Systematic Synthesis of Qualitative Research

Systematic Synthesis of Qualitative Research

Volumn 9780195387216, Issue , 2012, Pages 1-224

  Saini, Michael ^a   Shlonsky, Aron ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF TORONTO   (Canada)

Author keywords

Evidence based practice; Implementation science; Qualitative methods; Qualitative research; Qualitative synthesis; Social work; Systematic reviews

Indexed keywords

EID: 84921776017     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book    
DOI: 10.1093/acprof:oso/9780195387216.001.0001     Document Type: Book

References (330)

1. Abell, P. (1990). Methodological achievements in sociology over the past few decades with special reference to the interplay of qualitative and quantitative methods. London: Macmillan.
2. American Human Association (2005). Strategies to respond to the research needs of family group Conferencing. FGDM Issues in Brief. Retrieved from http://www.americanhumane.org/assets/pdfs/children/pc-fgdm-ib-strategiesresearch-needs.pdf.
3. Anastas, J. W. (2004). Quality in qualitative evaluation: Issues and possible answers. Research on Social Work Practice, 14(1), 57-65.
4. Anfara, V. A., Jr., Brown, K. M., & Mangione, T. L. (2002). Qualitative analysis on stage: Making the research process more public. Educational Researcher, 31(7), 28-38.
5. Angen, M. J. (2000). Evaluating interpretive inquiry: Reviewing the validity debate and opening the dialogue. Qualitative Health Research, 10(3), 378-395.
6. Arksey, H., & O'Malley, L. (2005). Scoping studies: Towards a methodological framework. International Journal of Social Research Methodology, 8(1), 19-32.
7. Attree P. (2004). Growing up in disadvantage: A systematic review of the qualitative evidence. Child: Care, Health & Development, 30(6), 679-689.
8. Attree, P. (2005). Parenting support in the context of poverty: A metasynthesis of the qualitative evidence. Health & Social Care in the Community, 13(4), 330-337.
9. Atkins, D. (2007). Creating and synthesizing evidence with decision makers in mind: Integrating evidence from clinical trials and other study designs. Medical Care, 45, S16-5S22.
10. Bailey, P. H. (1996). Assuring quality in narrative analysis. Western Journal of Nursing Research, 18(2), 186-194.
11. Banner, D. J., & Albarrran, J. W. (2009). Computer-assisted qualitative data analysis software: A review. Canadian Journal of Cardiovascular Nursing, 19(3), 24-31.
12. Barbour, R. S. (1998). Mixing qualitative methods: Quality assurance or qualitative quagmire? Quality Health Research, 8, 352-361.
13. Barbour, R. S. (2003). The newfound credibility of qualitative research? Tales of technical essentialism and co-option. Qualitative Health Research, 13(7), 1019-1027.
14. Barrera, F. (2006). Impact of private provision of public education: Empirical evidence from Bogotá's concession schools. World Bank Policy Research Working Paper 4121. Retrieved from http://wwwwds.worldbank.org/external/default/WDSContentServer/IW3P/IB/2007/01/26/000016406_20070126111542/Rendered/INDEX/wps4121.txt.
15. Barroso, J., Gallup, C. J., Sandelowski, M., Meynell, J., Pearce, P. F., & Collins, L. J. (2003). The challenge of searching for and retrieving qualitative studies. Western Journal of Nursing Research, 25, 153-178.
16. Barroso, J., & Powell-Cope, G. M. (2000). Metasynthesis of qualitative research on living with HIV infection. Qualitative Health Research, 10(3), 340-353.
17. Barroso, J., Sandelowski, M., & Voils, C. I. (2006). Research results have expiration dates: Ensuring timely systematic reviews. Journal of Evaluation in Clinical Practice, 12, 454-462.
18. Baskerville, R., & Wood-Harper, A. (1996). A critical perspective on action research as a method for information systems research. Journal of Information Technology, 11, 235-246.
19. Bate, S. P., & Robert, G. (2002). Knowledge management and communities of practice in the private sector: Lessons for modernizing the national health service in England and Wales. Public Administration, 80, 643-663.
20. Beck, C. (2003). Seeing the forest for the trees: A qualitative synthesis project. Journal of Nursing Education, 42, 318-323.
21. Bell, M. (1996). An account of the experiences of 51 families involved in an initial child protection conference. Child and Family Social Work, 1, 43-55.
22. Bell, M. (1999). Working in partnership in child protection: The conflicts. British Journal of Social Work, 29(3), 437-455.
23. Bell, M., & Wilson, K. (2006). Children's views of family group conferences. British Journal of Social Work, 36(4), 671-681.
24. Berger, P. L., & Luckmann, T., (1966). The social construction of reality. Garden City, NY: Anchor.
25. Bertero, C., & Chamberlain Wilmoth, M. (2007). Breast cancer diagnosis and its treatment affecting the self: A meta-synthesis. Cancer Nursing, 30(3), 194-202.
26. Black, N. (1994). Why we need qualitative research. Journal of Epidemiology and Community Health, 48, 425-426.
27. Bondas, T., & Hall, E. O. C. (2007). Challenges in approaching metasynthesis research. Qualitative Health Research, 17(1), 113-121.
28. Booth, A. (1996). In search of the evidence: Informing effective practice. Journal of Clinical Effectiveness, 1(1), 25-29.
29. Booth, A. (2001). Cochrane of cock-eyed? How should we conduct systematic reviews of qualitative research? Paper presented at the Qualitative Evidence-Based Practice Conference: Taking a critical stance, Coventry University.
30. Booth, A. (2006). "Brimful of STARLITE": Toward standards for reporting literature searches. Journal of the Medical Library Association, 94, 421-429.
31. Boulton, M., & Fitzpatrick, R. (1994). Quality in qualitative research. Critical Public Health, 5(3), 19-26.
32. Britten, N., Campbell, R., Pope C., Donovan, J., Morgan, M., & Pill, R. (2002). Using meta ethnography to synthesise qualitative research: A worked example. Journal of Health Services Research & Policy, 7, 209-215.
33. Brodie, K. A. (2008). Family group conference: An exploratory study describing the relationship between an internal agency environment and the process (doctoral dissertation). Howard University, Washington, D.C.
34. Brown, L. (2007). The adoption and implementation of a service innovation in a social work setting-A case study of family group conferencing in the UK. Social Policy and Society, 6(3), 321-332.
35. Buchanan, A., & Ritchie, C. (2004). What works for troubled children (rev. ed.). London: Barnardo's/Russell Press.
36. Campbell Collaboration (2001) Guidelines for preparation of review protocols. Retrieved from www.campbellcollaboration.org Campbell Collaboration Library. Retrieved from http://www.campbellcollaboration.org/library.php.
37. Campbell, R., Pound, P., Pope, C., Britten, N., Pill, R., Morgan, M., & Donovan, J. (2003). Evaluating metaethnography: A synthesis of qualitative research on lay experiences of diabetes and diabetes care. Social Science & Medicine, 56(4), 671-684.
38. Carnevale, F. A. (2002). Authentic qualitative research and the quest for methodological rigour. Canadian Journal of Nursing Research, 34(2), 121-128.
39. Cashmore, J. (2000). What the research tells us: Permanency planning, adoption and foster care. Children Australia, 25, 17-22.
40. Chan, A., Hróbjartsson, A., Haahr, M., Gøtzsche, P., & Altman, D. (2004). Empirical evidence for selective reporting of outcomes in randomized trials: Comparison of protocols to published articles. JAMA, 291(20), 2457-2465.
