Vulnerability assessment and mitigation for the Chinese railway system under floods

Reliability Engineering and System Safety

Volumn 137, Issue , 2015, Pages 58-68

  Hong, Liu ^a,b   Ouyang, Min ^a   Peeta, Srinivas ^b,c   He, Xiaozheng ^b   Yan, Yongze ^a  

^a HUAZHONG UNIVERSITY OF SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY   (China)

^b Purdue University   (United States)

^c PURDUE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

Chinese railway system; Flood hazard; Network; Vulnerability assessment; Vulnerability mitigation

Indexed keywords

FLOODS; HAZARDS; NETWORK SECURITY; NETWORKS (CIRCUITS); RAILROADS;

CHINESE RAILWAYS; FLOOD HAZARDS; MAINTENANCE STRATEGIES; NETWORK REPRESENTATION; NUMBER OF TRAINS; NUMERICAL EXPERIMENTS; VULNERABILITY ASSESSMENTS; VULNERABILITY MITIGATION;

RAILROAD TRANSPORTATION;

EID: 84921991318     PISSN: 09518320     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.ress.2014.12.013     Document Type: Article

References (63)

1. Chinas yearbook on transportation and communications. Beijing: Year Book House of China Transportation & Communications; 1980-2010
2. M. Macchi, M. Garetti, D. Centrone, L. Fumagalli, and G.P. Pavirani Maintenance management of railway infrastructures based on reliability analysis Reliab Eng Syst Saf 104 2012 71 83
3. Thomas L. Flood trends and global change. Proceedings of the euroconference on global change and catastrophe risk management: flood risks in Europe. Laxenburg, Austria; 1999.
4. Y.Y. Haimes On the definition of vulnerabilities in measuring risks to infrastructure Risk Anal 26 2 2006 293 296
5. T. Aven On some recent definitions and analysis frameworks for risk, vulnerability, and resilience Risk Anal 31 4 2010 515 522
6. Goldshtein V, Koganov GA, Surdutovich GI. Vulnerability and hierarchy of complex networks. arXiv:cond-mat/0409298
7. J.I. Uitto The geography of disaster vulnerability in megacities: A theoretical framework Appl Geogr 18 1 1998 7 16
8. S.L. Cutter Vulnerability to environmental hazards Prog Hum Geogr 20 4 1996 529 539
9. M. Ouyang Review on modeling and simulatio of interdependent critical infrastructure systems Reliab Eng Syst Saf 121 2014 43 60
10. M. Kaegi, R. Mock, and W. Krger Analyzing maintenance strategies by agentbased simulations: a feasibility study Reliab Eng Syst Saf 94 2009 1416 1421
11. Casalicchio E, Galli E. Federated agent based modeling and simulation: an approach for complex critical system analysis. In: Twenty-second workshop on principles of advanced and distributed simulation; 2008, PADS. 3-6 June, 2008, p. 147.
12. T. Rigole, K. Vanthournout, K. De Brabandere, and G. Deconinck Agents controlling the electric power infrastructure Int J Crit Infrastruct 4 1-2 2008 96 109
13. M.R. Permann Toward developing genetic algorithms to aid in critical infrastructure modeling Proceedings of the IEEE conference on technologies for homeland security 2007 192 197
14. E. Bompard, R. Napoli, and F. Xue Assessment of information impacts in power system security against malicious attacks in a general framework Reliab Eng Syst Saf 94 2009 1087 1094
15. Barrett C, Beckman R, Channakeshava K, Huang F, Kumar VSA, Marathe A., et al. Cascading failures in multiple infrastructures: from transportation to communication network. In: Proceedings of the fifth international CRIS conference on critical infrastructures. Beijing, 2010.
16. O'Reilly GP, Jrad A, Kelic A, LeClaire R. Telecom critical infrastructure simulations: discrete event simulation vs. dynamic simulation how do they compare? In: Proceedings of the IEEE global telecommunications conference, Washington, DC; 2007. p. 2597-2601. doi:10.1109/GLOCOM.2007.493.
17. H.J. Min, W. Beyeler, T. Brown, Y.J. Son, and A.T. Jones Toward modeling and simulation of critical national infrastructure interdependencies IIE Trans 39 2007 57 71
