Toward modeling and simulation of critical national infrastructure interdependencies

IIE Transactions (Institute of Industrial Engineers)

Volumn 39, Issue 1, 2007, Pages 57-71

  Min, Hyeung Sik J ^a   Beyeler, Walter ^a   Brown, Theresa ^a   Son, Young Jun ^b   Jones, Albert T ^c  

^a SANDIA NATIONAL LABORATORIES   (United States)

^b University of Arizona   (United States)

^c NATIONAL INSTITUTE OF STANDARDS AND TECHNOLOGY   (United States)

Author keywords

Critical infrastructure; Disruption evaluation; IDEF; System dynamics

Indexed keywords

ALGORITHMS; COMPUTER SIMULATION; ECONOMICS; MATHEMATICAL MODELS; OPERATIONS RESEARCH; OPTIMIZATION; PROFESSIONAL ASPECTS;

CRITICAL INFRASTRUCTURE; DISRUPTION EVALUATION; SYSTEM DYNAMICS;

SYSTEMS ENGINEERING;

EID: 33750609845     PISSN: 0740817X     EISSN: 15458830     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/07408170600940005     Document Type: Article

References (15)

1. Anon.(2003) National strategy for the physical protection of critical infrastructures and key assets. available at http://www.whitehouse.gov/ pcipb/physical.html http://www.whitehouse.gov/pcipb/physical.html. Accessed March 1, 2005
2. Azadivar, F. and Tompkins, G. (1999) Simulation optimization with qualitative and structural model changes: A genetic algorithm approach European Journal of Operational Research, 113, pp. 169-182. http://www.csa.com/htbin/linkabst.cgi?issn=0377-2217&vol=113&iss= &firstpage=169
3. Binder, T. and Vox, A. and Belyazid, S. and Haraldsson, H. and Svensson, M.(2004). Developing system dynamics models from causal loop diagrams. presented at the 22nd International Conference of the System Dynamics Society Oxford UK. In [pp.].
4. Brown, T. and Beyeler, W. and Barton, D. (2004) Assessing infrastructure interdependencies: The challenge of risk analysis for complex adaptive systems International Journal of Critical Infrastructures, 1(1), pp. 108-117. http://www.csa.com/htbin/linkabst.cgi?issn=&vol=1&iss= &firstpage=108 http://dx.doi.org/10.1504%2FIJCIS.2004.003800
5. Davidon, W.(1959) Variable metric methods for minimization. Argonne IL: Argonne National Laboratory. A.E.C. Research and Development Report ANL-5990
6. Forrester, J.(1961) Industrial Dynamics. Cambridge MA: MIT Press. (currently available from Pegasus Communications, Waltham, MA)
7. Murtagh, B. and Saunders, M.(1998) Stanford CA: Stanford University. MINOS 5.5 user's guide. Technical report SOL 83-20R
8. Presidential Decision Directive 63.(1998) Available at http://www.ciao.gov http://www.ciao.gov Accessed March 10, 2005
9. Reid, R. and Koljonen, E.(1999). Validating a manufacturing paradigm: A system dynamics modeling approach. Proceedings of the 1999 Winter Simulation Conference. In [pp. 759-765].
10. Richardson, G. (1986) Problems with causal-loop diagrams Systems Dynamics Review, 2(2), pp. 158-170. http://www.csa.com/htbin/ linkabst.cgi?issn=&vol=2&iss=&firstpage=158
11. Richardson, G. (1997) Problems in causal loop diagrams revisited Systems Dynamics Review, 13(3), pp. 247-252. http://www.csa.com/htbin/ linkabst.cgi?issn=&vol=13&iss=&firstpage=247 http://dx.doi.org/
12. Rinaldi, S. and Peerenboom, J. and Kelly, T. (2001) Identifying, understanding, and analyzing critical infrastructure interdependencies IEEE Control System Magazine, 21, pp. 11-25. http://www.csa.com/htbin/ linkabst.cgi?issn=0888-0611&vol=21&iss=&firstpage=11 http://dx.doi.org/10.1109%2F37.969131
13. Robinson, S. (1972) A quadratically convergent algorithm for general nonlinear programming problems Mathematical Programming, 3, pp. 145-156. http://www.csa.com/htbin/linkabst.cgi?issn=0025-5610&vol=3&iss= &firstpage=145 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007%2FBF01584986
14. Sterman, J.(2000) Business Dynamics: Systems Thinking and Modeling for a Complex World. New York NY: McGraw-Hill.
15. Wolfe, P.(1962) The reduced-gradient method. Santa Monica CA: The Rand Corporation. Internal resport