41. Charmaz, K. (1983). The grounded theory method: An explication and interpretation. In Robert M. Emerson (Ed.), Contemporary field Research: A Collection of Readings (pp. 109-128). Boston: Little, Brown and Company.
42. Charmaz, K. (2000). Grounded theory: Objectivist and constructivist methods. In N. Denzin & Y. Lincoln (Eds.), Handbook of qualitative research (2d ed., pp. 509-536). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
43. Charmaz, K. (2004). Premises, principles, and practices in qualitative research: Revisiting the foundations. Qualitative Health Research, 14(7), 976-993.
44. Coffey, A., & Atkinson, P. (1996). Making sense of qualitative data: Complementary research strategies. London: Sage.
45. Coffey, A., Holbrook, B., & Atkinson, P. (1996). Qualitative data analysis: Technologies and representations. Sociological Research Online, 1(1). DOI:10.4135/9780857028211. Retrieved from http://www.socresonline.org.uk/1/1/4.html.
46. Connolly, M. (1994). An act of empowerment: The Children, Young Persons and Their Families Act (1989). British Journal of Social Work, 24(1), 87-100.
47. Connolly, M. (2004). Fifteen years of family group conferencing: Coordinators talk about their experiences in Aotearoa, New Zealand. Unpublished research report. University of Canterbury, Christchurch, NZ.
48. Connolly, M. (2006). Fifteen years of family group conferencing: Coordinators talk about their experiences in Aotearoa New Zealand. British Journal of Social Work, 36, 523-540.
49. Cooper, H. (1998). Synthesizing research: A guide for literature reviews (3rd ed.). Thousand Oaks: CA: Sage.
50. Cooper, H., & Hedges, L. (Eds.). (1994). The handbook of research synthesis. New York: Russell Sage Foundation.
51. Corden, A., & Sainsbury, R. (2006). Using verbatim quotations in reporting qualitative social research: Researchers' views. Social Policy Research Unit, University of York. Retrieved from http://www.york.ac.uk/inst/spru/pubs/pdf/verbquotresearch.pdf.
52. Crea, T., & Berzin, S. (2008). Family involved in child welfare decisionmaking: Strategies and research on inclusive practices. Journal of Public Child Welfare, 3(3), 305-327.
53. Creswell, J. W. (1998). Qualitative inquiry and research design: Choosing among five traditions. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
54. Creswell, J. W. (2002). Educational research: Planning, conducting, and evaluating quantitative and qualitative research. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Pearson Education.
55. Creswell, J. W. (2003). Research design: Qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods approaches (2nd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
56. Creswell, J. W. (2006). Qualitative inquiry and research design: Choosing among five traditions. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
57. Creswell, J. W. (2007). Qualitative inquiry and research design. Choosing among five approaches (2nd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
58. Creswell, J. W. (2009). Research design: Qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods approaches (3rd ed.). Los Angles: Sage.
59. Creswell, J. W., & Maietta, R. C. (2002). Qualitative data analysis software. In D. C. Miller & N. J. Salkind (Eds.), Handbook of research design and social measurement (6th ed., pp. 143-200). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.
60. Creswell, J. W., & Miller, D. L. (2000). Determining validity in qualitative inquiry. Theory into Practice, 39(3), 124-131.
61. Cunning S, & Bartlett D. (2006). Family group conferencing: Assessing the long-term effectiveness of an alternative approach in child protection. Final report. Centre of Excellence for Child Welfare Website. Retrieved from http://www.cecw-cepb.ca/files/file/en/Final%20Report%20Family%20Grp%20Conferencing%20March2007.pdf.
62. Cutcliffe, J. R., & McKenna, H. P. (1999). Establishing the credibility of qualitative research findings: The plot thickens. Journal of Advanced Nursing, 30(2), 374-380.
63. Davies, P. (2003). What do we know already? In Cabinet Office (Ed.), The magenta book: Guidance notes for policy evaluation and analysis. London: Government Chief Social Researcher's Office, Cabinet Office.
64. Davis, L. H. (1994). Relating work to adult higher education. Journal of Continuing Higher Education, 42(1), 17-22.
65. Dawson, A., & Yancey, B. (2006). Youth participants speak about their family group conference. Washington, D.C.: American Humane Association. Retrieved from http://www.americanhumane.org/assets/pdfs/children/fgdm/pc-fgdm-ib-youth-participants.pdf.
66. Denscombe, M. (2008). Communities of practice: A research paradigm for the mixed methods approach. Journal of Mixed Methods Research, 2(3), 270-283.
67. Denyer, D., & D. Tranfield. (2006). Using qualitative research synthesis to build an actionable knowledge base. Management Decision, 44(2), 213.
68. Denzin, N. K. (1978). The research act: A theoretical introduction to sociological methods. New York: McGraw-Hill.
69. Denzin, N. K., & Lincoln, Y. S. (Eds.). (1994). Handbook of qualitative research. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
70. Denzin, N. K., & Lincoln, Y. S. (Eds.). (2000). Handbook of qualitative research (2nd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
71. Dixon-Woods, M., Agarwal, S., Jones, D., Young, B., & Sutton, A. (2005). Synthesising qualitative and quantitative evidence: A review of possible methods. Journal of Health Services & Research Policy, 10(1), 45-53.
72. Dixon-Woods, M., Agarwal, S., Young, B., Jones, D., & Sutton, A. (2004). Integrative approaches to qualitative and quantitative evidence. London: Health Development Agency.
73. Dixon-Woods, M., Bonas, S., Booth, A., Jones, D. R., Miller, T., Sutton, A. J., ... Young, B. (2006). How can systematic reviews incorporate qualitative research? A critical perspective. Qualitative Research, 6, 27-44.
74. Dixon-Woods, M., Cavers, D., Agarwal, S., Annandale, E., Arthur, A., Harvey, J., ... Sutton, A. J. (2006). Conducting a critical interpretive review of the literature on access to healthcare by vulnerable groups. BMC Medical Research Methodology, 6(35). Retrieved from http://www.biomedcentral.com/content/pdf/1471-2288-6-35.pdf doi:10.1186/1471-2288-6-35.
75. Dixon-Woods, M., & Fitzpatrick, R. (2001). Qualitative research in systematic reviews. BMJ, 323, 65-66.
76. Dixon-Woods, M., Fitzpatrick, R., & Roberts, K. (2001). Including qualitative research in systematic reviews: Opportunities and problems. Journal of Evaluation in Clinical Practice, 7(2), 125-133.
77. Dixon-Woods, M., Shaw, R. L., Agarwal, S., & Smith, J. A. (2004). The problem of appraising qualitative research. Quality & Safety in Healthcare, 13(3), 223-225.
78. Doyle, L. H. (2003). Synthesis through meta-ethnography: Paradoxes, enhancements, and possibilities. Qualitative Research, 3(3), 321-344.
79. Draucker, C. B., Martsolf, D. S., Ross., R., Cook, C. B., Stidham, A. W., & Mweemba, P. (2009). The essence of healing from sexual violence: A qualitative metasynthesis. Research in Nursing and Health, 32, 366-378.
80. Drisko, J. (1997). Strengthening qualitative studies and reports: Standards to enhance academic integrity. Journal of Social Work Education, 33, 1-13.