18. N. Kollikkathara, H. Feng, and D. Yu A system dynamic modeling approach for evaluating municipal solid waste generation, landfill capacity and related cost management issues Waste Manag 30 2010 2194 2203
19. R.F. Stapelberg Infrastructure systems interdependencies and risk informed decision making (RIDM): impact scenario analysis of infrastructure risks induced by natural, technological and intentional hazards J Syst Cybern Inform 6 5 2008 21 27
20. N. Santella, L.J. Steinberg, and K. Parks Decision making for extreme events: modeling critical infrastructure interdependencies to aid mitigation and response planning Rev Policy Res 26 4 2009 409 422
21. S.A. Patterson, and G.E. Apostolakis Identification of critical locations across multiple infrastructures for terrorist actions Reliab Eng Syst Saf 92 2007 1183 1203
22. E.E. Lee, J.E. Mitchell, and W.A. Wallace Restoration of services in interdependent infrastructure systems: a network flows approach IEEE Trans Syst Man, Cybern. C: Appl Rev 37 6 2007 1303 1317
23. P. Hines, E. Cotilla-Sanchez, and S. Blumsack Do topological models provide good information about vulnerability in electric power networks? Chaos 20 2010 033122
24. B. Cavdaroglu, J.E. Mitchell, T.C. Sharkey, and W.A. Wallace Integrating restoration and scheduling decisions for disrupted interdependent infrastructure systems Annal Operations Res 203 2013 279 294
25. E. Zio, and E. Ferrario A framework for the system-of-systems analysis of the risk for a safety-critical plant exposed to external events Reliab Eng Syst Saf 114 2013 114 125
26. P. Sen, S. Dasgupta, A. Chatterjee, P.A. Sreeram, G. Mukherjee, and S.S. Manna Small-world properties of the Indian railway network Phys Rev E 67 2003 036106
27. E. Roanes-Lozano, L.M. Laita, E. Roanes-Macías, M.J. Wester, J.L. Ruiz-Lozano, and C. Roncero Evolution of railway network flexibility: the Spanish broad gauge case Math Comput Simul 79 2009 2317 2332
28. L. Guo, and X. Cai Degree and weighted properties of the directed China railway network Int J Mod Phys C 19 2008 1909 1918
29. D.J. Watts, and S.H. Strogatz Collective dynamics of 'small-world' network Nature 393 1998 440 442
30. A.L. Barabási, and R. Albert Emergence of scaling in random networks Science 286 1999 509
31. R. Wang, J.X. Tan, X. Wang, D.J. Wang, and X. Cai Geographic coarse graining analysis of the railway network of China Phys A: Stat Mech Appl 387 2008 5639 5646
32. S. Derrible, and C. Kennedy The complexity and robustness of metro networks Phys A: Stat Mech Appl 389 2010 3678 3691
33. Zhang J.H., Hong L., Wang S.L., Xu X.M. Reliability assessments of chinese high speed railway network. IEEE international conference on intelligent rail transportation. Beijing, China 2011.
34. J.H. Zhang, X.M. Xu, L. Hong, S.L. Wang, and Q. Fei Networked analysis of the Shanghai subway network, in China Phys A: Stat Mech Appl 390 2011 4562 4570
35. S.E. Chang, and N. Nojima Measuring post-disaster transportation system performance: the 1995 Kobe earthquake in comparative perspective Transp Res A: Policy Pract 35 2001 475 494
36. A.P. Moran, A.H. Thieken, A. Schöbel, and C. Rachoy Documentation of flood damage on railway infrastructure Adv Intell Soft Comput Vol 81 2010 61 70
37. A. Nagurney, Q. Qiang, and L.S. Nagurney Environmental impact assessment of transportation networks with degradable links in an era of climate change Int J Sustain Transp 4 2010 154 171
38. S. Peeta, F.S. Salman, D. Gunnec, and K. Viswanath Pre-disaster investment decisions for strengthening a highway network Comput Operations Res 37 2010 1708 1719
39. E. Jenelius, and L.G. Mattsson Road network vulnerability analysis of area-covering disruptions: a grid-based approach with case study Transp Res A: Policy Pract 46 2012 746 760
