Plant transposable elements: biology and evolution. In: Wendel JF, Greilhuber J, Dolezel J, Leitch IJ. eds. Plant genome diversity, Vol. 1. Vienna: Springer, 17-34.
24. Kelly JD. 2001. Remaking bean plant architecture for efficient production. Advances in Agronomy 71: 109-143. (Pubitemid 33804317)
25. Kobayashi Y, Kaya H, Goto K, Iwabuchi M, Araki T. 1999. A pair of related genes with antagonistic roles in mediating flowering signals. Science 286: 1960-1962. (Pubitemid 129515905)
26. Koinange EMK, Singh SP, Gepts P. 1996. Genetic control of the domestication syndrome in common-bean. Crop Science 36: 1037-1045. (Pubitemid 26406974)
27. Kolkman JM, Kelly JD. 2003. QTL conferring resistance and avoidance to white mold in common bean. Crop Science 43: 539-548. (Pubitemid 36345568)
28. Konishi S, Izawa T, Lin SY, Ebana K, Fukuta Y, Sasaki T, Yano M. 2006. An SNP caused loss of seed shattering during rice domestication. Science 312: 1392-1396. (Pubitemid 43839553)
29. Kwak M, Gepts P. 2009. Structure of genetic diversity in the two major gene pools of common bean (Phaseolus vulgaris L., Fabaceae). Theoretical and Applied Genetics 118: 979-992.
30. Kwak M, Velasco DM, Gepts P. 2008. Mapping homologous sequences for determinacy and photoperiod sensitivity in common bean (Phaseolus vulgaris). Journal of Heredity 99: 283-291.
31. Kwak M, Kami JA, Gepts P. 2009. The putative Mesoamerican domestication center of Phaseolus vulgaris is located in the Lerma-Santiago basin of Mexico. Crop Science 49: 554-563.
32. Leitch AR, Leitch IJ. 2012. Ecological and genetic factors linked to contrasting genome dynamics in seed plants. New Phytologist, 194: 629-646.
33. Naito K, Zhang F, Tsukiyama T, et al. 2009. Unexpected consequences of a sudden and massive transposon amplification on rice gene expression. Nature 461: 1130-1134.
34. Norton JB. 1915. Inheritance of habit in the common bean. American Naturalist 49: 547-561.
35. Palmer SA, Clapham AJ, Rose P, et al. 2012. Archaeogenomic evidence of punctuated genome evolution in Gossypium. Molecular Biology and Evolution 29: 2031-2038.
36. Perry L, Sandweiss DH, Piperno DR, et al. 2006. Early maize agriculture and interzonal interaction in southern Peru. Nature 440: 76-79. (Pubitemid 43336269)
37. Piperno DR, Dillehay TD. 2008. Starch grains on human teeth reveal early broad crop diet in northern Peru. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, USA 105: 19622-19627.
38. Pnueli L, Carmel-Goren L, et al. 1998. The SELF-PRUNING gene of tomato regulates vegetative to reproductive switching of sympodial meristems and is the ortholog of CEN and TFL1. Development 125: 1979-1989. (Pubitemid 28297785)
39. Ratcliffe OJ, Riechmann JL. 2002. Arabidopsis transcription factors and the regulation of flowering time: a genomic perspective. Current Issues in Molecular Biology 4: 77-91. (Pubitemid 34649545)
40. Repinski SL, Kwak M, Gepts P. 2012. The common bean growth habit gene PvTFL1y is a functional homolog of Arabidopsis TFL1. Theoretical and Applied Genetics 124: 1539-1547.
41. Simmons MP, Ochoterena H. 2000. Gaps as characters in sequence-based phylogenetic analyses. Systematic Biology 49: 369-381.
42. Singh SP. 1982. A key for identification of different growth habits of Phaseolus vulgaris L. Annual Report of the Bean Improvement Cooperative 25: 92-95.
43. Singh SP, Gepts P, Debouck DG. 1991. Races of common bean (Phaseolus vulgaris L., Fabaceae). Economic Botany 45: 379-396.
44. Slotkin RK, Nuthikattu S, Jiang N. 2012. The impact of transposable elements on gene and genome evolution. In: Wendel JF, Greilhuber J, Dolezel J, Leitch IJ. eds. Plant genome diversity, Vol. 1. Vienna: Springer, 35-58.
45. Smartt J. 1990. Grain legumes: evolution and genetic resources. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
46. Studer A, Zhao Q, Ross-Ibarra J, Doebley J. 2011. Identification of a functional transposon insertion in the maize domestication gene tb1. Nature Genetics 43: 1160-1163.
47. Sweeney MT, Thomson MJ, Cho YG, Park YJ, Williamson SH, Bustamante CD, McCouch SR. 2007. Global dissemination of a single mutation conferring white pericarp in rice. PLoS Genetics 3: e133. http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pgen. 0030133.
48. Tanaka A, Fujita K. 1979. Photosynthesis and yield components in relation to grain yield of the field beans. Journal of the Faculty of Agriculture, Hokkaido University 59: 145-238.
49. Tian Z, Wang X, Lee R, et al. 2010. Artificial selection for determinate growth habit in soybean. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, USA 107: 8563-8568.
50. Yamanaka S, Nakamura I, Watanabe KN, Sato YI. 2004. Identification of SNPs in the waxy gene among glutinous rice cultivars and their evolutionary significance during the domestication process of rice. Theoretical and Applied Genetics 108: 1200-1204. (Pubitemid 38630160)
51. Zarrillo S, Pearsall DM, Raymond JS, Tisdale MA, Quon DJ. 2008. Directly dated starch residues document early formative maize (Zea mays L.) in tropical Ecuador. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, USA 105: 5006-5011. (Pubitemid 351738500)