81. Drisko, J. (1998). Using qualitative data analysis software. Journal of Technology in Human Services, 15(1), 1-19.
82. Drisko, J. W. (2004). Qualitative data analysis software: A user's appraisal. In D. Padgett (Ed.), The qualitative research experience (rev. ed., pp. 193-209). Belmont, CA: Wadsworth.
83. Eaves, Y. (2001). A synthesis technique for grounded theory data analysis. Journal of Advanced Nursing, 35(5), 654-663.
84. Egger, M., Davey-Smith, G., Schneider, M., & Minder, C. (1997). Bias in metaanalysis detected by a simple, graphical test. BMJ, 315, 629-634.
85. Egger, M., Smith, D., & Phillips, A. (1997). Meta-analysis principles and procedures. BMJ, 315, 1533-1537.
86. Erlandson, D., Harris, E., Skipper, B., & Allen., S. (1993). Doing naturalistic inquiry: A guide to methods. London: Sage Publications.
87. Espíndola, C. R., & Blay, S. C. (2009). Anorexia nervousa's meaning to patients: A qualitative synthesis. Psychopathology, 42, 64-80.
88. Evans, D. (2002). Database searches for qualitative research. Journal of the Medical Library Association, 90, 290-293.
89. Evans, D., & FitzGerald, M. (2002). Reasons for physically restraining patients and residents: A systematic review and content analysis. International Journal of Nursing Studies, 39, 735-743.
90. Fetterman, D. (1988). Qualitative approaches to evaluating education. Educational Research, 17(8), 17-23.
91. Finfgeld, D. (1999). Courage as a process of pushing beyond the struggle. Qualitative Health Research, 9, 803-814.
92. Finfgeld, D. L. (2003). Metasynthesis: The state of the art-so far. Qualitative Health Research, 13(7), 893-904.
93. Finfgeld-Connett, D. (2009). Management of aggression among demented or brain-injured patients. Clinical Nursing Research, 18(3), 272-287.
94. Finfgeld-Connett, D. (2010). Generalizability and transferability of metasynthesis research findings. Journal of Advanced Nursing, 66(2), 246-254.
95. Finlay, L. (2002). "Outing" the researcher: The provenance, process, and practice of reflexivity. Qualitative Health Research, 12(4), 531-545.
96. Flemming, K. (2007). Research methodologies. Synthesis of qualitative research and evidenced-based nursing. British Journal of Nursing, 16, 616-620.
97. Flemming, K., & Briggs, M. (2007). Electronic searching to locate qualitative research: Evaluation of three strategies. Journal of Advanced Nursing, 57(1), 95-100.
98. Forchuk, C., & Roberts, J. (1993). How to critique qualitative health research articles. Canadian Journal of Nursing Research, 25(4), 47-56.
99. Frankel, R. M. (1999). Standards of qualitative research. In B. F. Crabtree & W. L. Miller (Eds.), Doing qualitative research (2nd ed., pp. 333-346). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
100. Gallagher, F., & Jasper, M. (2003). Health visitors' experiences of family group conferences in relation to child protection planning: A phenomenological study. Journal of Nursing Management, 11(6), 377-386.
101. Gearing, R., Saini, M., & McNeill, T. (2007). Experiences and implications of social workers practicing in a pediatric hospital environment affected by SARS. Health and Social Work, 31(1), 17-27.
102. Gibbs, L. E. (2003). Evidence-based practice for the helping professions: A practical guide with integrated multimedia. Pacific Grove, CA: Brooks /Cole.
103. Gilgun, J. (2009). The four consensus of qualitative research. Qualitative Health Research, 19(6), 868-874.
104. Glaser, B. G. (1978). Theoretical sensitivity. Mill Valley, CA: Sociology Press.
105. Glaser, B. G., & Strauss, A. (1967). The discovery of grounded theory. Chicago: Aldine.
106. Glaser, B. G., & Strauss, A. (1971). Status passage. Chicago: Aldine.
107. Glasziou, P., Irwin, L., Bain, C., & Colditz, G. (2001). Systematic reviews in health care: A practical guide. Melbourne: Cambridge University Press.
108. Glisson, C. (1990). A systematic assessment of the social work literature: Trends in social work research. Knoxville: University of Tennessee, College of Social Work.
109. Golafshani, N. (2003). Understanding reliability and validity in qualitative research. The Qualitative Report, 8(4), 597-606.
110. Goldstein, J. R. (2006). How late can first births be postponed? Some illustrative population level calculations. Vienna Yearbook of Population Research, 4, 153-165.
111. Gollop, R., Ketley, D., Buchanan, D., Whitby, E., Lamont, S., Jones, J., ... & Fitzgerald, L. (2006). "Research into practice": A model for healthcare management research? Evidence & Policy: A Journal of Research, Debate and Practice, 2(2), 257-267.
112. Gough, D., & Elbourne, D. (2002). Systematic research synthesis to inform policy, practice and democratic debate. Social Policy and Society, 1, 225-236.
113. Graham, I. D., Logan, J., Harrison, M. B., Straus, S. E., Tetroe, J., Caswell, W., & Robinson, N. (2006). Lost in knowledge translation: Time for a map? Journal of Continuing Education in the Health Professions, 26, 13-24.
114. Grant, M. J. (2004). How does your searching grow? A survey of search preferences and the use of optimal search strategies in the identification of qualitative research. Health Information and Libraries Journal, 21(1), 21-32.
115. Greene, J. (2008). Is mixed methods social inquiry a distinctive methodology? Journal of Mixed Methods Research, 2(1), 7-22.
116. Greene, J. C. (1994). Qualitative programme evaluation. In N. K. Denzin & Y. S. Lincoln (Eds.), Handbook of qualitative research (pp. 530-545). London: Sage Publications.
117. Greene, J. C. (2007). Mixed methods in social inquiry. New York: John Wiley & Sons, Publishers.
118. Greene, J. C., & Caracelli, V. J. (Eds.). (1997). Advances in mixed-method evaluation: The challenges and benefits of integrated diverse paradigms. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
119. Greene, J. C., Caracelli, V. J., & Graham, W. F. (1989). Toward a conceptual framework for mixed-method evaluation designs. Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 11(3), 255-274.
120. Greenhalgh, T., Glenn, R., Macfarlane, F., Bate, P., & Kyriakidou, O. (2004). Diffusion of innovations in service organizations: Systematic review and recommendations. Milbank Quarterly, 82(4), 581-629.
121. Greenhalgh, T., & Taylor, R. (1997). How to read a paper: Papers that go beyond numbers (qualitative research). BMJ, 315, 595-616.
122. Grimshaw, J. M., Thomas, R. E., MacLennan, G., Fraser, C., Ramsay, C., Vale, L... Donaldson, C. (2004). Effectiveness and efficiency of guideline dissemination and implementation strategies. Health Technology Assessment, 8(6). Retrieved from http://www.hta.ac.uk/fullmono/mon806.pdf.
123. Grinnell, R. M. (1997). Social work research and evaluation: Quantitative and qualitative approaches (5th ed.). Itasca, IL: F. E. Peacock Publishers, Inc.
124. Guba, E. G., & Lincoln, Y. S. (1989). Fourth generation evaluation. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
125. Guba, E. G., & Lincoln, Y. S. (2005). Paradigmatic controversies, contradictions, and emerging confluences. In N. K. Denzin & Y. S. Lincoln (Eds.), The Sage handbook of qualitative research (3rd ed., pp. 191-215). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
126. Guyette, S. (1983). Community-based research: A handbook for Native Americans. Los Angeles: University of California American Indian Studies Center.