40. J. Sohn Evaluating the significance of highway network links under the flood damage: an accessibility approach Transp Res A: Policy Pract 40 2006 491 506
41. L. Dueñas-Osorio, I.C. James, and J.G. Barry Seismic response of critical interdependent networks Earthq Eng Struct Dyn 36 2007 285 306
42. L. Dueñas-Osorio, I.C. James, J.G. Barry, and B. Ann Interdependent response of networked systems J Infrastruct Syst 13 3 2007 185 194
43. T. Adachi, and B.R. Ellingwood Serviceability of earthquake-damaged water systems: effects of electrical power availability and power backup systems on system vulnerability Reliab Eng Syst Saf 93 2008 78 88
44. I. Hernandez, and L. Dueñas-Osorio Sequential propagation of seismic fragility across interdependent lifeline systems Earthq Spectra 27 1 2011 23 43
45. I. Hernandez, and L. Dueñas-Osorio Probabilistic study for cascading failures in interdependent lifeline systems Reliab Eng Syst Saf 111 2013 260 272
46. K. Poljanšek, F. Bono, and E. Gutiérrez Seismic risk assessment of interdependent critical infrastructure systems: the case of European gas and electricity networks Earthq Eng Struct Dyn 41 2012 61 79
47. M. Ouyang, and L. Dueñas-Osorio An approach to design interface topologies across interdependent urban infrastructure systems Reliab Eng Syst Saf 96 1 2011 1462 1473
48. M. Ouyang, and L. Dueñas-Osorio A three-stage framework resilience analysis framework for urban infrastructure systems Struct Saf 36 2012 23 31
49. M. Ouyang, and L. Dueñas-Osorio An efficient approach to compute generalized interdependent effects between infrastructure systems J Comput Civil Eng 25 5 2011 394 406
50. J. Winkler, L. Dueñas-Osorio, R. Stein, and D. Subramanian Interface network models for complex infrastructure systems J Infrastruct Syst 17 4 2011 138 150
51. L. Dueñas-Osorio, and S.M. Vemuru Cascading failures in complex infrastructure systems Struct Saf 31 2 2009 157 167
52. J. Johansson, and H. Hassel An approach for modeling interdependent infrastructure in the context of vulnerability analysis Reliab Eng Syst Saf 95 2010 1335 1344
53. M. Ouyang, L.J. Zhao, L. Hong, and Z.Z. Pan Comparisons of complex network based models and real train flow model to analyze Chinese railway vulnerability Reliab Eng Syst Saf 123 2014 38 46
54. Shipping Office of Ministry of Railways, Chinese Railway Passenger Train Timetable, China Railway Publishing House, Beijing, 2010.
55. M. Kurant, and P. Thiran Extraction and analysis of traffic and topologies of transportation networks Phys Rev E 74 2006 036114
56. D. Hine, and J.W. Hall Information gap analysis of flood model uncertainties and regional frequency analysis Water Resour Res 46 2010 19 31
57. Alkema D. Simulating floods: on the application of a 2D-hydraulic model for flood hazard and risk assessment [ITC Dissertation]. 2007.
58. D.S. Liu, and H.G. Matthies Uncertainty quantification with spectral approximations of a flood model IOP Conf Ser: Mater Sci Eng 10 1 2010 012208
59. C.A. Cummings, P.E. Todhunter, and B.C. Rundquist Using the Hazus-MH flood model to evaluate community relocation as a flood mitigation response to terminal lake flooding: the case of Minewaukan, North Dakota, USA Appl Geogr 32 2012 889 895
60. J. Eleuterio, C. Hattemer, and A. Rozan A system method for evaluating the potential impacts of floods on network infrastructures Nat Hazards Earth Syst Sci 13 2013 983 998
61. J.E. Ramirez-Marquez, C. M Rocco, and G. Levitin Optimal network protection against diverse interdictor strategies Reliab Eng Syst Saf 96 2011 374 382
62. Ramirez-Marquez JE, M Rocco C, Levitin G. Network protection against diverse attacks- a multi-objective perspective, PSAM 11/ESREL 2012, Helsinki, June 2012.
63. J.E. Ramirez-Marquez, and C. M Rocco Vulnerability based robust protection strategy selection in service networks Comput Ind Eng 63 2012 235 242