Authentic Qualitative Research and the Quest for Methodological Rigour

Canadian Journal of Nursing Research

Volumn 34, Issue 2, 2002, Pages

  Carnevale, Franco A ^a  

^a MCGILL UNIVERSITY   (Canada)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 0346346576     PISSN: 08445621     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (11)

1. Darwin, C. R. (1859/1968). The origin of species. Baltimore: Penguin.
2. Dickoff, J., & James, P. (1968). Researching research's role in theory development. Nursing Research, 17, 197-203.
3. Feyerabend, P. (1993). Against method (3rd Ed.). London: New Left Books.
4. Guba, E. G., & Lincoln, Y. S. (1981). Effective evaluation. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
5. Guba, E. G., & Lincoln, Y. S. (1994). Competing paradigms in qualitative research. In N. K. Denzin & Y. S. Lincoln (Eds.), Handbook of qualitative research (pp. 105-117). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
6. Heidegger, M. (1962). Being and time (J. Macquarrie & E. Robinson, Trans.). San Francisco: Harper Collins.
7. Kuhn, T. S. (1970). The structure of scientific revolutions (2nd Ed.). Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
8. Leininger, M. (1994). Evaluation criteria and critique of qualitative research studies. In J. M. Morse (Ed.), Critical issues in qualitative research methods (pp. 95-115). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
9. Sandelowski, M. (1986). The problem of rigor in qualitative research. Advances in Nursing Science, 8(3), 27-37.
10. Strauss, A. (1987). Qualitative analysis for social scientists. New York: Cambridge University Press.
11. Strauss, A., & Corbin, J. (1990). Basics of qualitative research: Grounded theory procedures and techniques. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.