127. HaIl, B. (1979). Knowledge as a commodity and participatory research. Prospects, 9(4), 393-408.
128. Hammerstrom, K., Wade, A., & Klint Jorgensen, A. M. (2010). Searching for studies: A guide to information retrieval for Campbell Systematic Reviews. Campbell Systematic Reviews. Supplement 1. Retrieved from www.campbellcollaboration.org/resources/research/.
129. Harden, A., Garcia, J., Oliver, S., Rees, R., Shepherd, J., Brunton, G., & Oakley, A. (2004). Applying systematic review methods to studies of people's views: An example from public health research. Journal of Epidemiology & Community Health, 58(9), 794-800.
130. Harden, A., Oakley, A., & Oliver, S. (2001). Peer-delivered health promotion for young people: A systematic review of different study designs. Health Education Journal, 60, 339-353.
131. Harden, A., & Thomas, J. (2005). Methodological issues in combining diverse study types in systematic reviews. International Journal of Social Research Methodology, 8(3), 257-271.
132. Harris, M. M. (1999). Practice network: I-O psychology.com-the internet and I-O psychology. The Industrial-Organizational Psychologist, 36, 89-93.
133. Harrison, M. I. (1994). Diagnosing organizations. Methods, models, and processes (2nd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
134. Hartley, J., Sydes, M., & Blurton, A. (1996). Obtaining information accurately and quickly: Are structured abstracts more efficient? Journal of Information Science, 22(5), 349-356.
135. Harvey, D. (2007). Understanding Australian rural women's ways of achieving health and wellbeing: A metasynthesis of the literature. Rural and Remote Health, 7, [Online]. Retrieved from http://rrh.deakin.edu.au PubMed: 17935458.
136. Haynes, R., Sackett, D., Gray, J., Cook, D. J., & Guyatt, G. H. (1996). Transferring evidence from research into practice: 1. The role of clinical care research evidence in clinical decisions. ACP Journal Club, 125, A14-16.
137. Haynes, R. B., Devereaux, P. J., & Guyatt, G. H. (2002). Clinical expertise in the era of evidence-based medicine and patient choice. ACP Journal Club, 136(2), A11-A14.
138. Higgins J. P. T., & Green S. (Eds.). (2006). Formulating the problem. Cochrane handbook for systematic reviews of interventions 4.2.6 (IV). Chichester, UK: The Cochrane Collaboration John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.
139. Higgins, J. P. T., & Green, S (Eds.). (2008). Cochrane handbook for systematic reviews of interventions version 5.0.1. Chichester, UK: The Cochrane Collaboration John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.
140. Holland, S., & O'Neil, S. (2006). We had to be there to make sure it was what we wanted: Enabling children's participation in family decision-making through the Family Group Conference. Childhood, 13(1), 91-111.
141. Holland, S., & Rivett, M. (2008). Everyone started shouting: Making connections between the process of family group conferences and family therapy practice. British Journal of Social Work, 38, 21-38.
142. Holloway, I., & Wheeler, S. (1995). Ethical issues in qualitative nursing research. Nursing Ethics, 2(3), 223-232.
143. Howe, K. R., (1988). Against the quantitative-qualitative incompatibility thesis (or dogmas diehard). Educational researcher, 17, 10-16.
144. Inui, T. S., & Frankel, R. M. (1991). Evaluating the quality of qualitative research: A proposal pro-tem. Journal of General Internal Medicine, 6(5), 485-486.
145. Jack, S. M. (2006). Utility of qualitative research findings in evidence-based public health practice. Public Health Nursing, 23, 277-283.
146. Jensen, L., & Allen, M. (1996). Meta-synthesis of qualitative findings. Qualitative Health Research, 6, 553-560.
147. Jensen, L. A., & Allen, M. N. (1994). A synthesis of qualitative research on wellness-illness. Qualitative Health Research, 4(4), 349-369.
148. Johnson, B., & Christenson, L. (2008). Educational research: Quantitative, qualitative, and mixed approached (3rd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
149. Johnson, R. B., & Onwuegbuzie, A. J. (2004). Mixed methods research: A research paradigm whose time has come. Educational Researcher, 33(7), 14-26.
150. Kane, G. A., Wood, V. A., & Barlow, J. (2007). Parenting programmes: A systematic review and synthesis of qualitative research Child. Care, Health, and Development, 33(6), 784-793.
151. Kaplan, B., & Duchon, D. (1988). Combining qualitative and quantitative approaches in information systems research: A case study. Management Information Systems Quarterly, 12(4), 571-584.
152. Karim, K. (2001). Assessing the strengths and weaknesses of action research. Nursing Standard, 15(26), 33-35.
153. Khan, K., Kunz, R., Kleijnen, J., & Antle, G. (2003). Systematic reviews to support evidence-based medicine: How to review and apply findings of healthcare research. London: Royal Society of Medicine Press.
154. Kearney, M. (1998). Ready to wear: Discovering grounded formal theory. Research in Nursing & Health, 21(2), 179-186.
155. Kearney, M. H. (2001). Levels and applications of qualitative research evidence. Research in Nursing and Health, 24, 145-153.
156. Kluger, M., Alexander, G., & Curtis, P. (2000). What works in child welfare. New York: Child Welfare League of America, Inc.
157. Lach, L., McNeil, T., & Nicholas, D. (2005). Quality in qualitative research. University of Toronto Unpublished document created for teaching purposes.
158. Larsson, R. (1993). Case survey methodology: Quantitative analysis of patterns across case studies. Academy of Management Journal, 36(6), 1515-1546.
159. Lavigne, J. V., & Faier-Routman, J. (1993). Correlates of psychological adjustment to pediatric physical disorders: A meta-analytic review and comparison with existing models. Developmental and Behavioral Pediatrics, 14, 117-123.
160. Laws, S., & Kirby, P. (2007). Under the table or at the table? Supporting children and families in family group conferences: A summary of the Daybreak research. East Sussex, United Kingdom. Brighton & Hove Children's Fund Partnership. Retrieved from http://www.worldwebwise.co.uk/daybreakfgc/docs/UnderthetableorattheTablesummary.pdf.
161. Lazaraton, A. (2003). Evaluative criteria for qualitative research in applied linguistics: Whose criteria and whose research? The Modern Language Journal, 87(1), 1-12.
162. Leech, N. L., & Onwuegbuzie, A. J. (2009). A typology of mixed methods research designs. Quality and Quantity: International Journal of Methodology, 43, 265-275.
163. Lemmer, B., Grellier, R., & Stevens, J. (1999). Systematic review of nonrandom and qualitative research literature: Exploring and uncovering an evidence base for health visiting and decision making. Qualitative Health Research, 9(3), 315-328.
164. Léveillé, S., Trocmé, N., Chamberland, C., & Brown, I. (2011). Partnerships in child welfare research. Toronto: Centre of Excellence for Child Welfare.
165. Lewins, A. (2008). CAQDAS: Computer assisted qualitative data analysis. In N. Gielbert (Ed.), Researching Social Life (3rd ed., pp. 343-357). London: Sage Publications.
166. Lewins, A., & Silver, C. (2007). Using software in qualitative research: A stepby-step guide. London: Sage Publications.
167. Lewis, J. (1998), Building an evidence-based approach to social interventions, Children and Society, 12, (pp. 136-140).
