Serviceability of earthquake-damaged water systems: Effects of electrical power availability and power backup systems on system vulnerability

Reliability Engineering and System Safety

Volumn 93, Issue 1, 2008, Pages 78-88

  Adachi, Takao ^a   Ellingwood, Bruce R ^a  

^a Georgia Institute of Technology   (United States)

Author keywords

Earthquakes; Electrical power; Fragility; Infrastructure; Lifeline systems; Networks; Probability; Reliability; Water distribution

Indexed keywords

ALGORITHMS; DAMAGE DETECTION; EARTHQUAKE EFFECTS; HAZARDS; NATURAL GAS; PROBABILITY; RELIABILITY THEORY; SEISMIC RESPONSE; TRANSPORTATION;

ELECTRICAL POWER; INFRASTRUCTURE; LIFELINE SYSTEMS; WATER DISTRIBUTION;

WATER DISTRIBUTION SYSTEMS;

EID: 34548569924     PISSN: 09518320     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.ress.2006.10.014     Document Type: Article

References (41)

1. Tierney KJ. Improving earthquake loss estimation: review, assessment and extension of loss estimation methodologies, MCEER Research Progress and Accomplishments 1997-1999. 2000. p. 12-27.
2. Cascos, George, et al. Emergency backup power supply. Am Water Works Assoc J 96 1 (2004) 41-43
3. Shinozuka M, et al. Impact on water supply of a seismically damaged water delivery system, lifeline earthquake engineering in the Central and Eastern US. TCREE Monograph 5, 1992. p. 43-57.
4. Hwang H., et al. Seismic performance assessment of water delivery systems. J Infrastruct Syst September (1998) 118-125
5. Piers J.A., et al. Seismic reliability of electrical power transmission systems. Nucl Eng Des 160 (1996) 427-439
6. Ang A.H.-S., et al. A model for the seismic reliability assessment of electric power transmission systems. Reliab Eng Syst Saf 51 (1996) 7-22
7. Shinozuka M, et al. Engineering and socioeconomic impact of earthquake-an analysis of electricity lifeline disruptions in the New Madrid area. MCEER Monograph 2, 1998.
8. Shinozuka M, et al. Seismic performance analysis of electric power systems, research progress and accomplishments 1997-1999. MCEER, 1999. p. 61-69.
9. Jin X, et al. Seismic performance analysis for LADWP power system. In: Proceedings of the conference on power systems and communications infrastructure for the future. Beijing, September 2002.
10. Floyd R.W. Algorithm 97: shortest path. Commun ACM 5(6) (1962) 345
11. Warshall S. A Theorem on Boolean matrices. J ACM (1962) 11-12
12. French S.P., and Jia X. Estimating societal impacts of infrastructure damage with GIS. URISA J 9 1 (1997) 31-43
13. Chang SE. Estimation of the economic impact of multiple lifeline disruption: Memphis light, gas and water division case study. NCEER-96-0011, August 1996.
14. Nuttli O.W. The earthquake problem in the Eastern United States. ASCE J Struct Div 108 ST6 (1982) 1302-1312
15. McGuire RK, Arabasz WJ. An introduction to probabilistic seismic hazard analysis. Geotechnical and Environmental Geophysics, vol.1. Society of Exploration Geophysics, 1990.
16. Eguchi R.T. Seismic hazard input for lifeline systems. Struct Saf 10 (1991) 193-198
17. Ishikawa Y., and Kameda H. Scenario earthquake vs. probabilistic seismic hazard. Struct Saf Reliab (1994) 2139-2146
18. Chang S.E., et al. Probabilistic earthquake scenarios: extending risk analysis methodologies to spatially distributed systems. Earthquake Spectra 16 3 (2000) 557-572
19. Bazzurro P., and Cornell C.A. Disaggregation of seismic hazard. Bull Seismol Soc Am 89 2 (1999) 501-520
20. Frankel A, et al. Documentation for the 2002 update of the National Seismic Hazard Maps. US Geological Survey open-file report, 02-420, 2002.
21. Federal Emergency Management Agency. FEMA 450-the 2003 NEHRP recommended provisions for new buildings and other structures. 2004.
22. American Society of Civil Engineers (ASCE). Minimum design loads for buildings and other structures (ASCE Standard 7-05) (2005), American Society of Civil Engineers, Reston, VA
23. US Geological Survey. Interactive deaggregation. 〈http://eqint.cr.usgs.gov/eq/html/deaggint2002.html〉; 2002.
24. Frankel A, et al. National Seismic Hazard Maps. US Geological Survey open-file report, 96-532, 1996.
25. Toro G.R., et al. Model of strong ground motions from earthquakes in central and Eastern North America: best estimates and uncertainties. Seismol Res Lett 68 1 (1997) 41-57
26. Atkinson G.M., and Boore D.M. Recent trends in ground motion and spectral response relations for North America. Earthquake Spectra 6 1 (1990) 15-35
27. Atkinson G.M., and Boore D.M. Ground-motion relations for Eastern North America. Bull Seismol Soc Am 85 (1995) 17-30
28. Delhe A., et al. Attenuation models inferred from intraplate earthquake recordings. Earthquake Eng Struct Dyn 19 (1990) 1125-1141
29. Hwang H., and Huo J. Attenuation relations of ground motion for rock and soil sites in eastern United States. Soil Dyn Earthquake Eng 16 (1997) 363-372
30. Toro G.R. Modification of the Toro et al. 1997 attenuation equations for large magnitudes and short distances (2002), Risk Engineering Inc.
31. Campbell K.W. Prediction of strong ground motion using the hybrid empirical method and its use in the development of ground-motion (attenuation) relations in eastern North America. Bull Seismol Soc Am 93 3 (2003) 1012-1033
32. Federal Emergency Management Agency. HAZUS 97 technical manual, 1997.
33. Katayama T, Kubo K, Sato N. Earthquake damage to water and gas distribution lines. In: Proceedings of the US national conference on earthquake engineering. 1975. p. 396-405.
34. O'Rourke M., and Ayala G. Pipeline damage due to wave propagation. J Geotechn Eng ASCE 119 9 (1993) 1490-1498
35. Eguchi RT. Early post-earthquake damage detection for underground lifelines. Final report to the National Science Foundation, Dames and Moore P.C., Los Angeles, California, 1991.
36. Broughton A.T., Van Arsdale R.B., and Broughton J.H. Liquefaction susceptibility mapping in the city of Memphis and Shelby County, Tennessee. Eng Geol 62 (2001) 207-222
37. O'Rourke TD, Jeon S-S. Seismic zonation for lifelines and utilities. In: Proceedings of the sixth international conference on seismic zonation. Palm Springs, CA, November 2000 [EERI CD-ROM].
38. American Lifelines Alliance (ALA). Seismic fragility formulations for water systems, Part 1 guideline. ASCE, April 2001.
39. Porter KA, et al. Performance of water supply pipelines in liquefied soil. In: Proceedings of the fourth US-Japan workshop on earthquake disaster prevention for lifeline systems. Los Angeles, 1991. p. 3-17.
40. Eguchi R. Seismic vulnerability models for underground pipes, earthquake behavior and safety of oil and gas storage facilities, buried pipelines and equipment, PVP-77 (1983), ASME, New York p. 368-73
41. Matsumoto M., and Nishimura T. Mersenne twister: 623-dimensionally equidistributed uniform pseudorandom number generator. ACM Trans Modeling Generation Methods Appl Monte Carlo Method 8 1 (1998) 3-30