168. Lewis, R. B. (2004). NVivo 2.0 and ATLAS.ti 5.0: A comparative review of two popular qualitative data-analysis programs. Field Methods, 16(4), 439-464.
169. Lincoln, Y. (1995). Emerging criteria for quality in qualitative and interpretive research. Quality Inquiry, 1(3), 275-289.
170. Lincoln, Y., & Guba, E. (1985). Naturalistic inquiry. Beverley Hills, CA: Sage Publications.
171. Littell, J. H., & Corcoran, J. (2010). Systematic reviews. In B. Thyer (Ed.), The handbook of social work research (2nd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.
172. Littell, J., Corcoran, J., & Pallai, V. (2008). Systematic reviews and metaanalysis. New York: Oxford University Press.
173. Lloyd, J. M. (2005). Role development and effective practice in specialist and advanced practice roles in acute hospital settings: Systematic review and meta-synthesis. Journal of Advanced Nursing, 49(2), 191-209.
174. Löschper, G. (2000). Crime and social control as fields of qualitative research in the social sciences. Forum Qualitative Sozialforschung/Forum: Qualitative Social Research, North America, 1(1) Art. 9. Retrieved from http://nbnresolving.de/urn:nbn:de:0114-fqs000195.
175. Lowe, H. J, & Barnett, G. O. (1994). Understanding and using the medical subject headings (MeSH) vocabulary to perform literature searches. JAMA, 271(14), 1103-1108.
176. Madill, A., Jordan, A., & Shirley, C. (2000). Objectivity and reliability in qualitative analysis: Realist, contextualist and radical constructionist epistemologies. British Journal of Psychology, 91(1), 1-20.
177. Maluccio, A., & Daly, J. (2000). Family group conferencing as "good" child welfare practice. In G. Burford & J. Hudson (Eds.), Family group conferencing. New directions in community-centered child and family practice (pp. 65-71). New York: Aldine De Gruyter.
178. Manten, A. A. (1973). Scientific literature reviews. Scholarly Publishing, 5, 75-89.
179. Martsolf, D. S., Draucker, C. B., Cook, C. B., Ross, R., Warner, A., & Mweemba, P. (2010). A meta-summary of qualitative findings about professional services for survivors of sexual violence. Qualitative Report, 15(3), 644-657.
180. Mason, J. (1996). Qualitative researching. London: Sage.
181. Maykut, P., & Morehouse, R. (1994). Beginning qualitative research: A philosophical and practical guide. London: Falmer Press.
182. Mays, N., & Pope, C. (1995). Qualitative research: Rigour and qualitative research. BMJ, 311(6997), 109-112.
183. Mays N., Pope, C., & Popay, J. (2005). Systematically reviewing qualitative and quantitative evidence to inform management and policy-making in the health field. Journal of Health Services of Research Policy, 10(1), 6-20.
184. McCready, A., & Donnelly, A. (2005). Family group conference project: Homefirst Community Trust. Northland Ireland. Retrieved from http://www.fgcforumni.org/cmsfiles/files/fgc-evaluation-report-march-2005-homefirst-trust.
185. McDermott, E., Graham, H., & Hamilton, V. (2004). Experience of being a teenage mother in the UK: A report of a systematic review of qualitative studies, The Centre for Evidence-based Public Health Policy, The Social and Public Health Services Unit, Glasgow: University of Glasgow.
186. McGaw S. (2000). What works for parents with learning disabilities?Barnardos. Retrieved from http://www.barnardos.org.uk/resources/researchpublications/documents/WWPARWLD.PDF.
187. McInnes, E., & Wimpenny, P. (2008). Using qualitative assessment and review instrument software to synthesise studies on older people's views and experiences of falls prevention. International Journal of Evidence-based Healthcare, 6(3), 337-344.
188. McIntosh, N. (1994). Structured abstracts and information transfer (British Library R&D Report 6142). London: British Library.
189. McKibbon, K. A., & Gadd, C. S. (2006). A quantitative analysis of qualitative studies in clinical journals for the 2000 publishing year. BMC Medical Inform Decision Making. Retrieved from http://www.biomedcentral.com/1472-6947/4/11.
190. McKibbon, K. A., Wilczynski, N. L., & Haynes, R. B. (2006). Developing optimal search strategies for retrieving qualitative studies in PsycINFO. Evaluation & the Health Professions, 29(4), 440-454.
191. Meadows-Oliver, M. (2006). Homeless adolescent mothers: A metasynthesis of their life experiences. Journal of Pediatric Nursing, 21, 340-349.
192. Meeker, M. A., & Jezewski, M. A. (2008). Metasynthesis: Withdrawing lifesustaining treatments: The experience of family decision-makers. Journal of Clinical Nursing, 18(2), 163-173.
193. Merriam, S. B. (1988). Case study research in education: A qualitative approach. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
194. Miles, M. B., & Huberman, M. (1994). Qualitative data analysis: A sourcebook of new methods (2d ed.). Beverly Hills, CA: Sage Publications.
195. Mishler, E. G. (1979). Meaning in context: Is there any other kind? Harvard Educational Review, 49, 1-19.
196. Mishna, F., Cook, C., Saini, M., Wu, M-J., & MacFadden, R., (2011). Prevention and intervention of cyber abuse targeting children and adolescents: A systematic review to evaluate current approaches. Research on Social Work Practice, 21(1), 5-14. doi: 10.1177/1049731509351988.
197. Morgan, D. (1998). Practical strategies for combining qualitative and quantitative methods: Applications to health research. Qualitative Health Research, 8(3), 362-376.
198. Morse, J. (2006). The politics of evidence. Qualitative Health Research, 16, 395-404.
199. Morse, J. M., & Singleton, J. (2001). Exploring the technical aspects of "fit" in qualitative research. Qualitative Health Research, 11(6), 841-847.
200. Moustakas, C. (1994). Phenomenological research methods. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
201. Mulrow, C. (1994). Systematic reviews: Rationale for systematic reviews. BMJ, 309, 597-599.
202. Muncey, T. (2009). An overview of mixed methods research. Journal of Research in Nursing, 14(2), 187-188.
203. Murphy, E., Dingwall, R., Greenbatch, D., Parker, S., & Watson, P. (1998). Qualitative research methods in health technology assessment: A review of the literature. Health Technology Assessment, 2, iii-ix, 1-274.
204. Neff, D. (2006). Perceptions of procedural justice in child protection: A study of family group conferencing (doctoral dissertation). Social Welfare, Graduate Division of the University of Hawaii.
205. Neuman, W. L. (2003). The meanings of methodology: Social research methods (5th ed.). Boston, MA: Allyn & Bacon.
206. Newman, I., & Benz, C. R. (1998). Qualitative-quantitative research methodology: Exploring the interactive continuum. Carbondale: Southern Illinois University Press.
207. Newman, M., Thompson, C., & Roberts, A. P. (2006). Helping practitioners understand the contribution of qualitative research to evidence-based practice. Evidence Based Nursing, 9, 4-7.
208. Nicholas, D., Globerman, J., Antle, B., McNeil, T., & Lach, L. (2006). Processes of meta-study: A study of psychosocial adaptation to childhood chronic health conditions. International Journal of Qualitative Methods, 5(1), 1-10. Retrieved from http://www.ualberta.ca/~ijqm/english/engframeset.html.
209. Noblit, G. W., & Hare, R. D. (1988). Meta-ethnography: Synthesizing qualitative studies. Newbury Park, CA: Sage Publications.
210. Noyes, J., & Popay, J. (2006). Directly observed therapy and tuberculosis: How can a systematic review of qualitative research contribute to improving services? A qualitative meta-synthesis. Journal of Advanced Nursing, 5(2), 231-249.
211. O'Campo, P., Kirst, M., Schaefer-McDaniel, N., Firestone, M., Scott, A., & McShane, K. (2009). Community-based services for homeless adults experiencing concurrent mental health and substance use disorders: A realist approach to synthesizing evidence. Journal of Urban Health, 86(6), 965-989.
212. Onwuegbuzie A.J. & Leech, N.L. (2007a). A call for qualitative power analyses. Quality & Quantity, 41, 105-121.
213. Onwuegbuzie, A. J., & Leech, N. L. (2007b). Sampling designs in qualitative research: Making the sampling process more public. The Qualitative Report, 12(2), 238-254.
214. Onwuegbuzie, A. J., & Leech, N. L. (2007c). Validity and qualitative research: An oxymoron? Quality and Quantity: International Journal of Methodology, 41, 233-249.
215. Padgett, D. (1998). Qualitative methods in social work research. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
216. Padgett, D. (2004). The qualitative research experience. Belmont, CA: Brooks/Cole.
217. Padgett, D. (2008). Qualitative methods in social work research (2nd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
218. Padgett, D. (2009). Qualitative and mixed methods in social work knowledge development. Social Work, 52(2), 101-105.
219. Palinkas, L. A., Schoenwald, S. K., Hoagwood, K., Landsverk, J., Chorpita, B. F., Weisz, J. R., & the Research Network on Youth Mental Health. (2008). An ethnographic study of implementation of evidence-based practice in child mental health: First steps. Psychiatric Services, 59, 738-746.
220. Park, P., Brydon-Miller, M., Hall, B., & Jackson, T. (1993). Voices of change: Participatory research in the United States and Canada. Westport, CT: Bergin & Garvey.
221. Parker, I. (2004). Criteria for qualitative research in psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 1(2), 95-106.
222. Parkinson, P., & Cashmore, J. (2007). Judicial conversations with children in parenting disputes: The views of Australian judges. International Journal of Law, Policy and the Family, 21, 160-189.
223. Parse, R. R. (2007). Building a research culture. Nursing Science Quarterly, 20(197), 148-154.
224. Paterson, B. L., Thorne, S., & Dewis, M. (1998). Adapting to and managing diabetes. Journal of Nursing School, 30(1), 57-62.
225. Paterson, B., Thorne, S. E., Canam, C., & Jillings C. (2001). Meta-study of qualitative health research: A practical guide to meta-analysis and metasynthesis. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
226. Patton, M. (1990). Qualitative evaluation and research methods. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
227. Patton, M. Q. (1999). Enhancing the quality and credibility of qualitative analysis. Health Services Research, 34(5), 1189-1209.
228. Patton, M. (2001). Qualitative evaluation and research methods (3rd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
229. Pawson, R. (2006). Evidence based policy: A realist perspective. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
230. Pawson, R., & Boaz, A. (2004). Evidence-based policy, theory-based synthesis, user-led review (ESRC Research Methods Programme Project). Retrieved from www.evidencenetwork.org/project3.asp.
231. Pawson, R., Greenhalgh, T., Harvey, G., & Walshe, K. (2004). Realist synthesis: An introduction (ESRC Research Methods Programme), University of Manchester. Retrieved from http://www.ccsr.ac.uk/methods/publications/documents/RMPmethods2.pdf.
232. Pawson, R., & Tilley, N. (1997). Realistic evaluation. London: Sage.
233. Pearson, A., Wiechula, R., Court, A., & Lockwood, C. (2005). The JBI model of evidence-based healthcare. Journal of British I Reports, 3, 207-216.
234. Peck, E., & Secker, J. (1999). Quality criteria for qualitative research: Does context make a difference? Qualitative Health Research, 9(4), 552-558.
235. Peek Corbin-Staton, A. (2009). Contexts of parental involvement: An interpretive synthesis of qualitative literature using the meta-interpretation method (doctoral dissertation). George Washington University, Washington, D.C.
236. Petticrew, M., & Roberts, H. (2006). Systematic reviews in the social sciences: A practical guide. Oxford: Blackwell.
237. Phillips, D. C. (2000). The expanded social scientist's bestiary. Lanham, MD: Rowman & Littlefield.
238. Popay, J. (2006). Incorporating qualitative information in systematic reviews. Paper presented at the 14th Cochrane Colloquium, Dublin, Ireland.
239. Popay, J., Arai, L., & Roen, K. (2003). Exploring methodological and practical issues in the systematic review of factors affecting the implementation of child injury prevention initiatives. London: Health Development Agency.
240. Popay, J., Rogers, A., & Williams, G. (1998). Rationale and standards for the systematic review of qualitative literature in health services research. Qualitative Health Research, 8(3), 341-351.
241. Pope, C., & Mays, N. (1995). Qualitative research: Reaching the parts other methods cannot reach: An introduction to qualitative methods in health and health services research. BMJ, 311, 42-45.
242. Pope, C., & Mays, N. (2009). Critical reflections on the rise of qualitative research. BMJ, 339, 3425-3425.
243. Pope, C., Mays, N., & Popay, J. (2007). Synthesizing qualitative and quantitative health research: A guide to methods. Berkshire, U.K.: Open University Press.
244. Pound, P., Britten, N., Morgan, M., Yardley, L., Pope, C., Daker-White, G., & Campbell, R. (2005). Resisting medicines: A synthesis of qualitative studies of medicine taking. Social Science and Medicine, 61, 133-155.
245. Power, R. (2001). Checklists for improving rigour in qualitative research. Never mind the tail (checklist), check out the dog (research). BMJ, 323(7311), 514-515.
246. Quinlan, E., & Quinlan. A., (2010). Representations of rape: Transcending methodological divides. Journal of Mixed Methods Research, 4(2), 127-143.
247. Reid, A., & Gough, S. (2000). Guidelines for reporting and evaluating qualitative research: What are the alternatives? Environmental Education Research, 6(1), 59-90.
248. Reinharz, S. T. (1979). On becoming a social scientist: From survey research and participant observation to experiential analysis. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
249. Riessman, C. (1993). Narrative analysis (qualitative research methods). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
250. Roberts, K., Dixon-Woods, M., Fitzpatrick, R., Abrams, K., & Jones, D. R. (2002). Factors affecting uptake of childhood immunization: A Bayesian synthesis of qualitative and quantitative evidence. Lancet, 360, 1596-1599.
251. Rodwell, M. K. (1987). Naturalistic inquiry: An alternative model for social work assessment. Social Service Review, 61, 231-246.
252. Rossman, G. B., & Wilson, B. L. (1985). Numbers and words: Combining qualitative and quantitative methods in a single large scale evaluation. Evaluation Review, 9(5), 627-643.
253. Royse, D., Thyer, B., Padgett, D., & Logon, T. (2006). Program evaluation (4th ed). Belmont, CA: Thomson.
254. Rubin, A. (2000). Standards for rigor in qualitative inquiry. Research on Social Work Practice, 10(2), 173-179.
255. Ryan, R., Hill, S., Lowe, D., Allen, K., Taylor, M., & Mead, C. (2011). Notification and support for people exposed to the risk of Creutzfeldt-Jakob disease (CJD) (or other prion diseases) through medical treatment (iatrogenically). Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews (3). Art. No.: CD007578. DOI: 10.1002/14651858.CD007578.pub2.
256. Sackett, D. L., Richardson, W. S., Rosenberg, W., & Haynes, R. B. (1997). Evidence based medicine. How to practice and teach EBM. Edinburgh: Churchill Livingstone.
257. Saini (2011). Qualitative research quality checklist. University of Toronto, Toronto, ON: Unpublished manuscript.
258. Saini, M., & Birnbaum, R. (2005). Linking judicial decision-making in joint custody awards with evidence-based practice: It is possible? Canadian Family Law Quarterly, 24, 139-165.
259. Saini, M., & Léveillé, S. (2011). Researcher-community partnerships: A systematic synthesis of qualitative research. In S. Léveillé, N. Trocmé, C. Chamberland, & I. Brown (Eds.), Partnerships in child welfare research. (pp. 1-42). Toronto: Centre of Excellence for Child Welfare.
260. Sandelowski M. (1994). Focus on qualitative methods. The use of quotes in qualitative research. Research in Nursing & Health, 17, 479-482.
261. Sandelowski, M. (1995). Focus on qualitative methods: Sample sizes in qualitative research. Research in Nursing & Health, 18, 179-183.
262. Sandelowski, M. (2001). Real qualitative researchers do not count: The use of numbers in qualitative research. Research in Nursing & Health, 24(3), 230-240.
263. Sandelowski, M. (2007). Words that should be seen but not written. Research in Nursing & Health, 30, 129-130.
264. Sandelowski, M., & Barroso, J. (2002). Reading qualitative studies. International Journal of Qualitative Methods, 1(1), Article 5. Retrieved from http://www.ualberta.ca/~ijqm/.
265. Sandelowski, M., & Barroso, J. (2003a). Creating metasummaries of qualitative findings. Nursing Research, 5, 226-233.
266. Sandelowski, M., & Barroso, J. (2003b). Toward a metasynthesis of qualitative findings on motherhood in HIV-positive women. Research in Nursing & Health, 26, 153-170.
267. Sandelowski, M., & Barroso, J. (2007). Handbook for synthesizing qualitative research. New York: Springer.
268. Sandelowski, M., Barroso, J., & Voils, C. I. (2007). Using qualitative metasummary to synthesize qualitative and quantitative descriptive findings. Research in Nursing & Health, 30, 99-111.
269. Sandelowski, M., Docherty, S., & Emden, C. (1997). Focus on qualitative methods, qualitative metasynthesis: Issues and techniques. Research in Nursing & Health, 20, 365-371.
270. Sandelowski, M., Voils, C. I., & Barroso, J. (2006). Defining and designing mixed methods research synthesis studies. Research in the Schools, 13(1), 29-40.
271. Sayer, A. (1992). Method in social science: A realist approach (2nd ed.). London: Routledge.
272. Schreiber, R., Crooks, D., & Stern, P. (1997). Qualitative meta-analysis. In J. Morse (Ed.), Completing a qualitative project: Details and dialogue. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
273. Seidel, J. (1991). Method and madness in the application of computer technology to qualitative data analysis. In N. Fielding & R. M. Lee (Eds.), Using computers in qualitative research (pp. 107-116). London: Sage.
274. Shank, G. (2002). Qualitative research. A personal skills approach. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Merrill Prentice Hall.
275. Shaw, I., & Gould, N. (2001). Qualitative social work research. London: Sage.
276. Shaw, R. L., Booth, A., Sutton, A. J., Miller, T., Smith, J. A., Young, B., ... Dixon-Woods, M. (2003). Electronic literature searching for systematic review of qualitative literature. Journal of Epidemiology and Community Health, 57(1), A15.
277. Shaw, R. L., Booth, A., Sutton, A. J., Miller, T., Smith, J. A., Young, B., ... Dixon-Woods, M. (2004). Finding qualitative research: An evaluation of search strategies. BMC Medical Research Methodology, 4, 1-5.
278. Shenton, A. K. (2004). Strategies for ensuring trustworthiness in qualitative research projects. Education for Information, 22(2), 63-75.
279. Sherman, E., & Reid, W. J. (1994). Qualitative research in social work. New York: Columbia University Press.
280. Sherwood, G. (1999). Meta-synthesis: Merging qualitative studies to develop nursing knowledge. International Journal for Human Caring, 3, 32-42.
281. Shlonsky, A., Schumaker, K., Cook, C., Crampton, D., Saini, M., Backe-Hansen, E. & Kowalski, K. (2008). Family Group Decision Makin for children at risk of abuse and neglect (protocol). Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, DOI: 10.1002/14651858. CD007984 Retrieved from http://www.campbellcollaboration.org/.
282. Sibthorpe, B., Bailie, R., Brady, M., Ball, S., Sumner-Dodd, P., & Hall, W. (2002). The demise of a planned randomised controlled trial in an urban Indigenous medical service. Medical Journal of Australia, 176, 273-276.
283. Silver, C., & Fielding, N. (2008). Using computer assisted qualitative data analysis. In C. Willing & W. Stainton-Rogers (Eds.), The Sage handbook of qualitative research in psychology (pp. 334-351). London: Sage Publications.
284. Sinclair, I. (2000). Methods and measurement in evaluative social work. In A. Mullender (Ed.), Theorising Social Work Research (Report to ESRC), University of Warwick. Retrieved from http://www.scie.org.uk/publications/misc/tswr/seminar6/sinclair.as.
285. Slater, L. (2008). Qualitative filters. University of Alberta. Retrieved from http://www.ualberta.ca/~lslater/QualFilters.html.
286. Smaling, A. (2003). Inductive, analogical, and communicative generalization. International Journal of Qualitative Methods, 2, 1, 52-67. Retrieved from http://www.ualberta.ca/~iiqm/backissues/2_1/html/smaling.html.
287. Smith, J. (1995). Semi structured interviewing and qualitative analysis. In J. A. Smith, R. Harre, & L. V. Langgenhove (Eds.), Rethinking methods in psychology (pp. 9-26). London: Sage.
288. Smith, J. A., Flowers, P., & Osborn, M. (1997). Interpretative phenomenological analysis and the psychology of health and illness. In L. Yardley (Ed.), Material discourses in health and illness (pp. 68-91). London: Routledge.
289. Smith, J. K., & Deemer, D. K. (2000). The problem of criteria in the age of relativism. In N. K. Denzin & Y. S. Lincoln (Eds.), Handbook of qualitative research (2nd ed., pp. 877-896). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
290. Smith, L., Pope, C., & Botha, J. (2005). Patients' help-seeking experiences and delay in cancer presentation: A qualitative synthesis. Lancet, 366, 825-831.
291. Sparkes, A. C. (2001). Myth 94: Qualitative health researchers will agree about validity. Qualitative Health Research, 11(4), 538-552.
292. St. Denis, V. (2004). Community-based participatory research: Aspects of the concept relevant for practice. In W. K. Carrol (Ed.), Critical strategies for social research (pp. 292-301). Toronto: Canadian Scholars Press Inc.
293. Steckler, A., McLeroy, K. R., Goodman, R. M., Bird, S. T., & McCormick, L. (1992). Toward integrating qualitative and quantitative methods: An introduction. Health Education Quarterly, 19(1), 1-8.
294. Stephenson, J. M., Imrie, J., & Sutton, S. R. (2000). Rigorous trials of sexual behaviour intervention in STD/HIV prevention: What can we learn from them? AIDS, 14(Suppl 3), S115-S124.
295. Strauss, A., & Corbin, J. (1990). Basis of qualitative research: Grounded theory procedures and techniques. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
296. Strauss, A., & Corbin, J. (1998). Basics of qualitative research: Techniques and procedures for developing grounded theory (2nd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
297. Sundell, K., & Vinnerljung, B. (2004). Outcomes of family group conferencing in Sweden. A three year follow up. Child Abuse and Neglect, 28, 267-286.
298. Sword, W., Jack, S. M., Niccols, A., Milligan, K., Henderson, J., & Thabane, L. (2009). Integrated programs for women with substance use issues and their children: A qualitative meta-synthesis of processes and outcomes. Harm Reduction Journal, 6(32), 1-17. doi:10.1186/1477-7517-6-32.
299. Tashakkori, A., & Teddlie, C. (2003). Handbook of mixed methods in the social and behavioral sciences. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
300. Temple, B., & Young, A. (2004). Qualitative research and translation dilemmas. Qualitative Research, 4(2), 161-178.
301. Tesch, R. (1990). Qualitative research: Analysis types and software tools. Bristol, PA: Farlmer.
302. Thomas, J., Harden, A., Oakley, A., Oliver, S., Sutcliffe, K., Rees, R., ... Kavanagh, J. (2004). Integrating qualitative research with trials in systematic reviews. BMJ, 328(7446), 1010-1012.
303. Thompson, C., McCaughan, D., Cullum, N., Sheldon, T. A., & Raynor, P. (2004). Increasing the visibility of coding decisions in team-based qualitative research in nursing. International Journal of Nursing Studies, 41(1), 15-20.
304. Thorne, S. (2006). Can qualitative meta-synthesis make a contribution to evidence-based practice? Issues and challenges in an era of research integration. Panel presentation for Advances in Qualitative Methods, Academy Health, Seattle, Washington.
305. Thorne, S., Jensen, L., Kearney, M. H., Noblit, G., & Sandelowski, M. (2004). Reflections on the methodological and ideological agenda in qualitative meta-synthesis. Quality Health Research, 14, 1342-1365.
306. Thorne, S., & Paterson, B. (1998). Shifting images of chronic illness. Image: Journal of Nursing Scholarship, 30(2), 173-178.
307. Thorne, S., Paterson, B., Acorn, S., Canam, C., Joachim, G., & Jillings, C. (2002). Chronic illness experience: Insights from a metastudy. Qualitative Health Research, 12(4), 437-452.
308. Tobin, G. A., & Begley, C. M. (2004). Methodological rigour within a qualitative framework. Journal of Advanced Nursing, 48(4), 388-396.
309. Tracy, S. J. (2010). Qualitative quality: Eight "Big-Tent" criteria for excellent qualitative research. Qualitative Inquiry, 16, 837-851.
310. Treloar, C., & Rhodes, T. (2009). The lived experience of hepatitis C and its treatment among injecting drug users: Qualitative synthesis. Quality Health Research, 19(9), 1321-1334.
311. Tugwell, P., Robinson, V., Grimshaw, J., & Santesso, N. (2006). Systematic reviews and knowledge translation. Bulletin World Health Organanization, 84(8), 643-651.
312. Tukey, J. (1962). The future of data analysis. Annals of Mathematical Statistics, 33(1), 1-67.
313. Turner, H., Boruch, R., Petrosino, A., Lavenberg, L., de Moya, D., & Rothstein, R. (2003). Populating an international web-based randomized trials register in the social, behavioral, criminological, and education sciences. The ANNALS of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, 589, 203-223.
314. Valadez, J., & Bamberger, M. (1994). Monitoring and evaluating social programs in developing countries: A handbook for policymakers, managers, and researchers. EDI Development Studies. Washington, D.C.: The World Bank.
315. Voils, C. I., Hasselblad, V., Crandell, J. L., Chang, Y., Lee, E., & Sandelowski, M. (2009). A Bayesian method for the synthesis of evidence from qualitative and quantitative reports: An example from the literature on antiretroviral medication adherence. Journal of Health Services Research Policy, 14, 226-233.
316. Waddell, C., Lavis, J. N., Abelson, J., Lomas, J., Shepherd, C. A., Bird-Gayson, T., ... Offord, D. R. (2005). Research use in children's mental health policy in Canada: Maintaining vigilance amid ambiguity. Social Science and Medicine, 61, 1649-1657.
317. Wade, C. A., Turner, H. M., Rothstein, H. R., & Lavenberg, J. (2006). Information retrieval and the role of the information specialist in producing high-quality systematic reviews in the social, behavioral, and education sciences. Evidence & Policy: A Journal of Research, Debate and Practice, 2, 89-108.
318. Wadsworth, M. J. (1998). Designing a qualitative study. In L. Bickman & D. Rog (Eds.), Handbook of applied social research methods (pp. 69-100). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
319. Walsh, D., & Downe, S. (2005). Meta-synthesis method for qualitative research: A literature review. Journal of Advanced Nursing, 50(2), 204-211.
320. Walters, L. A., Wilczynski, N. L., & Haynes, R. B. (2006). Hedges team. Developing optimal search strategies for retrieving clinically relevant qualitative studies in EMBASE. Qualitative Health Research, 16(1), 162-168.
321. Waterman, H. (1998). Embracing ambiguities and valuing ourselves: Issues of validity in action research. Journal of Advanced Nursing, 28(1), 101-105.
322. Weed, M. (2005). Meta interpretation: A method for the interpretive synthesis of qualitative research. Forum: Qualitative Social Research. 6(1). Retrieved from http://www.qualitative-research.net/index.php/fqs/article/viewArticle/508/1096.
323. Weed, M. (2008). A potential method for the interpretive synthesis of qualitative research: Issues in the development of meta-interpretation. International Journal of Social Research Methodology, 11(1), 13-28.
324. Weeks, L. C., & Strudsholm, T. (2008). A scoping review of research on complementary and alternative medicine (CAM) and the mass media: looking back, moving forward. BMC Complementary Alternative Medicine, 8(43). DOI: 10.1186/1472-6882-8-43.
325. Whittemore R., Chase, S. K., & Mandle, C. L. (2001). Validity in qualitative research. Qualitative Health Research, 11(4), 522-537.
326. Wikberg A., & Bondas, T. (2010). A patient perspective in research on intercultural caring in maternity care: A meta-ethnography. International Journal of Qualitative Studies in Health and Well-being, 8(5). doi: 10.3402/qhw. v5i1.4648.
327. Wilczynski, N. L., & Haynes, R. B. (2002). Robustness of empirical search strategies for clinical content in MEDLINE. Proceedings of AMIA Symposium, 1, 904-908). D020001793.
328. Wilczynski, N. L., Marks, S., & Haynes, R. B. (2007). Search strategies for identifying qualitative studies in CINAHL. Qualitative Health Research, 17(5), 705-710.
329. Wilson, K., & Amir, Z. (2008). Cancer and disability benefits: A synthesis of qualitative findings on advice and support. Psycho-Oncology, 17, 421-429.
330. Wong, S. S. L., Wilczynski, N. L., & Haynes, R. B. (2004). Developing optimal search strategies for detecting clinically relevant qualitative studies in Medline. Medinfo, 107(Pt 1), 311-316.